Also, the general view is that new sparse matrix formats should be in
packages rather than Base, which everyone agrees with. This would lead to
faster development - and Base can be modified to make it easy to add new
sparse formats.
-viral
On Wednesday, March 9, 2016 at 9:30:31 AM UTC+5:30,
Nobody is working on it at the moment, that I know of. We almost had a
working version then, but it was deemed too complex to include in Base at
that time.
-viral
On Wednesday, March 9, 2016 at 6:28:26 AM UTC+5:30, Anonymous wrote:
>
> Thank you for the response, I read the 2015 discussion on
Thank you for the response, I read the 2015 discussion on here about CSR
sparse matrices, do you happen to know the implementation status on when
this will be included?
On Monday, March 7, 2016 at 4:59:40 PM UTC-8, Tim Holy wrote:
>
> Likely yes to both. Best to just test yourself, of course.
Likely yes to both. Best to just test yourself, of course.
I'm sure you know this, but you'll want to access them through the return
values of findnz or equivalent, not using S[i,j].
--Tim
On Monday, March 07, 2016 10:50:58 AM Anonymous wrote:
> So I have a sparse matrix which doesn't get
