At 20:04 01/31/01, Raphal Luta wrote:
ingo schuster wrote:
Hi everybody,
did anybody submit a Jetspeed presentation for the ApacheCon? I just
realized that it would be very sad if nobody told the people that the
project has been revived...
Our team at IBM has been very busy the last
This email is autogenerated from the output from:
http://oss.software.ibm.com/developerworks/opensource/jakarta/proto/jetspeed.html
Buildfile: build\build.xml
prepare:
apis:
[java]
Santiago Gala wrote:
In my setup, using NAT and mod_jk, current Jetspeed is working right. I
think that if your reverse proxy is Apache, you could configure it to
connect to Jetspeed using APJ12/APJ13 connectors (that can be remote if
you want), and your problems will disappear.
As long
We have done some performance measurements, running JetSpeed on RS/6000
machines with one and with four processors. The 4-way machine's processors
are running about twice as fast as the 1-way's. Surprisingly, performance
seems to increase proportionally with the speed of the processors, but
Santiago Gala escribi:
Now I have a different problem: the (new) profiler does not create a
user directory neither falls back to the default psml. I'll check it.
fixed, please test
--
--
To subscribe:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
ingo schuster escribi:
At 18:44 01/31/01, Santiago Gala wrote:
ingo schuster escribi:
At 12:43 01/31/01, Jain, Deepak wrote:
Hi Ingo,
I implemented your changes then realised that this is not going to
work. The
URL class constructor which you have used
Raphal Luta escribi:
"W. Craig Trader" wrote:
Hi! I just loaded the latest Jetspeed (straight from CVS) and it looks
great. I set it up on my internal web/application server, and it runs
fine with one minor problem ... that makes the current incarnation utterly
useless.
For
Brian M. Long wrote:
my James mail server is running on my local machine. It seems to have
clobbered my other smtp client, so now i can't send or receive
e-mail unless
James is running (egad!).
begin
java.lang.ClassCastException: confirm.email.from doesn't map to a String
object
Santiago,
thanks for the detailed explanation, now I understand.
I was not concerned about the performance, but rather about potential
deadlocks.
It is good to hear that Turbine has already resolved the issue.
Best regards,
Thomas
Thomas Schaeck
IBM Pervasive Computing Division
Phone:
"Brian M. Long" escribi:
i have no idea what the rfc822 is. it's just showing up at the end of the
exception text in the monitor. i was hoping that someone who wrote the code
that throws the exception could tell me ;)
rfc822 is the specification of SMTP. (try somethings like
From: Jon Stevens [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, January 31, 2001 12:22 PM
If none of the proposals are accepted, I'm pretty sure that
there will be the ability to have a BOF session on Jetspeed.
It won't necessarily be official, but there is no reason why
we can't just
on 1/31/01 1:21 AM, "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The init method is synchronized - is there a particular reason for this ?
I looked at some other JetSpeed services, their init method was not
synchronized.
Best regards,
Thomas
There is no need to have the init() method
Raphal Luta escribi:
Ingo Rammer wrote:
Hi,
obviously you should insert the following line into
jetspeed/webapp/db/jetspeed.script
INSERT INTO TURBINE_ROLE VALUES(1,'authenticated_user',NULL)
Fixed in CVS as well as adding the confirm.* keys in JR.p.
Thanks for the debug
ingo schuster wrote:
At 20:36 01/31/01, Brian M. Long wrote:
hey folks.
where does the skin tag get generated in
/WEB-INF/psml/turbine/homeHTML.psml and the associated
/WEB-INF/psml/user/turbine/html/default.psml ?
basically what i'd like is for 2 different users to be able to have
At 10:20 02/01/01, Raphal Luta wrote:
Santiago Gala wrote:
In my setup, using NAT and mod_jk, current Jetspeed is working right. I
think that if your reverse proxy is Apache, you could configure it to
connect to Jetspeed using APJ12/APJ13 connectors (that can be remote if
you want), and
Santiago,
have a look at this site
http://www.javaworld.com/javaworld/javatips/jw-javatip42.html
there are some tips and hints about proxying java (especially the Follow-up
Tips)
Stephan
- Original Message -
From: "Santiago Gala" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: "JetSpeed" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ingo schuster wrote:
At 10:20 02/01/01, Raphal Luta wrote:
Santiago Gala wrote:
In my setup, using NAT and mod_jk, current Jetspeed is working right. I
think that if your reverse proxy is Apache, you could configure it to
connect to Jetspeed using APJ12/APJ13 connectors (that can
ingo schuster escribi:
At 10:20 02/01/01, Raphal Luta wrote:
Santiago Gala wrote:
In my setup, using NAT and mod_jk, current Jetspeed is working right. I
think that if your reverse proxy is Apache, you could configure it to
connect to Jetspeed using APJ12/APJ13 connectors (that
Something to be aware of: the "new" operator does a synchronize in many
JDKs.
- Sam Ruby
--
--
To subscribe:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Search:
Raphal Luta escribi:
I agree with most of your proposal. I think it is excelent, and we are
going the right direction to get something usable and workable.
Sorry for the delay in answering, but I wanted to understand it
completely before jumping in.
I like the way pull ideas are applied here.
Santiago Gala wrote:
Raphal Luta escribi:
In case you did not notice it yet, in the new layout proposal we use a pull
methodology, which means jetspeed has *no way* to know how many and which
panes will be included in a given template. I don't think this presents a
major issue but
At 13:48 02/01/01, Christophe Lombart wrote:
Hi All,
After a long Turbine study, I'm just starting with Jetspeed. So, sorry if
my question is really stupid or if it is a well know issue.
Is it possible to use Velocity or JSP for building my portlet view ? It
seems that no ! If I understand,
At 13:02 02/01/01, Santiago Gala wrote:
ingo schuster escribi:
At 10:20 02/01/01, Raphal Luta wrote:
Santiago Gala wrote:
In my setup, using NAT and mod_jk, current Jetspeed is working right. I
think that if your reverse proxy is Apache, you could configure it to
connect to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] escribi:
We have done some performance measurements, running JetSpeed on RS/6000
machines with one and with four processors. The 4-way machine's processors
are running about twice as fast as the 1-way's. Surprisingly, performance
seems to increase proportionally with the
Raphal Luta wrote ...
"W. Craig Trader" wrote:
For security, I use a web proxy (Apache) sitting in my DMZ to proxy actual
page requests to internal web/app servers. Unfortunately, Jetspeed is
generating web pages that specifically reference the complete internal
server name/port ... so
Raphal Luta escribi:
In case you did not notice it yet, in the new layout proposal we use a pull
methodology, which means jetspeed has *no way* to know how many and which
panes will be included in a given template. I don't think this presents a
major issue but you need to be aware of
Hi All,
After a long Turbine study, I'm just starting with Jetspeed. So, sorry if my
question is really stupid or if it is a well know issue.
Is it possible to use Velocity or JSP for building my portlet view ? It
seems that no ! If I understand, there is one specific portlet class used
for
What I suggest that you do is use a stock TR.props file as your basis and
then include= your JetspeedResources.props at the bottom. The JR.props file
will override the TR.props file settings.
thanks,
-jon
--
From: Java Apache CVS Development [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: "Java-Apache
What is "Together"?
Where is the license on this file?
-jon
--
From: Java Apache CVS Development [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: "Java-Apache Development" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2001 23:31:02 -0800 (PST)
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: CVS update:
Santiago,
thanks for confirming our observation.
Currently, we get all user data and the user PSMLs from IBM Secure Way
Directory Server (pretty scalable). Our traces/logs were switched off
during the performance measurements.
We are currently analyzing the trace staments across the
Craig Berry wrote:
From: Jon Stevens [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, January 31, 2001 12:22 PM
If none of the proposals are accepted, I'm pretty sure that
there will be the ability to have a BOF session on Jetspeed.
It won't necessarily be official, but there is no
Jon Stevens wrote:
on 1/31/01 12:53 AM, "Raphal Luta" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Yeah, that is just a paranoid check of mine because when the service was
written there was weird behavior with the service initialization order and
Rfal was working on the subject so I didn't want to
Its already fixed.
Keep reading further down your CVS update mailing list -- I caught that one
later too...
I will be doing some more work on this utility soon, I want to move the
mkdirs() stuff in the Profiler up into the utility.
Hope its not redundant, I searched thru Turbine but didnt find
McCabe, Steve wrote:
Hello,
Ive just installed Jetspeed on NT4 w/Tomcat-IIS (isapi)..but I can also hit
Tomcat directly using port 8080. I had Jetspeed up and running a few months
ago..but now Im on a different setup. When I hit the main page I get the
following error: (I noticed a few
on 2/1/01 1:33 AM, "Raphal Luta" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Now why did you move the PROPERTIES_PATH_KEY into TurbineServices rather than
TurbineResourceService ?
The latter is the only class which actually uses this constant and it's
definitely resources implementation related.
(there's also
We should probably do a BOF in addition to any official sessions that get
approved.
Another +1 here. I hope I will be able to go.
--
--
To subscribe:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
on 2/1/01 9:53 AM, "David Sean Taylor" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Its already fixed.
Keep reading further down your CVS update mailing list -- I caught that one
later too...
I will be doing some more work on this utility soon, I want to move the
mkdirs() stuff in the Profiler up into the
Raphal Luta wrote:
Jon Stevens wrote:
on 1/31/01 12:53 AM, "Raphal Luta" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Yeah, that is just a paranoid check of mine because when the service was
written there was weird behavior with the service initialization order and
Rfal was working on the subject so I
Thanks for the response. I stopped Tomcat, deleted everything
out of the Work folder and restarted...same error though.
Also, I searched the code for "keepgenerated" and it only
appears in jasper and tomcat files, so I don't think we can
set it in Jetspeed.
I didn't move any jars pursayI
At 21:10 02/01/01, Santiago Gala wrote:
We should probably do a BOF in addition to any official sessions that get
approved.
Another +1 here. I hope I will be able to go.
I won't be able to make it. :-( I will marry on April 7th - and I don't
want to risk that she changes her mind because I
Ingo,
I can't compile HTMLWriter.java, message:
jetspeed/src/java/org/apache/jetspeed/util/HTMLRewriter.java:346:52:346:81:
Error: No field named "IMPLIED" was found in type
"javax/swing/text/html/HTMLEditorKit$ParserCallback".
Which swing/java version is needed?
ingo.
--
This email is autogenerated from the output from:
http://oss.software.ibm.com/developerworks/opensource/jakarta/proto/jetspeed.html
HTTP/1.1 200 OK
Date: Fri, 02 Feb 2001 08:36:59 GMT
Yes,
I had the same problem.
Carlos.
ingo schuster wrote:
Ingo,
I can't compile HTMLWriter.java, message:
jetspeed/src/java/org/apache/jetspeed/util/HTMLRewriter.java:346:52:346:81:
Error: No field named "IMPLIED" was found in type
"javax/swing/text/html/HTMLEditorKit$ParserCallback".
43 matches
Mail list logo
