The important thing is to not put half of the GUI into Java classes,
like most MVC frameworks.
I took a look at Struts, but I assumed that it will create far too many
classes and require restarting the web app over and over again (to
reload the classes and/or the configuration file). A lot of my
Bill,
yes, I read your answers. I really appreciate them. I'm already doing
everything you mentioned (read-only methods etc.).
My guts say, that the weblogic default setting is, what you usually
would expect. (10K$/CPU and no concurrent access would be too bad). Bad
performance is still better
Besides being not as standards compliant as one would wish them to be,
the Oracle thin drivers have always been working like a breeze for me.
Most of the people that would be willing to pay for JBoss support will
be exactly those
who are using Oracle.
As you dig deeper into the
Hi,
the code to fill the clob looks like that:
Writer outstream = clob.getCharacterOutputStream();
int i = 0;
int chunk = 10;
while (i length)
{
outstream.write(i + hello world, 0, chunk);
i += chunk;
if (length - i chunk)
chunk = (int) length
FYI:
The following is on WinNT 4.0 SP6:
I just got Rel_3_0_0_7 from CVS and ran the test suite on it, once using
Sun JDK1.3.1_02 (gave 1 failure)
and then 1.3.1_03 (I did a clobber on jboss-all and testsuite and
cleaned the tmp and db directories between the tests).
This 1.3.1_03 test
(How can one believe that it is possible to configure a whole enterprise
from one file?)
The critique only means, that Jboss needs a configuration GUI (or at
least some command line tool like j2eeadmin).
Sun's intention was from the start, that nobody is going to look at the
config files
The view on the configuration should be task-oriented, not
file-oriented.
It's so easy to understand why a GUI is necessary. And why XML is
necessary.
Having to argue about these things makes me feel desolate.
Georg
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL
I have been waiting for that one ;-)
Seriously, my day-time job does not leave much room for coding anything
else.
This leaves me of course open to all kinds of attacks... especially
being ignored.
Georg
-Original Message-
From: marc fleury [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday,
This tableExists implementation is too naive. A JDBC driver need not support
catalogs.
Before doing the getCatalog() the code should query the DatabaseMetaData
interface whether
catalogs are supported. With ORACLE 8.1.7 JDBC Thin Client Driver one gets:
supportsCatalogsInDataManipulation
PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] Problem in JDBCStartCommand.java
On Monday, April 8, 2002, at 05:35 PM, Georg Schmid wrote:
so one could use getSchema() instead of getCatalog() (and don't forget
to
use getSchemaTerm() :-)).
I agree that getSchema() would be handy here. Unfortunately, I
On top of that:
http://www.tuxedo.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html
Georg
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of David
Jencks
Sent: Thursday, March 21, 2002 13:47
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] using ms sql server 2000 with
It depends on the quality of the JDBC driver and the type of database.
From my experience with using Sun's JDBC-ODBC bridge to read MS Access files
(kind of worst case) you can expect any amount of things that are not
working.
Although it seems much improved with JDK1.4 and Access2000.
So what
If you use JBoss (instead of developing it) it looks like that:
I deploy an EJB jar. After the last table has been created, no more info
appears on the console.
So I never know whether the deployment has completed successfully (or even
hangs).
I have to look through the list of ( 30) created
Bill,
for the WORA: (W)rite (O)nce, (R)un (A)nywhere.
Cheers
Georg
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Bill
Burke
Sent: Friday, February 01, 2002 14:37
To: Jboss-Development@Lists. Sourceforge. Net
Subject: RE: [JBoss-dev] That flaming
Just a remark:
in other large development organizations you are obliged to do some special
performances if you broke the nightly build: at MS you have to take care of
the build until some other guy checks in something that does not compile. At
a company I used to work for, you had to throw a
15 matches
Mail list logo
