On Friday 18 September 2015 20:30:32 Eike Hein wrote:
> > Kapture seems to have the most number of votes, so if nothing changes
> > I'll go with that.
>
> I'd like to object to using Kapture for a number of reasons
> ... apologies for getting involved at this late hour, I was
> on vacation for
El Divendres, 18 de setembre de 2015, a les 23:42:02, Jaroslaw Staniek va
escriure:
>
> Your experience may differ and I value that. Opt-in - nobody forces you.
It does, once person X submits a patch using github to KDERepoY he'll complain
if he can't for KDERepoZ.
Cheers,
Albert
El Divendres, 18 de setembre de 2015, a les 23:28:37, Vishesh Handa va
escriure:
> On Fri, Sep 18, 2015 at 10:14 PM, Martin Graesslin
wrote:
> > So I join Sune, Eike and Marco: "Free software needs free tools, no
> > proprietary pull requests for KDE development!"
>
> -1
>
On Saturday, September 19, 2015 02:12:13 AM Albert Astals Cid wrote:
> > I would prefer us to be more pragmatic. If an adequate free-software
> > tool exists, lets try to use it. If a proprietary tool provides a
> > better experience lets use that. For my own projects I will advocate
> >
On 18 September 2015 at 14:17, Ben Cooksley wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 19, 2015 at 12:14 AM, Jaroslaw Staniek wrote:
>> On 18 September 2015 at 14:00, Ben Cooksley wrote:
>>> On Fri, Sep 18, 2015 at 11:54 PM, Jaroslaw Staniek
Il Fri, 18 Sep 2015 22:14:04 +0200, Martin Graesslin ha scritto:
> So I join Sune, Eike and Marco: "Free software needs free tools, no
> proprietary pull requests for KDE development!"
I'm not such a big contributor, but I agree with the above people. We
already have a big issue with "open"
El Divendres, 18 de setembre de 2015, a les 23:43:34, Vishesh Handa va
escriure:
> On Fri, Sep 18, 2015 at 9:05 PM, Jaroslaw Staniek wrote:
> > 2. Regarding the issues/pull requests - nobody agreed/disagreed to my
> > proposal. Is anyone against an *opt-in* possibility of
On Fri, Sep 18, 2015 at 5:17 PM, Riccardo Iaconelli
wrote:
> On Saturday, September 19, 2015 02:12:13 AM Albert Astals Cid wrote:
> > > I would prefer us to be more pragmatic. If an adequate free-software
> > > tool exists, lets try to use it. If a proprietary tool provides a
>
On Sat, Sep 19, 2015 at 2:20 AM, Albert Astals Cid wrote:
>> It depends on our end goal: creating free software or creating free
>> software with only free tools? If it is the latter then I fear we have
>> already failed since many of us use additional tools to aid
>> development
On Friday, September 18, 2015 11:43:34 PM Vishesh Handa wrote:
> It depends on our end goal: creating free software or creating free
> software with only free tools? If it is the latter then I fear we have
> already failed since many of us use additional tools to aid
> development which are not
Ah, sorry. Wanted to answer.
I am not planning on working on Kannasaver right now. So I am fine with the
move.
Thanks for your maintenance efforts. :)
Regards
On Sep 14, 2015 3:34 PM, "Jeremy Whiting" wrote:
> Ok, requested kannasaver move to unmaintained.
>
> thanks,
>
Hi,
Am Freitag, 18. September 2015, 17:12:12 schrieb Boudhayan Gupta:
> Ladies and gentlemen, as you read this mail github.com/kde is being
> populated by the initial sync of all repositories.
Pardon for the late input, missed the dynamic of the people behind this idea
(and actually expected it
On 19 September 2015 at 00:00, Eike Hein wrote:
> I'd like to object to using Kapture for a number of reasons
> ... apologies for getting involved at this late hour, I was
> on vacation for most of this thread :)
>
> * The forcibly-inject-a-K naming scheme used to offer some
>
On Fri, Sep 18, 2015 at 9:10 PM, Friedrich W. H. Kossebau
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Am Freitag, 18. September 2015, 17:12:12 schrieb Boudhayan Gupta:
> > Ladies and gentlemen, as you read this mail github.com/kde is being
> > populated by the initial sync of all repositories.
>
> Pardon
On 09/01/2015 10:08 PM, Boudhayan Gupta wrote:
> Ladies and gentlemen, I'll take a decision on this in the next couple
> of days. As it stands now, Pixie is a universal favourite but we can't
> use it for copyright reasons.
>
> Kapture seems to have the most number of votes, so if nothing
On Fri, Sep 18, 2015 at 2:53 PM, David Edmundson
wrote:
>> > But again, please consider this as less controlled/predictable
>> > activity - that forking will happen anyway, as this is the value of
>> > github-based collaboration, and (IMHO) sense of our existence on
>>
On Friday 18 September 2015 22:14:04 Martin Graesslin wrote:
> I must say I'm uneasy with the thought of allowing pull requests - even as
> an exception. Seeing this raised on the day the mirroring started makes me
> sad that I initiated the whole thing.
Yes I'm uneasy about that too. I thought
On 09/18/2015 08:47 PM, Boudhayan Gupta wrote:
> While it is a bit late now (the repository rename was done yesterday),
> I'm still in love with the word Selfie (for the above reasons and
> more). I'm heavily considering requesting another rename to Selfie.
FWIW I feel bad about causing more
On Fri, Sep 18, 2015 at 9:12 PM, Sune Vuorela wrote:
>> 2. Regarding the issues/pull requests - nobody agreed/disagreed to my
>> proposal.
>> Is anyone against an *opt-in* possibility of enabling Issues and/or
>> Pull Requests for a given mirrored repo? Opt-in by maintainer of
On 18 September 2015 at 21:16, Marco Martin wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 18, 2015 at 9:12 PM, Sune Vuorela wrote:
>>> 2. Regarding the issues/pull requests - nobody agreed/disagreed to my
>>> proposal.
>>> Is anyone against an *opt-in* possibility of enabling
On Sat, Sep 19, 2015 at 8:10 AM, Friedrich W. H. Kossebau
wrote:
> Hi,
Hi,
>
> Am Freitag, 18. September 2015, 17:12:12 schrieb Boudhayan Gupta:
>> Ladies and gentlemen, as you read this mail github.com/kde is being
>> populated by the initial sync of all repositories.
>
>
On 09/18/2015 09:12 PM, Sune Vuorela wrote:
> Yes. I'm against. And I'm also against mirroring on github, but I didn't
> voice my opinion by that because it was said that issues and pull
> requests are not to be enabled.
>
> We should not proprietarize our development workflow. We should not
On Fri, September 18, 2015 23:28:37 Vishesh Handa wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 18, 2015 at 10:14 PM, Martin Graesslin
wrote:
> > So I join Sune, Eike and Marco: "Free software needs free tools, no
> > proprietary pull requests for KDE development!"
>
> -1
>
> I would prefer us to
On Saturday, September 19, 2015 12:17:00 AM Boudhayan Gupta wrote:
> On 19 September 2015 at 00:00, Eike Hein wrote:
> > I'd like to object to using Kapture for a number of reasons
> > ... apologies for getting involved at this late hour, I was
> > on vacation for most of this
On 18 September 2015 at 23:15, Ivan Čukić wrote:
> We should probably put something like LLVM guys did in the project
> description instead of actually having the real description.
>
> https://github.com/llvm-mirror/llvm
>> Mirror of official llvm git repository located at
>>
On Sat, Sep 19, 2015 at 9:06 AM, Jaroslaw Staniek wrote:
> On 18 September 2015 at 22:37, Ben Cooksley wrote:
>> On Sat, Sep 19, 2015 at 8:10 AM, Friedrich W. H. Kossebau
>> wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>>>
>>> Am Freitag, 18. September 2015,
On 18 September 2015 at 22:37, Ben Cooksley wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 19, 2015 at 8:10 AM, Friedrich W. H. Kossebau
> wrote:
>> Hi,
>
> Hi,
>
>>
>> Am Freitag, 18. September 2015, 17:12:12 schrieb Boudhayan Gupta:
>>> Ladies and gentlemen, as you read this mail
Hello Friedrich,
Am Freitag, 18. September 2015, 23:22:41 CEST schrieb Friedrich W. H.
Kossebau:
> For the first, my answer is not: mirror on github, but rather: make this
> info better accessable (heck, perhaps simply put in the About dialog, in a
> new tab "Developers").
I think its even
Am Samstag, 19. September 2015, 08:37:54 schrieb Ben Cooksley:
> On Sat, Sep 19, 2015 at 8:10 AM, Friedrich W. H. Kossebau
>
> wrote:
> > Am Freitag, 18. September 2015, 17:12:12 schrieb Boudhayan Gupta:
> > Can we please only mirror those projects whose maintainers are okay
On Fri, Sep 18, 2015 at 10:14 PM, Martin Graesslin wrote:
> So I join Sune, Eike and Marco: "Free software needs free tools, no
> proprietary pull requests for KDE development!"
-1
I would prefer us to be more pragmatic. If an adequate free-software
tool exists, lets try to
On 18 September 2015 at 22:55, Andre Heinecke wrote:
> On Friday 18 September 2015 22:29:31 Jaroslaw Staniek wrote:
>> I don't argue with that it needs free tools. Of course we need to be
>> able to operate as usual when the nonfree tools disappear.
>
> As one of the
On Fri, Sep 18, 2015 at 9:05 PM, Jaroslaw Staniek wrote:
> 2. Regarding the issues/pull requests - nobody agreed/disagreed to my
> proposal.
> Is anyone against an *opt-in* possibility of enabling Issues and/or
> Pull Requests for a given mirrored repo? Opt-in by maintainer of
On Sat, Sep 19, 2015 at 10:02 AM, Martin Steigerwald
wrote:
> Hello Friedrich,
Hi Martin,
>
> Am Freitag, 18. September 2015, 23:22:41 CEST schrieb Friedrich W. H.
> Kossebau:
>> For the first, my answer is not: mirror on github, but rather: make this
>> info better
On 18 September 2015 at 13:42, Boudhayan Gupta wrote:
> Ladies and gentlemen, as you read this mail github.com/kde is being
> populated by the initial sync of all repositories.
>
> Maybe someone should make a public announcement?
>
> Shout out to Ben, he truly is a superhero.
On Fri, Sep 18, 2015 at 11:42 PM, Boudhayan Gupta wrote:
> Ladies and gentlemen, as you read this mail github.com/kde is being
> populated by the initial sync of all repositories.
>
> Maybe someone should make a public announcement?
>
> Shout out to Ben, he truly is a superhero.
On Sat, Sep 19, 2015 at 12:14 AM, Jaroslaw Staniek wrote:
> On 18 September 2015 at 14:00, Ben Cooksley wrote:
>> On Fri, Sep 18, 2015 at 11:54 PM, Jaroslaw Staniek wrote:
>>> On 18 September 2015 at 13:42, Boudhayan Gupta
Ladies and gentlemen, as you read this mail github.com/kde is being
populated by the initial sync of all repositories.
Maybe someone should make a public announcement?
Shout out to Ben, he truly is a superhero.
On 17 September 2015 at 20:00, David Edmundson
wrote:
>
On Sat, Sep 19, 2015 at 12:50 AM, Myriam Schweingruber wrote:
> Hi all,
Hi Myriam,
>
> On Fri, Sep 18, 2015 at 1:42 PM, Boudhayan Gupta wrote:
>> Ladies and gentlemen, as you read this mail github.com/kde is being
>> populated by the initial sync of all
On Fri, Sep 18, 2015 at 1:41 PM, Martin Graesslin
wrote:
> On Friday, September 18, 2015 2:14:00 PM CEST Jaroslaw Staniek wrote:
> > On 18 September 2015 at 14:00, Ben Cooksley wrote:
> > > On Fri, Sep 18, 2015 at 11:54 PM, Jaroslaw Staniek
On 18 September 2015 at 14:00, Ben Cooksley wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 18, 2015 at 11:54 PM, Jaroslaw Staniek wrote:
>> On 18 September 2015 at 13:42, Boudhayan Gupta wrote:
>>> Ladies and gentlemen, as you read this mail github.com/kde is being
>>>
Hi,
On Friday 18 September 2015 17:12:12 Boudhayan Gupta wrote:
> Ladies and gentlemen, as you read this mail github.com/kde is being
> populated by the initial sync of all repositories.
>
> Maybe someone should make a public announcement?
>
> Shout out to Ben, he truly is a superhero.
Thanks
On Friday, September 18, 2015 2:14:00 PM CEST Jaroslaw Staniek wrote:
> On 18 September 2015 at 14:00, Ben Cooksley wrote:
> > On Fri, Sep 18, 2015 at 11:54 PM, Jaroslaw Staniek
wrote:
> >> On 18 September 2015 at 13:42, Boudhayan Gupta
On Friday, September 18, 2015 1:53:36 PM CEST David Edmundson wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 18, 2015 at 1:41 PM, Martin Graesslin
>
> wrote:
> > On Friday, September 18, 2015 2:14:00 PM CEST Jaroslaw Staniek wrote:
> > > On 18 September 2015 at 14:00, Ben Cooksley
On 2015-09-18, Jaroslaw Staniek wrote:
> Don't we slowly drop support for Reviewboard?
> (even I am still not sure how to correctly update phabricator diff
> from command line)
Then notes should be changed when we move from reviewboard to
> 2. Regarding the issues/pull
44 matches
Mail list logo