On Jul 29, 6:49 pm, "Rick Faircloth" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> An equitable system would have to be worked out, but no one
> who contributes would have been excluded...
The Debian team recently (some months ago) got into a political pickle
when they *hired* a release manager. The fact that any
On Jul 29, 2:40 am, "John Resig" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> My primary concern is that it isn't open, nor does it foster a
> community that promotes openness.
Another concern about a subscription service is that it could very
well offend the plugin authors who write the code but don't get part
Hi, all!
i just came across this by accident and thought it might interest some
plugin author enough to write a similar feature for jQuery:
http://imdb.com/title/tt0084787/faq
scroll way down, or search for "Are there any deleted scenes for this
movie?", and look for the red text which says "Sp
On Jul 28, 3:33 am, "Glen Lipka" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> http://commadot.com/?p=581
>
> I would love your thoughts on it.
To quote that post:
"First of all, I would only have to test ONE browser, regardless of
whether you used IE, FF, or Safari."
To play devil's advocate for a moment...
T
On Jul 28, 7:54 pm, Stephan Beal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> can find. The New Topic button is unfortunately not available when
> reading a post (it's only visible from the list-of-posts view).
i lied - it does show up as a normal link in the top/right of the
page. When in
On Jul 28, 7:18 pm, "Mitchell Waite" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have no idea how that happened, but I will be more careful. BTW I try to
> snip out chunks of text but I am not perfect, and so are a lot of other
> people here.
Sorry, i wasn't picking on you about top-posting or non-snipping.
On Jul 28, 6:52 pm, Klaus Hartl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On the other hand, stating that a plugin gets tested in only one of the
> mayor browsers and that you the author don't care much about other
> browsers doesn't motivate users much to use the plugin!
A very fair point. That goes back to
On Jul 28, 6:49 pm, Stephan Beal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The top post of this thread was from Nicolas Hoizey and is about a
> completely different topic:
>
> From: Nicolas Hoizey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Ken Burns effects using jQuery?
And then suddenly:
On Jul 28, 5:59 pm, "Mitchell Waite" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I started this thread myself, how is that hijacking?
The top post of this thread was from Nicolas Hoizey and is about a
completely different topic:
From: Nicolas Hoizey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2007 23:12:51 +0200
Loc
On Jul 28, 5:55 pm, Rey Bango <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> My advice to all who are concerned about this is to engage the plugin
> authors in some way to motivate them to update their work. If they don't
> want to, then consider adopting the plugin and enhancing it. That's
> happened on several oc
On Jul 28, 5:13 pm, Rey Bango <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
...
> plugin authors, a chance to see if anything breaks. And the code is in
> SVN so there's no reason for someone to not be able to test it.
That's a key phrase, "to not BE ABLE to test it." Certainly authors
are able, but we must recogni
On Jul 28, 1:30 am, "Mitchell Waite" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have this small script that shows and hides a button when you mouse over a
Mitchell, please, for the second time, DO NOT HIJACK THREADS!!! This
is at least the 3rd time i've seen you do it in the past few days!
When you have a qu
On Jul 28, 11:35 am, Christof Donat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> > If you want to call a method of a CLASS
> > then yes it will work because 'this' is then no longer tied to a
> > specific OBJECT.
>
> Yes, it is. It is tied to the "class object", which is the constructor
> function object
On Jul 28, 3:06 pm, "Rick Faircloth" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> We need some kind of system where plug-ins are tested and deemed
> compatible with this version or that version of the core and not with
> some other version.
>
> An automated system that checks for compatibility and dependencies.
On Jul 28, 2:53 am, Klaus Hartl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Jeffrey, this is exactly what I was thinking... So now does it work or not?
"Jein."
If you want to call a method of an OBJECT, it won't work because you
need a reference to THAT object (which you can encapsulate in a
closure/anonymous
On Jul 28, 3:11 am, "Rick Faircloth" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> What does everyone do to stay updated with the latest jQuery and plug-ins
> for every website?
Once you have a site working with your copy of jQ, there is no reason
to update it unless you find that it has a new feature you need or
On Jul 27, 7:11 pm, "Michael Geary" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Sorry to be a party pooper, but what happens if you call $s from inside a
> function, using replacement variables that are local to that function? How
> will the "eval" see those variables?
You can, to the best of my knowledge, eval
On Jul 27, 5:48 pm, Christof Donat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > so what is the proper syntax for calling this named function for that
> > change event?
>
> $(this).change(myfunction);
To expand on that a small bit: if you want to call a method of an
object then you must create an anonymous func
On Jul 27, 1:43 pm, Maggi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Ganeshji!
>
> You could create an overlay background div with 100% in height and
> width and write a small jQuery code for that.
The problem with this approach is that this consumes the click, such
that if the user clicks on another clicka
On Jul 27, 12:09 pm, weepy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> $s = function(s) {
> p = s.replace(/#{/g, "' + eval(").replace(/}/g, ") + '")
> p = "'" + p + "'"
> return eval(p)
> }
i almost went cross-eyed matching up the ' and " chars in that
s.replace() call. It's almost as readable as Perl cod
On Jul 27, 9:23 am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Happy to share this plugin!
> It is base on Klaus's tab plugin.http://www.twe-market.com/tab/#remote-tab-4
Nice :). Two comments:
a) In Firefox, the Download link is almost completely hidden/covered
up by the tabs.
b) i would recommend renaming you
Hi, Mike!
Something not directly related to your problem, but maybe helpful
nonetheless...
you can chain a lot of these calls to make them run faster. As it is
written now, you are forcing jQ to repeat a few of the searches
several times...
On Jul 27, 1:54 am, mcraig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Jul 26, 11:19 pm, Aaron <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> ok si i tried different ways of the above code with the
> if( $j('#SpeakerDIV').length ) but i can not seem to figure out how to
> get it to work.
i don't personally use either of the plugins you're working with, so i
can't say too much more
On Jul 26, 6:37 pm, "Mitchell Waite" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This going will make me sound really dumb but what is the difference between
> using single quote versus double quotes in jQuery, e.g.
Mitchel, PLEASE don't hijack other people's threads to post a
question. Start a new thread! Thre
On Jul 26, 4:48 pm, Aaron <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Is there a way to have it work if there is an element but if no
> element on the page dont throw an error?
a) hack the plugin source code
or
b) add a hidden accordion-compatible element to pages which don't
normally have one (that would be an
On Jul 25, 8:15 pm, andreas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Didn't have time to go over the posts in the group and i would
> appreciate answers/tips cause i need to deploy an app. based heavily
> on async calls and custom headers will be required in many occasions.
In the future i would recommend ly
On Jul 25, 5:03 pm, Aaron <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> jQuery(":first-child", this)[0] has no properties
...
> [Break on this error] header: jQuery(':first-child', this)
> [0].tagName // take first childs tagName ...
As i understand it (possibly incorrectly), the problem is that :first-
child is
On Jul 25, 4:37 pm, Aaron <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Can someone please help?
...
> But this still is not working and giving me an error. If i use just
> one of them they work fine but when i try and use both of them i get
> this javascript error.
> 0.tagname is null or not an object
Can you po
On Jul 25, 5:08 am, "Mike Alsup" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ok, these change are now available:
Did anyone else notice that the time between this post and Mike's
"I'll add this to the cycle plugin" post was only 19 minutes? So much
for "an evening's work" ;). Mike: if you decide to accept the p
On Jul 25, 12:41 am, "Mitchell Waite" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I know this is trivial but what it turned out I needed was something this
> simple
>
> jQuery.fn.toggleVis = function() {
>
> if(chesireCat.style.visibility == 'hidden') {
>
>chesireCat.style.visibility = 'visib
On Jul 24, 5:25 pm, "Glen Lipka" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> $("p").toggle(function(){
> $(this).addClass("selected");
> someVar = true;},function(){
>
> $(this).removeClass("selected");
> someVar = false;
>
> });
Instead of setting someVar, can't $(element).is("selected") be used?
On Jul 24, 5:23 pm, "Dan G. Switzer, II" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> However, plug-ins that don't need to return a specific value should be
> returning a jQuery reference so the chain doesn't break. The plug-ins that
> *do* break the chain should be clearly stated as doing such.
That's a questi
On Jul 24, 12:02 pm, "Rob Desbois" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The one problem with this is that these handlers are not fired for any of
> the tabs when they are initially setup with .tabs(), so I would suggest that
> this be done once they are setup - call onHide for the inactive tabs and
> onSh
Hi, all!
There's a new release of the Confirmer plugin:
Plugin description:
"Confirmer implements a novel approach to the process of confirming an
action. Normally this is achieved via a yes/no dialog box or a button
with a "confirm" checkbox next to it. The Confirmer plugin instead
sets up a si
On Jul 23, 9:07 pm, textdriven <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> If you look at the following page you'll see that the photonews letter
> works fine in IE (loads newsletters in Thickbox) and also work for all
> the other pages that use it...
>
> http://kadampa.org/en/centers/kmc-france/
>
> Except for
On Jul 23, 4:27 pm, Giovanni Battista Lenoci <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> > In short: any PHP version under 5.2 won't be supported much longer by
> > many leading PHP applications/frameworks.
>
> This is not the truth, this site suggest to make the transition to php5
> as soon as possible cause
On Jul 23, 10:37 am, Stephan Beal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Jul 23, 1:41 am, Rhapidophyllum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > I'm simply looking for a stable menu plugin. Of the various menu
> > plugins available, which are most commonly used/most stable?
On Jul 23, 11:27 am, "Rob Desbois" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> What is this definition of the === operator you are referring to? I'm
> unaware of it having ever been defined as a reference comparison, and having
> read the relevant part of the ECMA Script specification yesterday I'm
> certain it
On Jul 23, 1:41 am, Rhapidophyllum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm simply looking for a stable menu plugin. Of the various menu
> plugins available, which are most commonly used/most stable?
There are unfortunately no real metrics for this, so i'm GUESSING here
based on how many posts i see on
On Jul 23, 9:26 am, Klaus Hartl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> But that doesn't make any difference. It would still overwrite a
> property named "target" of the jQuery object.
Ah, i now see what you mean. Yes, that would of course be a danger.
> You have to know jQuery very well to not accidently
On Jul 23, 4:06 am, Dave Methvin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> All of those results make sense.
>
> > "print( (new String('foo') === new String('foo')))"
> > false
>
> Those are two different objects, even though they have the same value;
> object1 !== object2 by definition of the === operator.
Ag
On Jul 23, 12:53 am, "Rob Desbois" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
...
> So theoretically:
>
> > if (typeof someUndefined == 'fuzzyDuck')
>
> should return true also. I won't try it now but see what happens!
It's turning my brain all wahoonie-shaped, but here's what it looks
like:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~
On Jul 22, 11:57 pm, Klaus Hartl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> IMHO it is bad practice to store that element in the self, i.e. jQuery,
> object.
...
> A simple var should be sufficient.
>
> jQuery.fn.myPlugin = function(targetField) {
> var textfield = jQuery(targetField);
> ...
>
> };
A
On Jul 22, 8:15 pm, "Rob Desbois" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Stephan,
> The only time that == or != should be used (IMO anyway) is when you
> explicitly *want* type conversion to take place. Otherwise, it's safest (and
> faster) to use === or !==
The way i've always understood it (perhaps incor
On Jul 21, 2:15 pm, "Rob Desbois" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Try this:
>
> if (typeof myFunction === "undefined") {
Shouldn't that be:
if( typeof myFunction === undefined )
or
if( typeof myFunction == "undefined" )
??? i don't think === is what you want when comparing different string
insta
On Jul 22, 2:16 am, barophobia <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I think I understand but how do I handle the #passwordField part
> within the plugin?
In your plugin implementation, simply store a reference to the
#passwordField passed to your plugin. For example, if you plugin looks
like this:
jQuer
On Jul 21, 3:26 pm, navi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello All,
>
> I found that autocomplete runs only on PHP 5.2 and higher version, Any
> solution in this regard.
Unfortunately, the author of autocomplete fails to document which PHP
version it needs.
The "solution", i'm afraid, is to upgrade
> On Jul 18, 7:34 am, "Ganeshji Marwaha" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Did it work?
i just tried it, but it doesn't appear to have an affect - the click()
handler appears to take precedence, which actually does make sense
because you cannot have a double-click without having a single click.
i trie
On Jul 20, 5:31 am, Rey Bango <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> http://www.user-agents.org/
>
> I'm not associated with the site in anyway. I just thought that it would
> be a good resource for your guys.
Somewhat related, but even more off-topic: i got a Sony PSP yesterday.
The built-in web browser i
On Jul 18, 7:34 am, "Ganeshji Marwaha" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hmmm, just thinking out loud here, did u try attaching a no-op function to
> window.ondbclick...
That's an EXCELLENT idea! Thanks a lot!
Doh - i can't believe i didn't think of that before.
Perhaps jQ should install a no-op dou
On Jul 18, 5:51 pm, "Christopher Jordan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Instead of disabling the element for 500ms just ignore any other clicks on
> the element for 500ms. We often do this on elements with an onchange event.
> that way if the user changes items in a select too quickly (i.e.
> highli
Hi, all!
The past week i've written 4 plugins and i would like to take a moment
to share a tip which i've found useful while working on them.
In each of my plugin functions i optionally create a "debugging area",
a DIV element which i use to write debug info to:
jQuery.fn.initConfirmer = functi
On Jul 18, 2:29 am, Stephan Beal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Does disabling the element for 500ms sound like a reasonable solution
> to you? i'm not sure that disable makes much sense for non-buttons,
> but i think that buttons will make up 90%+ of use cases.
>
> ???
On Jul 18, 4:38 am, "Brandon Aaron" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> There aren't any yet besides what is in the main source file. There are two
> main methods: behavior and unbehavior. They are the first two methods in the
> js file and are commented (along with all the private methods). Here is the
On Jul 18, 4:51 am, "Ganeshji Marwaha" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Don't you like the idea of "click on the button", an extension slides out
> asking to confirm. When you click the "confirm" extension, you can go ahead
> with the action.
i do, but it breaks two of my rules for this plugin:
a) I
On Jul 17, 8:45 pm, "Brandon Aaron" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
...
> The example you provide would be best written without using behavior at all.
> However this is an interesting use-case and I would like to explore it in
> more detail. Would you mind providing a complete example for me to dig
> t
On Jul 18, 3:56 am, "Dan G. Switzer, II" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> The trickiest part would be showing the user progress of the timer before
> they can click to perform the action.
>
> The problem is I'm still not sure how intuitive this behavior would be. I
> guess a clue/tool tip that explai
On Jul 18, 1:58 am, "Dan G. Switzer, II" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> I'll also confirm that my finding the majority of non-hardcore users tend to
> double-click. Heck, one of my previous supervisors used to double-click
> every thing on a web page.
My girlfriend does the same (and it drives me u
On Jul 18, 1:43 am, "Ganeshji Marwaha" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> In the demo, once i click, the action gets cancelled too quickly before i
> understand that i need to click it again... Also, i guess it is pretty
> difficult to explain this to the user...
You're right - i had the timeout delay
On Jul 18, 12:47 am, Felix Geisendörfer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Cool idea. Just add support for a class that's being added to the button
> when in 'confirm' mode - otherwise there is no way to visually highlight
> this new UI approach for the user ; ).
My initial thought was to use an onclic
On Jul 18, 12:40 am, "Michael Geary" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Very cool idea. Anything to get rid of confirmation dialogs!
i didn't come up with the idea myself (of course). There is/was some
mail client (can't remember which) which uses/used a similar idea when
you move a mail to the trash.
On Jul 18, 12:35 am, "Tane Piper" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Very handy! Will be very useful for actions such as deleting. I'll
> be trying this one out.
Deleting is EXACTLY the reason i wrote it. i have an app with a
"Delete all" button and a "Confirm" checkbox next to it (because i
didn't k
Hi again, all!
Confirmer is a plugin for jQuery which implements a novel approach to
the process of confirming an action. Normally this is achieved via a
yes/no dialog box or a button with a "confirm" checkbox next to it.
The Confirmer plugin instead sets up a single button which changes to
a "co
Hi, all!
This morning i put together a plugin which provides a basic
filemanager-like view, called BogoFolders:
http://wanderinghorse.net/computing/javascript/jquery/bogofolders/
In short, it uses two HTML elements: one holds a list of icons/label
(e.g., the "file list") and one holds the conte
On Jul 17, 2:40 pm, "Dan G. Switzer, II" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> >c) The alphabetic display of plugins rewards those authors who name
> >their plugins starting with the letter 'A', because those are the
> >first ones which users will see when browsing the list.
...
> As for Issue C, I think m
On Jul 17, 2:42 pm, PragueExpat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Apparently, in IE and Firefox, the function must run to completion before
> the UI is updated with any CSS / DOM changes, but in Opera, the UI is
> updated immediately upon the jQ call.
Yeah, someone mentioned that behaviour a couple of
On Jul 16, 10:02 pm, "Christian Bach" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> The new documentation is located
> here:http://lovepeacenukes.com/tablesorter/2.0/docs/
Slick :).
A quick bug report for you:
Under: "Disabling headers, with inline options"
Clicking the "Major" column sorts by a different col
On Jul 17, 12:18 am, "Christopher Jordan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> yeah, I can see where that might be cool, but I still think it may take up
> too much of the devs time. Ultimately, though it's up to them if they wanted
> to do that sort of thing. I for one wouldn't complain if they did just
On Jul 16, 11:39 pm, "Tane Piper" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Maybe it's also time to start running a "seal of approval" program,
> where plugins are checked over to see if they are plugins, or scripts
> or tests/examples. With good code and good documention, it would nice
> to see a few more of
On Jul 16, 5:17 pm, "Armand Datema" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> yeah that is an option but i need a different bullet for each item
You still haven't given us much info to work with. Do you need a
specific number of bullets or an unpredictable/arbitrary number? If
you can generate the code on the
On Jul 16, 4:14 pm, Klaus Hartl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hm, in my opinion it is better to keep the three layers structure
> (HTML), presentation (CSS) and behavior (JS) as separated as possible.
That's certainly true, but creating an arbitrary number of classes for
different row colors could
On Jul 16, 12:47 pm, "Armand Datema" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi
>
> What is the best way to give a different class to each item in an unordered
> list
>
> just a for each and then apply a new class or is there something better
Applying classes has the limitation that you have to create a cl
On Jul 16, 2:42 pm, "Mike Alsup" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I suspect this is a platform issue. What platform and browser are you
> using? From what I'm told, Linux/FF is especially bad at hogging the
> CPU when rendering opacity (especially for a full page) which is why
To elaborate a small
On Jul 16, 3:06 pm, John Farrar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Maybe I am totally missing it. Please clear up my fog.
>
> 1. It seems like you are wanting to "Generate jQuery execution code
> via server pages.". I don't see what is offered by a plugin if that is
> the case. (Esp. since jQuery doesn'
On Jul 16, 8:23 am, David Duymelinck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Anyway i will start working on it this week and how to show something as
> soon as possible.
The value of this idea is immediately obvious, and if you manage to
get this working i would LOVE to see it :).
i'm a pretty good PHP cod
On Jul 16, 2:16 pm, "Alexandre Plennevaux" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Gilles, i'm very interested in your approach. I usually organize my js and
> css external files inside the php process in a much similar manner, adding
> jquery plugins necessary to output the user selected interface. Integrat
On Jul 16, 11:23 am, Klaus Hartl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> You're saying that is done on each page load. Isn't it better to do that
> once, when deploying the files? How long does it take to merge the files?
In a sense he IS only doing it once - he wrote the PHP code ONCE. ;)
Now PHP gets to d
Hi, all!
Nicolas Martin once released a PHP5-based JS packer (http://
joliclic.free.fr/php/javascript-packer/en/), a port of Dean Edwards'
packer code (http://dean.edwards.name/packer/).
Here is a derivative of Nicolas' code:
http://wanderinghorse.net/computing/javascript/#packers
that version
Hi, all!
i just wanted to take a moment to share a tip which i don't see used
too often on live sites:
Combine all of your JS scripts into a single file. This helps reduce
the load time of the page by reducing the number of separate GET
requests.
In principal you should be able to do the follow
Hiya!
i'm attempting to load a text file via .load() and insert it into a
separate element by fetching the loaded text via text(). Load is
working fine for me. e.g.:
$
('').appendTo( '#SplitterPaneBottom').load('jquery.splitter.js');
no problem - that appends a PRE to #SplitterPaneBotton and po
On Jul 15, 8:16 pm, Karl Swedberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hence the old tag line "New Wave JavaScript"
And quite in contrast to the meaning of "devo", which is "devolution."
On Jul 14, 5:32 pm, Karl Swedberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I suspect you'll want to roll your own solution, but daemach has put
> together a frameReady jQuery plugin to assist in dealing with this
> sort of thing:
>http://ideamill.synaptrixgroup.com/?p=6
>
> Might be good for some idea
On Jul 14, 1:51 pm, "Dan G. Switzer, II" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> The default behavior is show/hide. If you use manual callbacks you need to
> define the full behavior, so you'll want to add the show()/hide() calls to
> your jQuery chain.
The intention wasn't to define the functions which do
On Jul 13, 11:20 pm, "Ganeshji Marwaha" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> pardon my ignorance... i dont understand the purpose...
The purpose would be to allow easier inclusion of jQ code from server-
side scripts (in this case PHP). As it stands now, to create jQ code
from PHP you either have to impo
On Jul 14, 1:34 pm, "Dan G. Switzer, II" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Toggle already uses
> callbacks:http://docs.jquery.com/Events#toggle.28_even.2C_odd_.29
Doh... i was working from this page:
http://docs.jquery.com/Effects#toggle.28.29
in which the callbacks are not mentioned. Perhaps that
Tane Piper wrote:
> Today I am pleased to announce the initial release of my jQuery plugin
> - the jQuery Google Map Application.
>
> http://code.google.com/p/gmapp/
What immediately strikes me is that the download is 2.5k, whereas the
download for all of the tooltip implementations i've looked a
Hi, all!
Code taken from a recent post:
$("#toggle").click(function(){
$("#calendar .arc").toggle();
$("#calendar .arc").Highlight(1000, '#ff9');
...
that made me think: the highlight is useless(?) when the object is
hidden, but of course desired when it is shown. That c
On Jul 14, 9:07 am, "Brian Cherne" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Recommended reading:http://www.quirksmode.org/js/iframe.html
Thank you :). That's very helpful.
On Jul 13, 8:08 pm, Jörn Zaefferer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> About sticky tooltips: I'd find it much handier to be able to click
> anywhere outside the tooltip to close it, instead of a tiny close link.
> I'd even consider replacing the close-link alltogether: The user then
i disagree. Normal
On Jul 13, 5:49 am, Karl Swedberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hey everyone,
>
> Just thought I'd let you all know that I (finally) posted a blog
> entry announcing the official beta version of the clueTip plugin:
>
> http://www.learningjquery.com/2007/07/cluetip-plugin-beta
Nice :).
i was just
On Jul 13, 7:46 pm, Danjojo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
To expand on Scott's answer:
Some options include:
.html(...)
.text(...)
.load(...)
or even:
.empty()
to empty out the div, ready for re-population via append(), prepend(),
etc.
Hi, all!
Before i open up a can of worms which i don't want to deal with, i
thought i'd ask:
Are there any special concerns for using jquery in conjunction with
iframes? e.g. if i embed a sub-page within an iframe, can the top-
level page's jq still query/manipulate that sub-page's content
norma
On Jul 14, 12:16 am, Guapo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> the following text if copy from the book,I was confused with the
> variable globVar in the innerFun2,is it a clerical error or the
> variable in the statement "var globVar = outerFun();"?
> thank you all!
> ===
On Jul 12, 9:41 pm, Jörn Zaefferer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The trouble here is the mix of setters and getters. Provide the second
> argument and its a setter, leave it, and its a getter. In this case you
> have to make sure that no null or undefined is passed as the second
> argument, or you
Hiya!
What jQuery needs now is yet another tabbed interface plugin. Yeah,
right!!!
My 2nd jQ plugin:
http://wanderinghorse.net/computing/javascript/#bogotabs
It's nowhere as feature-rich as idTab or Klaus' tabs, but we can't all
be rich, can we?.
Using it looks like this:
$('#BogoTabPlacehol
Hi, all!
i wanted to pass along a trivial utility which i find indispensable in
my day-to-day web work. It's 100% cross-platform and doesn't require
any special know-how to use. i call it a "PNG Image".
Here's how it works...
Grab this image:
http://wanderinghorse.net/computing/webdesign/1600x
Hi, all!
i noticed the following today (jQ v1.1.3.1):
var lbl = jQuery("");
alert( lbl.attr('href') ); // == "#foo"
alert( lbl[0].href ); // == "http://my.site/path/#foo";
My questions are:
a) What is the reason (if any) for this discrepancy?
b) Is this a jQ bug?
i would expect .attr('href')
On Jul 12, 2:15 pm, stef <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> else if ($("#category").val() == "accessoires")
Are you sure that's correct? "accessories" is spelled wrong. i can't
see if it's also misspelled in your code, so i can't judge if that's
the problem or not.
i am, coinci
On Jul 12, 12:00 am, Jörn Zaefferer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> * You can use jQuery to create elements, eg. $("<" +
> props.elementType +
> ">").addClass(props.elementClass).css('background-color', color)
> <- chaining, too
i think i found a jQ bug (or "unexpected, undocum
On Jul 11, 11:47 pm, "Michael Geary" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It may be interesting to note that Doug no longer favors that approach. He
No, i wasn't aware of that.
> now prefers a much simpler technique that works directly with JavaScript's
> prototype system instead of trying to turn it i
201 - 300 of 327 matches
Mail list logo
