Re: RFR: 7100957 : Java doesn't correctly handle the SOCKS protocol when used over IPv6

On 03/01/2014 10:13, Dimitar Mavrodiev wrote: Greetings all, I've fixed this and created a test to cover it, is there a sponsor who could push this through? Here's a link to the webrev https://googledrive.com/host/0B2CI6Ih--1t5bVVwbVlBRmpVMDg/index.html. This would be a good one to being to the

Result: New jdk8 Reviewer: Stuart Marks

Voting for Stuart Marks [1] is now closed. Yes: 31 Veto: 0 Abstain: 0 According to the Bylaws definition of Lazy Consensus, this is sufficient to approve the nomination. -Alan. [1] http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/jdk8-dev/2013-November/003711.html

Re: Managing parallel change in JDK 8 and JDK 9

On 03/12/2013 09:37, Volker Simonis wrote: : So what will be the best way to downport something from JDK9 to JDK8. The only possiblity I see is again to "cherry pick"; i.e., export the change from JDK9 and import it into JDK8. Do you see other possibilities? We do this all the time when bringing

CFV: New jdk8 Reviewer: Stuart Marks

I hereby nominate Stuart Marks to jdk8 Reviewer. Stuart has Committer role in the jdk8, jdk7u and lambda projects. He has been contributing changes to OpenJDK for almost 3 years. He is author to more than 60 changes in the jdk8 forest and has additionally co-reviewed another 80+ changes. Vo

Result: New jdk8-dev Reviewer: Daniel Fuchs

Voting for Daniel Fuchs [1] is now closed. Yes: 14 Veto: 0 Abstain: 0 According to the Bylaws definition of Lazy Consensus, this is sufficient to approve the nomination. -Alan. [1] http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/jdk8-dev/2013-October/003562.html

Re: Review of OpenJDK Java tools nroff documentation

On 11/11/2013 20:31, raymond gallardo wrote: Hello Reviewers, As part of the OpenJDK review processes, the OpenJDK 8 nroff files for Java tools are up for review, which are attached as a zip file. I looked at several of the man pages and overall it looks like good work. The bundle that I gra

Re: [8]: revokeall.exe should be made executable on WXP/Cygwin

On 31/10/2013 21:11, Francis ANDRE wrote: Hi the revokeall.exe is not executable on WXP/Cygwin which leads to the error Z:/JDK/jdk8/jdk/test/sun/management/jmxremote/bootstrap/GeneratePropertyPassword.sh: line 107: Z:/JDK/jdk8/jdk/test/sun/management/jmxremote/bootstrap/../../windows/revoke

Re: RFR: 8022746: List of spelling errors in API doc

On 23/10/2013 16:05, sergey malenkov wrote: Could you please review the following huge fix: fix:http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~malenkov/8022746.8.0/ bug:https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8022746 The second version of the fix is here: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~malenkov/8022746.8.1/

CFV: New jdk8 Reviewer: Daniel Fuchs

I hereby nominate Daniel Fuchs to jdk8 Reviewer. Daniel is on his second tour of duty in Oracle's JDK team. Those on jmx-dev will remember Daniel from the early years of OpenJDK when he was contributing changes to JMX. He left for a while to work at another team in Sun before returning to Ora

Re: CFV: New JDK8 Committer: Mark Sheppard

Vote: yes

Re: RFR: 8022746: List of spelling errors in API doc

On 22/10/2013 13:22, sergey malenkov wrote: Hello, Could you please review the following huge fix: fix:http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~malenkov/8022746.8.0/ bug:https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8022746 I've replaced all typos with correct words in all documentations and comments. Our tech

Result: New jdk8-dev Reviewer: Staffan Larsen

Voting for Staffan Larsen [1] is now closed. Yes: 21 Veto: 0 Abstain: 0 According to the Bylaws definition of Lazy Consensus, this is sufficient to approve the nomination. -Alan. [1] http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/jdk8-dev/2013-October/003287.html

Re: CFV: New JDK 8 Reviewer: Seán Coffey

Vote: yes

Re: CFV: New JDK8 Committer Brent Christian (bchristi)

Vote: yes

CFV: New jdk8 Reviewer: Staffan Larsen

I hereby nominate Staffan Larsen to jdk8 Reviewer. Staffan leads the serviceability area in Oracle's JDK team and has been contributing changes to OpenJDK since Dec 2010. He has Reviewer role on the hsx project and is author of ~80 changes in the jdk8 forest. He has also co-reviewed ~100 othe

Result: New jdk8-dev Reviewer: Paul Sandoz

Voting for Paul Sandoz [1] is now closed. Yes: 17 Veto: 0 Abstain: 0 According to the Bylaws definition of Lazy Consensus, this is sufficient to approve the nomination. -Alan. [1] http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/jdk8-dev/2013-August/003022.html

Re: CFV: New JDK 8 Committer: Attila Szegedi (attila)

Vote: yes -Alan.

Re: missing jfr.jar in images section of MacOSX jdk8 build

On 29/08/2013 16:51, René Jansen wrote: Hi, I was able to successfully build jdk8 on MacOSX 10.8.4 until a few days ago. With updated source, re-ran .configure and make clean&& make all, I consistently receive a: ## Starting images Creating images/lib/charsets.jar Creating images/lib/ext/dns

Re: CFV: New jdk8 Committer: Jan Lahoda

Vote: yes

Re: Builds failing on jfr.jar

On 28/08/2013 08:27, Julien Ponge wrote: Hi, I am currently failing to build OpenJDK 8 (http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8/jdk8) on Mac OS X. A `make images` fails on a missing target to build jfr.jar with an error message similar to: make[2]: *** No rule to make target `/Users/jponge/Code/openjd

CFV: New jdk8 Reviewer: Paul Sandoz

I hereby nominate Paul Sandoz to jdk8 Reviewer. Paul has been compute bound on the jdk8 project for some time. Everyone following the Lambda and JSR-335 effort will recognize Paul. He has been a key contributor to the streams API and implementation, the spliterator API, and more. He has signi

Result: New jdk8 Committer: Peter Levart

Voting for Peter Levart [1] is now closed. Yes: 15 Veto: 0 Abstain: 0 According to the Bylaws definition of Lazy Consensus, this is sufficient to approve the nomination. -Alan. [1] http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/jdk8-dev/2013-August/002896.html

Re: CFV: New JDK8 Committer Brian Burkhalter (bpb)

Vote: yes To add to Mike's comments, this may be the first time where "significant contributions" is interpreted to include the huge effort required to coordinate, verify, and shepherd in a complex set patches and new algorithms. Those on core-libs-dev will be very familiar with the significa

Re: CFV: New JDK8 Committer Marcus Lagergren (lagergren)

Vote: yes

Re: FileVisitor / Are we feature frozen yet?

On 06/08/2013 06:39, Ben Evans wrote: Hi, I have a suggestion for a point lambdafication change which I don't think anyone's proposed yet. (As usual, if my Google-fu has failed me, please point me at the relevant discussion). In java.nio.file we have the FileVisitor interface, which defines 4 m

CFV: New jdk8 Committer: Peter Levart

I hereby nominate Peter Levart to jdk8 Committer. Those on core-libs-dev or lambda-dev will know Peter from his regular contributions and review comments. Peter has contributed or co-contributed more than 8 significant changes to jdk8 including the implementation of JEP-149 to reduce the foot

Re: CFV: New JDK8 Reviewer: Anton Tarasov

On 02/08/2013 03:32, Artem Ananiev wrote: I hereby nominate Anton Tarasov (OpenJDK user name: ant) to JDK8 Reviewer. Anton is currently a Committer in JDK7, 7u, 8, and OpenJFX projects. He is a member of AWT/Swing and JavaFX groups at Oracle, now working on JavaFX/Swing and Swing/JavaFX int

Re: CFV: New JDK8 Committer: Roger Riggs

Vote: yes

Re: CFV: New JDK8 Committer: Henry Jen

Vote: yes

Re: Review request: JDK8 b96 source with GPL header errors

On 28/06/2013 02:20, David Katleman wrote: Below are corrections to GPL headers errrors found in JDK8 b96 http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~katleman/8019347/webrev/ Lion share are the recent jaxb update All are punctuation issues, no code is involved, anyone can review. As a veteran of many suc

Re: JEP 178 - working example?

On 30/05/2013 11:15, Steve Poole wrote: Thanks for the quick response Bob. This all seems quite manual - are there any plans to add support to OpenJDK to help with this process? If someone is porting OpenJDK to an environment that doesn't support shared libraries then there is likely going to

Re: [java.lang.annotation.IncompleteAnnotationException] 9003386: call toString() on String in java.lang.annotation.IncompleteAnnotationException

On 28/05/2013 10:15, Otávio Gonçalves de Santana wrote: diff --git a/src/share/classes/java/lang/annotation/IncompleteAnnotationException.java b/src/share/classes/java/lang/annotation/IncompleteAnnotationException.java --- a/src/share/classes/java/lang/annotation/IncompleteAnnotationException.jav

Result: New jdk8 Committer: Paul Sandoz

Voting for Paul Sandoz [1] is now closed. Yes: 21 Veto: 0 Abstain: 0 According to the Bylaws definition of Lazy Consensus, this is sufficient to approve the nomination. -Alan. [1] http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/jdk8-dev/2013-May/002455.html

Re: CFV : New jdk8 Reviewer : Brian Goetz

Vote: yes

CFV: New jdk8 Committer: Paul Sandoz

I hereby nominate Paul Sandoz to jdk8 Committer. Everyone following the Lambda and JSR-335 effort will recognize Paul. He has been a key contributor to the streams API and implementation, the spliterator API, the extensive tests and more. This work has been coming into the jdk8 over the last f

Re: NetBeans does not start on latest JDK8 b87 build

On 03/05/2013 07:31, Sven Reimers wrote: Hi all, I am not sure if this is the right place, but I am not sure how to take this forward. After installing latest JDK8 b87 build I cannnot start NetBeans anymore. see: https://netbeans.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=229191 It seems this is caused by

Re: Monitoring open socket

On 02/05/2013 20:35, Enrico Olivelli wrote: Hi, In jdk7 there is no way to ask the jvm for the list of actually active sockets, witout jni or any other native non-portable solution. Is there any plan to add a jmx set of beans to monitor jvm network activity in a portable manner? Thanks Enrico I

Re: CFV: New JDK8 Committer: Jim Laskey

Vote: yes

Re: CFV: New JDK8 Reviewer: Athijegannathan Sundararajan (Sundar)

Vote: yes

Re: Review request: JDK-8012643 JDK8 b86 source with GPL header errors (jaxws & jdk)

On 20/04/2013 00:04, David Katleman wrote: Below are corrections to GPL headers found in JDK8 b86: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~katleman/8012643/webrev.jaxws.01 http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~katleman/8012643/webrev.jdk.01 Corresponding CR http://bugs.sun.com/bugdatabase/vi

Result: New jdk8-dev Reviewer: Erik Joelsson

Voting for Erik Joelsson [1] is now closed. Yes: 20 Veto: 0 Abstain: 0 According to the Bylaws definition of Lazy Consensus, this is sufficient to approve the nomination. -Alan. [1] http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/jdk8-dev/2013-March/002208.html

CFV: New jdk8 Reviewer: Erik Joelsson

I hereby nominate Erik Joelsson to jdk8 Reviewer. Erik has Committer role on the jdk8 and build-infra projects. He is the author of more than 70 changes pushed to the jdk8 forest over the last 9 months. He has also been reviewer/co-reviewer on at least 30 other changes and is relied on by alm

Re: CFV: New JDK8 Committer: Landon Fuller

Max, It's not clear to me that the contributions to the BSD Port project can be used to demonstrate contributions to the jdk8 project. In the jdk8 history (hg logs) then the only reference I can find to Landon is in the attributions on the initial (huge) change-sets that brought the Mac port

Re: CFV: New JDK8 Committer: Eric McCorkle

Vote: yes

Re: CFV: New JDK8 Committer: Eric McCorkle

On 14/03/2013 17:03, Jonathan Gibbons wrote: : Note: Some changesets were mistakenly marked as authored by Alan Bateman instead of Eric. I forgot the Contributed-by attribution in one change-set. Sorry about that, we only noticed it after the push. -Alan.

Re: RFR : JDK-8009162: "make test" target change

On 05/03/2013 22:04, Martin Buchholz wrote: : Also historically, the build system was very unreliable about failing to pick up changes in an incremental rebuild. Anyways, enough hard problems to keep y'all employed! Martin Try out sjavac to see what is possible (it's not enabled by default ye

Re: RFR : JDK-8009162: "make test" target change

On 05/03/2013 20:58, Martin Buchholz wrote: On Tue, Mar 5, 2013 at 5:37 AM, Alan Bateman <mailto:alan.bate...@oracle.com>> wrote: it make sense to default to the JDK image. This introduces a new problem, where a developer will build and test, but because the lazy develope

Re: RFR : JDK-8009162: "make test" target change

On 04/03/2013 22:52, Mike Duigou wrote: Hello all; Sorry for the wide broadcast but this change, though very small, affects many different teams. Currently the JDK8 root repo "make test" target runs against the jdk pre-image. ie. the compiled jdk classes. Many tests regression tests expect to

Re: JEP-161 questions

On 13/02/2013 17:56, Giorgis, Dan (Tridium) wrote: We currently use a headless J2SE 1.5 JRE in an embedded device. A smaller footprint J2SE Java 8 profile is very attractive to us. I think this will go a long ways to bridging the gap between J2ME capable devices and devices that are bigger,

Re: JEP 175: Integrate PowerPC/AIX Port into JDK 8

On 05/02/2013 12:06, Steve Poole wrote: : I agree we do need to tackle the refactoring problem - I just wanted to keep it a separate concern and not made a precondition for this JEP - which I think we all agree on? I am more than happy to help with the refactoring necessary in JDK8 proper ove

Result: New jdk8 Committer: Dan Xu

Voting for Dan Xu [1] is now closed. Yes: 17 Veto: 0 Abstain: 0 According to the Bylaws definition of Lazy Consensus, this is suffcient to approve the nomination. -Alan. [1] http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/jdk8-dev/2013-January/001871.html

Re: Review required for Nashorn

On 16/01/2013 13:20, Jim Laskey (Oracle) wrote: Alan, The code will sit in a separate repository. The model is as it is in the nashorn forest (http://hg.openjdk.java.net/nashorn/jdk8). The Infrastructure changes for the build and management of the nashorn repo are in progress and are being t

Re: Review required for Nashorn

On 16/01/2013 12:08, Jim Laskey (Oracle) wrote: Before we can push the Nashorn source into jdk8 forest, a formal review of the code must take place. This is a large body of work (94,442 lc) and will require several sets of eyes. If you are a jdk8 reviewer http://openjdk.java.net/bylaws#revie

CFV: New jdk8 Committer: Dan Xu

I hereby nominate Dan Xu to jdk8 Committer. Dan joined the JDK libraries team in Oracle about 6 months ago and has contributed several changes to jdk8 so far: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8/tl/jdk/rev/c2be39b27e1c http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8/tl/jdk/rev/d29a7ce28189 http://hg.openjdk.java.

Re: CFV: New JDK8 Committer: Jaroslav Bachorik

On 10/01/2013 12:54, Staffan Larsen wrote: I hereby nominate Jaroslav Bachorik to JDK8 Committer. Vote: yes

Re: Review request: 8005096: Move a few source files in swing/beaninfo and in a demo.

On 07/01/2013 13:57, Fredrik Öhrström wrote: : The makefile comments, comment on the fact that Java sources that reside inside make/tools are in fact part of the dt.jar (ie part of the jdk, not just a tool). However this is not that easy to fix, since the actual tool that generates the swing cla

Re: Review Request : Java exe doesn't process args ending Back slash

On 19/12/2012 17:05, jayashree viswanathan wrote: Hi All, Java.exe doesn't seems to process arguments ending with back slashes well , in windows only . I have added test scenario and changeset in the below webrev . http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~jviswana/7188114/webrev.01/ This seems to be int

Result: New jdk8-dev Reviewer: Mike Duigou

| |||Voting for Mike Duigou [1] is now closed|. Yes: 24 Veto: 0 Abstain: 0 According to the Bylaws definition of Lazy Consensus, this is sufficient to approve the nomination. -Alan. ||| |[1] http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/jdk8-dev/2012-November/001658.html| ||

CFV: New jdk8 Reviewer: Mike Duigou

I hereby nominate Mike Duigou to jdk8 Reviewer. Mike has Committer role on the jdk8, jdk7u, jdk7 and lambda projects. Mike is author of over 40 changes in the jdk8 forest, has sponsored several changes from contributors, and has been reviewer/co-reviewer on more than 80 other changes. Mike is

Re: CFV: New JDK8 Committer: Erik Joelsson

Vote: yes

Re: file.encoding vs. sun.jnu.encoding(?) on OS X

On 08/11/2012 19:25, Scott Kovatch wrote: Hello, I want to bring up something that is causing a lot of confusion, and is generating a lot of bugs on OS X. What is the relationship between path names and file.encoding? Or, maybe more correctly, _why_ is there some relationship between path nam

Re: JDK 8 M4

On 07/11/2012 11:14, Tim Ellison wrote: : I don't see any code for JEP 105, but may have missed it Jon published a preview of the API and webrev on compiler-dev some time ago, see: http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/compiler-dev/2012-September/004752.html -Alan.

Re: Fwd: RFR: 6519127 : user.home property not set correctly

On 01/11/2012 06:17, Sean Chou wrote: Hi , Would anyone like to give some more comments ? Is it possible to figure out what kinds of tests should be done for this modification ? core-libs-dev is the list to continue the discussion on this proposal. As I mentioned in the thread so far, wha

Re: RFR: JDK-8000970: Break out auxiliary classes that will prevent multi-core compilation of the JDK.

On 19/10/2012 09:50, David Holmes wrote: Hi Fredrik, I think this will need to be split up by area. I don't think it's worth spending effort splitting up these changes, at least not a fine grain split as this is just moving code around. Periodically there are cross-cutting changes, the warning

Re: Raise MAX_VM_MEMORY

On 16/09/2012 13:39, Henri Gomez wrote: For some days, I got OOM in Javadoc stages for jdk8 and lambda on Linux I think others build OpenJDK 8 on 32bits systems could be in same trouble and I suggest to raise it from 612m to 768m. --- jdk/make/docs/Makefile.orig 2012-09-16 14:38:19.714697484 +

Re: Please Review : Javadoc - docencoding not available to stylesheet post 7006270

On 13/09/2012 10:05, jayashree viswanathan wrote: Hi all , Looking for a reviewer for a change request . This change is in Javadoc tool , which doesn't seems to take up value of the docencoding getting passed unlike the other generated HTML files . webrev is available at http://cr.openjdk.j

Re: build failure: Compiler error in JDK8

On 27/08/2012 18:02, Christian Thalinger wrote: On Aug 26, 2012, at 11:29 PM, Mahesh Pujari wrote: Hi, Trying to build openJDK (http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8/jdk8) using new build infra. Getting compiler error in "jdk\src\share\classes\java\lang\invoke\AdapterMethodHandle.java" This cl

Re: Typo in javadoc of Path.java

On 17/04/2012 20:13, Alexander Thaller wrote: Hello. I think that in the javadoc for the class Path in /jdk/src/share/classes/java/nio/file/Path.java there is a typo in the last line of the third paragraph. Instead of "[...] the {@link #startsWith startsWith} and {@link #endsWith endWith} metho

Re: RFR: 7113349 JDK8 port to macosx

On 27/02/2012 23:47, David Holmes wrote: : General meta comment: When this stuff went into 7u my biggest complaint was that it introduced a mass of new platform-specific stuff in places that weren't otherwise platform specific. That still seems to be the case. I was really hoping/expecting th

Re: RFR: 7113349 JDK8 port to macosx

On 22/02/2012 21:50, Michael McMahon wrote: This is the webrev for the Mac OS changes for JDK8. It is pretty much a straight merge of the current jdk7u-dev changes. It builds and passes most JCK and regression tests with only a small number of failures. http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~michaelm/711

Re: JEP 138: Autoconf-Based Build System

On 22/02/2012 10:49, Erik Joelsson wrote: When we state that supporting IDEs is a non goal, we mean that we will not make an effort to improve the support over what is already there. It's an important goal that we don't regress functionality or workflows. If the langtools team is happy keeping

Result: New jdk8 Committer: Kurchi Subhra Hazra

Voting for Kurchi Subhra Hazra [1] is now closed. Yes: 20 Vote: 0 Abstain: 0 According to the Bylaws definition of Lazy Consensus, this is sufficient to approve the nomination. -Alan. [1] http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/jdk8-dev/2012-February/000716.html

Re: FilterOutputStream.close() throws exception from flush()

On 10/02/2012 13:16, Alex Lam S.L. wrote: I think I have narrowed it down to this changeset: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/hsx/hotspot-rt/jdk/rev/759aa847dcaf 7015589: (spec) BufferedWriter.close leaves stream open if close of underlying Writer fails Which no longer catches and ignores the except

Re: Warning Fixes from LJC Hack Session

On 04/02/2012 07:48, Michael Barker wrote: I see Rémi has suggested a slice& dice but I think that's a bit too much work for the changes involved. Instead I would suggest a simple split, send the AWT/Printing/Beans changes to awt-dev + 2d-dev, and everything else to core-libs-dev. Attached is a

CFV: New jdk8 Committer: Kurchi Subhra Hazra

I hereby nominate Kurchi Subhra Hazra to jdk8 Committer. Kurchi graduated from the University of Illinois, Urbana Champaign with a M.Sc. in Computer Science last summer, joining Oracle in July 2011 to work on the JDK with a focus on networking and libraries. To date Kurchi has contributed sev

Re: AIX and OpenJDK

On 01/02/2012 18:26, Volker Simonis wrote: I think the prerequisite for a port can not be that there exists access to it on "x86 hardware". With this constraint there will never be an OpenJDK port to other architectures like PPC/Itanium/ARM to name just a few. (By the way, there once upon a time

Re: Warning Fixes from LJC Hack Session

On 02/02/2012 09:05, Michael Barker wrote: Hi, Attached is a patch that was a result of our work at the LJC OpenJDK Hack session on Tuesday. They are all warning fixes, based on the same rules as the big warning cleanup day from last year. I rolled it up into a single patch, but I can split it

Re: AIX and OpenJDK

On 01/02/2012 16:40, Steve Poole wrote: I can see your point of view but the amount of work to support AIX is much lower than that for Mac - so I don't see the need. You obviously have some critieria in your head about port vs no port so I would be interested to understand that in more deta

Re: AIX and OpenJDK

On 01/02/2012 15:02, Tobias Frech wrote: Hi! The following might be inappropriate here, but I found it very surprising when I found out rt.jar contains platform specific code in the classes that are part of the API. I would have expected all of these special cases to be locked away in some sun.*

Re: AIX and OpenJDK

On 31/01/2012 10:49, Steve Poole wrote: hi all, Last year there was a discussion [1] about adding AIX platform support into OpenJDK. I'd like to pick up that conversation and complete this work. To recap the salient points of the thread: 1: The scale of the changes to support AIX withou

Re: Java User Group - Warnings clean-up hack day - 31st of Jan

On 31/01/2012 00:08, Stuart Marks wrote: : (Crap. I've just realized that I never pushed Deepak Bhole's java.text patches from December. To avoid conflicts, I'd suggest avoiding changes to src/share/classes/java/text. Other areas should be fair game.) Another one is java.util. Rémi provided a p

Re: CFV: New jdk8 Committer: Charles Lee

Vote: Abstain We clearly need to broaden the committer base. I have had some interaction with Charles on a few of the changes that were cited in the nomination mail. I would be happy to support his nomination to committer once he has built up a few more significant contributions.

Re: OpenJDK adoption by Java User Groups

On 09/12/2011 17:14, Jonathan Gibbons wrote: Stephen, I've browsed around the links for Clover. It looks very interesting, but it's not clear to me the constraints under which it operates. Note that OpenJDK uses jtreg for the publicly available regression tests, and that many of the tests re

Re: OpenJDK adoption by Java User Groups

On 09/12/2011 10:16, Martijn Verburg wrote: To add further to this, please send myself or Mike Barker any ideas you'd like to see tackled and we'll get them added to the list. There is an almost endless list of things that could be done. Along the lines of the warnings clean-up, then sorting th

Re: Review Request: Warnings cleanup in sun.management and its subpackages

On 07/12/2011 16:12, Kurchi Hazra wrote: : Hi Mandy, I ran the jdk_land and jdk_management tests from jdk/test folder with and without my changes. I get 8 failures. Is this normal? All the tests should pass. Does 8 failures mean the same test failing on 8 hardware/OS combinations or 8 dist

Re: Tests (Was Warnings Cleanup in java.util. (more from hack day))

On 03/12/2011 11:27, Martijn Verburg wrote: Hi all, So the recent warnings clean up exercise got me thinking about the approach we took and how we could make it safer by applying/running tests in some of these areas. I'm very new to the OpenJDK, but I figure there must be a suite of tests (for t

Re: Collections.enumeration() WAS Warning Cleanup Day

On 03/12/2011 12:37, Rémi Forax wrote: I've started to remove warnings from java.util and I'm not able to cleanly retrofit java.util.PropertyPermission because java.util.Collections.enumeration is wrongly typed. Rémi - you might want to sync up with Mike Duigou as I believe he has been working

Re: Warnings Cleanup in java.util. (more from hack day)

On 03/12/2011 00:49, John Rose wrote: : If you remove 900 warnings, there is a good chance of causing some sort of bug. ( http://blogs.oracle.com/jrose/entry/three_software_proverbs ) The 900 warnings may be masking other bugs, so we take the risk. Alexandre (Sasha) Boulgakov spent his summer