Baptiste/Jesse
Apologies if any of my comments come across as offensive. It was more out
of frustraion that our log ingestion for Jenkins masterslogs was broken by
an undocumented and unexpected change.
I've filed a Jira as above -
https://issues.jenkins-ci.org/browse/JENKINS-57888
Regards
On
This was indeed an undocumented feature you and possibly others were
relying on, this is it got broken without anyone realizing.
We are sorry about that, but so the right way to have this fixed is as
Jesse was saying: please file a JIRA to explain the use case so we can
possibly make a user-facing
Unfortunately Java dev is not my forte..
It's a shame this change was put in under the radar, with no changelog
entry and no documentation update to define the new log format :(
On Friday, June 7, 2019 at 8:46:05 PM UTC+1, Jesse Glick wrote:
>
> Well, you can work on a PR to add a supported
Well, you can work on a PR to add a supported log format option to
`jenkinsci/winstone`.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Jenkins Developers" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to
You're right that Jenkins doesn't provide details via help, but the method
is documented on the Jenkins wiki, and is a standard Java mechanism of
customising the logging output...
I can also see several mentions of the same method in this email thread...
However the changes introduced have
On Fri, Jun 7, 2019 at 6:23 AM 'Gavin Williams' via Jenkins Developers
wrote:
> Unfortunately this appears to have broken the ability to provide a custom log
> format :(
>
> See https://issues.jenkins-ci.org/browse/JENKINS-57888 for more info...
Seems like an RFE to me. `java -jar jenkins.war
Jesse
Unfortunately this appears to have broken the ability to provide a custom
log format :(
See https://issues.jenkins-ci.org/browse/JENKINS-57888 for more info...
Ideas?
Cheers
Gavin
On Thursday, April 11, 2019 at 12:27:45 AM UTC+1, Jesse Glick wrote:
>
> On Wed, Apr 4, 2018 at 8:18 PM
On Wed, Apr 4, 2018 at 8:18 PM Jesse Glick wrote:
> As to the concrete format to pick, I do not have a strong opinion but
> note that there is a compact one-line formatter in `support-core`
> (later copied to `jenkins-test-harness` as well).
https://github.com/jenkinsci/winstone/pull/63
--
You
As I have already said many times, I fully support this initiative.
Tomcat has done this move a while ago and it was a great success.
Cyrille
On Wednesday, April 4, 2018 at 3:18:00 PM UTC+2, Baptiste Mathus wrote:
>
> Hello everyone,
>
> Having worked on more things related to Jenkins logging
On Wed, Apr 11, 2018 at 11:18 AM, Jesse Glick wrote:
> 2018-04-11 15:15:56.836+ [id=37] INFO
> o.j.main.modules.sshd.SSHD#start: Started SSHD at port
>
Rrrgh, GMail line-wrapping without the RFC to preserve significant
newlines. Trying again as HTML:
2018-04-11
On Wed, Apr 11, 2018 at 10:01 AM, James Nord wrote:
> I think date should always come first though, not level and use a
> datetime format that does not have to cope with am/pm or crazy American date
> styles!
FTR the formatter in `support-core` produces output such as
> Anyone can easily change the logging format in Jenkins by passing custom
> J.U.L properties file.
I know at least one person that did!
+1 to change the default. I think date should always come first though,
not level and use a datetime format that does not have to cope with am/pm or
crazy
> On 5. Apr 2018, at 23:24, gsimpson via Jenkins Developers
> wrote:
>
> I am going to go ahead and strongly disagree with the characterization that
> changing the logging is easy. I may be the only one that has ever struggled
> with getting custom logging for
> On Wednesday, April 4, 2018 at 9:12:39 AM UTC-7, Oleg Nenashev wrote:
> Anyone can easily change the logging format in Jenkins by passing custom
J.U.L properties file.
>
I am going to go ahead and strongly disagree with the characterization that
changing the logging is easy. I may be the
> On 4. Apr 2018, at 21:20, Oleg Nenashev wrote:
>
> • We enable the new logging format in Essentials + immediately get
> benefit from it (e.g. via Logstash/fluentd)
> • We offer a feature flag in standard Jenkins. Start from opt-in, then
> maybe opt-out at
2018-04-04 18:12 GMT+02:00 Oleg Nenashev :
> Hi Baptiste,
>
> Anyone can easily change the logging format in Jenkins by passing custom
> J.U.L properties file.
>
Yes. But in practice, I'm convinced virtually nobody does this.
> So it should not be a problem to change
I think I already claimed my hate for this logging format many times.
For sure I understand Oleg's concern with the impact of changing the
default settings.
Like always for such kind of change when we don't really know how it could
impact our users I would prefer to introduce the change non
I'm +1 to change the format. 2 lines is really annoying
On Wed, Apr 4, 2018 at 7:24 PM, R. Tyler Croy wrote:
> (replies inline)
>
> On Wed, 04 Apr 2018, Oleg Nenashev wrote:
>
> > Hi Baptiste,
> >
> > Anyone can easily change the logging format in Jenkins by passing custom
(replies inline)
On Wed, 04 Apr 2018, Oleg Nenashev wrote:
> Hi Baptiste,
>
> Anyone can easily change the logging format in Jenkins by passing custom
> J.U.L properties file.
> So it should not be a problem to change logging format even if you do not
> add a custom logging appender for ELK.
> On 4. Apr 2018, at 18:12, Oleg Nenashev wrote:
>
> Changing a default logging format may cause regressions in existing
> monitoring systems. I would rather be conservative and keep the default
> logging format in Jenkins unless there is a strong justification to do
Hi Baptiste,
Anyone can easily change the logging format in Jenkins by passing custom
J.U.L properties file.
So it should not be a problem to change logging format even if you do not
add a custom logging appender for ELK.
Changing a default logging format may cause regressions in existing
Hello everyone,
Having worked on more things related to Jenkins logging recently, I've had
the opportunity to remember my past pain when I was operating a Jenkins
instance and sending logs to an ELK cluster.
Compared to almost everything else in the infrastructure, the logstash
rules for Jenkins
22 matches
Mail list logo