On Fri, September 18, 2015 23:28:37 Vishesh Handa wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 18, 2015 at 10:14 PM, Martin Graesslin
wrote:
> > So I join Sune, Eike and Marco: "Free software needs free tools, no
> > proprietary pull requests for KDE development!"
>
> -1
>
> I would prefer us to be more pragmatic. If
On Sat, Sep 19, 2015 at 2:20 AM, Albert Astals Cid wrote:
>> It depends on our end goal: creating free software or creating free
>> software with only free tools? If it is the latter then I fear we have
>> already failed since many of us use additional tools to aid
>> development which are not fre
On Fri, Sep 18, 2015 at 5:17 PM, Riccardo Iaconelli
wrote:
> On Saturday, September 19, 2015 02:12:13 AM Albert Astals Cid wrote:
> > > I would prefer us to be more pragmatic. If an adequate free-software
> > > tool exists, lets try to use it. If a proprietary tool provides a
> > > better experie
On Friday, September 18, 2015 11:43:34 PM Vishesh Handa wrote:
> It depends on our end goal: creating free software or creating free
> software with only free tools? If it is the latter then I fear we have
> already failed since many of us use additional tools to aid
> development which are not fre
El Divendres, 18 de setembre de 2015, a les 23:43:34, Vishesh Handa va
escriure:
> On Fri, Sep 18, 2015 at 9:05 PM, Jaroslaw Staniek wrote:
> > 2. Regarding the issues/pull requests - nobody agreed/disagreed to my
> > proposal. Is anyone against an *opt-in* possibility of enabling Issues
> > and/
On Saturday, September 19, 2015 02:12:13 AM Albert Astals Cid wrote:
> > I would prefer us to be more pragmatic. If an adequate free-software
> > tool exists, lets try to use it. If a proprietary tool provides a
> > better experience lets use that. For my own projects I will advocate
> > reviewboar
El Divendres, 18 de setembre de 2015, a les 23:42:02, Jaroslaw Staniek va
escriure:
>
> Your experience may differ and I value that. Opt-in - nobody forces you.
It does, once person X submits a patch using github to KDERepoY he'll complain
if he can't for KDERepoZ.
Cheers,
Albert
___
El Divendres, 18 de setembre de 2015, a les 23:28:37, Vishesh Handa va
escriure:
> On Fri, Sep 18, 2015 at 10:14 PM, Martin Graesslin
wrote:
> > So I join Sune, Eike and Marco: "Free software needs free tools, no
> > proprietary pull requests for KDE development!"
>
> -1
>
> I would prefer us
Il Fri, 18 Sep 2015 22:14:04 +0200, Martin Graesslin ha scritto:
> So I join Sune, Eike and Marco: "Free software needs free tools, no
> proprietary pull requests for KDE development!"
I'm not such a big contributor, but I agree with the above people. We
already have a big issue with "open" desk
On Sat, Sep 19, 2015 at 10:02 AM, Martin Steigerwald
wrote:
> Hello Friedrich,
Hi Martin,
>
> Am Freitag, 18. September 2015, 23:22:41 CEST schrieb Friedrich W. H.
> Kossebau:
>> For the first, my answer is not: mirror on github, but rather: make this
>> info better accessable (heck, perhaps si
Hello Friedrich,
Am Freitag, 18. September 2015, 23:22:41 CEST schrieb Friedrich W. H.
Kossebau:
> For the first, my answer is not: mirror on github, but rather: make this
> info better accessable (heck, perhaps simply put in the About dialog, in a
> new tab "Developers").
I think its even poss
On 18 September 2015 at 23:15, Ivan Čukić wrote:
> We should probably put something like LLVM guys did in the project
> description instead of actually having the real description.
>
> https://github.com/llvm-mirror/llvm
>> Mirror of official llvm git repository located at
>> http://llvm.org/git/l
On Fri, Sep 18, 2015 at 9:05 PM, Jaroslaw Staniek wrote:
> 2. Regarding the issues/pull requests - nobody agreed/disagreed to my
> proposal.
> Is anyone against an *opt-in* possibility of enabling Issues and/or
> Pull Requests for a given mirrored repo? Opt-in by maintainer of the
> patches. We c
On 18 September 2015 at 22:55, Andre Heinecke wrote:
> On Friday 18 September 2015 22:29:31 Jaroslaw Staniek wrote:
>> I don't argue with that it needs free tools. Of course we need to be
>> able to operate as usual when the nonfree tools disappear.
>
> As one of the KDE-Windows developers. Who wo
On Fri, Sep 18, 2015 at 10:14 PM, Martin Graesslin wrote:
> So I join Sune, Eike and Marco: "Free software needs free tools, no
> proprietary pull requests for KDE development!"
-1
I would prefer us to be more pragmatic. If an adequate free-software
tool exists, lets try to use it. If a propriet
On Fri, Sep 18, 2015 at 10:18 PM, Martin Klapetek
wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 18, 2015 at 2:47 PM, Boudhayan Gupta wrote:
>>
>>
>> While it is a bit late now (the repository rename was done yesterday),
>> I'm still in love with the word Selfie (for the above reasons and
>> more). I'm heavily considering
Am Samstag, 19. September 2015, 08:37:54 schrieb Ben Cooksley:
> On Sat, Sep 19, 2015 at 8:10 AM, Friedrich W. H. Kossebau
>
> wrote:
> > Am Freitag, 18. September 2015, 17:12:12 schrieb Boudhayan Gupta:
> > Can we please only mirror those projects whose maintainers are okay with
> > the added wo
On Fri, Sep 18, 2015 at 2:47 PM, Boudhayan Gupta wrote:
>
> While it is a bit late now (the repository rename was done yesterday),
> I'm still in love with the word Selfie (for the above reasons and
> more). I'm heavily considering requesting another rename to Selfie.
>
> Are there any strong obj
Eike Hein ha scritto:
>
>
> On 09/01/2015 10:08 PM, Boudhayan Gupta wrote:
>> Ladies and gentlemen, I'll take a decision on this in the next couple
>> of days. As it stands now, Pixie is a universal favourite but we can't
>> use it for copyright reasons.
>>
>> Kapture seems to have the most numbe
We should probably put something like LLVM guys did in the project
description instead of actually having the real description.
https://github.com/llvm-mirror/llvm
> Mirror of official llvm git repository located at
> http://llvm.org/git/llvm. Updated every five minutes.
> http://llvm.org
Cheers,
On Saturday, September 19, 2015 12:17:00 AM Boudhayan Gupta wrote:
> On 19 September 2015 at 00:00, Eike Hein wrote:
> > I'd like to object to using Kapture for a number of reasons
> > ... apologies for getting involved at this late hour, I was
> > on vacation for most of this thread :)
> >
> > *
On Sat, Sep 19, 2015 at 9:06 AM, Jaroslaw Staniek wrote:
> On 18 September 2015 at 22:37, Ben Cooksley wrote:
>> On Sat, Sep 19, 2015 at 8:10 AM, Friedrich W. H. Kossebau
>> wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>>>
>>> Am Freitag, 18. September 2015, 17:12:12 schrieb Boudhayan Gupta:
Ladies and gent
On 18 September 2015 at 22:37, Ben Cooksley wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 19, 2015 at 8:10 AM, Friedrich W. H. Kossebau
> wrote:
>> Hi,
>
> Hi,
>
>>
>> Am Freitag, 18. September 2015, 17:12:12 schrieb Boudhayan Gupta:
>>> Ladies and gentlemen, as you read this mail github.com/kde is being
>>> populated by
On Friday 18 September 2015 22:29:31 Jaroslaw Staniek wrote:
> I don't argue with that it needs free tools. Of course we need to be
> able to operate as usual when the nonfree tools disappear.
As one of the KDE-Windows developers. Who would be able to cope if their
precious Visual Studio is unava
On Sat, Sep 19, 2015 at 8:10 AM, Friedrich W. H. Kossebau
wrote:
> Hi,
Hi,
>
> Am Freitag, 18. September 2015, 17:12:12 schrieb Boudhayan Gupta:
>> Ladies and gentlemen, as you read this mail github.com/kde is being
>> populated by the initial sync of all repositories.
>
> Pardon for the late in
On 18 September 2015 at 22:14, Martin Graesslin wrote:
> On Friday, September 18, 2015 9:52:46 PM CEST Jaroslaw Staniek wrote:
>> On 18 September 2015 at 21:16, Marco Martin wrote:
>> > On Fri, Sep 18, 2015 at 9:12 PM, Sune Vuorela wrote:
>> >>> 2. Regarding the issues/pull requests - nobody agr
On Friday 18 September 2015 22:14:04 Martin Graesslin wrote:
> I must say I'm uneasy with the thought of allowing pull requests - even as
> an exception. Seeing this raised on the day the mirroring started makes me
> sad that I initiated the whole thing.
Yes I'm uneasy about that too. I thought "W
On Fri, Sep 18, 2015 at 9:10 PM, Friedrich W. H. Kossebau
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Am Freitag, 18. September 2015, 17:12:12 schrieb Boudhayan Gupta:
> > Ladies and gentlemen, as you read this mail github.com/kde is being
> > populated by the initial sync of all repositories.
>
> Pardon for the late input
On Friday, September 18, 2015 9:52:46 PM CEST Jaroslaw Staniek wrote:
> On 18 September 2015 at 21:16, Marco Martin wrote:
> > On Fri, Sep 18, 2015 at 9:12 PM, Sune Vuorela wrote:
> >>> 2. Regarding the issues/pull requests - nobody agreed/disagreed to my
> >>> proposal. Is anyone against an *opt
Hi,
Am Freitag, 18. September 2015, 17:12:12 schrieb Boudhayan Gupta:
> Ladies and gentlemen, as you read this mail github.com/kde is being
> populated by the initial sync of all repositories.
Pardon for the late input, missed the dynamic of the people behind this idea
(and actually expected it
On 18 September 2015 at 21:16, Marco Martin wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 18, 2015 at 9:12 PM, Sune Vuorela wrote:
>>> 2. Regarding the issues/pull requests - nobody agreed/disagreed to my
>>> proposal.
>>> Is anyone against an *opt-in* possibility of enabling Issues and/or
>>> Pull Requests for a given
On 09/18/2015 09:12 PM, Sune Vuorela wrote:
> Yes. I'm against. And I'm also against mirroring on github, but I didn't
> voice my opinion by that because it was said that issues and pull
> requests are not to be enabled.
>
> We should not proprietarize our development workflow. We should not wor
On Fri, Sep 18, 2015 at 9:12 PM, Sune Vuorela wrote:
>> 2. Regarding the issues/pull requests - nobody agreed/disagreed to my
>> proposal.
>> Is anyone against an *opt-in* possibility of enabling Issues and/or
>> Pull Requests for a given mirrored repo? Opt-in by maintainer of the
>> patches. We
On 2015-09-18, Jaroslaw Staniek wrote:
> Don't we slowly drop support for Reviewboard?
> (even I am still not sure how to correctly update phabricator diff
> from command line)
Then notes should be changed when we move from reviewboard to
> 2. Regarding the issues/pull requests - nobody agreed/
On Fri, Sep 18, 2015 at 2:53 PM, David Edmundson
wrote:
>> > But again, please consider this as less controlled/predictable
>> > activity - that forking will happen anyway, as this is the value of
>> > github-based collaboration, and (IMHO) sense of our existence on
>> > github.
>>
> Issues can ar
On Friday 18 September 2015 20:30:32 Eike Hein wrote:
> > Kapture seems to have the most number of votes, so if nothing changes
> > I'll go with that.
>
> I'd like to object to using Kapture for a number of reasons
> ... apologies for getting involved at this late hour, I was
> on vacation for mos
On 18 September 2015 at 14:17, Ben Cooksley wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 19, 2015 at 12:14 AM, Jaroslaw Staniek wrote:
>> On 18 September 2015 at 14:00, Ben Cooksley wrote:
>>> On Fri, Sep 18, 2015 at 11:54 PM, Jaroslaw Staniek wrote:
On 18 September 2015 at 13:42, Boudhayan Gupta wrote:
> La
On 09/18/2015 08:47 PM, Boudhayan Gupta wrote:
> While it is a bit late now (the repository rename was done yesterday),
> I'm still in love with the word Selfie (for the above reasons and
> more). I'm heavily considering requesting another rename to Selfie.
FWIW I feel bad about causing more sys
On 19 September 2015 at 00:00, Eike Hein wrote:
> I'd like to object to using Kapture for a number of reasons
> ... apologies for getting involved at this late hour, I was
> on vacation for most of this thread :)
>
> * The forcibly-inject-a-K naming scheme used to offer some
> utility in the for
On 09/01/2015 10:08 PM, Boudhayan Gupta wrote:
> Ladies and gentlemen, I'll take a decision on this in the next couple
> of days. As it stands now, Pixie is a universal favourite but we can't
> use it for copyright reasons.
>
> Kapture seems to have the most number of votes, so if nothing change
On Friday, September 18, 2015 1:53:36 PM CEST David Edmundson wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 18, 2015 at 1:41 PM, Martin Graesslin
>
> wrote:
> > On Friday, September 18, 2015 2:14:00 PM CEST Jaroslaw Staniek wrote:
> > > On 18 September 2015 at 14:00, Ben Cooksley wrote:
> > > > On Fri, Sep 18, 2015 at 1
On Fri, Sep 18, 2015 at 1:41 PM, Martin Graesslin
wrote:
> On Friday, September 18, 2015 2:14:00 PM CEST Jaroslaw Staniek wrote:
> > On 18 September 2015 at 14:00, Ben Cooksley wrote:
> > > On Fri, Sep 18, 2015 at 11:54 PM, Jaroslaw Staniek
> wrote:
> > >> On 18 September 2015 at 13:42, Boudhay
On Sat, Sep 19, 2015 at 12:50 AM, Myriam Schweingruber wrote:
> Hi all,
Hi Myriam,
>
> On Fri, Sep 18, 2015 at 1:42 PM, Boudhayan Gupta wrote:
>> Ladies and gentlemen, as you read this mail github.com/kde is being
>> populated by the initial sync of all repositories.
>>
>> Maybe someone should
Hi all,
On Fri, Sep 18, 2015 at 1:42 PM, Boudhayan Gupta wrote:
> Ladies and gentlemen, as you read this mail github.com/kde is being
> populated by the initial sync of all repositories.
>
> Maybe someone should make a public announcement?
>
> Shout out to Ben, he truly is a superhero.
I see qui
On Friday, September 18, 2015 2:14:00 PM CEST Jaroslaw Staniek wrote:
> On 18 September 2015 at 14:00, Ben Cooksley wrote:
> > On Fri, Sep 18, 2015 at 11:54 PM, Jaroslaw Staniek
wrote:
> >> On 18 September 2015 at 13:42, Boudhayan Gupta wrote:
> >>> Ladies and gentlemen, as you read this mail g
On Sat, Sep 19, 2015 at 12:14 AM, Jaroslaw Staniek wrote:
> On 18 September 2015 at 14:00, Ben Cooksley wrote:
>> On Fri, Sep 18, 2015 at 11:54 PM, Jaroslaw Staniek wrote:
>>> On 18 September 2015 at 13:42, Boudhayan Gupta wrote:
Ladies and gentlemen, as you read this mail github.com/kde i
On 18 September 2015 at 14:00, Ben Cooksley wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 18, 2015 at 11:54 PM, Jaroslaw Staniek wrote:
>> On 18 September 2015 at 13:42, Boudhayan Gupta wrote:
>>> Ladies and gentlemen, as you read this mail github.com/kde is being
>>> populated by the initial sync of all repositories.
>
On Fri, Sep 18, 2015 at 11:42 PM, Boudhayan Gupta wrote:
> Ladies and gentlemen, as you read this mail github.com/kde is being
> populated by the initial sync of all repositories.
>
> Maybe someone should make a public announcement?
>
> Shout out to Ben, he truly is a superhero.
Credit belongs mo
Hi,
On Friday 18 September 2015 17:12:12 Boudhayan Gupta wrote:
> Ladies and gentlemen, as you read this mail github.com/kde is being
> populated by the initial sync of all repositories.
>
> Maybe someone should make a public announcement?
>
> Shout out to Ben, he truly is a superhero.
Thanks
On Fri, Sep 18, 2015 at 11:54 PM, Jaroslaw Staniek wrote:
> On 18 September 2015 at 13:42, Boudhayan Gupta wrote:
>> Ladies and gentlemen, as you read this mail github.com/kde is being
>> populated by the initial sync of all repositories.
>>
>> Maybe someone should make a public announcement?
>>
On 18 September 2015 at 13:42, Boudhayan Gupta wrote:
> Ladies and gentlemen, as you read this mail github.com/kde is being
> populated by the initial sync of all repositories.
>
> Maybe someone should make a public announcement?
>
> Shout out to Ben, he truly is a superhero.
Thanks a lot!
Is it
Ladies and gentlemen, as you read this mail github.com/kde is being
populated by the initial sync of all repositories.
Maybe someone should make a public announcement?
Shout out to Ben, he truly is a superhero.
On 17 September 2015 at 20:00, David Edmundson
wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, Sep 17, 2015 at
Hey there,
I was wondering if you wanted to try our email marketing and lead
generation solutions.
We have worked on a number of projects and campaigns, all our packages are
designed
according to your requirements.
If you are interested, I would be more than happy to develop a plan that
works wi
Ah, sorry. Wanted to answer.
I am not planning on working on Kannasaver right now. So I am fine with the
move.
Thanks for your maintenance efforts. :)
Regards
On Sep 14, 2015 3:34 PM, "Jeremy Whiting" wrote:
> Ok, requested kannasaver move to unmaintained.
>
> thanks,
> Jeremy
>
> On Sun, Sep 6
54 matches
Mail list logo