Re: [kde-community] Retiring applications - was - Re: Applications in KDE Generation 5

On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 1:37 AM, Albert Astals Cid aa...@kde.org wrote: El Dimecres, 15 de gener de 2014, a les 21:47:17, John Layt va escriure: Hi, * A number of our apps and utilities really have had their day and need retiring, e.g. KsCD, Kppp, KFloppy. There's no point keeping

[kde-community] strawpoll: kde quassel core hosting

Ahoy ahoy, It just occured to me that I know rather a lot of people who either operate their own Quassel Core [1] or are on a shared core with a bunch of other community members. So, I was talking to Ben Cooksley about the possibility of offering a Quassel Core in addition to the already existing

Re: [kde-community] Official KDE mirror on github

On Mon, Aug 17, 2015 at 7:46 AM, Martin Graesslin mgraess...@kde.org wrote: I suggest that we: * introduce an official mirror for all KDE repositories on github * replace all existing (non-official) clones * disallow pull-requests on github to not replace our development model by a

Re: KDE licence policy update

On Sat, Feb 11, 2017 at 12:37 AM, Luigi Toscano wrote: > Jonathan Riddell ha scritto: > >> The main change is for docs and other non-code files to become >> CC-BY-SA 4. This allows it to be converted to code (it's one-way >> compatible with LGPL 3) > Do you have more

Re: Please move project task tracking to Phabricator

On Wed, Nov 2, 2016 at 11:33 AM, Martin Graesslin wrote: > On Wednesday, November 2, 2016 10:26:28 PM CET Ben Cooksley wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> As some will be aware we currently have two Kanban board style >> solutions deployed - Kanboard at todo.kde.org and Phabricator at >>

Re: KDE GPG Keyserver

On Mon, Jul 24, 2017 at 5:11 PM, Sandro Knauß wrote: > Hey, > >> I recommend using the keyserver (pool) that's recommended by the official >> GnuPG FAQ [1] or, even better, sticking to the default, unless you have a >> specific reason for not using those. If you are concerned

Re: KDE GPG Keyserver

On Mon, Jul 24, 2017 at 3:04 PM, Boudhayan Gupta wrote: > Ingo: I just set up gossip with the SKS pool but it hasn't synced anything > yet. https://www.sks-keyservers.net/status/ still not synced I am afraid

Re: github, phabricator: a new threadZ

to argue any side. On Thu, Aug 10, 2017 at 9:02 AM, Harald Sitter <sit...@kde.org> wrote: > I for one would pick the alternative which is not using our > infrastructure and instead click two buttons so I don't have to file > paperwork manually nor have to wait for said paperwork to ge

Re: github, phabricator: a new threadZ

On Thu, Aug 10, 2017 at 11:06 AM, Adriaan de Groot wrote: > Perhaps we should ask sitter what kinds of scratch repo's those were, and > whether he would have created them on KDE infra, if there was a similarly > simple one-click way to create scratch repo's. - experimental snap

Re: Applications Lifecycle Policy

On Tue, Jul 4, 2017 at 1:43 PM, Kevin Ottens wrote: > Hello, > > On Tuesday, 4 July 2017 13:20:43 CEST Jonathan Riddell wrote: >> The applications lifecycle policy needs an update >> >> Is this a good current state of it or are there more stages? >> >>

Re: Applications Lifecycle Policy

On Wed, Jul 5, 2017 at 7:01 AM, Christian Mollekopf wrote: >> This comes again from the diversity in view: for me the review, with all >> its limits, it's the baseline. >> As showed in the discussion, releasing from playground is not more >> complicated than other type of

Re: github, phabricator: a new threadZ

On Wed, Aug 9, 2017 at 1:39 PM, Boudewijn Rempt wrote: > On Wed, 9 Aug 2017, Riccardo Iaconelli wrote: > >> This is a new thread entirely, but incidentally also something we >> should also think about. Why many KDE developers choose github instead >> of scratch KDE repositories

Re: Splitting Craft, move the recipes to GitHub

On Wed, Aug 23, 2017 at 4:24 PM, Sebastian Kügler wrote: > Could you not merge these things from github somehow, so that we can keep the > canonical copy on KDE's git, or perhaps also pull recipes from github, *in > addition to* KDE's git? 2 cents: some people already do that one

Re: phab reviews

On Fri, Aug 25, 2017 at 2:00 PM, Ben Cooksley <bcooks...@kde.org> wrote: > On Fri, Aug 25, 2017 at 8:59 PM, Harald Sitter <sit...@kde.org> wrote: >> For one it makes it hard to keep on top of reviews across all our software. >> More importantly though, how e

phab reviews

Hola! Our phabricator guide says that at least one person needs to be set as reviewer to get any review. https://community.kde.org/Infrastructure/Phabricator#Posting_a_Patch This sucks. For one it makes it hard to keep on top of reviews across all our software. More importantly though, how

Re: phab reviews

On Sat, Aug 26, 2017 at 1:06 PM, Ben Cooksley wrote: >> fact we could perhaps automate this (initially on repo creation?). We >> have a members property in our repo-metdata yamls, so we could have a >> package for each repo that tracks all files and subscribes the Owners. >>

Re: Reminder: KDE (AT) MeetUp: 27th of October in Vienna

Ah uh ah, I shall attend! See you there ^^ On Tue, Oct 24, 2017 at 8:47 PM, Stefan Derkits wrote: > Hello fellow (Austrian) KDE People, > > this is a short reminder about the upcoming KDE MeetUp in Vienna this > Friday: > > KDE Austria MeetUp: > > When: 27th of October, 7 pm

bugzilla, it's products, how they relate to projects. it's a mess...

Hola! Every other month I run my head into the desk over bugzilla products -.- - 99% of time if I want to file a bug against a new project that project has no product in bugzilla at all - unmaintained-ness is not reflected. you can file bugs against

Re: Discourse

On Tue, Oct 30, 2018 at 8:38 AM Boudewijn Rempt wrote: > > On maandag 29 oktober 2018 19:31:54 CET Jonathan Riddell wrote: > > Discourse is modern forum and mailing list software. Examples at > > https://discussion.fedoraproject.org/ or https://discourse.ubuntu.com/ > > > > I went to a talk at

Re: Discourse

On Tue, Oct 30, 2018 at 7:28 AM Ben Cooksley wrote: > thanks to Docker's lack of user namespaces Docker has user namespacing. At blue systems we've been using it since September 2016 https://docs.docker.com/engine/security/userns-remap/ HS

Re: Discourse

On Mon, Oct 29, 2018 at 7:32 PM Jonathan Riddell wrote: > > > Discourse is modern forum and mailing list software. Examples at > https://discussion.fedoraproject.org/ or https://discourse.ubuntu.com/ > > I went to a talk at the Embedded Linux Summit about how Fedora moved to use > Discourse.

Re: Closing NEEDSINFO bugs after 30 days

On Fri, Nov 16, 2018 at 2:16 PM Boudewijn Rempt wrote: > > On vrijdag 16 november 2018 14:11:29 CET Harald Sitter wrote: > > > - human sets needsinfo > > - 15 days pass: bot posts reminder > > - reporter comments > > - N days pass: bug gets automatically dropped

Re: Closing NEEDSINFO bugs after 30 days

On Fri, Nov 16, 2018 at 2:40 PM Alexander Potashev wrote: > > пт, 16 нояб. 2018 г. в 16:35, Boudewijn Rempt : > > > > On vrijdag 16 november 2018 14:31:39 CET Alexander Potashev wrote: > > > > > You only considered to case when human sets NEEDSINFO. If NEEDSINFO is > > > set by a script, we may

Re: Policy on stale bugs (was Re: Closing NEEDSINFO bugs after 30 days)

On Fri, Nov 16, 2018 at 10:37 AM Luigi Toscano wrote: > Please disable it for now, or just enable it for projects who explicitly wants > it for now. As mentioned on IRC: everyone please note that unless a change was made by bug-jani...@kde.org it was not actually done automatically (or not that

Re: Closing NEEDSINFO bugs after 30 days

(Pulling this back to the NEEDSINFO thread since it sounds unrelated to what Luigi was writing about in the Policy on stale bugs thread) On Fri, Nov 16, 2018 at 12:51 PM Boudewijn Rempt wrote: > I know it's well-meant, and it does help to get old bugs resolved -- but it > really should use a

Re: Bugzilla template problems

Oh btw, just as a random FYI: I think stuff like this is why ubuntu eventually ended up having a GUI tool (ubuntu-bug) to help file bug reports with useful metadata. Putting it on the user to figure this stuff out is unreliable at best and can easily get overwhelming.

Re: Bugzilla template problems

On Thu, Oct 4, 2018 at 6:14 PM Nate Graham wrote: > > Can the template be overridden on a per-project basis? Yes. [% IF product.name == 'foobar' %] ... [% END %] I think making the template text more generically applicable is more reasonable though. Otherwise the about system bit can basically

Re: Bugzilla template problems

018 um 22:11 schrieb Harald Sitter: > > Oh btw, just as a random FYI: I think stuff like this is why ubuntu > > eventually ended up having a GUI tool (ubuntu-bug) to help file bug > > reports with useful metadata. Putting it on the user to figure this > > stuff out is unreli

Re: Discourse

On Thu, Nov 29, 2018 at 5:41 PM Luca Beltrame wrote: > > Can you describe these workflows a bit? > > There is this https://www.discourse.org/plugins/akismet.html not sure > > Is it Akismet in name, or uses the service? I am not sure what that means I am afraid. > > it's sufficient though. One

Re: Discourse

On Tue, Dec 4, 2018 at 1:31 PM Luca Beltrame wrote: > > Il giorno Tue, 4 Dec 2018 12:48:48 +0100 > Harald Sitter ha scritto: > > > OTOH I also don't understand how the current spam protection works. Do > > we maintain a list of blacklisted words? Because from what I >

Re: Discourse

I've started a wiki page. I encourage people to chip in. https://community.kde.org/Infrastructure/Evaluation/Discourse HS

Re: Discourse

On Tue, Dec 4, 2018 at 12:03 PM Luca Beltrame wrote: > > Il giorno Tue, 4 Dec 2018 11:58:27 +0100 > Harald Sitter ha scritto: > > > > Is it Akismet in name, or uses the service? > > I am not sure what that means I am afraid. > > Akismet is a (non-Free)

Re: Discourse

On Thu, Nov 29, 2018 at 9:03 AM Ben Cooksley wrote: > > On Wed, Nov 28, 2018 at 5:25 AM Lays Rodrigues wrote: > > > > Let's not go in that way. > > As a ~new person~ on KDE, 3 years only, we need to move to a modern web. At > > least in my point of view, I really think that using old stuff

Re: Discourse

On Thu, Nov 29, 2018 at 11:54 AM Boudewijn Rempt wrote: > > On donderdag 29 november 2018 11:32:12 CET Harald Sitter wrote: > > > In fact, I am also not sure why everyone seems to consider importing > > 10 year old forum posts a given requirement here. We migrated away

Re: Closing NEEDSINFO bugs after 30 days

On Mon, Nov 19, 2018 at 1:12 AM Myriam Schweingruber wrote: > > > > On Fri, 16 Nov 2018 at 14:22, Harald Sitter wrote: >> >> On Fri, Nov 16, 2018 at 2:16 PM Boudewijn Rempt wrote: >> > >> > On vrijdag 16 november 2018 14:11:29 CET Harald Sitter

Re: Closing NEEDSINFO bugs after 30 days

On Mon, Sep 17, 2018 at 8:25 PM Nate Graham wrote: > +1, in favor, especially if we can close them in an automated fashion. > Closing bugs isn't as frustrating for filers as it used to be anyway, since > if they ever show up again with new information, they can just re-open them. Should be

Re: Closing NEEDSINFO bugs after 30 days

On Tue, Sep 18, 2018 at 12:59 PM Boudewijn Rempt wrote: > > Would it also be possible to automatically remove the needinfo status if the > reporter adds a comment after it's set to needinfo? Yes.

Re: Shutdown of paste.kde.org

On Sat, Feb 2, 2019 at 8:46 PM Ben Cooksley wrote: > We'll be shutting this service down in approximately one weeks time. > Should anyone be using it to store content for long term purposes we'd > advise you to migrate it to either Phabricator, Gitlab or somewhere > more permanent (like a wiki)

Re: Shutdown of paste.kde.org

On Sat, Feb 2, 2019 at 8:46 PM Ben Cooksley wrote: > Because this makes it functionally equivalent to the pastebin > functionality included in both Phabricator > (phabricator.kde.org/paste/) and Gitlab (invent.kde.org/snippets) > we've decided that it would be best if paste.kde.org were to be >

Re: Shutdown of paste.kde.org

On Tue, Feb 5, 2019 at 9:12 AM Ben Cooksley wrote: > > On Tue, Feb 5, 2019 at 1:26 AM David Narvaez > wrote: > > > > On Mon, Feb 4, 2019 at 6:52 AM Harald Sitter wrote: > > > How does this affect the playground app cutepaste? Or rather: what's > > > the p

Re: Anonymous contributions

On Thu, Apr 11, 2019 at 8:04 PM Nate Graham wrote: > > On Thu, 11 Apr 2019 11:55:42 -0600 David Edmundson < da...@davidedmundson.co.uk> wrote > > There are legal implications as the copyright is ultimately held by real people. > > Could we require that anonymous contributors

Re: FSF leadership

On Thu, Sep 19, 2019 at 10:29 AM Jens wrote: > > TBH I worry less about past transgressions or the communicative fallout > than I do a lack of response from us. (this is me not having a blessed > clue what exactly went down 2009) > > I do agree with you on many points and I think you raise a lot

Re: Should KDE join the (Digital) Global Climate Strike this friday?

This is an awesome idea! I'm all for it. Finding someone to fiddle with the website at such short notice may be problematic though. Social media support should be easy peasy. On Wed, Sep 18, 2019 at 6:01 PM wrote: > > Hello to all members of the KDE community, > > this friday (september the

Re: Sysadmin Load Reduction: Code Related Services

On Sat, Nov 16, 2019 at 10:14 AM Ben Cooksley wrote: > (Harald, I assume it's only requirement is a copy of the > sysadmin/repo-metadata repository locally, and it doesn't require the > actual Git repositories?) Correct.

Re: Sysadmin Load Reduction: Code Related Services

On Sat, Nov 16, 2019 at 9:40 PM Ben Cooksley wrote: > > On Sun, Nov 17, 2019 at 5:19 AM Carl Schwan wrote: > > > > Hi all, > > Hi Carl, > > > > > Can the gitlab api be of useful in the future? > > > > e.g https://invent.kde.org/api/v4/groups/7 > > While for many purposes Gitlab's API wil be

Re: Sysadmin Load Reduction: Code Related Services

On Sat, Nov 9, 2019 at 11:37 PM Alexander Potashev wrote: > > сб, 9 нояб. 2019 г. в 02:51, Ben Cooksley : > > In the category of no longer in use, we have the compatibility > > generator for the kde_projects.xml file. This was introduced when we > > shutdown Redmine/Chiliproject and migrated to

Re: Sysadmin Load Reduction: Code Related Services

On Mon, Nov 18, 2019 at 7:33 PM Ben Cooksley wrote: > > On Tue, Nov 19, 2019 at 7:27 AM Albert Astals Cid wrote: > > > > El dilluns, 18 de novembre de 2019, a les 13:34:19 CET, Harald Sitter va > > escriure: > > > And lastly, fold the i18n data into t

Re: Sysadmin Load Reduction: Code Related Services

On Mon, Nov 18, 2019 at 6:29 PM Ben Cooksley wrote: > It'll be hard to tell whether a name is unique or not when creating a > repository unfortunately. > For the most part I do not expect collisions to occur though and we > certainly won't aim to create duplicate names. Wouldn't creating a repo

Re: Issues with the issue tracking system

Hey. On Mon, Nov 4, 2019 at 2:12 AM Philippe Cloutier wrote: > > Dear community, > I am facing 2 issues with the ITS which I cannot solve myself currently. > > Over the last months, I requested the "severity" (importance) of several > tickets to be adjusted: >

Re: Feedback on new feature: energy performance settings

On Wed, Aug 12, 2020 at 7:52 PM John Salatas wrote: > It would be good to have a confirmation from more users, before deciding > whether we will expose the governor settings in the GUI or not. # AMD Ryzen 7 4800H (acpi-cpufreq): schedutil/ondemand/conservative: idle at minimum configured

auto-comment on bugzilla when making an MR?

Salut! Does anyone think it'd be a worthwhile investment to have some piece of tech automatically comment on bug reports when someone posts an MR on invent? I pretty much never bother posting comments with the MR but at the same time I know that at least the Plasma team decided to actively use

dictionaryrunner license problems

Hola Is anybody willing or able to get in touch with Jason A. Donenfeld? He's being unresponsive to emails https://markmail.org/message/xupktbituuuojwip and the dictonaryrunner he wrote is lacking licensing information

Re: dictionaryrunner license problems

It's been resolved. Nothing to see here :) On Thu, Aug 6, 2020 at 6:58 PM Harald Sitter wrote: > > Hola > > Is anybody willing or able to get in touch with Jason A. Donenfeld? > He's being unresponsive to emails > https://markmail.org/message/xupktbituuuojwip and the dictonar

Re: Feedback on new feature: energy performance settings

On Sun, Aug 9, 2020 at 2:05 PM John Salatas wrote: > > Hi. > > I just committed a set of patches for powerdevil [1] and > plasma-workspace [2] in order to expose > in the GUI some settings related to the cpu's energy performance. > > Apparently, these settings seem to make great difference in

Re: auto-comment on bugzilla when making an MR?

On Tue, Jun 16, 2020 at 7:08 PM Albert Astals Cid wrote: > > El dimarts, 16 de juny de 2020, a les 12:54:07 CEST, Harald Sitter va > escriure: > > Tech that automatically mentioned MRs on bugs has been rolled out and > > seems to be working nicely. CCBUG: only mentions the M

Re: auto-comment on bugzilla when making an MR?

Tech that automatically mentioned MRs on bugs has been rolled out and seems to be working nicely. CCBUG: only mentions the MR while BUG: also marks the bug ASSIGNED. Enjoy. HS

Re: is a BSL licensed service acceptable for sysadminy use cases?

+1 On Wed, Jun 9, 2021 at 9:28 PM Kenny Coyle wrote: > > So with the licensing question aside, I realise that there is a desire here > to have log (and/or metric) aggregation services available for KDE services. > > With Akademy happening in a few weeks, should we discuss this in a BoF? I >

Re: is a BSL licensed service acceptable for sysadminy use cases?

On Fri, May 28, 2021 at 12:25 PM Harald Sitter wrote: > > On Fri, May 28, 2021 at 11:43 AM Sune Vuorela wrote: > > > > On 2021-05-26, Anna “CyberTailor” wrote: > > >> After 36 months, the code becomes Apache-2.0 licensed (the conversion > > >> per

is a BSL licensed service acceptable for sysadminy use cases?

Ahoy ahoy I do on occasion write behind the scenes micro services for various things we need in KDE and usually more specifically neon. It's always been a big lament of mine that we don't really have a good way to record errors from these services. Gitlab meanwhile has builtin support for a piece

Re: is a BSL licensed service acceptable for sysadminy use cases?

On Fri, May 28, 2021 at 12:52 PM Ingo Klöcker wrote: > > On Freitag, 28. Mai 2021 12:36:35 CEST Andrius Štikonas wrote: > > 2021 m. gegužės 28 d., penktadienis 11:25:49 BST Harald Sitter rašė: > > > On Fri, May 28, 2021 at 11:43 AM Sune Vuorela wrote: > > > >

Re: is a BSL licensed service acceptable for sysadminy use cases?

On Fri, May 28, 2021 at 11:43 AM Sune Vuorela wrote: > > On 2021-05-26, Anna “CyberTailor” wrote: > >> After 36 months, the code becomes Apache-2.0 licensed (the conversion > >> period) > > > > So you can use old sentry versions, which are open source. > > > > +1. I think we should support free

Re: is a BSL licensed service acceptable for sysadminy use cases?

On Wed, May 26, 2021 at 11:52 PM Albert Astals Cid wrote: > > El dimecres, 26 de maig de 2021, a les 16:07:14 (CEST), Harald Sitter va > escriure: > > Ahoy ahoy > > > > I do on occasion write behind the scenes micro services for various > > things we need in

Re: GCompris and AGPL

On Mon, Feb 15, 2021 at 8:38 PM Timothée Giet wrote: > > Hi, > > Last year, in order to create the Analog Electricity activity in > GCompris, we had to integrate some existing code for the electric > circuit simulation engine. The code weintegratedis under the AGPLv3 > license... > > First

Re: Extending the license policy to include ODbL-1.0

+1 On Wed, Sep 15, 2021 at 5:27 PM Volker Krause wrote: > > Hi, > > there's a MR [1] for ki18n containing data tables generated from OSM data, > which implies the ODbL-1.0 license [2]. We also already have other places > ([3], [4]) actually doing this. > > However that's a license not yet

Re: Press Release: Okular, world's first eco-certified software product!

So amazing! Congratulations and big thanks to everyone involved :) On Wed, Mar 16, 2022 at 10:23 AM Joseph P. De Veaugh-Geiss wrote: > > Apologies for cross-posting! > > [Deutsch unten] > > Today KDE is excited to announce that Okular, the multi-platform > universal document viewer, is the first

A new blogs.kde.org

https://discuss.kde.org/t/a-new-blogs-kde-org/5011

Re: Gitlab update, 2FA now mandatory

On Tue, Oct 25, 2022 at 1:22 PM Ahmad Samir wrote: > > On 25/10/22 12:11, Carl Schwan wrote: > > Le dimanche 23 octobre 2022 à 5:55 PM, Christoph Cullmann (cullmann.io) > > a écrit : > > > > > >> On 2022-10-23 08:32, Ben Cooksley wrote: > >> > >>> Hi all, > >>> > >>> This afternoon I updated

Re: Gitlab update, 2FA now mandatory

On Tue, Oct 25, 2022 at 1:52 PM Ahmad Samir wrote: > > On 25/10/22 13:29, Harald Sitter wrote: > > On Tue, Oct 25, 2022 at 1:22 PM Ahmad Samir wrote: > >> > >> Can a first time contributor create a fork, create multiple/100 MR's and > >> spin up

discourse testing

Hello my dearies, at last; the day has come! We are testing discourse as new forum software. I'd like to invite you to give it a bit of testing so we can figure out problems or annoyances we have with it. This is currently limited to people with an invent account while we do internal testing -

Re: discourse testing

I'm actually not sure what that is about. Maybe Carl knows? On Sat, Dec 31, 2022 at 2:40 PM Grzegorz Szymaszek wrote: > > Hi, > > When trying to register, I’ve got the Email, Username and Name filled > out from (most likely) Invent. The fourth field, Invent Profile, is > empty. Could you explain

Re: Mailing list for people involved in Linux distributions

We already have a distro list. Nobody uses it xD https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/distributions On Wed, Feb 1, 2023 at 12:51 PM Paul Brown wrote: > > On Wednesday, 1 February 2023 11:29:41 CET Anna (cybertailor) Vyalkova wrote: > > Distro people! > > > > We're starting a mailing

Re: discourse testing

Good morning! Since my last email we've made various improvements as suggestions came in. If we forgot to action something please give @sitter or @carl a ping. We've now also enabled site-local registration as well as login using google, facebook, and github. Please give this a good testing if

Re: using gitlab ultimate

On Wed, Aug 2, 2023 at 4:23 PM Ingo Klöcker wrote: > > On Mittwoch, 2. August 2023 15:55:44 CEST Harald Sitter wrote: > > On Wed, Aug 2, 2023 at 3:48 PM Sune Vuorela wrote: > > > On 2023-08-02, Harald Sitter wrote: > > > > I don't think so > > >

Re: using gitlab ultimate

On Wed, Aug 2, 2023 at 4:35 PM wrote: > > On 2023-08-02 16:26, Harald Sitter wrote: > > On Wed, Aug 2, 2023 at 4:23 PM Ingo Klöcker wrote: > >> > >> On Mittwoch, 2. August 2023 15:55:44 CEST Harald Sitter wrote: > >> > On Wed, Aug 2, 2023 at 3:48 PM S

using gitlab ultimate

Ahoy! How about we start using the gitlab ultimate rather than the free version? It'd give us access to some handy dandy features like - CI dashboard - multiple MR assignees - better issue boards - epics & roadmaps - dependency scanning support (for our supporting projects written in ruby, go,

Re: using gitlab ultimate

On Wed, Aug 2, 2023 at 3:48 PM Sune Vuorela wrote: > > On 2023-08-02, Harald Sitter wrote: > > I don't think so > > As such, I have a hard time seeing that these mentioned features is > important enough to give in on what I feel are our principles of a > organization do

Re: using gitlab ultimate

I don't think so On Wed, Aug 2, 2023 at 3:39 PM Sune Vuorela wrote: > > On 2023-08-02, Harald Sitter wrote: > > Ahoy! > > > > How about we start using the gitlab ultimate rather than the free version? > > Is it free software ? > > https://mako.cc/writing/hill-free_tools.html > > /Sune >

planet forwarding to discuss?

may be of interest https://discuss.kde.org/t/post-planet-kde-org-blogs-on-discuss-automatically/2287/1

Re: Proposal for using gitlab for kdereview process

https://community.kde.org/Goals/All_about_the_Apps On Wed, Feb 7, 2024 at 11:16 PM Friedrich W. H. Kossebau wrote: > > Long time ago, but perhaps there are still memories... > > Am Dienstag, 4. Juli 2023, 14:32:59 CET schrieb Jonathan Riddell: > > I've gone ahead an updated the Sanity checklist