mmmmmm, i am not talking about porting xor integration. i am talking
about php beeing a _frontend_ in the depest meaning. unfortunately was
this not sufficient for the php people to fullfill the the marketing flyers
of their products. so they called the backend, and there is definitely
by ten.
marcf
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On
Behalf Of Holger Baxmann
Sent: Thursday, January 09, 2003 7:28 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Re[4]: [JBoss-dev] PHP
mmmmmm, i am not talking about porting xor integration. i
finally they'll have a true OOP language
OOP in this case: Other Orphaned Preprocessor ;-)
bax
julien
mf what is the zend engine?
mf marcf
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On
Behalf Of julien viet
Sent: Thursday, January 09, 2003
]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of marc
fleury
Sent: Thursday, January 09, 2003 7:35 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Re[4]: [JBoss-dev] PHP
holger,
we totally agree and we are talking about the same thing. I already
proposed it to Julien back when we wanted to go PN. The idea
: Re[4]: [JBoss-dev] PHP
holger,
we totally agree and we are talking about the same thing. I already
proposed it to Julien back when we wanted to go PN. The idea is indeed
to RUN PHP APPS AS IS in JBoss but with the merit of same VM cache
access. That is what it is all about and what
PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Re[4]: [JBoss-dev] PHP
I've been looking into this as you speak. Seems from reading
doco that you
can't go Java-PHP-Java which is what we need. Not sure what
would happen
if PHP called from Java created a JVM. Too bad there isn't a PHP Jython
like thing
