I guess its some kind of coincidence that I am
noticing a high degree of informal commentary on UG
lists lately. You do realize that this kind of thing
reflects badly on customer and employer appeal?
For instance, I could say some kind of offhand
comment like they'll give a greencard to
Sorry Mr. Zeidner, informal developer-related commentary is indeed
inappropriate content for a USERS GROUP.
In fact, I have seen on this list that at certain JUG meetings,
discussion on non-Java technologies have been discussed.
Everyone needs to get back to working on corporate project #101
-jug.org
Subject: Re: [jug-discussion] OT: Google and Yahoo
Sorry Mr. Zeidner, informal developer-related
commentary is indeed
inappropriate content for a USERS GROUP.
In fact, I have seen on this list that at certain
JUG meetings,
discussion on non-Java technologies have been
discussed
On 9/21/06, josh zeidner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
JUGs will
likely degrade in relevance( a process already in
effect )
Huh-Huh. Huh-Huh. He said jugs.
Dunno about you, but jugs are still very high in relevance to me.
Sorry, just doing my part to keep the quality of discussions on this
PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, September 21, 2006 11:49 AM
To: jug-discussion@tucson-jug.org
Subject: Re: [jug-discussion] OT: Google and Yahoo
Sorry Mr. Zeidner, informal developer-related
commentary is indeed
inappropriate content for a USERS GROUP.
In fact, I have seen on this list that at certain
JUG
Thanks Chad. Your 'Beavis and Butthead' reference
certainly helped to support your statement.
-jmz
--- Chad Woolley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 9/21/06, josh zeidner [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
JUGs will
likely degrade in relevance( a process already in
effect )
Huh-Huh. Huh-Huh.
zeidner [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, September 21, 2006 11:37 AM
To: jug-discussion@tucson-jug.org
Subject: Re: [jug-discussion] OT: Google and Yahoo
I guess its some kind of coincidence that I am
noticing a high degree of informal commentary on UG
lists lately. You do realize
-Original Message-
From: Jon Thomas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, September 21, 2006 12:29 PM
To: jug-discussion@tucson-jug.org
Subject: Re: [jug-discussion] OT: Google and Yahoo
i wish we could get an opinion out of this group
On Sep 21, 2006, at 11:16 AM, josh zeidner wrote
Vegas, NV 89156
Phone:(702)866-9034
Cell:(518)378-6154
Fax:(702)974-0341
-Original Message-
From: josh zeidner [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, September 21, 2006 11:37 AM
To: jug-discussion@tucson-jug.org
Subject: Re: [jug-discussion] OT: Google and Yahoo
I guess its some
]
Sent: Thursday, September 21, 2006 12:39 PM
To: jug-discussion@tucson-jug.org
Subject: Re: [jug-discussion] OT: Google and Yahoo
Thanks Chad. Your 'Beavis and Butthead' reference
certainly helped to support your statement.
-jmz
--- Chad Woolley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 9/21/06, josh
Josh -- if you are sincere about starting a discussion on the topic of
JCP and JUG Goverance, then by all means walk your own talk and start a
new thread with a relevant subject line.
-Tim
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL
, #1096
Las Vegas, NV 89156
Phone:(702)866-9034
Cell:(518)378-6154
Fax:(702)974-0341
-Original Message-
From: josh zeidner [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, September 21, 2006 11:37 AM
To: jug-discussion@tucson-jug.org
Subject: Re: [jug-discussion] OT: Google and Yahoo
I guess
What we all need is more people who take themselves too seriously.
This group is what it is. I'm sure that most of us have worked
together at some point and understand each others capacities and
interests and I have seen some great and merited discussions on this
list. I've also seen
-discussion] OT: Google and
Yahoo
Sorry Mr. Zeidner, informal developer-related
commentary is indeed
inappropriate content for a USERS GROUP.
In fact, I have seen on this list that at certain
JUG meetings,
discussion on non-Java technologies have been
discussed.
Everyone needs to get
: Thursday, September 21, 2006 1:23 PM
To: jug-discussion@tucson-jug.org
Subject: Re: [jug-discussion] OT: Google and Yahoo
Thanks, Jon. Your sentence fragment has been noted
by the authorities. -jmz
--- Jon Thomas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
i wish we could get an opinion out of this group
Jon,
I think all your statements are valid here.
Remember, I was initially asking a question. I am
certainly not looking to criticize the relationships
between list members, but please keep in mind that
having an official and functional resource for local
Java developers makes everyones
, 2006 11:37 AM
To: jug-discussion@tucson-jug.org
Subject: Re: [jug-discussion] OT: Google and Yahoo
I guess its some kind of coincidence that I am
noticing a high degree of informal commentary on UG
lists lately. You do realize that this kind of thing
reflects badly on customer and employer appeal
We're calling it Society 3.0 now.
On Sep 21, 2006, at 1:19 PM, josh zeidner wrote:
--- Michael Oliver [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ok since any sort of frivolity is frowned upon by
some, let's get serious.
Call it govern themselves or sensorship or
standards or regulations,
etc. but the
,
so thanks for raising my status.
Ollie
-Original Message-
From: josh zeidner [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, September 21, 2006 2:19 PM
To: jug-discussion@tucson-jug.org
Subject: RE: [jug-discussion] OT: Google and Yahoo
--- Michael Oliver [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ok
, September 21, 2006 2:00 PM
To: jug-discussion@tucson-jug.org
Subject: Re: [jug-discussion] OT: Google and Yahoo
That would be Butthead. Beavis would have replied: hehe. hehe. Jugs
RULE!
On 9/21/06, Michael Oliver [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Which part was Beavis and which part was Butthead, for my
Gramlich [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, September 21, 2006 2:22 PM
To: jug-discussion@tucson-jug.org
Subject: Re: [jug-discussion] OT: Google and Yahoo
We're calling it Society 3.0 now.
On Sep 21, 2006, at 1:19 PM, josh zeidner wrote:
--- Michael Oliver [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ok
At 01:19 PM 9/21/2006, you wrote:
--- Michael Oliver [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ok since any sort of frivolity is frowned upon by
some, let's get serious.
Call it govern themselves or sensorship or
standards or regulations,
etc. but the problem with that is who decides? If a
discussion
To Tim and Jon:
I nearly fell out of my freaking chair at White and Nerdy.
To the rest of you:
If you haven't seen it, it's a must see.
Back to Tim:
Even Google hasn't solved the problem of how to migrate all of your
friends and relatives from your old address. Besides, this way I can
spy
On 9/20/06, Nick Lesiecki [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Oh, and anyone who's in the area for Hackday's welcome to come and
visit the 'plex. Dunno what Yahoo has planned for HackDay, but I
guarantee our cafe food is better on the average Tuesday than it is
at Yahoo's special event.
He's right. The
Nick,
Are we really supposed to believe that a new gmail account can't
subscribe to the Tjug mailing list?. that's some strong koolaid
they are serving in the cafe
:p
-Todd
***
Todd R. Ellermann
President PHXJUG.org
[EMAIL
Alright alright, you got me! I'm LAZY.
:)
Nick
On Sep 20, 2006, at 1:58 PM, Todd Ellermann wrote:
Nick,
Are we really supposed to believe that a new gmail account can't
subscribe to the Tjug mailing list?. that's some strong koolaid
they are serving in the cafe
:p
-Todd
Lol... am I the only one laughing that Nick sent this from his yahoo.com
email?
Hojillion -- number of hos you can fit in your car ... hmm, in my
two-seater that'd only be one and she'd have to sit on the wife's
lap...which would most likely end badly. grin
It's too bad GOOG doesn't seem to have
27 matches
Mail list logo
