[jQuery] Re: SlickSpeed CSS Selector TestSuite

Glen Lipka wrote: This topic comes up every time a speed test emerges. To me, speed is totally irrelevant in most circumstances that I use jQuery. Speed of Development is most important. if I can finish my job faster then the user will be happier. If they have to wait 1/10 of a second longer

[jQuery] Re: SlickSpeed CSS Selector TestSuite

Well said Glen. I would have to agree that these tests are for the most part totally irrelevant with regards to most usage. Anyways, I would still use jQuery even if it was 30k. That is still very small compared to a the image file sizes that are used in highly designed/styled web sites. I no

[jQuery] Re: SlickSpeed CSS Selector TestSuite

Well said. That about sums it up for me. _ From: jquery-en@googlegroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Glen Lipka Sent: Tuesday, June 12, 2007 11:08 AM To: jquery-en@googlegroups.com Subject: [jQuery] Re: SlickSpeed CSS Selector TestSuite This topic comes up every time a spe

[jQuery] Insert new div into existing div

In looking at the DOM manipulation commands I'm not clear on the best way to insert a div into an existing div. More specifically I need to do something like this: Start with an empty div Insert a div... ... <-- inserted And another ... ... ... <-- inserted etc. I want every inser

[jQuery] Re: jEditable on blank field

It is an known issue. I have a solution for it but have not implemented it yet. Solution would be to dynamically add a string such as "Click to edit" to an empty element. String would be configurable. This way you have something to click even if element was empty. Any other ideas are wel

[jQuery] Re: SlickSpeed CSS Selector TestSuite

This topic comes up every time a speed test emerges. To me, speed is totally irrelevant in most circumstances that I use jQuery. Speed of Development is most important. if I can finish my job faster then the user will be happier. If they have to wait 1/10 of a second longer, they will not be hea

[jQuery] Google AdSense slowing down jQuery (1.1.2) rules in IE6

I just find some weird problem with Google AdSense. It's specific to IE6 (IE7 not tested), in FF 2 working fine. Google AdSense slows down jQuery rules matching--i.e., it's wait for all the ad images to get loaded. I suppose, "ready" fails here. While googling, I came across similar discussion

[jQuery] XML selectors not working in > 1.1.2 ?

Using the Ext JS DateField which exposes a bug with 1.1.2 that prevents navigation beyond a month. They suggest using a release > 1.1.2 as the bug has been resolved. Problem is the following code (simplified for this example) no longer works: function xmlFromStr(text){ if (typeof DOMPar

[jQuery] Weird IE6 issue...

I've got a weird IE6 issue. I'm creating a DOM fragment that gets appended to the DOM using the append() method. Before that DOM method gets append, I'm doing some additional manipulation to change the value of some form fields. If I output the contends of alert(oDom.html()); I can see that my c

[jQuery] Re: SlickSpeed CSS Selector TestSuite

On Tuesday, June 12, 2007 7:25 AM Rey Bango <> said: > With that said, its definitely our turn to get things ramped up but > we're kind of in a quandary. See, one of the benefits of jQuery is its > very small file size. We're still the smallest library out there and > our overall functionality is

[jQuery] Re: ImageBox by Matthieu Paineau

John just IM'd me and he said you should be all set. Look forward to seeing some awesome work on ImageBox Matthieu. Rey... mpaineau wrote: Hi, i'm volunteer but John didn't create yet my SVN access... so i'm waiting... On May 30, 9:27 pm, Rey Bango <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Matthieu Paine

[jQuery] Re: ImageBox by Matthieu Paineau

Hi, i'm volunteer but John didn't create yet my SVN access... so i'm waiting... On May 30, 9:27 pm, Rey Bango <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Matthieu Paineau said that he wanted to continue to support it and would > be committing changes to SVN. I'm not sure, though, how he's coming > along with t

[jQuery] Re: Possible to intercept enter/return key?

This should do the trick: $("yourSelector").keydown(function(e){ if (e.keyCode == 13) { $("yourSelector").submit(); } }); -Marshall Arne-Kolja Bachstein wrote: Hi there,   is it possible to bind a keydown event to intercept the enter/return key? I have a form that i

[jQuery] Possible to intercept enter/return key?

Hi there, is it possible to bind a keydown event to intercept the enter/return key? I have a form that is submitted manually and does not have form tags around it (can't do this, restriction of the cms I am using). and now it - of course - doesn't react with a "start search" when hitting return

[jQuery] Re: Problem accessing jQuery Documentation website

Ahh, yes it's working normally now. Cheers. -Michael- On Jun 12, 6:02 pm, "Rob Desbois" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I saw it too, although problem vanished after 5 minutes ish. >

[jQuery] Re: @Glen Lipka: jQuery to Prototype? (Was Re: jQuery dimScreen)

I believe it is a vertical line that goes down the middle of the zoomed image. In a previous post, there were suggestions of how to fix this. One day, I or someone will get around to fixing it. I believe it should also be fixed to use the same HTML markup as the prototype one. This allows for be

[jQuery] Re: Macrumors running live udpates of WWDC

Mike, >This didn't work for me. Did anyone get the debug menu working on Windows >yet? It worked for me, but the file isn't created until the first time you run Safari. -Dan

[jQuery] Re: jquery documentation as xml?

Is the documentation's raw content available somewhere online? Yes it is, on the API page: http://jquery.com/api/ You find a link to many versions of the api, like XML and JSON. ~Sean

[jQuery] Re: Macrumors running live udpates of WWDC

Klaus Hartl schrieb: Shelane Enos wrote: Actually, I did manage to install Safari 3 and maintain Safari 2. To do this, you have to "copy" Safari 2 into another folder in the applications when i'm not totally wrong: safari 3 adds some basic libs to your OSX so keeping them side by side is pr

[jQuery] Re: Macrumors running live udpates of WWDC

Shelane Enos wrote: Actually, I did manage to install Safari 3 and maintain Safari 2. To do this, you have to "copy" Safari 2 into another folder in the applications folder (I made one called Safari2). So Safari 2 exists in both the folder and the Applications folder. Then I ran the installer

[jQuery] Re: Macrumors running live udpates of WWDC

I don't know if order matters, but I kept all the elements in alphabetical order when adding this. I inserted it between IEFavoritesWereImported and InputFieldWidthRatio. -Matt On Jun 12, 2007, at 8:16 AM, Franck Marcia wrote: Yes, I did. I applied Matt's tip, restarted Safari and the d

[jQuery] Re: SlickSpeed CSS Selector TestSuite

Rey Bango wrote: Hi Robert, Thats precisely the reason that its slower. We continue to work on providing the most comprehensive functionality in the smallest package. This is one of the drawbacks of that approach. Rey... Robert O'Rourke wrote: > Is Jquery slower because it's more compact

[jQuery] Re: jquery.com is down

If you need documenation, this might help. http://jquery.bassistance.de/api-browser/ > > FWIW, the "visual jQuery" site is down as well: >

[jQuery] Re: Macrumors running live udpates of WWDC

Yes, I did. I applied Matt's tip, restarted Safari and the debug menu appeared right after the help menu. Franck. On 12 juin, 17:05, "Mike Alsup" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > This didn't work for me. Did anyone get the debug menu working on Windows > yet? > > Mike > > On 6/12/07, Matt Vanderpo

[jQuery] Re: Macrumors running live udpates of WWDC

Actually, I did manage to install Safari 3 and maintain Safari 2. To do this, you have to "copy" Safari 2 into another folder in the applications folder (I made one called Safari2). So Safari 2 exists in both the folder and the Applications folder. Then I ran the installer, which replaced the S

[jQuery] Re: SlickSpeed CSS Selector TestSuite

I agree. I don't want to see jQuery get bloated, but if it was between the two options of "Keep it < 20kb but slower" or "Go to 25-30kb and get major improvements" I'd vote for number two. I'd only go for number one if there was really going to be little improvement to any of the changes. One

[jQuery] Re: jquery.com is down

On Jun 12, 10:57 am, "John Resig" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Yeah, the server was having some difficulties, it should be back up in a > minute. > > --John > > On 6/12/07, traunic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > Same here, another DOS attack? But then the ping would fail right? FWIW, the

[jQuery] Re: Macrumors running live udpates of WWDC

This didn't work for me. Did anyone get the debug menu working on Windows yet? Mike On 6/12/07, Matt Vanderpol <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Per a comment on Slashdot (http://apple.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=238141&cid=19468947) open %APPDATA%\Apple Computer\Safari\Preferences.plist in your f

[jQuery] Re: SlickSpeed CSS Selector TestSuite

Great post, Felix! Very well said. What does this mean? It means that jQuery is nowhere as slow as the final test results make it appear (26x slower then mootools). It means that mootools got the performance lead in some specific selector (and does good in general) which is given way too much

[jQuery] Re: jquery.com is down

Yeah, the server was having some difficulties, it should be back up in a minute. --John On 6/12/07, traunic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Same here, another DOS attack? But then the ping would fail right?

[jQuery] Re: SlickSpeed CSS Selector TestSuite

On 6/12/07, Rey Bango <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:- We can increase selector speeds at the expense of file size How about looking at this specifically a little closer? It's already been pointed out that jQuery could get a lot bigger and /still/ remain the smallest library. So, the question is why 2

[jQuery] Re: jquery.com is down

Same here, another DOS attack? But then the ping would fail right?

[jQuery] Re: SlickSpeed CSS Selector TestSuite

Well here is my personal (and widely uneducated) opinion on this speed test. First what I think is good about it: * each framework get's it's own iframe - avoid conflicts between them * the test itself is written without using a framework What I think is bad about it: * There are 3 nt

[jQuery] Re: SlickSpeed CSS Selector TestSuite

Rey Bango wrote: So at the end of the day, it comes down to this: - We can increase selector speeds at the expense of file size or - We can continue to focus on providing tight code in a small package and take what is arguably a small hit in speed I've had no issues at all with JQuery's pe

[jQuery] Re: SlickSpeed CSS Selector TestSuite

Speaking as somebody who had not even considered using javascript, because of a complete and utter lack of knowledge of its inner workings, the major reasons for selecting jquery as a tool of choice were 1. it is readily understandable (once you have taken the time to read the documentation and u

[jQuery] Re: SlickSpeed CSS Selector TestSuite

Hi Robert, Thats precisely the reason that its slower. We continue to work on providing the most comprehensive functionality in the smallest package. This is one of the drawbacks of that approach. Rey... Robert O'Rourke wrote: > Is Jquery slower because it's more compact then? ie. better f

[jQuery] Re: SlickSpeed CSS Selector TestSuite

Rey Bango schrieb: One of the reasons that these libraries have made substantial improvements has been that jQuery has lead the pack in terms of [...] if i have to parse alot #selectors i could easily swap to "jquery-steroids.js" or sth. like this but would the meintainers be able to keep bo

[jQuery] Re: SlickSpeed CSS Selector TestSuite

Don't we have a plugin which might allay some of the speed concerns? I'm LOVING the fact that jQuery is 19k, BUT even if it were to bump up to 25k or 30k, it would STILL be the smallest overall library. And honestly, these days, people spend 100k just on one IMAGE, which doesn't even provide any

[jQuery] Re: SlickSpeed CSS Selector TestSuite

Michael Stuhr wrote: my results: FF 2.0.0.4 WinXP-SP2 http://onenterframe.de/temp/ micha Is Jquery slower because it's more compact then? ie. better for light usage? I much prefer the syntax and the community around jquery. I never got any helpful responses from anyone on the mootools for

[jQuery] Re: SlickSpeed CSS Selector TestSuite

One of the reasons that these libraries have made substantial improvements has been that jQuery has lead the pack in terms of innovation and our efforts have motivated them to finally improve their frameworks. Prototype is probably the best example of this, having been forced to finally forma

[jQuery] Re: SlickSpeed CSS Selector TestSuite

It's crazy how much faster Prototype, MooTools and ext are. -Original Message- From: jquery-en@googlegroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Michael Stuhr Sent: Tuesday, June 12, 2007 9:14 AM To: jquery-en@googlegroups.com Subject: [jQuery] Re: SlickSpeed CSS Selector TestSuite

[jQuery] Re: SlickSpeed CSS Selector TestSuite

Andy Matthews schrieb: It's by the people who "won" the testing, so that makes it just a little suspect. This is probably just like the testing from about 6 months back in which the jQuery library was several versions older than the most recent. That said, here's what I got: IE 7.0.57/PC --

[jQuery] Re: SlickSpeed CSS Selector TestSuite

It's by the people who "won" the testing, so that makes it just a little suspect. This is probably just like the testing from about 6 months back in which the jQuery library was several versions older than the most recent. That said, here's what I got: IE 7.0.57/PC - prototype 1.5

[jQuery] Re: SlickSpeed CSS Selector TestSuite

Bil Corry wrote on 6/12/2007 6:43 AM: - SlickSpeed is a CSS selector test suite provided by the MooTools folk. This tool comes at the same time as they release CSS3 support in Mootools, and it compares Prototype, jQuery, MooTools, Ext, and CSS Query.

[jQuery] SlickSpeed CSS Selector TestSuite

- SlickSpeed is a CSS selector test suite provided by the MooTools folk. This tool comes at the same time as they release CSS3 support in Mootools, and it compares Prototype, jQuery, MooTools, Ext, and CSS Query. - - Bi

[jQuery] Re: Validate RC2 Preview: Remember The Milk Signup

Give it a try, your feedback is priceless. I choosed your validation plugin amongs all others. My goal is to share client side and server side validation rules. I mean that I want validation to be done on client side, but when data is submitted on server, the same check should be done once aga

[jQuery] Re: Macrumors running live udpates of WWDC

Mike Alsup wrote: I'm *really* excited to be able to run Safari on Windows, but has anyone used this beta? I've never seen anything render so slowly. It's entirely unusable on my XP box. It seems that reports of success w/this in XP and Vista are all over the place. Apple's bringing beta b

[jQuery] Re: jquery form plugin - double action (fadein) problem

Thanks Mike! Working really nice now. jquery rocks :) best reards, sławek

[jQuery] Re: jquery form plugin - double action (fadein) problem

Yeah, it's certainly open to interpretation. As currently implemented it mimics the jQuery load method and so the behavior is the same for something like this: $('myTargets').load('myUrl', function() { alert('ok'); }); In the above you would get an alert for every matching target. But to me t

[jQuery] Re: Autcomplete function help

Sebastian, Look at the following example: http://www.pengoworks.com/workshop/jquery/autocomplete.htm View the source code and look at the lookupAjax() and lookupLocal() functions. You could call these functions during the onblur event to check the value. Just remember that is an asynch

[jQuery] Re: jquery form plugin - double action (fadein) problem

Mike, >I see the problem. It's an issue with how the success handler is >called from the form plugin. When you specify a target element the >success callback is being invoked once for every matching element. >This is not correct and I will need to fix it. In the meantime, you >can mod your cod

[jQuery] Re: Slightly OT: javascript and AJAX response 'concurrency'

Hi Rob, JS is single-threaded so it's not possible for the callback to be invoked before the current function has completed executing (unless, as I said, you force the sync behavior). Mike On 6/12/07, Rob Desbois <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Great, thanks. How do you know this - is it part of

[jQuery] Re: jquery form plugin - double action (fadein) problem

I see the problem. It's an issue with how the success handler is called from the form plugin. When you specify a target element the success callback is being invoked once for every matching element. This is not correct and I will need to fix it. In the meantime, you can mod your code like this

[jQuery] Re: jquery.com is down

I can confirm I can't access the site either, however I am able to ping the site: PING www.jquery.com (66.199.227.42) 56(84) bytes of data. 64 bytes from 66-199-227-42.reverse.ezzi.net (66.199.227.42): icmp_seq=1 ttl=46 time=101 ms 64 bytes from 66-199-227-42.reverse.ezzi.net (66.199.227.42): icm

[jQuery] jquery.com is down

For your information, the jquery.com server is down, since a few hours. Hope it's nothing serious alex Ce message Envoi est certifié sans virus connu. Analyse effectuée par AVG. Version: 7.5.472 / Base de données virus: 269.8.13/844 - Date: 11/06/2007 17:10

[jQuery] Re: Slightly OT: javascript and AJAX response 'concurrency'

Great, thanks. How do you know this - is it part of the ECMAScript specification or is there some other reference you can point me too? --rob On 6/12/07, Mike Alsup <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: It's guaranteed as long as you don't force a synchronous call using the async option. Mike On 6/12

[jQuery] Re: Slightly OT: javascript and AJAX response 'concurrency'

It's guaranteed as long as you don't force a synchronous call using the async option. Mike On 6/12/07, Rob Desbois <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I have a function which generates an AJAX request to retrieve information. The display of this information requires modification of the interface - the

[jQuery] Slightly OT: javascript and AJAX response 'concurrency'

I have a function which generates an AJAX request to retrieve information. The display of this information requires modification of the interface - the structure of the function is roughly: function getInfo() { do AJAX request, success callback is onAjaxResponse setup interface to display

[jQuery] Re: Problem accessing jQuery Documentation website

I saw it too, although problem vanished after 5 minutes ish. On 6/12/07, Michael Andreas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Oh my.. http://groups.google.com/group/jquery-en/browse_thread/thread/2fb8eb9152b705ef It's happening again today (2007-06-12 09:45Z). I got the message "jQuery JavaScript Lib

[jQuery] Re: jQuery, Ajax Form and memory usage

Hi Vivi, Do you have a sample page so we can see this in action? On 6/12/07, Vivi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Up on this issue :)

[jQuery] Re: Macrumors running live udpates of WWDC

nothing works as expected on my box (xp+sp2), google is broken, and text doesn't display on most of the pages (it only actually appeared on one page - google.com).. and there's no text in the menus.. it seems like they rushed this beta a bit.. dennis. Felix Geisendörfer wrote: On an (un)rel

[jQuery] Re: jquery form plugin - double action (fadein) problem

link to sample: http://www.torli.pl/fadein/index.html lockman

[jQuery] Problem accessing jQuery Documentation website

Oh my.. http://groups.google.com/group/jquery-en/browse_thread/thread/2fb8eb9152b705ef It's happening again today (2007-06-12 09:45Z). I got the message "jQuery JavaScript Library has a problem" over at Documentation (http://docs.jquery.com/). The main site (http://jquery.com/) isn't affected cu

[jQuery] jquery form plugin - double action (fadein) problem

link to sample page: http://www.torli.pl/fadein/index.html Wrocław Non Stop - eksplozja kultury we Wrocławiu! 22 czerwca - 1 lipca 2007. W ramach festiwalu wystąpią m.in. Iggy Pop & The Stooges! wwW.wroclawnonstop.pl http://klik.wp.pl/?adr=h

[jQuery] Re: jquery form plugin - double action (fadein) problem

link to sample page: http://www.torli.pl/fadein/index.html ROLLING STONES - A BIGGER BANG Warszawa Służewiec 25 lipca 2007 r. http://klik.wp.pl/?adr=http%3A%2F%2Fadv.reklama.wp.pl%2Fas%2Frollingstones.html&sid=1186

[jQuery] Re: jquery form plugin - double action (fadein) problem

sample page: http://www.torli.pl/fadein/index.html

[jQuery] Re: jquery form plugin - double action (fadein) problem

link to sample page with the problem: www.torli.pl/fadein/index.html

[jQuery] Re: jquery form plugin - double action (fadein) problem

the problem is visualized at http://www.torli.pl/fadein/index.html

[jQuery] Re: jQuery, Ajax Form and memory usage

Up on this issue :)

[jQuery] Re: jquery form plugin - double action (fadein) problem

sample code of this problem is here: http://www.torli.pl/fadein/index.html

[jQuery] Re: jquery form plugin - double action (fadein) problem

here is a link to my fadein problem: http://www.torli.pl/fadein/index.html best regards sk

[jQuery] Re: Macrumors running live udpates of WWDC

On an (un)related note: Is anybody having rendering quirks with the Safari 3 beta on Win XP? I just noticed that a couple sites of mine that I thought would render well in Safari are messed up. Even Google Ads seems to be affected. Anybody with similar problems? -- Felix PS: Click on the lin

[jQuery] Re: :contains - a bit more specific?

Thanks Erik, it works great! :) > $('div.commentfooter > span').filter(function() { return $(this).html() == > 'test'; }).append('class'); ---dominik

[jQuery] Re: @Glen Lipka: jQuery to Prototype? (Was Re: jQuery dimScreen)

On Jun 11, 7:36 pm, "Glen Lipka" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > No, I was really annoyed to have to put that in. > The guy I helped produce the site insisted on switching. > > I was going to put in the jQuery version of lightbox, but it has an issue > with FF for the Mac (which of course my friend u

[jQuery] Re: Macrumors running live udpates of WWDC

Mike Alsup wrote: I'm *really* excited to be able to run Safari on Windows, but has anyone used this beta? I've never seen anything render so slowly. It's entirely unusable on my XP box. It is also totally annoying that you can't run Safari 3 beta and 2 side by side on a Mac... grrr, App

[jQuery] jquery documentation as xml?

Hello friends, i'm considering developing a small standalone app to access the jquery doc. Is the documentation's raw content available somewhere online? Thank you, Alexandre Alexandre Plennevaux - LAb[au] asbl.vzw / MediaRuimte Lakensestraat/Rue de Laeken 104 B-1000 Brussel-Bruxelles-B

[jQuery] IE7 and WinXP

Hi all, I have a simple page with some options and an ajax call made to update a div based on what options were chosen. This is on our intranet so only have to worry one browser (IE). This worked fine on windows 2000 pro and IE6; however since we got new computers with winxp and IE7, the ajax bi

<    1   2