no one can actually sell OJ in "little silvery envelopes". ;-)
>
> As previously said services and extended functionality is a completely
> different thing...
>
>
>
> Pedro Doria Meunier
> (351) 91 302 49 72 - (351) 96 247 99 12
> MSN - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> ICQ - 3
49 72 - (351) 96 247 99 12
> MSN - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> ICQ - 308-182-126
> Skype: pdoriam
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
> Sunburned Surveyor
> Sent: quinta-feira, 2 de Novembro de 2006 21:57
> To: L
ta-feira, 2 de Novembro de 2006 21:57
To: List for discussion of JPP development and use.
Subject: Re: [JPP-Devel] [jump-users] RE: Commercial Support For OpenJUMP
That was definitely not the response I was looking for. I was actually
hoping for some positive feedback.
Let me clarify some things
That was definitely not the response I was looking for. I was actually
hoping for some positive feedback.
Let me clarify some things for Pedro, then I'll respond to David's comment.
Pedro wrote: "One thing is having the developers being paid for their
work on some
extended functionality to some c
Pedro,
This struck me in a similar manner ... so I did a little reading of the
GPL, and I'm not sure SS's comments (as read this am on the blog site
mentioned) do not violate Clause #2 of the GPL.
Thanks for expressing what many of us are probably thinking.
David
-Original Message-
Fro
