https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=368862
--- Comment #25 from Guenther M. Erhard ---
Hello Maik,
Is there any progress here? I've compiled a current version from git, but the
problem is still there.
You mention libexiv2 is probably the root cause when writing to raw files. Is
there anything I
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=368862
--- Comment #27 from Guenther M. Erhard ---
Yes, the thumbnail after import from camera is now o.k. - regardless of the
option setting.
The problem starts when meta data is written to the raw, e.g. adding a tag or
correcting time.
I've done some tests:
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=368862
--- Comment #28 from Guenther M. Erhard ---
Some more warnings exiftool gives on my test files:
"[minor] Ignored empty rdf:Bag list for mwg-rs:RegionList -
E-M5_Meta-write.ORF"
"[minor] Fixed incorrect URI for xmlns:MicrosoftPhoto - GME15825.ORF"
--
Y
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=368862
--- Comment #16 from Guenther M. Erhard ---
Just compiled 5.3 from git with libraw 0.18 and the error is the same. So it is
libraw.
I'll report to the libraw team.
Thanks,
Guenther
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug chan
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=368862
--- Comment #17 from Guenther M. Erhard ---
The libraw team has tested it and thinks that libraw is o.k.:
https://github.com/LibRaw/LibRaw/issues/77
So what is broken?
Guenther
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=368862
--- Comment #20 from Guenther M. Erhard ---
There is feedback from libraw project:
"In Libraw 0.17 and newer we added additional data type check.
Original (from camera) images passes it, while digikam-imported are not.
After digikam procesing (on import
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=368862
Bug ID: 368862
Summary: Thumbnails for Olympus raw (ORF) in albumview are
blurred
Product: digikam
Version: 4.12.0
Platform: Ubuntu Packages
OS: Linux
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=368862
--- Comment #1 from Guenther M. Erhard ---
Created attachment 101101
--> https://bugs.kde.org/attachment.cgi?id=101101&action=edit
Screenshot of digikam album view with blurred orf thumbnail
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching a
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=368862
--- Comment #3 from Guenther M. Erhard ---
Hi Gilles,
I have put one sample orf, one rw2 sample and the screenshot put on GMX cloud:
https://cloud.gmx.net/ngcloud/external?guestToken=IIaKtrn9RvGsY3IGwMMumQ&loginName=guenther.erh...@gmx.de
BR
Günther
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=368862
--- Comment #6 from Guenther M. Erhard ---
Created attachment 101112
--> https://bugs.kde.org/attachment.cgi?id=101112&action=edit
Thumbnail extracted from ORF by dcraw
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=368862
--- Comment #7 from Guenther M. Erhard ---
Hi Gilles and Maik,
No, CMS is correctly installed and setup.
But I'm confused that libraw extracts such a small preview. If I use dcraw -x
GME15390.ORF then I got an embedded jpg with 2400x3000 which is perf
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=368862
--- Comment #8 from Guenther M. Erhard ---
One more thought: I use Digikam since version 0.8 and had never experienced
this in all versions (did regularly updates from svn). Also after it was
possible to have the thumbnails greater than 256px the pictur
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=368862
--- Comment #9 from Guenther M. Erhard ---
> But I'm confused that libraw extracts such a small preview. If I use dcraw
> -x GME15390.ORF then I got an embedded jpg with 2400x3000 which is perfectly
Just saw a typo: the command is dcraw -e FILENAME
--
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=368862
--- Comment #11 from Guenther M. Erhard ---
Mi Maik,
That is maybe a glue. I use the experimental feature write meta data to raw
files.
To compare it I have made a new picture and imported it into digikam and did
nothing else. But the result was the s
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=368862
--- Comment #12 from Guenther M. Erhard ---
And all these files showed the correct preview with the same digikam version
(e.g. 4.13) under Ubuntu 14.04.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=368862
--- Comment #14 from Guenther M. Erhard ---
In my opinion the problem is the libraw version. Exiv2 is the same version
(0.25) on both Ubuntu 14.04 and 16.04.
I have now installed libraw 0.16.2 instead of 0.17.1 in my Ubuntu 16.04 and
recompiled digikam
16 matches
Mail list logo
