7-
> > February/011365.html
> > the idea was to add a new annotation `java.lang.annotation.Generated`
> > to replace the old problematic one.
> >
> > Is it my imagination, or did this get forgotten?:
> > http://download.java.net/java/jdk9/docs/api/java/lang/
> > annotation/package-summary.html
> >
> > Stephen
> >
>
idea was to add a new annotation `java.lang.annotation.Generated`
> to replace the old problematic one.
>
> Is it my imagination, or did this get forgotten?:
> http://download.java.net/java/jdk9/docs/api/java/lang/
> annotation/package-summary.html
>
> Stephen
>
On 20 September 2017 at 14:22, Alan Bateman wrote:
> That was the original suggestion but that package is more for annotations
> types that are used as meta annotations (@Native should have gone elsewhere
> but we can't change that now).
A point acknowledged by
http://mail.openjdk.java.net/piperm
On 20/09/2017 13:58, Stephen Colebourne wrote:
Ouch. Thats an unpleasant result. It should have gone in `java.lang.annotation`.
Stephen
That was the original suggestion but that package is more for
annotations types that are used as meta annotations (@Native should have
gone elsewhere but we c
/2017 13:43, Stephen Colebourne wrote:
>>>
>>> As per this email:
>>>
>>> http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/jigsaw-dev/2017-February/011365.html
>>> the idea was to add a new annotation `java.lang.annotation.Generated`
>>> to rep
n 20/09/2017 13:43, Stephen Colebourne wrote:
> >>
> >> As per this email:
> >>
> >> http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/jigsaw-dev/2017-
> February/011365.html
> >> the idea was to add a new annotation `java.lang.annotation.Generated`
> &
v/2017-February/011365.html
>> the idea was to add a new annotation `java.lang.annotation.Generated`
>> to replace the old problematic one.
>>
>> Is it my imagination, or did this get forgotten?:
>>
>
> The discussion/review moved to core-libs-dev and compiler-dev
On Wed, Sep 20, 2017 at 7:49 AM, Alan Bateman wrote:
> On 20/09/2017 13:43, Stephen Colebourne wrote:
>>
>> As per this email:
>>
>> http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/jigsaw-dev/2017-February/011365.html
>> the idea was to add a new annotation `java.lang.an
On 20/09/2017 13:43, Stephen Colebourne wrote:
As per this email:
http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/jigsaw-dev/2017-February/011365.html
the idea was to add a new annotation `java.lang.annotation.Generated`
to replace the old problematic one.
Is it my imagination, or did this get
As per this email:
http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/jigsaw-dev/2017-February/011365.html
the idea was to add a new annotation `java.lang.annotation.Generated`
to replace the old problematic one.
Is it my imagination, or did this get forgotten?:
http://download.java.net/java/jdk9/docs/api
10 matches
Mail list logo
