Re: [j-nsp] group interface

This has been discused several times on the Juniper J-net forum http://forums.juniper.net/jnet/board/message?board.id=switchthread.id=672 http://forums.juniper.net/jnet/board/message?board.id=switchmessage.id=525 The answer is yes via Groups The answer is also yes via JWEB in which you can

Re: [j-nsp] Cisco Compact Flash in m10i

Hi, I have some Flash provided by Juniper in our M10i and we have the same messages I think you don't have to worry about it Regards Alain BRIANT ad0: Device does not support APM ad0: 999MB SILICONSYSTEMS INC 1GB V2.23 at ata0-master PIO4 -Message d'origine- De :

Re: [j-nsp] error messages on M10

Hi Seems to be an hardware problem on you memory (RAM) ECC mean that the tranfers in memory are corrupted (Error Correcting code) Since it's telling you that the FEB card is impacted you'de rather try to change it! -Message d'origine- De : juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net

Re: [j-nsp] origin of bgp routes with juniper

Hi Shariq There where a post on the juniper web site (jnet) regarding this question with some precise answers. You can find it here: http://forums.juniper.net/jnet/board/message?board.id=IProutingthread.id=672 HTH -Message d'origine- De : juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net

Re: [j-nsp] M10i RE Upgrade

Hi Gareth BB is Base Bundle (the card is comming in the chassis) R is Redundancy (that you buy if you want redundancy and so that is optionnal) S is Spare (That you by for replacement and so that is not normaly installed in a router) You'de rather change of supplier ;-) Kind regards Alain

Re: [j-nsp] OSPF NBMA

Hi Aamir I have tried this configured with logical routers on an M7i without any problem: What kind of router are you using Which version of software? Regards Alain logical-systems { R1 { interfaces { fe-1/3/0 { unit 0 { vlan-id 0;

Re: [j-nsp] New post: OSPF export policing

Hi Serghei Can you confirm with a show route extensive 0.0.0.0 instance VRF-B the details of the route received. I have just build a litte lab with your config with logical routers (not virtual ones ... Vrf) I have the same ditribution filters as the one you're describing: policy-statement

Re: [j-nsp] Update failed on J-Series

Hi all On my side I have a some Jseries running 9.3 (R1 not R2) with only 256Mb of Flash without problem As I can remember, the upgrade has done using the command: request system storage cleanup And request system software add no-copy unlink - reboot --- JUNOS 9.3R1.7 built 2008-11-12

Re: [j-nsp] Port Mirroring on M7i

Hi mario Should you try to generate some traffic crossing the M7i ? I should think that the answers to your ping request issued by the M7i are not mirrored ? Give a try Regards alain -Message d'origine- De : juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net

Re: [j-nsp] JUNOS BootP-relay Behaviour

Thanks for your answers, but like I told you the JTAC admited that the implementation done on JUNOS on the M series is the correct one. Buy the way on the EX the VPN keyworkd doesn't exist: --- JUNOS 9.4R1.8 built 2009-02-08 16:30:58 UTC al...@switch_ex3200 set forwarding-options helpers bootp

[j-nsp] JUNOS BootP-relay Behaviour

When I configure DHCP relay like this on an EX switch: set forwarding-options helpers bootp interface XX server @IPDHCPserver The outgoing relayed paquets are received on the DHCP server with a source address of the outgoing interface of the EX switch (the Net IP.B address)

Re: [j-nsp] VRF router reflector support

I can only say the contrary. BGP route reflection is supported in VRF (L3/VPN) networks. We are using BGP RR in our L3/VPN/MPLS network. So I don't understand what is your problem ? -Message d'origine- De : juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net

Re: [j-nsp] generate a default route question

Hi William Its much more simple to do it: You only need to do a static route pointing to a next-hop that is on your 1.1.1.0/24 network Even if this next hop doesn't exist. Lets assume that your local interface is 1.1.1.1/24 You can write the static route like this: routing-options {

Re: [j-nsp] finding route ID number

Hi Justin In case of some other types of routes (not BGP) you can find the index in the show route forwarding-table [EMAIL PROTECTED] show route forwarding-table Routing table: inet Internet: DestinationType RtRef Next hop Type Index NhRef Netif

Re: [j-nsp] router for IX

Hi Matthias I don't know where you could find the limit on the M7i but like you said it's the next smallest router after the Jseries, but it has a big difference which is it's an hardware based router opposed to the Jserie. I have on one of my customer's network some M7i with about 65 peers ,

Re: [j-nsp] allow-configuration/permission + insert

Hi Otto I have made some tests with you simple login config and I can find a simple workaround I think that's not what you wer looking for but it's works Just be in the right place: edit firewall family inet filter access_in Copy the complete filter in a notepad Insert the new term where you

Re: [j-nsp] question regarding multiple interfaces in vpls (vlan-tagswap used)

Simon Just look at this: http://www.juniper.net/techpubs/software/junos/junos90/mx-solutions-guide/one-vpls-instance-for-several-vlans.html#id-vpls-many-vlans One VPLS Instance for Several VLANs routing-instances { customer-c1-v1-to-v1000 { instance-type vpls; vlan-id all; # Note the use of

Re: [j-nsp] Logical Routers intercommunication?

I am sure that what you're trying to do is working on Little M series (M7i M10i ...) I have made a lot of tests this way also using some I-BGP or E-BGP between the logical routers. Are you sure your two logical routers are interconnected via external interfaces or subinterfaces? Do you have

Re: [j-nsp] ex-series: counters for transit traffic ?

Hi Alexandre Concerning the pps (paquets per second) or bps (bytes per second) counters they are not active See doc : http://www.juniper.net/techpubs/en_US/junos9.1/topics/reference/command-summary/show-interfaces-gigabit-ethernet-ex-series.html (not enabled !) But the counters are couting the

Re: [j-nsp] OSPF invalid net mask

Hi lee If you still have this problem I think you've made a kind of loop and like you said at the end of your mail you need to have two separates vlans going to the switches as on your J series it's two different interfaces on two different networks. If vlan 810 is propagated between the two

Re: [j-nsp] Reliable Static Routing

Hi FJ BFD is realy something you can use (like Stacy said) assuming that you have BFD configured on both sides (like Amos said), that's to say that you need on both sides Juniper routers or Juniper on the first side and other vendor equipment BFD capable. Regards Alain -Message

Re: [j-nsp] Serial Question

Hi Lee Can you provide us for some traces: Monitor trafic interface se-1/0/1 We will see the lmi traffic And Show interface se-1/0/1 extensive I believe it's an LMI problem Normaly the default lmi on Juniper is ansi like the one you've configured on Cisco (so this should be OK) But perhaps

Re: [j-nsp] T-640 management ports

Hi German, again (I already sent this message last week but it seems it has not been processed) I sent that to you and jnsp: You must be careful using the Aux port. The cabling like you've seen is not completely the same as on the console port. Juniper is providing a crossover cable with some

Re: [j-nsp] T-640 management ports

Hi German You must be careful using the Aux port. The cabling like you've seen is not completely the same as on the console port. Juniper is providing a crossover cable with some loops in it. If you are using this kind of cable you will be able to connect a PC on the console port and on the Aux

Re: [j-nsp] VRRP flap between CRS-1 and junos 8.5 M40

Sorry for those stupid questions ... But the third one is still the right one : You are not saying if the flap is when the reboot at the end of the upgrade is done or if the flap occurs during the upgrade. - Does the flapping occurs during the reboot or before ? In fact I have seen with

Re: [j-nsp] M7i Compact Flash

Hi all I have installed version 9.0R2.10 in an M7i with 256Mb of Compact flash. With a roouting engine 400 with 768Mb of ram and this is working fine The release notes Is not clear regarding this point: RAM requirement increased (M-series, MX-series, and T-series routing platforms)-The compact