) Support - Help us define priorities. Raise priorities (Critical) to
the issues that *MUST* make it for the release. Create issues, if there
is something missing.
Cheers
/Dimitris
--
Dimitris Andreadis
AS Development Manager
JBoss, a Division of Red Hat
http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBAS-3368
Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security?
Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier
Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo
I suppose the 'common'sources willbe removed
from Branch_4_0 HEAD ?
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Ruel LoehrSent: 21 June, 2006 23:30To:
jboss-developmentSubject: [JBoss-dev] Promotion of common module to
independent project
So at the end of the day, the Tomcat code in JBoss will not
exactly correspond to an official Tomcat release version. Is
that correct?
I know we have been maintaining full Tomcat source within the
JBoss AS CVS. I'm wondering about the pros and cons you
experienced with Tomcat because
We are going to have an SP1 for 4.0.4 just before JBW, to fix minor
glitches and upgrade EJB3 to CR8.
Branch JBoss_4_0_4_SP was created for this purpose, to check this out
use:
cvs co -r JBoss_4_0_4_SP jboss-4.0.x
The JIRA for this SP1 is here:
I'm not sure what's the best way to handle this, make CC 4.0. builds,
point to Branch_4_0_4_SP instead (for a week until we release this), or
introduce new CC build/testsuite/compatibility builds for 4.0.4.SP1?
Ryan?
-Original Message-
From: Dimitris Andreadis
Sent: 02 June, 2006 18
I suppose it is safe to remove the javax.xml.bind.* classes from our
jboss-j2ee.jar in 4.0.4.SP1 (and HEAD too) as Thomas did in Branch_4_0
for 4.0.5.CR1?
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=3948753#3948753
___
JBoss-Development
I suppose after Arjuna's integration the Transaction Recovery task and
subtasks are obsolete now?
http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBAS-1402
---
Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security?
Get stuff done quickly
We certainly need to maintain compatibility between the 4.x (and 3.2.x)
versions, so the serialVersionUID must be the same, although I don't
know why this Mbean needs to be serializable in the first place.
And since you are just adding fields, implementing Externalizable should
not really be
18:35
To: jboss-development@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] KeyGeneratorFactory serialVersionUID
Dimitris Andreadis wrote:
We certainly need to maintain compatibility between the 4.x (and
3.2.x) versions, so the serialVersionUID must be the same,
although I
don't know
To: Dimitris Andreadis; Roy Russo; Julien Viet; Ryan Campbell
Cc: Adrian Brock; Steve Ebersole;
'jboss-development@lists.sourceforge.net'; QA; Rali Genova
Subject: RE: jboss-4.0.4 portal-2.2 issue
We need to document the incompatibility in the release notes
and either create an sp release
Because:
- this is a minor release increase (not a micro) for Hibernate
- we always stay up-to-date with our third party libraries
- EhCache had a major cache design flaw that was fixed in
1.2 (use to keep the cache manager as a singleton)
- we do not keep outdated cache provider, but
Ok, I saw Clebert opened this:
http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBAS-3208
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Dimitris Andreadis
Sent: 12 May, 2006 11:17
To: Bill Burke; Scott M Stark; Tom Elrod
Cc: jboss-development
But why that incompatibility (not working with older ehcache) was
introduced in hibernate?
-Original Message-
From: Emmanuel Bernard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 13 May, 2006 20:26
To: Roy Russo
Cc: Scott M Stark; Dimitris Andreadis; Julien Viet; Ryan
Campbell; Adrian Brock
So we either bundle the new version of ehcache or hibernate needs
fixing?
-Original Message-
From: Scott M Stark
Sent: 13 May, 2006 17:28
To: Roy Russo; Julien Viet; Ryan Campbell
Cc: Adrian Brock; Steve Ebersole;
'jboss-development@lists.sourceforge.net'; QA; Rali Genova
A couple of days ago Telrod modifed JBossRemoting to fix a dubious
warning in SerializationStreamFactory, and re-checked this in as jboss
remoting 1.4.2.GA
Now Bill, made some change in remoting to produce a patch version, but
Telrod's change is missing.
What's happened? Wasn't Tom's version
The release notes for JBoss-4.0.4.GA are in Branch_4_0,
build/docs/readme.html, if you want to look at.
If you want to highlight a new feature you've worked on, or better
document a compatibility/configuration issue, let me know before EOB
today.
Thanks
/Dimitris
Hi,
I saw Bill added lib/quartz-all-1.5.2.jar and deploy/quartz-ra.rar, in
the default/all configs.
Was there any discussion on this or jira issue to track it? Where is
this used? Is it tested at all?
13:23:46,908 INFO [RARDeployment] Required license terms exist, view
META-INF/ra.xml in
Except for the fix of the ejb3-4.0-testsuite
(http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBAS-2988)
Is there a way to get seam ejb3 examples tested?
http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBAS-3067 (seam examples)
http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBAS-3066 (ej3 examples)
1) Can Thomas just use the
If anyone can take a look, we often (but not always) get those tests
failing:
(works on my PC, but some time fails in CruiseControl)
testUnackedMultipleSession
org.jboss.test.jbossmq.test.UnackedUnitTestCase
(may be solved, by Brian's recent jgroups protocol configuration
changes?)
In Branch_4_0 we have:
componentref name=hibernate version=3.2.0.CR1/
componentref name=hibernate-annotations version=3.1beta9/
componentref name=hibernate-entitymanager version=3.1beta7/
componentref name=antlr version=2.7.6rc1/
We agree we want those to become:
H - 3.2.0.CR2
HA - 3.2.0.CR1
Scott already changed this, and it'll work if you unzip with a native
tool (not jdk's jar utility).
-Original Message-
From: Mladen Turk
Sent: 08 May, 2006 11:56
To: Scott M Stark
Cc: Jason T. Greene; jboss-development@lists.sourceforge.net; QA
Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] RE: FW:
This will be in the distro when the 4.0.4.GA comes out. We don't have a
downloable snapshot available, unless you want to checkout Branch_4_0
and build it yourself :)
-Original Message-
From: Mladen Turk
Sent: 08 May, 2006 12:06
To: Dimitris Andreadis
Cc: Scott M Stark; Jason T
So Ruel fixed it, but Kabir reverted to puting them to bin
???
Kabir
I added the .deployer files to jboss/aop/1.5.0-snapshot/bin, and put
tasks.xml back to the way it was, i.e.
artifacttype type="deployer" outputtype="lib"/
This
Not sure who created the .zip distro, but I would suggest
that next time it gets created on some linux box.
That way the correct file modes will be picked up.
Regards,
Mladen.
I don't think this will work. The bin-zip target in
build/build-release.xml uses the ant zip task to create the
I tested it too, so if we zip with /usr/bin/zip the produced zip file
maintains the file permissions, as long as you unzip with
/usr/bin/unzip.
If you use the 'jar' utility, the permission are lost when zipping, and
also ignored when unzipping (if they were put there by /usr/bin/zip).
So a
I've seen lately a few file additions with wrong -kk or -kb
flags. Is that an eclipse setup thing, maybe?
From: Scott M Stark Sent: 05 May,
2006 15:51To: jboss-development@lists.sourceforge.net; Dimitris
Andreadis; Ruel LoehrSubject: RE: [JBoss-dev] RE:
jboss-4.0-jdk-matrix
serialization classes.
You can override the existing jboss remoting 1.4.2.GA, since nobody is
using it yet.
Does this make sense?
-Original Message-
From: Tom Elrod
Sent: 05 May, 2006 04:38
To: Dimitris Andreadis
Cc: Tom Elrod; Scott M Stark; Clebert Suconic; QA;
jboss-development
Unless, something is absolutely critical or is guaranteed to be solved
by the submitter during the weekend(!), please do not submit any tasks
scheduled for 4.0.4.GA. They'll be just deferred to the next release.
Thanks
/Dimitris
---
Using
Remoting
Serialization
Microcontainer
Jbossxb
Cache
(And JBossWS until recentrly)
All of the above have a snapshot release for development purposes, so
is this what Kabir needs?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Kabir Khan
Sent: 04
This is the current jboss project dependencies on JBoss 4.0.4.GA
componentref name=jboss/aop version=1.5.0-snapshot/
componentref name=jboss/backport-concurrent version=2.1.0.GA/
componentref name=jboss/cache version=1.2.4.SP2/
componentref name=jboss/microcontainer version=1.0.2/
componentref
that can't be bundled with
the jboss-4.0.x j2ee1.4 build.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Dimitris Andreadis
Sent: Thursday, May 04, 2006 12:25 AM
To: jboss-development@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: RE: [JBoss-dev
- JBossRemoting, (a) the version number shouldn't be 1.4.2.GA ??.
Second, I don't see any dependency in its component-info.xml on
JBossRemoting ?
Don't understand what you mean by the second point.
Hi Tom,
If remoting is using JBossSerialization, shouldn't the dependency be
; Dimitris Andreadis; Scott M Stark; Adrian
Brock; Kabir Khan; Alexey Loubyansky; Thomas Diesler;
jboss-development@lists.sourceforge.net; QA
Subject: Re: JBAS 4.0.4.GA project dependencies
Well, if using jboss serialization, there is a dependency.
However, this is not the default (java
Is JBossSerialization actually, or this is just the API, in which case
you can just bundle the missing classes?
JBossSerialization is about 121Kb, and jboss-minimal 190kb.
-Original Message-
From: Tom Elrod
Sent: 04 May, 2006 22:48
To: Dimitris Andreadis
Cc: Scott M Stark; Clebert
I meant actually used by remoting in this setup, sorry.
-Original Message-
From: Dimitris Andreadis
Sent: 04 May, 2006 23:34
To: Tom Elrod
Cc: Scott M Stark; Clebert Suconic; QA;
jboss-development@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: RE: Problem with minimal config in Branch_4_0
seconds
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 05 May, 2006 00:57To: Dimitris Andreadis;
jboss-development@lists.sourceforge.net; QASubject:
jboss-4.0-jdk-matrix Build FailedImportance:
High
View results here - http://cruisecontrol.jboss.com/cc/buildresults/jboss
http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBAS-3171
-Original Message-
From: Scott M Stark
Sent: 02 May, 2006 07:34
To: Clebert Suconic; Tom Elrod
Cc: Dimitris Andreadis; QA; 'jboss-development@lists.sourceforge.net'
Subject: RE: Problem with minimal config in Branch_4_0
Ok
The class has been renamed to org.jboss.lang.EnumImpl, but I do see the
old org.jboss.lang.Enum there, and in the jbossretro-rt.jar that goes
with JBAS 4.0.4.
Is this why the org.jboss.test.compatibility.test still fails?
http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBAS-3103
http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBAS-3108 - jbossretro1.0.0.GA drop
What remains to be fixed for jbossretro 1.0.0.GA ?
http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBAS-2411 - Need basic xpath testing
Can we point Aaron to the type of tests needed ?
http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBAS-2652 - Need
JBossPOJOServer-1.0 Alpha / Final
Can those releases be removed from JIRA? There is just one open issue
recorded (http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBAS-2545) that should
probably move to JB5, if not there already.
Thanks
/D
---
Using Tomcat
You (or eclipse) have checked in the file with the -kk flag. There is a
command to change this but I don't remember by heart, so the quick and
dirty way is to remove and re-add, as a text file.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Heiko
Did something change recently in serialization/remoting?
run -c minimal
...
15:15:32,609 INFO [NamingService] JNDI bootstrap JNP=/0.0.0.0:1099,
RMI=/0.0.0.0:1098, backlog=50, no client SocketFactory, Server
SocketFactory=class org.jboss.net.sockets.DefaultSocketFactory
15:15:32,629 WARN
Normally you need to copy into a new hibernate release.
For this particular case, if you just add the javassist dependency,
without changing anything else, I suppose you could modify component.xml
with the effect being that older versions of component using this
version of hibernate will pickup
Stark
Kabir Khan
Tom Elrod
Alexey Loubyansky
Darran Lofthouse
Weston Price
Gavin King
Julien Viet
Dimitris Andreadis
Andrew Oliver
Ruel Loehr
Anil Saldhana
Stan Silvert
Brian Stansberry
) throw in ideas for improving our case handling to make it more
effective and timely.
Your input is welcome
Thanks
/Dimitris
Build System (Lead: Scott M Stark)
Clustering (Lead: Scott M Stark)
CMP service (Lead: Alexey Loubyansky)
Deployment Service (Lead: Dimitris Andreadis)
Documentation
This is the beginning of the discussion!
So if anyone wants to propose what component/leads need
add/remove/change?
I completely agree with all of those. Have you started
the discussion on the components leads yet? If not, let's
get that discussion started. I think that is the
Some possibilities also:
Could be changed:
Build System == Ruel Loehr
Clustering == Brian Stansberry
JBossCache == Manik Surtani
IIOP = Franscisco Reverbel
Could be added:
ClassLoaders = Scott Stark
EJB3 = Bill Burke
EJB Timers == Dimitris Andreadis
Scott owns also the following components
http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBAS-2937
run.conf
JAVA_OPTS=-server -Xms128m -Xmx128m
-Dsun.rmi.dgc.client.gcInterval=360
-Dsun.rmi.dgc.server.gcInterval=360
run.bat
set JAVA_OPTS=%JAVA_OPTS% -Xms128m -Xmx512m
---
Any particular reason we don't need the rmi gc
So the resolution is we upgrade to cglib 2.1.3 (if that works) and
hibernate is the only component using it?
I see 3 related tasks:
http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBAS-3101
http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBAS-2642
http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBAS-3061
-Original
Is this related to http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBAS-1888 ?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Ben Wang
Sent: 07 April, 2006 10:35
To: jboss-development@lists.sourceforge.net
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [JBoss-dev]
It's not planned. Some do individual TCK testing (e.g. WS).
-Original Message-
From: Alexey Loubyansky
Sent: 07 April, 2006 15:42
To: Dimitris Andreadis
Cc: jboss-development
Subject: Re: Toward JBoss v4.0.4.GA - Part 1 - JIRA tasks
Are the J2EE TCK tests part of the QA
/Dimitris
--
xxx
Dimitris Andreadis
Core Developer
JBoss Europe SàRL
xxx
---
This SF.Net email is sponsored by xPML, a groundbreaking scripting language
that extends applications into web and mobile media. Attend
version=1.0.0.CR1/
componentref name=jboss/jbossws version=1.0.0.CR6/
componentref name=jboss/jbossws14 version=1.0.0.CR6/
componentref name=jboss/jbossxb version=1.0.0.CR3/
componentref name=jboss/serialization version=1.0.0.CR4/
--
xxx
Dimitris Andreadis
Core Developer
JBoss
When we started work on 4.0.4 we had 300+ issues ahead of us, now after
2 candidate releases we are down to around 80, which is quite an
achievement, but still a significant amount of work is left for the
final (GA) release.
The current target date is 26th/April which includes Easter and is just
Forgot also to mention that thing that should go in the admin guide
should be linked from this JIRA task:
http://wiki.jboss.org/wiki/Wiki.jsp?page=404UpgradeIssues
---
This SF.Net email is sponsored by xPML, a groundbreaking scripting
Actually the correct link:
http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBAS-2821
Forgot also to mention that thing that should go in the admin
guide should be linked from this JIRA task:
---
This SF.Net email is sponsored by xPML, a
From: Adrian Brock
Let's keep the process simple please.
I already:
1) Describe the change on the JIRA task
2) Update and the relevant WIKI page and link it on the JIRA task
3) Mark the JIRA task as requiring a doco change
I am not going to update an arbitrary number of web pages when
Do we guarantee client-server compatibility between different
JBoss revisions?
After JBoss 4.0.2 3.2.8 we try to guarantee interoperability with
previous (4.0.0/4.0.1) versions.
In other words, is a client using 4.0.1 client jars
guaranteed to connect without problems to a 4.0.4 server?
So jboss-remoting 2.0.0 could come with the next version of jboss-as
2.0.5, unless there are other dependencies.
Why not putting dates on the remoting releases?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Tom Elrod
Sent: 04 April, 2006 17:04
Works for me!
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Adrian Brock
Sent: 03 April, 2006 22:51
To: jboss-development@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: RE: [JBoss-dev] Unassigned for 4.0.4
Try again.
On Mon, 2006-04-03 at 14:31 -0500,
This filter should show the open 4.0.4.GA issues left for every user
(i.e. the current user), so you can see what's assigned to you.
http://jira.jboss.com/jira/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa?mode=hiderequestI
d=12310484
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL
created a more generic version of this:
http://jira.jboss.com/jira/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa?mode=hid
erequestId=12310181
On Mon, 2006-04-03 at 16:20 -0500, Dimitris Andreadis wrote:
This filter should show the open 4.0.4.GA issues left for
every user
(i.e. the current user), so you can
to be compatible with: [EMAIL PROTECTED], ver
sion=1.0.4.1jboss}]
by: jboss/jbossws
--
xxx
Dimitris Andreadis
Core Developer
JBoss Europe SàRL
xxx
---
This SF.Net email is sponsored by xPML, a groundbreaking scripting
Alex was telling me about a single failing test he wanted to look at
(MBeanServerUnitTestCase).
I don't know about those ones.
-Original Message-
From: Ryan Campbell
Sent: 30 March, 2006 21:26
To: Scott M Stark; Dimitris Andreadis; '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Cc: 'jboss-development
* componentref name=gnu-regexp version=1.1.14/
This is used by the snmp-adaptor to do some pattern matching, mainly due
to having the adapter in the 3.2.x branch also, where there is no jdk1.3
support for regular expressions and I didn't want to have different
sources across branches.
I
Related to http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBAS-3011
Alexey, should we just copy the current snapshot into a
jbossxb-1.0.0.CR3, or wait another day?
Thanks
---
This SF.Net email is sponsored by xPML, a groundbreaking scripting language
You can try that, although I see tom's comment about having to map the
org.jboss.ws.* properties to org.jboss.remoting.*
http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBWS-683
We also need a non-snapshot release from Alexey
(http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBAS-3011) or we can just copy the
current
I'm going to try locally remoting 1.4.1_final on 4.x with jdk1.4
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Ryan Campbell
Sent: 28 March, 2006 23:49
To: jboss-development@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: RE: [JBoss-dev] Do a clean build
Just to keep y'all up-to-date, I have one more piece of code
to do before I cut the Hibernate release for use with 4.0.4.
It'll be done today...
Great; I created a task to track the hibernate upgrade:
http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBAS-3009
3rd April (give or take)
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Steve Ebersole
Sent: 20 March, 2006 19:03
To: jboss-development@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: [JBoss-dev] 4.0.4
I am trying to nail down a short-term release schedule
But you need to get your changes with 4.0.4.CR2 (due out this week) so
they get tested!
After CR2 you'll need to target 4.0.5
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Dimitris Andreadis
Sent: 20 March, 2006 19:09
To: jboss-development
]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Dimitris Andreadis
Sent: Monday, March 20, 2006 11:24 AM
To: jboss-development@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: RE: [JBoss-dev] 4.0.4
But you need to get your changes with 4.0.4.CR2 (due out this
week) so they get tested!
After CR2 you'll need
and then start on 3.2.1 or
whatever.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Dimitris Andreadis
Sent: Monday, March 20, 2006 11:42 AM
To: jboss-development@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: RE: [JBoss-dev] 4.0.4
I love those
Jason, for every binary file, does it make a new physical file, or is it
one big file with some sort of marking to distinguish the entries? CVS
is really bad with binaries, more so big ones...
-Original Message-
From: Jason T. Greene
Sent: 18 March, 2006 08:16
To:
http://jira.jboss.com/jira/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa?reset=truemode=hi
desorter/order=DESCsorter/field=priorityresolutionIds=-1pid=10030fi
xfor=12310573
The major things left are (a) use jbossretro for jbossws (b) the
installer (c) resolve existing testcases and any other failing tests
that may
at the extension. Windoze tools (winzip, etc.) can
open .tar.gz anyway.
-Original Message-
From: Scott M Stark
Sent: 17 March, 2006 20:24
To: Dimitris Andreadis; 'jboss-development@lists.sourceforge.net'
Cc: QA
Subject: RE: Simplifying the JBoss source/binary distributions
This is what
So one of the problems we have is what version of Tomcat to use:
Anil wants the latest 5.5.16
http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBAS-2926
http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBAS-2899
Thomas wants 5.5.12
http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBWS-736
What is it going to be ???
Currently we produce bz2, tar.gz for the sources and bz2, tar.gz, .zip
for the binary distros.
There are issues with users using non-gnu tar (for the tar.gz distros)
that doesn't support long filenames, etc., and at the same time, if you
look at the download pages only 5-15% will use the
http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBAS-2955
If Franscisco wants to add any comments on the upgrade.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Scott M Stark
Sent: 16 March, 2006 21:12
To: jboss-development@lists.sourceforge.net; Francisco
Open a jira tasks also, so it goes in the release notes :)
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Adrian Brock
Sent: 13 March, 2006 12:09
To: jboss-development@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] Add dgc flags to defualt
Since we are still some 130 issues left, we'll probably do a CR2 on the
17th instead, and give another week for cleaning up and testing things
for the GA.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Bill Burke
Sent: 08 March, 2006 15:51
To:
@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] drop dead date for 4.0.4?
BTW, these changes from RC2 to CR2 is gonna confuse the hell
out of users
Dimitris Andreadis wrote:
Since we are still some 130 issues left, we'll probably do a CR2 on
the 17th instead, and give another week
ed or unsafe operations.Note:
Recompile with -Xlint:unchecked for details.1 error15
warnings
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 02 March, 2006 10:42To: Adrian Brock; Bill
Decoste; Brian Stansberry; Dimitris Andreadis;
jboss-development@lists.sour
The QA tasks to track the release:
http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBQA-311
One security case left:
http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBAS-2820
And failing security related tests in the testsuite:
http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBAS-2872
Need to verify that the misc-clients -
Sent: 24 February, 2006 21:43
To: Adrian Brock; Dimitris Andreadis
Cc: jboss-development@lists.sourceforge.net; Architect
Council; QA; Ivelin Ivanov
Subject: RE: Finalizing the Release of JBAS 3.2.8.SP1
4.0.4.GA - YourHelp is Needed
The new jta code is not fully cleaned and in a public
It's a tradeoff between introducing a xsl parser dependency that the
user may not want vs modifying the TransformerFactory to be more
flexible at the cost of the user potentially have to configure the
TransformerFactory default. I think modifying the
TransformerFactory is
the most
I don't follow why this is necessary. If we just remove
javax.xml.transform.TransformerFactory from xml-apis.jar then the jdk
bundled TransformerFactory will be used to choose the correct
implementation.
A user can always drop his own xalan.jar to lib/endorsed (for jdk1.4/5),
or server/xxx/lib
One a related note, we are down to 194 issues for 4.0.4.GA, 49 of which
are CMP ones.
Alexey, can you go through them to see if there is anything important
that needs to be solved for 4.0.4.GA (i.e. within the next 2-3 weeks)?
Thanks
/D
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Ruel, have you created a JIRA task for the upgrade? Just so
it goes into the release notes.
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Ruel LoehrSent: 22 February, 2006 19:57To:
jboss-development@lists.sourceforge.netSubject: [JBoss-dev]
JBossCache
/javax.xml.transform.TransformerFactory
entry as this takes precedence over the TransformerFactory defaults.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Dimitris Andreadis
Sent: Wednesday, February 22, 2006 9:24 AM
To: jboss-development@lists.sourceforge.net
We are some 190 JIRA tasks away from JBAS 4.0.4.GA, so please, don't be
shy, browse through your area (or adopt a new one :) and
qualify/tackle/reschedule tasks:
WebServices 6
XML 3
WebSvr(tomcat) 8
Testsuite 5
System 1
Security
I tried to remove lib/endorsed/xalan.jar in 4.0.x and the situation is
as follows:
Works fine under jdk1.5, but breaks under jdk5 when the XSLSubDeployer
does a
TransformerFactory tf = TransformerFactory.newInstance();
The problem is lib/endorsed/xml-apis.jar includes a
this?
-Original Message-
From: Dimitris Andreadis (JIRA) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, February 20, 2006 4:00 AM
To: Jira Notifications
Subject: [JBoss JIRA] Updated: (JBAS-2073) Remove xalan.jar from
./lib/endorsed
[ http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBAS-2073
So the problem is lack of encapsulation of the essentially
global org.apache.xalan.processor.TransformFactoryImpl name
due to the proliferation of the xalan distribution. One
should be able to work around this by introducing a
org.apache.xalan.processor.TransformFactoryImpl2 that loaded
Hello everybody,
We have scheduled 2 releases of JBoss AS:
v3.2.8.SP1 for 03/Mar/06 (i.e. in 2 weeks time)
v4.0.4.GA for 17/Mar/06 (i.e. in 4 weeks time)
3.2.8SP1 is needed to address a couple of issues with 3.2.8 (JBossMQ
-already fixed- and some extra interop scenarios with 4.0.2 versions,
BEGIN:VCALENDAR
METHOD:REPLY
PRODID:Microsoft CDO for Microsoft Exchange
VERSION:2.0
BEGIN:VTIMEZONE
TZID:(GMT-06.00) Central Time (US Canada)
X-MICROSOFT-CDO-TZID:11
BEGIN:STANDARD
DTSTART:16010101T02
TZOFFSETFROM:-0500
TZOFFSETTO:-0600
rt/service
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 03 February, 2006 01:45To: Adrian Brock; Clebert
Suconic; Dimitris Andreadis; jboss-development@lists.sourceforge.net; QA; Ryan
CampbellSubject: jboss-3.2-testsuite Build Completed With Testsuite
ErrorsImpor
One of the differences I see in the 2 branches, is the useFullHashMode:
org.jboss.invocation.MarshalledInvocation
/** A flag indicating if the */
static boolean useFullHashMode = false;
Which was added around 3.2.4
http://sourceforge.net/docman/display_doc.php?docid=21888group_id=22866
Somehow we need to do a better job keeping the installer
xml descriptor templates in-synch with the module xml descriptors, so
whenever a descriptor changes the template needs
updating.
I just fixed a trivial one, probably my bad: http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBAS-2742
The other thing
1 - 100 of 210 matches
Mail list logo
