On 11/Aug/20 15:57, Andrew Alston wrote:
>
> HI Mark,
>
>
>
> Long time no talk.
>
>
>
> So – there are fundamentally different things to consider in SR-MPLS –
> for one thing – and this is kinda lacking in the market – because Node
> SID’s are typically static – you need a system to track
I vote for static Adj-SID allocations for the SR-MPLS. It makes operations much
more convenient as one might arrange a map of interface name (index) to an
Adj-SID.
--
Vladimir Blazhkun (via iPhone).
> On 11 Aug 2020, at 16:58, Andrew Alston
> wrote:
>
> Adjacency SID’s are less of a
burning through blocks of 256 labels at a time and its getting deaggregated –
this can get used pretty fast in a large network.
Thanks
Andrew
From: juniper-nsp On Behalf Of Mark Tinka
Sent: Tuesday, 11 August 2020 16:51
To: juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [j-nsp] SRGB Allocation
On 11/Aug/20 15:42, Andrew Alston wrote:
> Sorry for starting a new thread - I wasn't actually subscribed and your email
> querying about SRGB allocation was brought to my attention by one of your
> friendly Juniper Ambassadors, so hopped on to give you my thoughts.
Welcome to the list,
(Apologies if this appears twice, seems my subscription wasn't right the first
time!)
Hi Antti,
Sorry for starting a new thread - I wasn't actually subscribed and your email
querying about SRGB allocation was brought to my attention by one of your
friendly Juniper Ambassadors, so hopped on to
On 11/Aug/20 13:54, Vladimir Blazhkun wrote:
> We have considered multiple options, including the graceful automated RSVP-TE
> LSP restart, etc. But, in the end, reboot wins.
>
> I would also recommend thinking about allocating the Segment IDentifiers and
> corresponding SR-MPLS labels in
Hi, Antti,
We have considered multiple options, including the graceful automated RSVP-TE
LSP restart, etc. But, in the end, reboot wins.
I would also recommend thinking about allocating the Segment IDentifiers and
corresponding SR-MPLS labels in advance to ensure cross-vendor transparency (as
Hi list,
For those that have already deployed SR-MPLS, I would be curious to know which
methodology you have followed when defining the SRGB label range? Have you just
consciously taken an overlapping label range and then during a maintenance
window restarted RPD so that other protocols using
8 matches
Mail list logo