Re: Re: Future of KSysguard - removing remote monitoring

On Wed, Mar 9, 2011 at 12:55 AM, Alex Fiestas afies...@kde.org wrote: Keep this feature as a plugin or something would be awesome, I've used this feature in the past and it was very helpful. Yeah, surely not one the most important feature but *very* helpful if one stumbles upon a use case :D

Re: Help on .desktop files for oxygen

On Thursday 28 April 2011 11:54:13 Hugo Pereira Da Costa wrote: Having all the configuration featurs of oxygen-settings in systemsettings is simply not an option (it has been discussed at length among oxygen devs). It does not have to be in the existing KCMs ;) (i.e. see what Ben wrote). All

Re: KDM plans and lightDM

On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 8:16 AM, Martin Gräßlin mgraess...@kde.org wrote: On Mon, 13 Jun 2011 16:29:45 -0400, Shaun Reich predator...@gmail.com wrote: lightDM is also headed by my dear friend Canonical, as is clearly seen. Serious question: does anyone know if it requires Canonical's

Re: KDM plans and lightDM

On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 12:02 AM, Alex Fiestas afies...@kde.org wrote: On Monday, June 13, 2011 10:24:22 PM Thomas Lübking wrote: Am Mon, 13 Jun 2011 21:34:56 +0200 schrieb Martin Gräßlin mgraess...@kde.org: What does power management has to do with KDM? This belongs into powerdevil where

Re: KDM plans and lightDM

On Tuesday 14 June 2011 17:42:55 Martin Gräßlin wrote: On Tuesday 14 June 2011 10:35:49 Harald Sitter wrote: On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 8:16 AM, Martin Gräßlin mgraess...@kde.org wrote: There are of course more issues to think about when considering using something in our workspace

Re: KDM plans and lightDM

On Tuesday 14 June 2011 22:19:40 Martin Gräßlin wrote: On Tuesday 14 June 2011 20:26:45 Harald Sitter wrote: snip Agreed. Yet despite having complete control we did not manage to come up with a truly good workspace experience that starts at the DM (power management, good looks, I

Re: KDM plans and lightDM

On Tuesday 14 June 2011 14:55:58 Shaun Reich wrote: How does lightDM even handle different authentication types? KDM has a plugin system which handles different auth types (fingerprint, winbindd, etc.). However, the fundamental flaw that I can see..is that at some level or another, the

Re: KDM plans and lightDM

On Tuesday 14 June 2011 15:37:25 Shaun Reich wrote: On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 2:58 PM, Harald Sitter sit...@kde.org wrote: Should that ever get finished. Shaun? Good question ;-) Yeah, it's in a pretty finished state, after my unintentional hiatus. Mostly I've been cleaning stuff up(and yes

Re: grantlee-0.1.8 build failed on arm7

On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 9:20 AM, Rolf Eike Beer k...@opensource.sf-tec.de wrote: Sune Vuorela wrote: diff --git a/templates/lib/abstractlocalizer.cpp b/templates/lib/abstractlocalizer.cpp index 4e5b15d..104d888 100644 --- a/templates/lib/abstractlocalizer.cpp +++

Re: smallish project needed

On Fri, Aug 12, 2011 at 3:26 PM, Mark mark...@gmail.com wrote: Ah oke. Just some idea i have now.. Right now someone is working on a Phonon QML thing. SOMEONE? like seriously? :P I guess I need to work on my public image a bit :P

Re: smallish project needed

On Fri, Aug 12, 2011 at 4:09 PM, Stefan Majewsky stefan.majew...@googlemail.com wrote: On Fri, Aug 12, 2011 at 3:58 PM, Mark mark...@gmail.com wrote: Dolphin is going in the QML direction? Yes, I think a Juk rewritten in QML could be a good thing. Well, in that direction.. it's not written in

Re: Where is kmix hidden?

On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 6:54 PM, Lukas Appelhans l.appelh...@gmx.de wrote: I guess there were no efforts yet from the kdemultimedia team to make the move. I did not realize we had to take care of the move seems a bit inconvenient.

Re: QML support in kde.org services

On Sun, Sep 4, 2011 at 2:18 PM, Stefan Majewsky stefan.majew...@googlemail.com wrote: 2. api.kde.org doesn't show QML elements. Problem with this is that Doxygen does not support QML (yet anyway), actually I would not know how to make this work in a sane manner considering that plenty of QML

Re: KNotify-considerations for frameworks

On Fri, Sep 23, 2011 at 1:01 AM, Sune Vuorela nos...@vuorela.dk wrote: Consider doing some classes for Phonon to do audio notifications for those who needs that or alternatively get a cross desktop audio notification dbus spec, just like the galago spec and get the workspaces to implement it.

Re: phonon javascript

On Thu, Feb 9, 2012 at 4:39 AM, Shaun Reich shaun.re...@kdemail.net wrote: anyone know how can i access phonon through javascript? javascript? qtscript you mean? I think you will need http://code.google.com/p/qtscriptgenerator/ for that

Re: Proposed adjustments to our release cycles

Ahoy, On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 1:05 PM, Sebastian Kügler seba...@gmail.com wrote: Starting with KDE Frameworks 5, we will release Frameworks, Workspaces and Applications each with their own release cycles. Each of these releases would be a set of tarballs of the latest stable versions of the

Re: Proposed adjustments to our release cycles

On Sat, Jun 16, 2012 at 1:21 PM, Marco Martin notm...@gmail.com wrote: On Saturday 16 June 2012, Shaun Reich wrote: and the freezes would have to be *very* well communicated, because even now we run into issues with people not realizing that we're in string freeze or feature freeze. a part

Re: Review Request 110330: Make Prompt on access kwalletd setting apply in more situations

generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/110330/ --- (Updated May 6, 2013, 5:28 p.m.) Review request for KDE Runtime and Harald Sitter. Description --- kwalletd has a Prompt when an application

Phonon4Qt5 Phonon5 Branches

As you may be aware phonon supports building the phonon4 API against Qt5 by building the phonon4qt5 branch. Due to consolidation efforts at the Phonon sprint last weekend the phonon4qt5 transitional library is now merged into the master branch of both phonon and phonon-vlc (gstreamer blocked on

Re: Re: openSUSE packagers' take on the 3 month release cycle

On Tue, Jul 9, 2013 at 12:38 PM, Martin Gräßlin mgraess...@kde.org wrote: On Tuesday 09 July 2013 06:33:21 Scott Kitterman wrote: On Tuesday, July 09, 2013 12:05:30 PM Àlex Fiestas wrote: On Monday 08 July 2013 22:01:29 Andrea Scarpino wrote: We don't just run a sed rule on each spec

Re: openSUSE packagers' take on the 3 month release cycle

On Tue, Jul 9, 2013 at 2:28 PM, Scott Kitterman k...@kitterman.com wrote: Could you please elaborate why the licensing stuff cannot be automatically done? There I'd a licensecheck script that does this. It helps, but the results have to be checked and properly documented and so thete is still

Re: openSUSE packagers' take on the 3 month release cycle

On Tue, Jul 9, 2013 at 2:34 PM, Vishesh Handa m...@vhanda.in wrote: On Tue, Jul 9, 2013 at 5:58 PM, Scott Kitterman k...@kitterman.com wrote: There I'd a licensecheck script that does this. It helps, but the results have to be checked and properly documented and so thete is still substantial

Re: gdk_x_error (was: Re: [kile] [Bug 321759] Kile crashes when file is opened from menu)

On Tue, Jul 9, 2013 at 11:30 AM, Boudewijn Rempt b...@valdyas.org wrote: On Friday 05 July 2013 Jul 15:34:06 Sven Brauch wrote: 2. GDK installs a deadly X error handler, causing the application to exit, instead of just printing an error message. See multiple backtraces containing

Fwd: looking for phonon gstreamer maintainer

-- Forwarded message -- From: Harald Sitter sit...@kde.org Date: Mon, Sep 23, 2013 at 4:55 PM Subject: looking for phonon gstreamer maintainer To: For discussion of multimedia (sound/video) issues under KDE kde-multime...@kde.org Ahoy, since everyone who ever was/is/wanted

Re: Fwd: looking for phonon gstreamer maintainer

On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 1:24 PM, Aaron J. Seigo ase...@kde.org wrote: On Wednesday, September 25, 2013 12:35:25 Harald Sitter wrote: since everyone who ever was/is/wanted to be Phonon GStreamer maintainer is either busy or has no interest in it, the backend has as of right now no actual

Re: Fwd: looking for phonon gstreamer maintainer

On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 3:38 PM, Daniel Nicoletti dantt...@gmail.com wrote: I have a question: I had to write a Qt5 app for playing music/video some time ago, and I have used QtMultimedia5, so far so good QtMultimedia seems to provide everything I needed tho it still uses gstreamer 0.10.

Re: Fwd: looking for phonon gstreamer maintainer

On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 9:53 PM, Aaron J. Seigo ase...@kde.org wrote: thanks for the swift and excellent response! muchly appreciated ... On Wednesday, September 25, 2013 15:00:43 Harald Sitter wrote: d) at some point port to phonon5 would it at all make sense to see if we can resuscitate

Re: Fwd: looking for phonon gstreamer maintainer

On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 2:54 PM, Vadim Zhukov persg...@gmail.com wrote: * One more serious question: how well does this backend copes with (recent versions of) GStreamer 1.x? It doesn't seeing as there is an unfinished porting branch. HS

Re: Fwd: looking for phonon gstreamer maintainer

On Mon, Sep 30, 2013 at 3:11 AM, Weng Xuetian wen...@gmail.com wrote: Would it be easier to make phonon-gstreamer to use QtGstreamer and hence also make someone to maintain QtGstreamer? No. Maintaining two things is more work than maintaining one ;) On top of that there are no real synergies

Re: Fwd: looking for phonon gstreamer maintainer

On Fri, Oct 4, 2013 at 5:50 PM, Daniel Vrátil dvra...@redhat.com wrote: On Wednesday 25 of September 2013 12:35:25 Harald Sitter wrote: -- Forwarded message -- From: Harald Sitter sit...@kde.org Date: Mon, Sep 23, 2013 at 4:55 PM Subject: looking for phonon gstreamer

Re: Fwd: looking for phonon gstreamer maintainer

On Mon, Oct 7, 2013 at 2:36 PM, Jean-Baptiste Kempf j...@videolan.org wrote: On 04 Oct, Daniel Vrátil wrote : in Fedora we have a big interest in keeping phonon-gstreamer alive, namely because we can't ship phonon-vlc due to legal issues (you know, US company, software patents and what not...)

Re: Review Request 113242: Make UdevProcessor work with modern udev

/solid/udev/sys/devices/LNXSYSTM:00/LNXCPU:03' udi = '/org/kde/solid/udev/sys/devices/LNXSYSTM:00/LNXCPU:04' udi = '/org/kde/solid/udev/sys/devices/LNXSYSTM:00/LNXCPU:05' udi = '/org/kde/solid/udev/sys/devices/LNXSYSTM:00/LNXCPU:06' - Harald Sitter On Oct. 14, 2013, 2:59 p.m., Àlex Fiestas wrote

Re: Adopting AppData in KDE?

On Sat, Nov 2, 2013 at 8:48 PM, Richard Hughes hughsi...@gmail.com wrote: On 2 November 2013 19:33, Albert Astals Cid aa...@kde.org wrote: What's the point in having an installer that hides more than half of the apps in the world that don't ship a file that is not a standard and doesn't seem

Review Request 114298: prevent ksplashqml crash when a theme does not exist or cannot be loaded

7c528d056ee680f69a6d3d60d1dbeeae9d548846 Diff: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/114298/diff/ Testing --- ksplashqml Foo --test - sigsev without patch - exits with patch Thanks, Harald Sitter

Re: Review Request 114298: prevent ksplashqml crash when a theme does not exist or cannot be loaded

--- On Dec. 4, 2013, 1:54 p.m., Harald Sitter wrote: --- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/114298/ --- (Updated Dec. 4

Re: Review Request 114298: prevent ksplashqml crash when a theme does not exist or cannot be loaded

to prevent nullptr access problems. Diffs - ksplash/ksplashqml/SplashApp.cpp 7c528d056ee680f69a6d3d60d1dbeeae9d548846 Diff: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/114298/diff/ Testing --- ksplashqml Foo --test - sigsev without patch - exits with patch Thanks, Harald Sitter

Review Request 114314: Fix traceback in Python runner plugins

KittehRunner(plasmascript.Runner): def match(self, context): print match def run(self, context, match): print run def reloadConfiguration(self): print reloadConfig def CreateRunner(parent): return KittehRunner(parent) Thanks, Harald Sitter

Re: Review Request 114314: Fix traceback in Python runner plugins

CreateRunner(parent): return KittehRunner(parent) Thanks, Harald Sitter

Re: http://techbase.kde.org/Development/Review_Board looks terribly complicated

On Mon, Dec 16, 2013 at 12:29 AM, Albert Astals Cid aa...@kde.org wrote: adding a section before all that huge lists of hard stuff just saying You can code, do a git diff and upload the diff in the webpage. oh my god, yes, please! HS

frameworks build instructions wrong / won't work with kubuntu 14.04

Alohas, tldr: in ubuntu 14.04 automoc will (currently does) fall over dead with a qt5 built according to frameworks build instructions. what to do? According to Ubuntu getting cmake to pick up the correct build binaries (outside system paths) via environment variables is not a sane way to do it

Re: frameworks build instructions wrong / won't work with kubuntu 14.04

On Wed, Dec 18, 2013 at 6:09 PM, Harald Sitter sit...@kde.org wrote: tldr: in ubuntu 14.04 automoc will (currently does) fall over dead with a qt5 built according to frameworks build instructions. what to do? xnox was nice enough to look into this in detail and identified the problem as having

Re: frameworks build instructions wrong / won't work with kubuntu 14.04

On Thu, Dec 19, 2013 at 2:20 PM, Stephen Kelly steve...@gmail.com wrote: Harald Sitter wrote: xnox was nice enough to look into this in detail and identified the problem as having a much smaller scope than I had originally thought. 1) What is the problem? Essentially this change: http

Re: frameworks build instructions wrong / won't work with kubuntu 14.04

On Thu, Dec 19, 2013 at 7:45 PM, Dimitri John Ledkov dimitri.led...@surgut.co.uk wrote: So I was very clueless why Harald brought up that failing to build from source in his PPA build to a such a wide audience, when it was entirely unwarranted. And also in such a hasty manner, minutes after

Re: frameworks build instructions wrong / won't work with kubuntu 14.04

On Thu, Dec 19, 2013 at 3:19 PM, Sune Vuorela nos...@vuorela.dk wrote: On 2013-12-19, Harald Sitter sit...@kde.org wrote: Should be fixed as per: http://launchpadlibrarian.net/160197164/cmake_2.8.12.1-1ubuntu2_2.8.12.1-1ubuntu3.diff.gz It looks a bit better, but it is still full of open

KDM + ConsoleKit + Logind

Ahoys I was looking for some input on KDM+CK in a Logind world. When a system is using Logind I guess KDM+CK doesn't do much useful, so the question arose whether distributions with such a lineup should build without CK support. In short: If the rest of the system uses Logind, should KDM be

Re: KDM + ConsoleKit + Logind

On Mon, Feb 17, 2014 at 2:09 PM, Matthias Klumpp matth...@tenstral.net wrote: 2014-02-17 13:55 GMT+01:00 Lukáš Tinkl lti...@redhat.com: Dne 17.2.2014 11:51, Harald Sitter napsal(a): Ahoys I was looking for some input on KDM+CK in a Logind world. When a system is using Logind I guess KDM+CK

Re: KDM + ConsoleKit + Logind

On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 2:30 AM, Rex Dieter rdie...@math.unl.edu wrote: Harald Sitter wrote: Right, but short of patching KDM to gain proper logind support, should one build with or without CK, build without it. i.e. does CK add anything useful if the rest of the system is not using

ECM uninstall target

alohas, I just ported phonon/five to ECM and noticed that apparently ECM does not have an include or something to introduce an uninstall target. Are there plans to introduce such a thing or am I simply blind and not seeing the already existing include? HS

kubuntu 14.04 and 4.13rc/final

salut, Kubuntu 14.04 is due for release on April 17 and since that is very close to 4.13 final tagging/release it is going to be a tight squeeze to get the final on the release ISO. While landing the final is very much the intended course of action there is a chance that we won't be able to make

Re: KDE Frameworks Release Cycle

On Mon, May 5, 2014 at 11:11 AM, Martin Klapetek martin.klape...@gmail.com wrote: On Sun, May 4, 2014 at 6:36 PM, David Faure fa...@kde.org wrote: [Cross posting against my will...] On Sunday 04 May 2014 16:27:44 Luigi Toscano wrote: I understand that the big concern was about the testing:

Re: SDDM-KCM In Review

On Mon, Oct 6, 2014 at 11:48 PM, Albert Astals Cid aa...@kde.org wrote: There is no COPYING file (not sure if this one is mandatory or not, ask Riddell) Mandatory it is. At least for just about all GNU licenses as they even explicitly mention that a full copy needs to accompany the source. HS

Re: Review Request 121083: Replace manual export files with CMake's generate_export_header

there and generate_export_header is not available without ECM. - Harald Sitter On Nov. 21, 2014, 10:47 p.m., Andrius da Costa Ribas wrote: --- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/121083

Re: Review Request 121083: Replace manual export files with CMake's generate_export_header

On Nov. 22, 2014, 12:18 a.m., Harald Sitter wrote: This breaks the kde4 build as ECM is not being used there and generate_export_header is not available without ECM. Andrius da Costa Ribas wrote: generate_export_header isn't in ECM, but in cmake itself (http://www.cmake.org/cmake

Re: Review Request 121083: Replace manual export files with CMake's generate_export_header

On Nov. 22, 2014, 12:18 a.m., Harald Sitter wrote: This breaks the kde4 build as ECM is not being used there and generate_export_header is not available without ECM. Andrius da Costa Ribas wrote: generate_export_header isn't in ECM, but in cmake itself (http://www.cmake.org/cmake

Re: kio-extras

On Thu, Jan 22, 2015 at 11:42 AM, Jonathan Riddell j...@jriddell.org wrote: kio-extras is currently released part of Plasma 5. It's need said that it would be better to be part of applications because they're plugins used by applications and typically not by the desktop. They are plugins used

Re: Review Request 122404: [OS X]: draft support for audio in the IOKit backend

in turn is pulseaudio listing || backend listing). So, enabling VLC to expose this information through the libvlc_audio_output_device enumerable would be the best course of action. If the VLC devs don't want that or whatever, then putting it in Phonon seems the most useful approach. - Harald

Re: Kdenlive joining KDE Applications (in kdemultimedia?)

On Fri, Feb 13, 2015 at 5:31 PM, Vincent Pinon vpi...@kde.org wrote: So this mail is to get your feedback and prepare the move, if OK for you. It appears to me that at least once there is an mkpath call missing before trying to write a file http://i.imgur.com/QkDMTiC.jpg Also all buttons in the

Re: Kdenlive joining KDE Applications (in kdemultimedia?)

On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 3:23 PM, Vincent Pinon vpi...@kde.org wrote: Le mercredi 18 février 2015, 10:03:28 Harald Sitter a écrit : MLT not having had a release worries me a bit though. That is pretty much a show-stopper. Do we have an approximate date for when they intend to release? Release

Re: Review Request 122812: Fix BIC introduced in kdelibs 4

at this point. - Harald Sitter On March 4, 2015, 5:26 p.m., Andrea Iacovitti wrote: --- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/122812

Re: kdesudo in git

On Thu, Aug 20, 2015 at 3:28 PM, Jonathan Riddell j...@jriddell.org wrote: On Thu, Aug 20, 2015 at 02:01:58PM +0200, Luigi Toscano wrote: Maybe it's possible to change kdesu to expose a please cache this property between backend and frontend (in a secure way). Better than keeping two programs

folder icons where should they be set

salut mes amis so this popped up https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=352498 and GTK/Gnome rather seems to set the folder icon as part of their folder-display-component sort of thing (e.g. file open as well as file browsers and what not). it does so however *without* creating a .directory file

Re: folder icons where should they be set

http://freedesktop.org/wiki/Software/xdg-user-dirs/ On Fri, Sep 11, 2015 at 8:57 AM, Thomas Lübking <thomas.luebk...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Freitag, 11. September 2015 00:16:35 CEST, Harald Sitter wrote: > >> being my confused self I am rather clueless as to where th

Re: folder icons where should they be set

On Fri, Sep 11, 2015 at 9:43 AM, Thomas Lübking <thomas.luebk...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Freitag, 11. September 2015 09:37:44 CEST, Harald Sitter wrote: >> >> http://freedesktop.org/wiki/Software/xdg-user-dirs/ > > > "Interesting" concept where the system

Re: folder icons where should they be set

On Fri, Sep 11, 2015 at 9:00 AM, Kai Uwe Broulik wrote: > Hi, > > Aren't these XDG standard dirs you can even configure? Just show the folder > at XDG images with a pictures folder icon and so on. "Just" xD I did however find kfileitem.cpp which seems like the right

breeze repo to be split into breeze and breeze-icons come plasma 5.5

Some time between now and plasma 5.5 branching we will split the breeze icon theme from the breeze repo to its own breeze-icons repo. HS

Re: qca-qt5 (qt5 branch) merge into qca (master branch)

QCA's qt5 branch has now been merged back into master. master now behaves like qt5 did. If qt5 is found libqca-qt5 is built, if it isn't found qt4 is a requirement and libqca will be built. You can override this behavior by using the cmake option QT4_BUILD. Going to prep a tarball shortly. HS

qca-qt5 (qt5 branch) merge into qca (master branch)

ahoy ahoy qca-qt5 as a "thing" is a build time switch on the same source as qca (qt4). so, it is the same source base but depending on how you run cmake you either get the qt5 or the qt4 build. originally various adjustments had to be made to qca-qt5 to make it work reliably without conflicting

Review Request 125529: switch kde4libs defaults from oxygen to breeze

d9efbb0275e1094c887bb62382d5ddb4135684d7 kdeui/kernel/kstyle.cpp 95a71c24842338fbe6bf5128f6fb76029960b64a Diff: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/125529/diff/ Testing --- Thanks, Harald Sitter

Re: Review Request 125529: switch kde4libs defaults from oxygen to breeze

r/125529/#review86378 --- On Oct. 5, 2015, 2:21 p.m., Harald Sitter wrote: > > --- > This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: > https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/125529/ > -

Re: Review Request 122403: [OS X] adaptations to phonon component.

looks fine in general. - Harald Sitter On Feb. 3, 2015, 12:41 p.m., René J.V. Bertin wrote: > > --- > This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: > https://git.reviewboard.kde.

Re: Snappy sprint reporty musing

On Tue, Jul 26, 2016 at 1:08 PM, Harald Sitter <sit...@kde.org> wrote: > Snappy right now has limited exposure as it is only available on > Ubuntu (Unity). This is actively being worked on with main blockers > being missing golang stacks (snapd is mostly written in Go), missing >

Re: Can't release applications

On Wed, Jul 27, 2016 at 12:27 PM, Luigi Toscano wrote: > On Wednesday, 27 July 2016 12:22:45 CEST Aleix Pol wrote: >> Hi, >> There's a major blocker when trying to release applications nowadays. >> To update the stable branch one needs to commit to the >>

Re: The curious case of stuck systemd poweroff

On Thu, Jul 14, 2016 at 3:43 PM, Andreas Hartmetz <ahartm...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hello, > > Am Donnerstag, 14. Juli 2016, 11:11:26 CEST schrieb Harald Sitter: >> Hola! >> >> ever since systemd and or sddm started not killing all our session >> processes

Re: The curious case of stuck systemd poweroff

On Thu, Jul 14, 2016 at 8:06 PM, Andreas Hartmetz <ahartm...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Donnerstag, 14. Juli 2016 16:19:15 CEST Harald Sitter wrote: >> On Thu, Jul 14, 2016 at 3:43 PM, Andreas Hartmetz > <ahartm...@gmail.com> wrote: >> > Hello, >> > >&g

Snappy sprint reporty musing

Hello sweeties! Last week Scarlett, Aleix, Matthias and I took to the Snappy sprint in Heidelberg to discuss how to make it the most useful for KDE. I'd like to give you an overview of what was discussed along with some background, so we are all on the same page. If you already know what Snappy

Re: Snappy sprint reporty musing

On Tue, Jul 26, 2016 at 2:07 PM, Sebastian Kügler <se...@kde.org> wrote: > On Tuesday, July 26, 2016 1:08:28 PM CEST Harald Sitter wrote: >> - a store REST API (of which the reference version is the ubuntu store) > > So something like this exists for flatpaks as well,

The curious case of stuck systemd poweroff

Hola! ever since systemd and or sddm started not killing all our session processes we have had problems of poweroff/reboot getting hung up waiting for processes to quit. Recently systemd then started sending them TERM by default, which in theory should make things behave as before, but more often

Re: What's kde-core-devel for?

On Thu, Dec 15, 2016 at 10:18 PM, Albert Astals Cid wrote: > In the old days it had kdelibs development discussion but not that that has > moved over to kde-frameworks-devel, waht's kde-core-devel for? *cough* http://markmail.org/thread/opcvfo5h7elrvqdl Everyone kinda agrees that

Re: Elisa is in kdereview

On Wed, Jun 21, 2017 at 11:15 PM, Matthieu Gallien wrote: > Hello, > On mercredi 21 juin 2017 23:01:23 CEST Albert Astals Cid wrote: >> El divendres, 16 de juny de 2017, a les 22:44:03 CEST, Matthieu Gallien va >> >> escriure: >> > Hello, >> > >> > Elisa is now in

Re: http://commitfilter.kde.org/ ?

See http://markmail.org/thread/hekkp2rcdvir732q http://markmail.org/thread/b6neyhjak2h4g2yd On Sun, Oct 29, 2017 at 9:47 PM, Martin Koller wrote: > Should http://commitfilter.kde.org/ still exist ? > Currently I get "unknown host" > > -- > Best regards/Schöne Grüße > > Martin >

Re: Kdiff3 release.

this should help https://community.kde.org/ReleasingSoftware On Thu, Aug 2, 2018 at 9:25 AM Michael Reeves wrote: > > That's what I'm looking at doing. The translation need some minor updating. > In particular the docs were changed to correct some obsolete information > regarding windows and

Re: CI system maintainability

On Thu, Mar 28, 2019 at 3:57 PM David Jarvie wrote: > I agree. Mandatory reviews might work if there is a team of active people > working on a project, but if there is only one person with real knowledge of > the code We do have common ownership of code, so if there is only one person with

Re: KDE's release script not functional on stable openSUSE

2.1 reached EOL almost 2 years ago. I suggest you ruby-build or rvm a newer version isolated from your system's. On Thu, Jan 24, 2019 at 11:29 AM Jaroslaw Staniek wrote: > > Hi Jonathan, > The releaseme tools require ruby 2.3 while openSUSE 42.3 depends on 2.1. And > it lacks multiple ruby

Re: binary compatibility and qwidget::event

b0743a00b6f > [2] > https://cgit.kde.org/kiconthemes.git/commit/?id=083bb8a80fd5941e6fcbaf1ec12a08d8f8c881a5 > > Am 12.07.19 um 11:14 schrieb Harald Sitter: > > Hey > > > > our binary compatibility page [1] states that one should > > > > "reimplement event in QObjec

binary compatibility and qwidget::event

Hey our binary compatibility page [1] states that one should "reimplement event in QObject-derived classes, even if the body for the function is just calling the base class' implementation." Does anyone know the reason this helps maintain BC? [1]

Re: Possible to move some KF5 frameworks to invent?

On Tue, Aug 13, 2019 at 12:54 PM Ben Cooksley wrote: > > On Mon, Aug 12, 2019 at 11:48 PM David Faure wrote: > > > > On lundi 12 août 2019 13:04:29 CEST Ben Cooksley wrote: > > > On Mon, Aug 12, 2019 at 10:54 PM Albert Vaca Cintora > > > > > > wrote: > > > > On Mon, Aug 12, 2019, 18:46 Ben

Re: Possible to move some KF5 frameworks to invent?

On Mon, Aug 12, 2019 at 12:23 AM David Faure wrote: > > On dimanche 11 août 2019 22:14:19 CEST Albert Astals Cid wrote: > > without having your own fork of a repository, that is annoying for various > > reasons > > If creating a fork can be scripted, then that could be a fallback solution > (to

rekonq to unmaintained

I'd like to suggest moving rekonq to unmaintained Its master branch is still kdelibs4, the frameworks branch hasn't seen any progress in 21 months. Hasn't had a release in years. Very unmaintained all in all. Any objections? HS

Re: rekonq to unmaintained

now unmaintained https://commits.kde.org/sysadmin/repo-metadata/67d487fe1262c65cbef2fdc0c10e80ad14fc22fc On Thu, Sep 12, 2019 at 3:45 PM Harald Sitter wrote: > > I'd like to suggest moving rekonq to unmaintained > > Its master branch is still kdelibs4, the frameworks branch hasn'

Re: binary compatibility and qwidget::event

That makes sense. Thanks all! :) On Fri, Jul 12, 2019 at 1:09 PM Volker Krause wrote: > > On Friday, 12 July 2019 11:24:35 CEST Harald Sitter wrote: > > But why was that BIC to begin with? Which of the "don'ts" did it violate? > > IIUC re-implementing a virt

Re: Blacklisting of PIM from the CI system

On Tue, Dec 3, 2019 at 8:55 PM Volker Krause wrote: > > On Sunday, 1 December 2019 04:00:19 CET Ben Cooksley wrote: > > On Sun, Dec 1, 2019 at 10:17 AM Volker Krause wrote: > > > On Saturday, 30 November 2019 19:14:38 CET Ben Cooksley wrote: > [...] > > > > Fixing the current set of failures

Re: Blacklisting of PIM from the CI system

3 AM Kevin Kofler wrote: > > Harald Sitter wrote: > > Random thought to make dependency problems more obvious: glue the git > > sha into the cmake package version for frameworks (when built from > > git) so it finds "5.65.0.abcd123" given us a lead on wha

Re: Blacklisting of PIM from the CI system

It's a good idea. I thought about that briefly. Two problems immediately came to mind that made me discard the idea: a) for builds that are not from git we'd not know the commit count (unless we glue that into the git release commit / tag - which I am not sure we actually want, but is certainly a

Re: KDiagram - Persistent FTBFS for stable branch on Windows

On 12.10.20 11:23, Milian Wolff wrote: > On Montag, 12. Oktober 2020 11:11:22 CEST Ben Cooksley wrote: >> Hi KDiagram Developers, >> >> The stable branch of KDiagram has been persistently failing to build from >> source now on Windows for a period greater than 5 days. > > Hey Ben, > > can you

Re: stale MR triaging - you can help!

On 16.10.20 10:00, Albert Astals Cid wrote: > El dimarts, 13 d’octubre de 2020, a les 15:53:10 CEST, Harald Sitter va > escriure: >> Moin >> >> As promised in a previous mail I've set up a system that helps us find >> stale MRs to ensure patches don't fall by the

Re: CMake kauth_install_* with system kauth and user CMAKE_INSTALL_PREFIX

Yo On 18.10.20 10:11, Milian Wolff wrote: > Hey all, > > since some time now I'm only compiling parts of KF5 selectively into a custom > prefix. Most notably, I'm only interested in ktexteditor and syntax- > highlighting, and would like to obtain all other frameworks through my > distribution

Re: CMake kauth_install_* with system kauth and user CMAKE_INSTALL_PREFIX

On 19.10.20 12:30, Milian Wolff wrote: > On Montag, 19. Oktober 2020 11:27:29 CEST Harald Sitter wrote: >> Yo >> >> On 18.10.20 10:11, Milian Wolff wrote: >>> Hey all, >>> >>> since some time now I'm only compiling parts of KF5 selectively

Re: CMake kauth_install_* with system kauth and user CMAKE_INSTALL_PREFIX

On 19.10.20 17:06, Milian Wolff wrote: > On Montag, 19. Oktober 2020 16:56:27 CEST Harald Sitter wrote: >> On 19.10.20 12:30, Milian Wolff wrote: >>> On Montag, 19. Oktober 2020 11:27:29 CEST Harald Sitter wrote: >>>> Yo >>>> >>>>

Re: CMake kauth_install_* with system kauth and user CMAKE_INSTALL_PREFIX

On 19.10.20 17:44, Ingo Klöcker wrote: > On Montag, 19. Oktober 2020 17:22:22 CEST Milian Wolff wrote: >> On Montag, 19. Oktober 2020 17:21:28 CEST Harald Sitter wrote: >>> I'm not sure it's a good idea, but we could treat this like >>> KDE_INSTALL_USE_QT_SYS_PATHS. By d

stale MR triaging - you can help!

Moin As promised in a previous mail I've set up a system that helps us find stale MRs to ensure patches don't fall by the wayside. Lists are filed as issues on invent. To help out you can hit the bell to subscribe to `New issue` events at https://invent.kde.org/sysadmin/gitlab-triaging First

  1   2   >