Re: [JBoss-dev] CPU at 99.9 % after completionofrun-basic-testsuite

2002-04-11 Thread Peter Fagerlund
I think that maybe this is a testsuite error and not a jboss one ... - I do it in *cascades* - this might exhibit problem ? ... because some testsuites as of now leaves "crack" behind --not dropping tables and keep simulated corporate data - then in existence on the next run ---SLOPPY ... I have

[JBoss-dev] J2ME Embedded Tease

2002-04-12 Thread Peter Fagerlund
Q - What is a Java Delivery Server ? *** SUN and Nokia have joined forces in making Java a reality in the wireless world of applications here in Hongkong. As of today, the worldwide adoption and high-volume deployments of Java Technology enabled handsets by wireless operators has generated trem

Re: [JBoss-dev] Re: INSERTING AN ALREADY EXISTING BEAN

2002-04-13 Thread Peter Fagerlund
Marc, This is getng silly !!! ... just employ James ??? ... on 14-04-2 00.37, Dain Sundstrom at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > It will be like we discussed. The mail just took like 2 hours to get > delivered. I'm almost done... it is very simple > > -dain > > Bill Burke wrote: > >> Why n

Re: [JBoss-dev] Deployer design

2002-04-14 Thread Peter Fagerlund
on 15-04-2 01.24, Larry Sanderson at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > I don't know... perhaps someone would like to add a custom layer of security > on all deployments. Perhaps they would like to get an email when new > deployments occur. Who knows? The point is I can see no down-side to > making th

Re: [JBoss-dev] Deployer design

2002-04-14 Thread Peter Fagerlund
on 15-04-2 02.10, David Jencks at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > On 2002.04.14 19:44:06 -0400 Peter Fagerlund wrote: >> on 15-04-2 01.24, Larry Sanderson at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >> >>> I don't know... perhaps someone would like to add a custom layer of >&

Re: [JBoss-dev] 3.0.0 RC1 is available

2002-04-15 Thread Peter Fagerlund
on 16-04-2 00.56, Peter Fagerlund at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > on 16-04-2 00.20, marc fleury at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > >> |Sounds like I am the first person to grab a copy? >> >> You want a Tshirt? > > how many jboss contributers does it take to change a lig

Re: [JBoss-dev] 3.0.0 RC1 is available

2002-04-15 Thread Peter Fagerlund
on 16-04-2 00.20, marc fleury at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > |Sounds like I am the first person to grab a copy? > > You want a Tshirt? how many jboss contributers does it take to change a lightbulb ? ___ Jboss-development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTE

Re: [JBoss-dev] 3.0.0 RC1 is available

2002-04-16 Thread Peter Fagerlund
on 16-04-2 01.51, marc fleury at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > |4 in all + the backup of thousands more - cool ... > | > |;-) > | > |Love > > Love indeed my friend, your english is greatly improved > > "Bouge de la" ahhh ... Du menar denna "bara i tanken" by ? ... Kan inte franska ... vill *

Re: [JBoss-dev] Clustering statefulSessionHome.remove did not fail

2002-04-26 Thread Peter Fagerlund
on 27-04-2 01.01, marc fleury at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > The order of the Defenders is the ultimate one, work on the meta-system, and > bring meta-order to the order less. It's self arranging once the system is > there? > > One day there will be a *real* theoritical analysis of how Open Sour

Re: [JBoss-dev] HEAD & ClassCircularityError

2002-05-15 Thread Peter Fagerlund
on 15-05-2 16.51, Sacha Labourey at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >> jason, sacha or dain >> >> i need a test case, and in fact it should be in test cvs > > Sure. I don't have time now though. Any one else? Ilike to - then time says - hepp- like - i do have the time to read and "grep" the 'thingo'

Re: [JBoss-dev] WL Deployer, II

2002-05-15 Thread Peter Fagerlund
on 16-05-2 01.18, Scott M Stark at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > because they want a one deployment unit works > with all servers package. What can We be part of Invent here ? ___ Have big pipes? SourceForge.net is looking for download

Re: [JBoss-dev] Mckoi SQL

2002-05-16 Thread Peter Fagerlund
duh ... give Tomas some cred ! ... Chief Technology Officer of free db support for dummies that do not se pure speed in front of ready made icons ___ Have big pipes? SourceForge.n

[JBoss-dev] Fresh Checkout -> Build Failing

2001-12-03 Thread Peter Fagerlund
FYI : I just did a fresh checkout and it halts at j2ee I do some clean up in the lab instead ... /peter_f ___ Jboss-development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development

Re: [JBoss-dev] Fresh Checkout -> Build Failing

2001-12-03 Thread Peter Fagerlund
on 1-12-04 00.03, Jason Dillon at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > please provide a more verbose > description of the problem. it did not build at the time of post - somebody could check for history in CVS or do a dp diff to find it -heheheh ... Thanks /peter_f ___

Re: [JBoss-dev] Jetty

2001-12-03 Thread Peter Fagerlund
As earlier thread mentioned/suggested - both the test and 'kick start' would *grow* tremendously by having some apps deployed from get GO ... ? /peter_f on 1-12-04 01.06, Julian Gosnell at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Who is suggesting you hit these urls ? > > As bundled, Jetty comes with no ap

Re: [JBoss-dev] Jetty

2001-12-03 Thread Peter Fagerlund
ter, > > I'm not sure what you are saying ! > > Do you think there should be apps pre-deployed ? > > If so where - I removed them from '/' because i felt it might hinder people > who > wanted to deploy their own stuff. > > Jules > > > Peter Fag

Re: [JBoss-dev] time is up, where is adam heath?

2001-12-03 Thread Peter Fagerlund
on 1-12-04 03.55, Ean Schuessler at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Is the JBoss group a non-profit, not-for-profit? You are still in the last century ? are You not ? it is a new dawn here ! glowing ... /peter_f " Only fools se darkness in the night - the wise se a vault of azure " ___

Re: [JBoss-dev] time is up, where is adam heath?

2001-12-03 Thread Peter Fagerlund
on 1-12-04 04.41, Ean Schuessler at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > - Beyond the apparently successful training effort there is a developing > focus on services. badabingbadabong ... Yes and You and Your Fourtune 500 service company is sharing ... hmmm ... good /peter_f " Only fools se darkness i

Re: [JBoss-dev] time is up, where is adam heath?

2001-12-04 Thread Peter Fagerlund
on 1-12-04 16.30, Hicks, James at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > I can relate to some points Ean Schuessler made. Now, I am not attacking > anyone on this list or the JBoss Group, I just want to raise a few issues. Yes -very good -use the jboss bussines list for those QA's - or lets set up a "Heat"

Re: [JBoss-dev] Jetty

2001-12-04 Thread Peter Fagerlund
>> Either way it sounds interesting, and I have been >> sitting on my duff >> long enough in here that I need to donate some stuff >> back. >> >> Al >> >> Julian Gosnell wrote: >> >>> --- Peter Fagerlund <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrot

Re: [JBoss-dev] jboss build failed

2001-12-04 Thread Peter Fagerlund
Jason -this is very much alike what I experienced erlier yesterday ... not in managment but in j2ee ... on 1-12-04 06.48, [EMAIL PROTECTED] at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > = > ==THIS IS AN AUTOMATED EMAIL - SEE http://www.lubega

Re: [JBoss-dev] jboss build failed

2001-12-04 Thread Peter Fagerlund
on 1-12-04 21.52, Julian Gosnell at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > I updated my RH tree 1/2 an hour ago, made clen and rebuilt - no problems. Yes that is the way - build - no probs -> but there seems to be some slack here -and that is counterproductive inbeetwen - i build now - hurray ... IMNSHO /

Re: [JBoss-dev] jboss build failed

2001-12-04 Thread Peter Fagerlund
get it. > > --jason > > > On Wed, 5 Dec 2001, Peter Fagerlund wrote: > >> on 1-12-04 21.52, Julian Gosnell at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >> >>> I updated my RH tree 1/2 an hour ago, made clen and rebuilt - no problems. >> >> Yes that is the way - b

Re: [JBoss-dev] jboss build failed

2001-12-04 Thread Peter Fagerlund
on 1-12-05 01.22, Jason Dillon at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > I totally don't understand any of the emails you send. I don't mean to be > offensive, I just don't get it. hehehe - thats what *they* said about all the people -that actually changed something -in our narrow frame of thinking ... th

Re: [JBoss-dev] JBOSS DEV LIST AND ***FORUM*** USAGE

2001-12-05 Thread Peter Fagerlund
on 1-12-06 03.46, marc fleury at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > |and one request for the users of forum: > |do quote (not over quote), otherwise your messages make very little sense > |when read from the mailing list > > yes good point, > > "to quote or not to quote" Could the post from forum hav

Re: [JBoss-dev] JBoss 3.0 Demo App

2001-12-05 Thread Peter Fagerlund
on 1-12-05 22.44, Bill Burke at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Yes, and these examples should ship with the JBoss distribution. They > should also be run with the nightly build so that we know whether or not > they work. I think these examples are crucial now that the bulk of > documentation will b

[JBoss-dev] Re: Testing reply urls...

2001-12-05 Thread Peter Fagerlund
looks good - maybe just to many newlines at bottom before the sf list footer - and could the links be green ? ... JBoss Forums: JBoss Development: Testing reply urls... View: http://jboss.org/forums/thread.jsp?forum=66&thread=4924 Reply: http://jboss.org/forums/post.jsp?forum=66&thread=4924

Re: [JBoss-dev] Re: Testing reply urls...

2001-12-05 Thread Peter Fagerlund
on 1-12-06 06.05, Jason Dillon at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > the newlines are added by the sf footer, not by the forums... and are you > smoking crack? green? I am sure if you mess with the tint on your monitor > enough you could get them green... ahhh ... -oki - newlines no go ... -i wish it

Re: [JBoss-dev] CVS update: newsite/src/docs/pictures jason.jpg

2001-12-05 Thread Peter Fagerlund
One could "color-correct" all the photos to go in a unified "filtered" look ! just a suggestion ... if Julia(?) has time ... it would look so much more in line with how the rest of the site is comming along. JBoss Forums: JBoss Development: [JBoss-dev] CVS update: newsite/src/docs/pictur

Re: [JBoss-dev] JBoss 3.0 Demo App

2001-12-05 Thread Peter Fagerlund
on 1-12-06 05.09, Peter Fagerlund at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > I can think of two demos now : namely snoop.jsp and includeEJB.jsp that both > are causing failiurs in the WebUnitTestSuite now ( well < yesterday ;-) ) > since they where not deployed ... ahhh... my mistake WebUnitT

Re: [JBoss-dev] Automated JBoss Testsuite Results

2001-12-05 Thread Peter Fagerlund
on 1-12-06 06.29, Jason Dillon at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > What is up with DefaultDS? lubega.com is not writing out its server log in full -for the last test's -so i do not know ... hth /peter_f ___ Jboss-development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED

Re: [JBoss-dev] JBoss 3.0 Demo App

2001-12-05 Thread Peter Fagerlund
on 1-12-06 07.01, Allen Fogleson at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >> So do we : >> - create a demo folder ? >> ( jboss-all/demo, jboss-3.0.0alpha/demo ) >> ( have some deploy by default >> or >> from there be able to do manual deploy drops ) >> > That makes sense. actually I think they should all de

Re: [JBoss-dev] JBoss 3.0 Demo App

2001-12-05 Thread Peter Fagerlund
on 1-12-06 07.01, Allen Fogleson at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > has anyone started working on dukes bank on Jboss 3? U mean the BanUnitTest ? ... It usually works just fine ... so how would We double some of the tests as demos ? or just use the Tests as the demos ? ... how can we combine ? that i

Re: [JBoss-dev] Automated JBoss Testsuite Results

2001-12-05 Thread Peter Fagerlund
> I tried touching hsqldb-default-service.xml, and got > a very unhelpful log message: > 21:40:35,854 INFO [AutoDeployer] Auto deploy of > file:/nfs/home/jason/ws/jboss/jboss-all/build/output/j > oss-3.0.0alpha/deploy/hsqldb-default-service.xml > 21:40:35,855 INFO [ServiceDeployer] not deploying

Re: [JBoss-dev] Automated JBoss Testsuite Results

2001-12-06 Thread Peter Fagerlund
on 1-12-06 13.12, Chris Kimpton at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Does this mean that the tests will fail until then - or is there > another problem on my Testsuite run? No i do not think so ... that behaivior has been there some time ... but the new log4j.RollingFileAppender might need a bigger num

Re: [JBoss-dev] JBoss 3.0 Demo App

2001-12-06 Thread Peter Fagerlund
on 1-12-06 15.44, Julian Gosnell at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > 1. some architectures (One of my first beta testers is > on MacOS X) do not seem to have the jar at all - it > seems to have been collapsed into the rest of the > runtime. ahhh . a special for OSX ... hmmm . > 2. Many people will be

Re: [JBoss-dev] JBoss 3.0 Demo App

2001-12-06 Thread Peter Fagerlund
on 1-12-06 16.22, Peter Fagerlund at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >> 2. Many people will be running JBoss on a JRE not a >> JDK, and precompiling their JSPs during development. Could We not just say clearly : SDK required - else If running under JRE please copy tools.jar here .

Re: [JBoss-dev] JBoss 3.0 Demo App

2001-12-06 Thread Peter Fagerlund
on 1-12-06 15.56, marc fleury at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Please move the demo-app discussion on the online forum, Yes very good - We still need to find a structur -here now : Scenario : I dload JBoss3.0 binary - it comes with a demo folder of deployable examples In dload JBoss3.0 src i

Re: [JBoss-dev] jboss build failed

2001-12-07 Thread Peter Fagerlund
on 1-12-07 19.01, marc fleury at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > good for you but this should be the last of these messages, I did a clean co and halts at MBeanProxy:112 ... On a related topic... What happend with the decentrialised build/run-testsuite/uppload results to lubega from different OS's

Re: [JBoss-dev] JBoss build faied

2001-12-07 Thread Peter Fagerlund
Timestamp by above gives me error on build ... let Me guess nobody elsehasthe BALLS to to say so - hehehehehehe /Uknowwho on 1-12-08 00.30, marc fleury at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > clean co works for you? doing better? let us know if it is still broken, last > I saw it was ok, > > marcf > >

Re: [JBoss-dev] JBoss build faied

2001-12-07 Thread Peter Fagerlund
on 1-12-08 02.41, Peter Fagerlund at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > me error on build ... let Me guess Building beautiful now ... seems one has to flush hard when on unix ...maybe on AS/400 as well? ... all i did was reopen shell ... (cache sucks) !? ... anyway... Avanti /pete

Re: [JBoss-dev] Automated JBoss Testsuite Results

2001-12-07 Thread Peter Fagerlund
>> JBoss daily test results >> >> SUMMARY >> >> Number of tests run: 162 >> >> >> >> Successful tests: 159 >> >> Errors:1 >> >> Failures: 2 > > we are almost there it seems Yes - out of 162 We have a 100% suc

Re: [JBoss-dev] Automated JBoss Testsuite Results

2001-12-08 Thread Peter Fagerlund
on 1-12-08 11.29, Chris Kimpton at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > "javac is in the classpath" - is there something I can change in my > config to correct this? I believe I have an empty CLASSPATH when > starting the jboss tests - so it should just be what jboss/ant > adds... I think Julian is looki

Re: [JBoss-dev] Automated JBoss Testsuite Results

2001-12-08 Thread Peter Fagerlund
on 1-12-08 18.04, Allen Fogleson at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > in my build script i changed > /jboss-all/server/src/etc/conf/default/jboss-service.xml by adding > tools.jar to the classpath element. then in my build script in the > _module-j2ee-most I added the following: > > > tofile="${insta

Re: [JBoss-dev] [AUTOMATED] JBoss org.jboss.Shutdown does not work

2001-12-09 Thread Peter Fagerlund
on 1-12-09 11.06, Chris Kimpton at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > The message "The database is closed as Embbeded" HSQLDB is writing out this message for every "channel" connection it has ... when the JVM decides to GC ... I will update HypersonicDatabase so it identifyes itself throught its own log

Re: [JBoss-dev] Automated JBoss Testsuite Results

2001-12-09 Thread Peter Fagerlund
I am impressed by the fact that green threeds now runs all tests and the others run 36 lesser tests - it used to be the other way around not to long ago ? ... /peter_f ___ Jboss-development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/

[JBoss-dev] A State of the Machine Running

2001-12-10 Thread Peter Fagerlund
Starting Suspended Stopping returning anything else means running ? ... ;-) /peter_f ___ Jboss-development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development

[JBoss-dev] Re: A State of the Machine Running

2001-12-10 Thread Peter Fagerlund
Is it me or U that have the -clockoff ? ... /peter_f on 1-12-11 03.28, Jason Dillon at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Huh? > > --jason > > > On Tue, 11 Dec 2001, Peter Fagerlund wrote: > >> Starting >> Suspended >> Stopping >&

[JBoss-dev] Re: A State of the Machine Running

2001-12-10 Thread Peter Fagerlund
on 1-12-11 03.35, Jason Dillon at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Ok, one more time... > > Huh? Two times -heh *** We need a state -spine thing : --to deploy on ---then Auto/level/grade/scope/... deloyer() has a state ... /peter_f > --jason > > > On Tue, 11 Dec 2001,

Re: [JBoss-dev] [AUTOMATED] JBoss org.jboss.Shutdown does not work

2001-12-12 Thread Peter Fagerlund
I recall back when i was looking at the undependencys that : -the "callchain" used by jboss_redhat_init.sh stop is using these MBeans "JMX:name=Connector,type=RMI" "Adaptor:name=html" "JBOSS-SYSTEM:service=Naming" and when they go out of scope (naming) ... no more is logged ? ... --so those MB

Re: [JBoss-dev] Re: Can xdoclet not do unnecessary work?

2001-12-12 Thread Peter Fagerlund
on 1-12-12 08.43, Ara at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Hey I'm using WebSphere myself :-) > But I think I should look at jboss more seriously ;-) It look's like it is going to be *redefining-the-industry* easy to develop and deploy on ... it will save You vast amounts of time ... simply one will ge

Re: [JBoss-dev] Tests: 129 or 203?

2001-12-16 Thread Peter Fagerlund
on 1-12-16 22.57, David Maplesden at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > but we don't seem to get one after the 203. -203 --You are referring to ---green threads !!! ... Just $recently$ the *2* BlackdownVM's got clear shutdowns ! ... but (but they never wrote out log in full ! ... this resembeling the o

Re: [JBoss-dev] Tests: 129 or 203?

2001-12-17 Thread Peter Fagerlund
on 1-12-17 05.40, Jason Dillon at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >> -203 --You are referring to ---green threads !!! ... > > What? Honestly, do you feel that all of these hypens really need to be > here? I think you have some weird punctuation obsession, if you don't type > at least one pucnctuation

Re: [JBoss-dev] BmpUnitTestCase failing due to class loader issue

2001-12-19 Thread Peter Fagerlund
on 1-12-20 03.19, Scott M Stark at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > hese are the hsqldb.jars in the dist I am currently running: mmm ... how many deploy xml´s in deploy / conf / sub / sub / duplica*y*e / sub duplicate folders ? ... do U have ? ... I know stupid question - just making conversation re

Re: [JBoss-dev] BmpUnitTestCase failing due to class loader issue

2001-12-19 Thread Peter Fagerlund
on 1-12-20 03.53, Peter Fagerlund at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > deploy xml´s in deploy / conf / sub / sub / duplica*y*e / sub duplicate > folders ? ... do U have ? ... It will get deployed as many times as You ask it to deploy *** ((port) & ( invocation style))) ... HSQLDB... is

Re: [JBoss-dev] MBean depends, I'm not getting how it works

2001-12-19 Thread Peter Fagerlund
on 1-12-20 05.37, David Budworth at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Am I just missing something here? do not think so - I hear You clear ... but meanwhile and before ev. change -just order Your MBeans ordered ? ... /peter_f ___ Jboss-development mailing

Re: [JBoss-dev] Re: HURRAY!!!!!

2001-12-22 Thread Peter Fagerlund
Go back - -- WayBack ... there is truth ... ( or how U prefere to spee () ... meaning ... "understanding the same" !) ... tho ... on 1-12-22 19.29, Adrian Brock at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Yep, > > Thats the problem. I'm not sure how to fix this? > > First I made it always read the

Re: [JBoss-dev] [AUTOMATED] JBoss org.jboss.Shutdown does not work

2001-12-23 Thread Peter Fagerlund
on 1-12-22 16.51, [EMAIL PROTECTED] at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Please could we get this fixed... It is just the snobosish code genius that hinders this ! ... hehe ... haha hohoho ... /peter_f ___ Jboss-development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [JBoss-dev] Seem to have a platform problem with deployment

2001-12-23 Thread Peter Fagerlund
I do not understand this fully yet - but the cl separation - gives unprecedented integrity ! ... ? ... /peter_f on 1-12-21 08.32, Scott M Stark at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Its just the default distribution that results from running build.sh > with the addition of the idgen.jar to the lib/dep

Re: [JBoss-dev] What the point?

2001-12-28 Thread Peter Fagerlund
on 1-12-28 23.30, John Woo at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > I read the description on your web site, and get very > excited about the product. MetavValue ! ... > But when I try and use the > JBoss 3.0 alpha, I am wondering why you not spend any > time on the web container? J2EE container without a

Re: [JBoss-dev] Re: Re: What the Point?

2001-12-28 Thread Peter Fagerlund
U are exercising a Debian distro *view* ? ... heheheheheheh And have what ??? ... problem / solution domain ... are U referring to here ??? ... I think and will stake my being **on**, that WE can ***help*** ... /peter_f ___ Jboss-development m

Re: [JBoss-dev] What the Point?

2001-12-28 Thread Peter Fagerlund
on 1-12-29 02.26, John Woo at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > It is a bunch of > frustrated user speaking to an empty room while a > bunch of academic are off playing with Java. yes ... perchanche ... so what are U doing here ? ... heh "If we knew what it was we were doing, it would not be called

Re: [JBoss-dev] Re: Re: What the Point?

2001-12-28 Thread Peter Fagerlund
on 1-12-29 02.21, John Woo at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > but you forum software down now. hehe Will analyse ! this is fun ... fbi/co and stuff ... man that sp (south pacific) training is realise ... /peter_f ___ Jboss-development mailing li

Re: [JBoss-dev] Re: HURRAY!!!!!

2001-12-28 Thread Peter Fagerlund
on 1-12-29 03.08, Adrian Brock at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Hi, > > Correction. > > I've now seen the problem on Windows JDK1.3.1_02 :-( > > Regards, > Adrian Makes me wonder - thanks I like wonder ... ___ Jboss-development mailing list [EMAIL P

Re: [JBoss-dev] Deployment problem.

2002-01-02 Thread Peter Fagerlund
on 02-01-2 10.06, Eric Chow at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > "access control" Try the Installation & Configuration forum http://jboss.org/forums/forum.jsp?forum=61 for a OS specific solution ... /peter_f ___ Jboss-development mailing list [EMAIL PROTEC

Re: [JBoss-dev] more jmx domain structure

2002-01-04 Thread Peter Fagerlund
on 04-01-2 23.28, Jason Dillon at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > I would not expect users to have to or want to change those. I think this defines well the semantic func going on ... I am a user ( proud user, that is ( ... ) ( so are U ( ...( proud that is ) ) ) ... ) ... I am a dev ... I am I ...

Re: [JBoss-dev] more jmx domain structure

2002-01-04 Thread Peter Fagerlund
>Yah that's it... I love the way ... U ... come back .. on nothingness´s /p "The language we use influences the thoughts we think much more than the thoughts we think influence the language we use." ___ Jboss-development mailing list [EMAIL PRO

Re: [JBoss-dev] RH docs

2002-01-09 Thread Peter Fagerlund
Yes - a wallet componenet followed with a RT CC Processor Servive ... Is something others can match ... Wallet would be a persistent store called with wallet.add(002$) call --from whatever service --- in a jboss container ... /peter_f RT = Real Time == danger === oki - "so `CRT´ \""close to re

Re: [JBoss-dev] Config Help

2002-01-18 Thread Peter Fagerlund
YEA - thats easy !!! ... read the FAQ & RTMF and then ask over at user@list (really displaced sematiccts here !) and heepp your on ... /p on 19-01-2 02.11, Darryl Thompson at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Hell, > > I am new to Jboss and trasitioning from Weblogic > server 6.1. I need to

Re: [JBoss-dev] 3.0 snapshot

2002-01-25 Thread Peter Fagerlund
You are marc´ed ! ... on 26-01-2 01.54, [EMAIL PROTECTED] at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > who's marc ? > > ___ > Jboss-development mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development _

Re: [JBoss-dev] JBOSS @ JAVAONE TSHIRT CONTEST

2002-02-07 Thread Peter Fagerlund
JBoss Serve´s All ___ Jboss-development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development

Re: [JBoss-dev] JBOSS @ JAVAONE TSHIRT CONTEST

2002-02-07 Thread Peter Fagerlund
JBoss One for All ___ Jboss-development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development

Re: [JBoss-dev] JBOSS @ JAVAONE TSHIRT CONTEST

2002-02-07 Thread Peter Fagerlund
JBoss Embedded ___ Jboss-development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development

Re: [JBoss-dev] JBOSS @ JAVAONE TSHIRT CONTEST

2002-02-07 Thread Peter Fagerlund
on 07-02-2 23.36, Colin Daly at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > in the immortal words of Ali > > JBoss: > we're young > we're fast > we're handsome and > we can't possibly be beaten. We would collect excessive belly lint .. though ... ___ Jboss-developme

Re: [JBoss-dev] JBOSS @ JAVAONE TSHIRT CONTEST

2002-02-07 Thread Peter Fagerlund
When it comes to suggestions here --- hotmail and debian accounts will not qualify ... ___ Jboss-development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development

Re: [JBoss-dev] JBOSS @ JAVAONE TSHIRT CONTEST

2002-02-07 Thread Peter Fagerlund
I will second the switch ... on 08-02-2 00.15, James Ward at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Simply Irresistible > > YOUR APP SERVER SUCKS! > > First they ignore us... > Second they laugh at us... > Then they fight us.. > And then we win! > > We're the shit! > > For a good time type www.jboss

Re: [JBoss-dev] JBOSS @ JAVAONE TSHIRT CONTEST

2002-02-07 Thread Peter Fagerlund
on 08-02-2 00.46, Adam Heath at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > On Fri, 8 Feb 2002, Peter Fagerlund wrote: > >> When it comes to suggestions here --- hotmail and debian accounts will not >> qualify ... > > What do you mean by the above comment? > > I sent my mail with

Re: [JBoss-dev] JBOSS @ JAVAONE TSHIRT CONTEST

2002-02-07 Thread Peter Fagerlund
Suggetions for leaflet tagging the skirt ! -- ( translation from Oleg´s sourze ... ) The bloom of the furture holds freedom, SUNRISE nurture the influx of our taste, Hey, president follow the vangard, Autonomous BEA ... -- + the runner up´s ++ Humor is expelled !. The Source is you. LUDICROU

[JBoss-dev] Jar hierarchy

2001-05-17 Thread Peter Fagerlund
In what jar file is org.jboss.jdbc located - I need to do a test run with the 2.2.1 binary distro. I added a stopService() method in the HypersonicDatabase.class that will be called by the MServer. /peter ___ Jboss-development mailing list [EMAIL PRO

Re: [JBoss-dev] Jar hierarchy

2001-05-18 Thread Peter Fagerlund
t; Hi all, >> >> Peter Fagerlund asked: >>>> In what jar file is org.jboss.jdbc located - I need to do a test run with >> >> Toby Allsopp answered: >>> jboss.jar, I think. >> >> yes, there it is. >> >> Please don't call

[JBoss-dev] Deployment

2001-05-20 Thread Peter Fagerlund
Greetings, What is the status of the TO DO ? It was mentioned a refresh of the code ... does it have bugs or just needs massaging ? ... It was mentioned some efficency probs with copying ... could one use a move instead ? ... I would like to understand more in the discussion of remote deploym

[JBoss-dev] Re: Deployment

2001-05-21 Thread Peter Fagerlund
on 1-05-20 13.09, I wrote: > It was mentioned a refresh of the code ... does it have bugs or just needs > massaging ? ... A total rewrite then ? > I se an instance of jboss - when deployed on - that could replicate to > other nodes of jboss instances ... or to load deployments from other > j

Re: [JBoss-dev] Call for Help

2001-05-22 Thread Peter Fagerlund
on 1-05-23 03.20, Julian Gosnell at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Jetty does this by creating/destroying MBean facades for these objects > on the fly (as they are added /removed to/from a BeanContext which > generates events). This has the advantage that Servlets loaded from a > Jetty config file

re: [JBoss-dev] Exposing internal Components through JMX

2001-05-22 Thread Peter Fagerlund
Absolutetly - it is a JMX foundation so JBoss should utilise the spec to the fullest and get sponsored with the JDMK (6000$ a pop) from Sun ... Imagine Sun's JDMK sale's ammo if JBoss is built using the JDMK ... there might be "political" showstoppers there - I do not know ... if so - lets code it

Re: [JBoss-dev] Re: Deployment

2001-05-31 Thread Peter Fagerlund
> 2- the ClasspathExtension... one of our core classes is not really built for > the pure web deployment (suprisingly enough) and fails in URL mode (for > sure)... Yes - its all file based - altho it has a reference to a MLet, The MLet reference is created with a reference to the ContextClassLoa

Re: [JBoss-dev] Re: Deployment

2001-05-31 Thread Peter Fagerlund
on 1-05-31 13.56, marc fleury at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > yeah, don't make something simple sound complex :) ;-) how bout using JSP to serve a *list* to the CPE ? /peter ___ Jboss-development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.sourceforg

Re: [JBoss-dev] Re: Deployment

2001-05-31 Thread Peter Fagerlund
Hey - dont look back - look up *S* - there is JMX - and all ClasspathExtension's (on every JBoss node/instance) are MBeans ... if We are talking about remote web deployment among JBoss/JMX instances should'ent We use the management of instruments then ... ??? ... /peter

Re: [JBoss-dev] Re: Deployment

2001-06-03 Thread Peter Fagerlund
on 1-06-01 01.18, Peter Fagerlund at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Hey - dont look back - look up *S* - there is JMX - and all > ClasspathExtension's (on every JBoss node/instance) are MBeans ... if We are > talking about remote web deployment among JBoss/JMX instances should&#x

Re: [JBoss-dev] MarshalledObject + URLClassLoader = huge networktraffic

2001-06-09 Thread Peter Fagerlund
on 1-06-08 20.59, Joseph Dane at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > on a related note, can someone comment on dynaimc code downloading > problem and the proposed solution? I just recently started checking > out JBoss, and have generally been impressed. but the fact that > dynamic downloading just plain

Re: [JBoss-dev] zombie thread-> bug

2001-06-25 Thread Peter Fagerlund
on 1-06-25 08.27, marc fleury at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > it seems two processes, webserver (dynaserver) and hypersonicSQL do not > close properly on Linux and don't really close their threads like it they > are supposed to. Do the "shutdownhook" get installed ? (on Linux (VM ?)) - and jmx is c

Re: [JBoss-dev] zombie thread-> bug

2001-06-25 Thread Peter Fagerlund
on 1-06-25 18.26, Dain Sundstrom at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > I don't know if this helps but you can always call inerrupt() on the thread. > This causes the thread to throw an InterruptedException. Which will cause > most code to exit unless they catch Exception in the main loop and restart. W

Re: [JBoss-dev] High load...

2001-06-25 Thread Peter Fagerlund
on 1-06-25 18.39, Dain Sundstrom at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > You should try this on some other OSes. and with Blackdowns VM http://www.blackdown.org if or when time permits ... /p ___ Jboss-development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.s

The next generation GUI (was : Re: [JBoss-dev] EJX and XML)

2001-06-25 Thread Peter Fagerlund
on 1-06-25 19.30, marc fleury at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > The next generation GUI Could be built using a set of extension to a freeware "shell" like the Together Community Edition 5.0 http://www.togethercommunity.com/community-edition.shtml or some other free tool with "easy" yet powerfull plu

Re: The next generation GUI (was : Re: [JBoss-dev] EJX and XML)

2001-06-25 Thread Peter Fagerlund
on 1-06-25 22.26, Dain Sundstrom at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Dude, GUI tools suck. Just edit the xml by hand. IMO if a person can't edit > xml they shouldn't be configuring the server or ejb-jar. Yes exactly - throw out Gnome and the like alltogether - U are using Lynx reading this and the ear

[JBoss-dev] The Core for the next generation GUI

2001-06-26 Thread Peter Fagerlund
After some sleep - I have come to understand that the shell to be used - should ofcource be JMX based thus enable'ing using one tool for a whole cluster and also for geographically unbound service'ing ... This then allows the components to be written as MBeans - plugin a new service been - be it f

Re: The next generation GUI (was : Re: [JBoss-dev] EJX and XML)

2001-06-26 Thread Peter Fagerlund
on 1-06-26 15.13, Jay Walters at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > You guys wouldn't want to hear my stories... suffice it to say I agree that > if you can't understand to edit the properties files by hand you probably > shouldn't be editing them with a GUI... It can be a checkbox on a feature > list

Re: The next generation GUI (was : Re: [JBoss-dev] EJX and XML)

2001-06-26 Thread Peter Fagerlund
on 1-06-26 16.23, Jay Walters at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > I don't edit my xml by hand or by tool, I generate it! Cool - that rules ... and can be utilised by many if it has a userfriendly UI in front ... I would say a generator is a tool - together with a facade - it is the future ... /peter

Re: The next generation GUI (was : Re: [JBoss-dev] EJX and XML)

2001-06-26 Thread Peter Fagerlund
on 1-06-26 16.38, Jay Walters at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > the tool really needs to maintain consistency. Good point - very good point indeed - kind of goes without saying - now - that You did ;-) - really - lets try keep things consistent, simple, lean and mean ... /peter

Re: [JBoss-dev] JBossGUI: Let's start

2001-06-27 Thread Peter Fagerlund
on 1-06-26 20.36, Schaefer, Andreas at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > To finally bring the JBoss GUI flying let's start > a project for that ;-) Yeeay > My idea of the JBoss GUI would be a dynamic, expandable > and version aware GUI helping an administrator, deployer > and Developer dealing with JB

<    1   2   3