Solr looks pretty slick! Thanks for pointing this one out Erik. Any
idea when it's coming out of incubator status?
-warner
On Jun 21, 2006, at 3:28 AM, Erik Hatcher wrote:
Yeah, but what about Ruby on Rails?! ;)
My current projects (yes, more than one) consist of a RoR front-end
and a
On 6/20/06, Rick Hightower [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:[snip]
Injection via an abstract getter, anyone?Shudder?
shudder.
I think I have grasped it (but I enjoy complex stuff), but to use it on alarge team... YIKES! There is going to be a lot of developer body bags.
[snip]
Granted Tapestry is very
Erik,
lowercase web services? What do you use to talk XML on the RoR
side? One of the Ruby SOAP implementations, something homegrown, or
something else?
I work for a Rails shop, and we've done SOAP in one app. The one
thing I noticed it had in common with Java (Axis) was that it NEVER
just
Erik,
Good to hear from you. No one has asked me to work on a RoR project yet.
I pretty much work on whatever the client wants (except for Struts; I won't
do Struts).
We are creating our own version of RoR called Presto.
Presto is based on Spring, Hibernate, Facelets and JSF.
It is similar to
--- Rick Hightower [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Since I am a consulting, I give advice, but will
happily work with Tapestry
or JSF.
Being a capitalist, I tend to pick the one with the
highest bill rate. :o)
Being an engineer, I tend to pick the one with the
best value to my customer. :)
Flame bait?
From: cara
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 21, 2006
9:17 AM
To: jug-discussion@tucson-jug.org
Subject: Re: [jug-discussion] App
Dev Framework choices
On 6/20/06, Rick Hightower
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
[snip]
Injection via an abstract
So Josh, let me get this straight if a Tapestry project pays $1 dollar an
hour and a JSF project pays $100.00 an hour (or vice versa), you would work
on the Tapestry project (or vice versa) because it is a better fit.
Congrats! You are a much better man than me. I am not completely motivated
by
On Jun 21, 2006, at 10:02 AM, Warner Onstine wrote:
Solr looks pretty slick! Thanks for pointing this one out Erik. Any
idea when it's coming out of incubator status?
Solr is where it's at... hear me now, believe me later. As for the
incubator... who knows? It's very mature as it is and
On Jun 21, 2006, at 12:35 PM, Chad Woolley wrote:
lowercase web services? What do you use to talk XML on the RoR
side? One of the Ruby SOAP implementations, something homegrown, or
something else?
Currently Solr returns back a custom XML layout and accepts a custom
format. These are
--- Rick Hightower [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So Josh, let me get this straight if a Tapestry
project pays $1 dollar an
hour and a JSF project pays $100.00 an hour (or vice
versa), you would work
on the Tapestry project (or vice versa) because it
is a better fit.
Hey Rick, thanks for the
To Rick:
I really haven't had a chance to use either of the framework
(Spring.NET nor NHibernate) but I've tracked their progress. I caught
a podcast from one of the devs for Spring.NET and it sounded like they
was a fair amount of interest in the project. NHibernate hit version
1 around the
I have to step in here and clarify that Rick (I'm sure) was being
tongue in cheek.
If he is anything he is the guy you turn to to clean out bloat.
I assume it was recognized throughout the list that he was joking,
but in case it was not, let me clarify for anyone who doesn't know
him...he
I believe she was applauding your inclusion of human aspects factors
in making a technological decision and sarcastically saying that was
blasphemy. I'm afraid Cara's getting kind of cynical after working at
her current job location. They tend to be ratherum.behind on
the technology and
13 matches
Mail list logo
