[JBoss-dev] php5 is coming

2003-03-29 Thread julien viet
have a look at the new php 5 : http://talks.php.net they added : exceptions, modifiers, interfaces, abstract, namespaces and more. it's mono powered. it seems that now they want to reach enterprise level and have to get more credibility for that. julien

Re: [JBoss-dev] php5 is coming

2003-03-29 Thread julien viet
sorry I gave a wrong link : http://talks.php.net/show/php5intro jv have a look at the new php 5 : http://talks.php.net jv they added : exceptions, modifiers, interfaces, abstract, namespaces and more. jv it's mono powered. jv it seems that now they want to reach enterprise level and have

[JBoss-dev] Generic ThreadPool in JBoss?

2003-03-29 Thread Thomas Peuss
Hello! I need a thread pool to simplify my code for the HTTP-loadbalancer. Is there a generic ThreadPool in JBoss-code (HEAD)? Any hints welcome CU Thomas --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: The Definitive IT and Networking Event. Be

Re: [JBoss-dev] Generic ThreadPool in JBoss?

2003-03-29 Thread David Jencks
There is the jca 1.5 thread pool, BaseWorkManager. It is a simple implementation of the j2ee 1.4 official thread pool. If this provides more than you want to deal with, lets discuss design. david jencks On 2003.03.29 09:04 Thomas Peuss wrote: Hello! I need a thread pool to simplify my code

[JBoss-dev] hsqldb options

2003-03-29 Thread David Jencks
Prompted by a customer, I did some experiments with hsqldb options. Currently we specify a tcp port and require a hsqldb mbean to start the hsqldb server. This opens a port and requires explicit hsqldb shutdown. Two other options that appear to work are: specify url jdbc:hsqldb:. and remove

Re: [JBoss-dev] Generic ThreadPool in JBoss?

2003-03-29 Thread Bela Ban
Thomas Peuss wrote: Hello! I need a thread pool to simplify my code for the HTTP-loadbalancer. Is there a generic ThreadPool in JBoss-code (HEAD)? I'd go for the concurrent.util (Doug Lea's stuff) thread pool (called PooledExecutor). It will be part of JDK 1.5 (Tiger). -- Bela Ban

Re: [JBoss-dev] hsqldb options

2003-03-29 Thread Micael
There is no good reason. At 10:55 AM 3/29/03 -0500, you wrote: Prompted by a customer, I did some experiments with hsqldb options. Currently we specify a tcp port and require a hsqldb mbean to start the hsqldb server. This opens a port and requires explicit hsqldb shutdown. Two other options

Re: [JBoss-dev] Generic ThreadPool in JBoss?

2003-03-29 Thread Scott M Stark
The thread pool needs to be a true mbean service with stats and its configuration exposed via JMX, not just a class. The JCA api and associated component David mentioned should be a good start for such a service. Scott Stark Chief Technology Officer JBoss Group, LLC

[JBoss-dev] !

2003-03-29 Thread shyu
[] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] * * * 95206 (0571) 86465080 86467128 86455732 (0571)86469732 13958106746 E_mail[EMAIL PROTECTED] www.hzefu.com www.hzefu.net www.hzefu.cn QQ965301 --- This SF.net email is

Re: [JBoss-dev] hsqldb options

2003-03-29 Thread Scott M Stark
There is no reason why we can't just document both configs and let the user choose what they want. The pure in memory version seems like the better default configuration. Scott Stark Chief Technology Officer JBoss Group, LLC - Original

Re: [JBoss-dev] Generic ThreadPool in JBoss?

2003-03-29 Thread David Jencks
Also, the jca mbean I wrote uses Doug Lea's implementation for the actual pool. david On 2003.03.29 11:59 Scott M Stark wrote: The thread pool needs to be a true mbean service with stats and its configuration exposed via JMX, not just a class. The JCA api and associated component David

RE: [JBoss-dev] Generic ThreadPool in JBoss?

2003-03-29 Thread Bill Burke
I say write your own pool. You can usually optimize it more closely than a generic service. Well, that's my experience from writing the PooledInvoker. Bill -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of David Jencks Sent: Saturday, March 29, 2003

RE: [JBoss-dev] hsqldb options

2003-03-29 Thread Bill Burke
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of David Jencks Sent: Saturday, March 29, 2003 10:55 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [JBoss-dev] hsqldb options Prompted by a customer, I did some experiments with hsqldb options. Currently we

RE: [JBoss-dev] hsqldb options

2003-03-29 Thread Sacha Labourey
Well, for quick prototyping it is nice to use the persistent version which allows to use JBossMQ for example and restart JBoss without loosing persistent messages. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Scott M Stark Sent: samedi, 29. mars

RE: [JBoss-dev] hsqldb options

2003-03-29 Thread Sacha Labourey
Did you take a look at McKoi? http://www.mckoi.com/database/ From the DOC: = There are four transaction isolation levels defined by the SQL standard. Each isolation level provides varying degrees of protection from seeing changes made by concurrent connections. The Mckoi database

Re: [JBoss-dev] hsqldb options

2003-03-29 Thread Scott M Stark
Thinking more about this, the default config should continue to be the file based persistence version since that is what users may already be using for a persistent store across server restarts. If you want a change in this behavior you need to change the hsqldb jca setup. Just document it in the

Re: [JBoss-dev] Generic ThreadPool in JBoss?

2003-03-29 Thread Scott M Stark
And that is contrary to the generic services architecture we want. First demonstrate the generic service does not work before coding a one-off. Scott Stark Chief Technology Officer JBoss Group, LLC - Original Message - From: Bill Burke

[JBoss-dev] XMBean and transient attributes

2003-03-29 Thread Scott M Stark
I'm working on updating the xmbean tests in 3.2 to make sure what we will have in the 3.2.0 release is usable and there is an issue with transient attributes and the default value for currencyTimeLimit. An attribute element like: attribute access=read-write

RE: [JBoss-dev] hsqldb options

2003-03-29 Thread Bill Burke
Too many writes, to many Optimistic exceptions. TRANSACTION_SERIALIZABLE usually is considered a performance bottleneck in the same way that our QueuedPessismistic Entity bean lock can be a bottleneck as well. I would like to try out ECPERF with Mckoi to see what kind of performance boost we

RE: [JBoss-dev] hsqldb options

2003-03-29 Thread Bill Burke
Strange, seems that you can turn of commit conflicts for dirty reads. This is actually READ_COMMITTED behavior. Cool. This DB seem cool. Wonder how well it works. -Original Message- From: Bill Burke [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, March 29, 2003 3:00 PM To: [EMAIL

[JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Bugs-710396 ] Deployed .war unaccessible in Tomcat 4.1

2003-03-29 Thread SourceForge.net
Bugs item #710396, was opened at 2003-03-26 15:09 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=710396group_id=22866 Category: CatalinaBundle Group: v3.2 Status: Open Resolution: Works For Me Priority: 5 Submitted By: Stefan Reich (sreich) Assigned to:

[JBoss-dev] !

2003-03-29 Thread shyu
[] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] * * * 95206 (0571) 86465080 86467128 86455732 (0571)86469732 13958106746 E_mail[EMAIL PROTECTED] www.hzefu.com www.hzefu.net www.hzefu.cn QQ965301 --- This SF.net email is

[JBoss-dev] What is the diff between the two xmbean default settings

2003-03-29 Thread Scott M Stark
There are two default values in an xmbean attribute declaration, one of which appears to be ignored. For this attribute: attribute access=read-only default=3.14159 descriptionPi is a read-only attribute added at the metadata level for which there is no state in the User2

Re: [JBoss-dev] XMBean and transient attributes

2003-03-29 Thread Juha-P Lindfors
it should set the value to -1 in the MBeanAttributeInfo descriptor if no getMethod fields are specified // if no method mapping, enable caching automatically if (getMethod == null currTimeLimit == null) descr.setField(CURRENCY_TIME_LIMIT, -1); -- Juha On Sat, 29

Re: [JBoss-dev] hsqldb options

2003-03-29 Thread Peter Fagerlund
lördagen den 29 mars 2003 kl 18.54 skrev Sacha Labourey: Well, for quick prototyping it is nice to use the persistent version which allows to use JBossMQ for example and restart JBoss without loosing persistent messages. Yes when You want to prototype a remote DB for some reason, the legacy

Re: [JBoss-dev] What is the diff between the two xmbean default settings

2003-03-29 Thread David Jencks
I think the one that is an attribute of the attribute element is a leftover from the xmbean implementation in Juha's book, later replaced with the default element in the descriptors. david jencks On 2003.03.29 16:41 Scott M Stark wrote: There are two default values in an xmbean attribute

Re: [JBoss-dev] What is the diff between the two xmbean default settings

2003-03-29 Thread Scott M Stark
Ok, its not used anywhere in the code so I dropped it from the dtd. Scott Stark Chief Technology Officer JBoss Group, LLC - Original Message - From: David Jencks [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, March 29, 2003 7:06