They have also changed the signature of the serializer´s xsd-emitter
methods.
It´s in now.
CGJ
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Jung , Dr. Christoph [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Gesendet: Mittwoch, 8. Januar 2003 08:26
An: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Betreff: AW: AW: [JBoss-dev] Updating to use
John,
Thanks. Just applied them (semantically).
CGJ
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: John Fawcett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Gesendet: Mittwoch, 8. Januar 2003 02:22
An: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Betreff: [JBoss-dev] patch for axis1.1beta upgrade
Hi,
Below is a patch to upgrade the jboss
Bugs item #664322, was opened at 2003-01-08 12:37
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=664322group_id=22866
Category: JBossCMP
Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Daniel Spilker (nichdiemama)
Assigned
Bugs item #664322, was opened at 2003-01-08 13:37
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=664322group_id=22866
Category: JBossCMP
Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Daniel Spilker (nichdiemama)
Assigned
Bugs item #663228, was opened at 2003-01-06 19:39
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=663228group_id=22866
Category: JBossCMP
Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Peter Luttrell (objec)
Assigned to:
Apologies for a slightly off topic posting. I'm looking for a dedicated
hosting service on which we'll be putting a JBoss based site. Does anyone
have any recommendations? I've looked at Eapps, who look promising, does
anyone have experience of them? Who hosts the jboss.org site?
TIA
Alex Sumner
Bugs item #664373, was opened at 2003-01-08 14:23
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=664373group_id=22866
Category: JBossCMP
Group: v3.2
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Sacha Labourey (slaboure)
Assigned to:
Patches item #664390, was opened at 2003-01-08 08:49
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376687aid=664390group_id=22866
Category: None
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Alex Shneyderman (ashneyderman)
Assigned to:
Bugs item #664322, was opened at 2003-01-08 12:37
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=664322group_id=22866
Category: JBossCMP
Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Daniel Spilker (nichdiemama)
Assigned
Bugs item #664400, was opened at 2003-01-08 14:19
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=664400group_id=22866
Category: JBossServer
Group: v3.2
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Rod Burgett (rodburgett)
Assigned to:
Bugs item #664373, was opened at 2003-01-08 15:23
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=664373group_id=22866
Category: JBossCMP
Group: v3.2
Status: Open
Resolution: Accepted
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Sacha Labourey (slaboure)
Assigned to: Alexey
Bugs item #664373, was opened at 2003-01-08 15:23
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=664373group_id=22866
Category: JBossCMP
Group: v3.2
Status: Open
Resolution: Accepted
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Sacha Labourey (slaboure)
Assigned to: Alexey
Bugs item #664373, was opened at 2003-01-08 14:23
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=664373group_id=22866
Category: JBossCMP
Group: v3.2
Status: Open
Resolution: Accepted
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Sacha Labourey (slaboure)
Assigned to: Alexey
Bugs item #664459, was opened at 2003-01-08 11:21
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=664459group_id=22866
Category: JBossMQ
Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Ryan Harris (rpharris)
Assigned to:
Bugs item #664453, was opened at 2003-01-08 09:14
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=664453group_id=22866
Category: Clustering
Group: v3.2
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Matt Cleveland (groovesoftware)
Assigned to:
jag kör mountShares i rc.local och umountShares i rc.6
umountShares.sh
Description: application/shellscript
mountShares.sh
Description: application/shellscript
Patches item #664469, was opened at 2003-01-08 11:36
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376687aid=664469group_id=22866
Category: JBossMQ
Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Ryan Harris (rpharris)
Assigned to:
ScanMail for Microsoft Exchange has detected virus-infected attachment(s).
Sender = [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Recipient(s) = [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject = [JBoss-dev] smb mount script
Scanning Time = 01/08/2003 17:43:43
Action on virus found:
The attachment umountShares.sh matched file blocking settings.
I'm very sorry. I sent this to the wrong recepient. Please ignore...
On Wednesday 08 January 2003 17.30, Per Nyfelt wrote:
jag kör mountShares i rc.local och umountShares i rc.6
---
This SF.NET email is sponsored by:
SourceForge
Bugs item #664459, was opened at 2003-01-08 16:21
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=664459group_id=22866
Category: JBossMQ
Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Ryan Harris (rpharris)
Assigned to:
Bugs item #664453, was opened at 2003-01-08 09:14
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=664453group_id=22866
Category: Clustering
Group: v3.2
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Matt Cleveland (groovesoftware)
Assigned to:
On Mon, 6 Jan 2003, Scott M Stark wrote:
I'm planning on putting out the 3.0.5 and 3.2.0RC1 releases this Sunday, 2003-1-12
so if you have something you want in have it done by then.
Does 3.0.5 work on sun jdk 1.3.1 yet(re: my problem)?
Bugs item #664373, was opened at 2003-01-08 14:23
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=664373group_id=22866
Category: JBossCMP
Group: v3.2
Status: Closed
Resolution: Fixed
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Sacha Labourey (slaboure)
Assigned to: Alexey
On Wed, 8 Jan 2003, Sacha Labourey wrote:
EAR (not war though): it should deploy thanks to the russian dolls
btw, I really like the term 'russion dolls' applied as the name of the nested
deployment feature. It's cute.
---
This SF.NET
It works fine on Win2k, WinXP, OSX with the 1.3.1 jdk. I can't test 1.3.1
on RedHat because of some libgc issue.
Scott Stark
Chief Technology Officer
JBoss Group, LLC
- Original Message -
From: Adam Heath [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL
Bugs item #664547, was opened at 2003-01-08 10:51
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=664547group_id=22866
Category: JBossServer
Group: v2.4 (stable)
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Kyle VanderBeek (kylev)
Assigned to:
Bugs item #664547, was opened at 2003-01-08 10:51
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=664547group_id=22866
Category: JBossServer
Group: v2.4 (stable)
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Kyle VanderBeek (kylev)
Assigned to:
Bugs item #664635, was opened at 2003-01-08 15:33
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=664635group_id=22866
Category: None
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Paul Morris (rpmorris)
Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous
Bugs item #664635, was opened at 2003-01-08 15:33
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=664635group_id=22866
Category: None
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Paul Morris (rpmorris)
Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous
Bugs item #664635, was opened at 2003-01-08 15:33
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=664635group_id=22866
Category: None
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Paul Morris (rpmorris)
Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous
I have been unable to get a second instance of JBoss running on my Solaris Server. I'm using JBoss 3.0.4 and Jetty for the HTTP/Servlet engine.
Based on what I've read on the Jboss forum's I have tried to do the following:
I've changed the ports defined in
Bugs item #664453, was opened at 2003-01-08 17:14
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=664453group_id=22866
Category: Clustering
Group: v3.2
Status: Open
Resolution: Accepted
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Matt Cleveland (groovesoftware)
Assigned to:
Bugs item #664635, was opened at 2003-01-08 12:33
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=664635group_id=22866
Category: None
Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Paul Morris (rpmorris)
Assigned to: Scott
JBoss daily test results
SUMMARY
Number of tests run: 1010
Successful tests: 1004
Errors:5
Failures: 1
[time of test: 2003-01-08.12-28 GMT]
[java.version:
These are the ports I know about. It looks like the each one of these
services has to either have the port settings modified or to use an optional
attribute line bindAddress or serverAddress to change the IP used.
8080 - default Jetty HTTP port. The default port can be changed
using:
Bugs item #664547, was opened at 2003-01-08 10:51
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=664547group_id=22866
Category: JBossServer
Group: v2.4 (stable)
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Kyle VanderBeek (kylev)
Assigned to:
Bugs item #664547, was opened at 2003-01-08 10:51
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=664547group_id=22866
Category: JBossServer
Group: v2.4 (stable)
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Kyle VanderBeek (kylev)
Assigned to:
Bugs item #664547, was opened at 2003-01-08 13:51
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=664547group_id=22866
Category: JBossServer
Group: v2.4 (stable)
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Kyle VanderBeek (kylev)
Assigned to:
On Tue, 7 Jan 2003, Sacha Labourey wrote:
Hello,
Yesterday I commited a BeanShell (BSH, www.beanshell.org) sub-deployer in
HEAD. It is in module varia and you can find its lib in
varia/output/lib/bsh-deployer.sar.
It allows you to hot-deploy *.bsh files in /deploy.
[snip]
/me goes
I wonder if it would be possible to put the .bsh in a .sar in your .ear?
Not sure, haven't tried it.. And agreed, this bsh support really is
interesting..
-Original Message-
From: Adam Heath [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, January 08, 2003 11:52 AM
To: Jboss-Dev
Cc:
If something like this could also be added to J2EE deployments(in META-INF
dirs), then I'd be even more excited.
Well, have you simply tried to put a xxx.bsh file inside your JAR, SAR or
EAR (not war though): it should deploy thanks to the russian dolls
packaging feature.
James Higginbotham writes:
I wonder if it would be possible to put the .bsh in a .sar in your
.ear?
Sounds excruciating :-). Won't it tickle?
---
This SF.NET email is sponsored by:
SourceForge Enterprise Edition + IBM + LinuxWorld =
On Wed, 8 Jan 2003, Sacha Labourey wrote:
If something like this could also be added to J2EE deployments(in META-INF
dirs), then I'd be even more excited.
Well, have you simply tried to put a xxx.bsh file inside your JAR, SAR or
EAR (not war though): it should deploy thanks to the
OK, I've just tested and the russian doll feature wasn't working with .bsh
files. It is now fixed.
Furthermore, I just tested this case: I added a xxx.bsh file inside a
ejb.jar file. Result: the deployment process respect the
create/start/stop/destroy steps i.e. you have this sequence:
- create
I found a RedHat 7.3 system on which the Sun JDK 1.3.1_06 is ok and 3.0.5RC1
starts up fine:
[starksm@bliss Java]$ java -version
java version 1.3.1_06
Java(TM) 2 Runtime Environment, Standard Edition (build 1.3.1_06-b01)
Java HotSpot(TM) Client VM (build 1.3.1_06-b01, mixed mode)
[starksm@bliss
Scott,
Do you accept the beanshell sub-deployer in pre-HEAD branches? 3.2? 3.0?
Cheers,
Sacha
-Message d'origine-
De : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]De la part de Adam
Heath
Envoye : jeudi, 9 janvier 2003 06:47
A : Jboss-Dev
Cc : [EMAIL
46 matches
Mail list logo
