On Tuesday 25 February 2014 17:12:37 Jonathan Riddell wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 04:55:43PM +0100, Kevin Ottens wrote:
> > OK, but then the said change is either in the packaging or in our own
> > cmake
> > files as we'd have to drop the SOVERSION later on when our
Hello,
On Tuesday 25 February 2014 14:32:27 Jonathan Riddell wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 03:29:16PM +0100, Kevin Ottens wrote:
> > Beside I still don't see a clear motive behind that change (Jonathan
> > hinted at helping with packaging but it looks like not all packager
Hello everyone,
This is the minutes of the Week 9 KF5 meeting. As usual it has been held on
#kde-devel at 4pm Paris time.
Were present: alexmerry, dfaure, krake, mgraesslin, teo, tosky and myself.
Announcement:
* Alpha 2 will be prepared on saturday;
* Please push toward completion of the sti
On Tuesday 25 February 2014 13:06:25 David Faure wrote:
> On Tuesday 25 February 2014 08:04:16 Kevin Ottens wrote:
> > On Monday 24 February 2014 20:23:25 šumski wrote:
> > > On Monday 24 of February 2014 16:13:48 Jonathan Riddell wrote:
> > > ...
> > >
&
On Monday 24 February 2014 20:23:25 šumski wrote:
> On Monday 24 of February 2014 16:13:48 Jonathan Riddell wrote:
> ...
>
> > Shall I do this change to the frameworks?
>
> My opinion as a fellow packager is - please don't. IMHO, now that the
> versioning is fully correct, it would be really weir
Hello all,
Just a quick reminder:
The next KF5 Update Meeting will happen on #kde-devel tomorrow at 4pm Paris
time.
See you there!
Regards.
--
Kévin Ottens, http://ervin.ipsquad.net
KDAB - proud supporter of KDE, http://www.kdab.com
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed mes
Hello,
On Monday 24 February 2014 02:49:45 Aleix Pol wrote:
> I would say that we should follow however it's done in Qt. So far we've
> been trying to provide as much of a similar experience as if it was another
> Qt module. Doing so here as well could be interesting too.
>
> The changes you prop
On Sunday 23 February 2014 17:47:48 David Faure wrote:
> On Sunday 23 February 2014 17:02:55 John Layt wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I'm building all of Frameworks from scratch for the first time, using the
> > openSUSE packages for Qt 5.2, and qguiaddons fails with:
> >
> > [ 24%] Building CXX object
>
On Sunday 23 February 2014 10:08:13 David Faure wrote:
> On Monday 17 February 2014 16:00:08 Eike Hein wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > in the KDialog-based KConfigDialog of yesteryear, it was fairly easy
> >
> > to hide the Help button:
> > dialog->button(KDialog::Help)->hide();
> >
> > This is useful
On Saturday 22 February 2014 14:44:06 Mark Gaiser wrote:
> April 24th is final for the Frameworks sprint. Or is it still possible
> to change it to April 3-6?
It's final, you wouldn't get me after all on the 3rd, and it's likely
pointless to have it without Aurélien.
Regards.
--
Kévin Ottens, h
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115827/#review50455
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Kevin Ottens
On Feb. 21, 2014, 7:35
> On Feb. 21, 2014, 6:29 a.m., Kevin Ottens wrote:
> > I understand Ivan point of view. Now I'm wondering about something: Are we
> > sure the situation will be the same in the future for a 5 to 6 transition?
> > I don't think we can be 100% sure and so we
Hello,
On Thursday 20 February 2014 20:03:20 Aaron J. Seigo wrote:
> I ran into an interesting situation the other day with libkactivities: it
> uses KDBusConnectionPool to create connections in a thread-safe manner.
> KDBusConnectionPool creates a connection in whatever thread it happens to
> be
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115908/#review50449
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Kevin Ottens
On Feb. 20, 2014, 11:51
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115901/#review50448
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Kevin Ottens
On Feb. 19, 2014, 10:57
agree with Aleix I'd
like it to be closer to the target with less regressions before letting it in.
You still have a few days. ;-)
Also don't forget to update the yaml and the list of frameworks in the wiki,
it's moving in tier 3 territory AFAICT.
- Kevin Ottens
On Feb. 13,
827/#comment35497>
Should definitely be inlined, but then can go in after that.
- Kevin Ottens
On Feb. 17, 2014, 10:49 a.m., Martin Gräßlin wrote:
>
> ---
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply,
> On Feb. 19, 2014, 2:07 p.m., Alex Merry wrote:
> > I don't think papering over the X11-ness of kdesu like this is the right
> > approach. Of course, what this framework really needs is a test app; maybe
> > a simple port of the kdesu app from kde-runtime?
This kind of "papering over" can on
> On Feb. 3, 2014, 6:07 p.m., Raphael Kubo da Costa wrote:
> > Please see the big comment below the elseif line, the link to the
> > kde-core-devel and
> > http://lists.kde.org/?l=kde-core-devel&m=138244424421211&w=2: the issue
> > here is that if you pass -fno-exceptions to clang you need to
> On Jan. 27, 2014, 7:45 a.m., Kevin Ottens wrote:
> > src/lib/kaboutdata.cpp, line 941
> > <https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115207/diff/1/?file=235099#file235099line941>
> >
> > Not really my type of thing. It's acting on an object behind our back
> On Jan. 27, 2014, 2:23 a.m., Aleix Pol Gonzalez wrote:
> > It's a test, not a demo. If you want, it's for demonstrating the developer
> > that he did it right, but I wouldn't see it as documentation.
> >
> > I would rename it to KRecentFilesAct
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115896/#review50441
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Kevin Ottens
On Feb. 19, 2014, 12:47
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115840/#review50440
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Kevin Ottens
On Feb. 17, 2014, 7:04
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115816/#review50438
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Kevin Ottens
On Feb. 19, 2014, 11:54
> On Feb. 18, 2014, 11:13 p.m., Alex Merry wrote:
> > Does this have any other users than kdoctools? If not, it should probably
> > just move to that module. Even if kde4support ends up using it, I don't
> > view that as a reason to put it in ECM.
>
> Luigi Toscano wrote:
> There are no
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115879/#review50436
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Kevin Ottens
On Feb. 18, 2014, 10:54
g/r/115875/#comment35495>
Hm we're loosing the test mode for QStandardPaths, I don't think that's
desirable.
- Kevin Ottens
On Feb. 18, 2014, 9:52 p.m., Alexander Richardson wrote:
>
> ---
> This is an auto
st want to make sure we thought
that through.
- Kevin Ottens
On Feb. 18, 2014, 9:50 p.m., Hrvoje Senjan wrote:
>
> ---
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://git.r
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115775/#review50432
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Kevin Ottens
On Feb. 18, 2014, 3:49
> On Feb. 20, 2014, 2:36 p.m., Kevin Ottens wrote:
> > Any concerns left on that patch? It'd be nice to have it in alpha 2.
>
> Kevin Krammer wrote:
> I guess the main problem is that due to a weird JavaScriptCore internal
> thing the unit test crashe
it in alpha 2.
- Kevin Ottens
On Feb. 16, 2014, 6:54 p.m., Kevin Krammer wrote:
>
> ---
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://git.reviewboard
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115702/#review50375
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Kevin Ottens
On Feb. 16, 2014, 5:03
don't have more.
- Kevin Ottens
On Feb. 16, 2014, 12:14 p.m., Alex Merry wrote:
>
> ---
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://git.reviewboard
ch is interesting and
shouldn't stay in limbo too long.
- Kevin Ottens
On Feb. 12, 2014, 11:28 p.m., David Gil Oliva wrote:
>
> ---
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://git.review
> On Feb. 15, 2014, 3:51 p.m., Alexander Richardson wrote:
> > Same Problem on Windows: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115210/
> > Further discussion needed I guess
I'd propose the discussion to be started on list then. Once the discussion is
started this patch can be discarded until we reac
g/r/115028/#comment35418>
Not sure about that... I don't think we want the library itself to use
deprecated methods. So knowing about that through warnings would make sense.
- Kevin Ottens
On Feb. 6, 2014, 5:20 p.m., Alex
g/r/115504/#comment35416>
Didn't you mean if (BUILD_EPS_PLUGIN) ? This line confuses me. :-)
- Kevin Ottens
On Feb. 5, 2014, 5:41 p.m., Alex Merry wrote:
>
> ---
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To r
essed now? Please make a
second round of reviews or ship it.
- Kevin Ottens
On Jan. 31, 2014, 1:01 p.m., Martin Gräßlin wrote:
>
> ---
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://git.reviewboard
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/114997/#review50335
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Kevin Ottens
On Jan. 28, 2014, 11:48
Hello,
On Wednesday 19 February 2014 21:18:31 šumski wrote:
> i've started pushing Frameworks to openSUSE Factory (i.e. next openSUSE
> release), and our legal review found some issues[1][2][3] with mentioned
> frameworks licenses.
> Details in the links bellow (basically, certain files are not li
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115658/#review50153
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Kevin Ottens
On Feb. 11, 2014, 1:30
Hello everyone,
This is the minutes of the Week 8 KF5 meeting. As usual it has been held on
#kde-devel at 4pm Paris time.
Were present: afiestas, alexmerry, dfaure, mck182, mgraesslin, sebas,
svuorela, teo, tosky and myself.
Announcement:
* Alpha 1 is out;
* Get ready for alpha 2 end of next
Hello all,
Just a quick reminder:
The next KF5 Update Meeting will happen on #kde-devel tomorrow at 4pm Paris
time.
See you there!
Regards.
--
Kévin Ottens, http://ervin.ipsquad.net
KDAB - proud supporter of KDE, http://www.kdab.com
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed mes
Hello,
On Saturday 15 February 2014 23:27:40 David Faure wrote:
> Looks like a historical thing to me, from before kstyle got integrated into
> frameworkintegration.
>
> If I read git log correctly, this src/kstyle/CMakeLists.txt file comes from
> Kévin's commit 3864cfe2347af01b.
>
> Kévin, any
On Wednesday 12 February 2014 10:11:48 David Gil Oliva wrote:
> El 12/02/2014 09:46, "Kevin Ottens" escribió:
> > On Tuesday 11 February 2014 23:19:39 David Faure wrote:
> > > On Thursday 06 February 2014 23:30:25 David Faure wrote:
> > > > I have pac
On Tuesday 11 February 2014 23:19:39 David Faure wrote:
> On Thursday 06 February 2014 23:30:25 David Faure wrote:
> > I have packaged up KF5 alpha 1 and uploaded it for packagers.
>
> And alpha1 is now public !
>
> (tarballs published, git tags pushed)
Woohoo! Thanks!
Reminder: Alpha 2 in 17 d
Hello everyone,
This is the minutes of the Week 6 KF5 meeting. As usual it has been held on
#kde-devel at 4pm Paris time.
Were present: afiestas, agateau, alexmerry, apol, dfaure, dgilo, krake,
mgraesslin, Riddell, teo, tosky and myself.
Announcement:
* Alpha 1 still not published;
* Please
Hello all,
Just a quick reminder:
The next KF5 Update Meeting will happen on #kde-devel tomorrow at 4pm Paris
time.
See you there!
Regards.
--
Kévin Ottens, http://ervin.ipsquad.net
KDAB - proud supporter of KDE, http://www.kdab.com
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed mes
Hello,
On Friday 07 February 2014 06:25:46 Martin Klapetek wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 6, 2014 at 11:30 PM, David Faure wrote:
> > I have packaged up KF5 alpha 1 and uploaded it for packagers.
> >
> > Can we consider KF5 frozen all of tomorrow (Friday 7) ?
>
> I have quite some extensive changes for K
On Thursday 06 February 2014 07:23:30 Kevin Ottens wrote:
> On Thursday 06 February 2014 01:15:15 David Faure wrote:
> > Some issues left:
> > - who do we write down as maintainer for attica?
>
> Good question, let's mark it "TBD" until someone dares to step
On Thursday 06 February 2014 07:23:30 Kevin Ottens wrote:
> On Thursday 06 February 2014 01:15:15 David Faure wrote:
> > Some issues left:
> > - who do we write down as maintainer for attica?
>
> Good question, let's mark it "TBD" until someone dares to step
Hello,
On Thursday 06 February 2014 09:37:39 Martin Gräßlin wrote:
> Does anyone have an idea why that might be the case and how to properly
> investigate this?
Guessing: Does the platform plugin for wayland reimplement
QPlatformIntegration::themeNames()? Ideally it should provide the same list
On Thursday 06 February 2014 01:15:15 David Faure wrote:
> Some issues left:
> - who do we write down as maintainer for attica?
Good question, let's mark it "TBD" until someone dares to step up for it.
Regards.
--
Kévin Ottens, http://ervin.ipsquad.net
KDAB - proud supporter of KDE, http://www.
On Wednesday 05 February 2014 18:39:51 David Faure wrote:
> On Wednesday 05 February 2014 09:55:08 Jeremy Whiting wrote:
> > I can do the changes if needed. It just needs the changes here:
> > http://community.kde.org/Frameworks/Porting_Notes under "Build System"
> > ?
>
> No, it should follow all
Hello everyone,
This is the minutes of the Week 6 KF5 meeting. As usual it has been held on
#kde-devel at 4pm Paris time.
Were present: agateau, alexmerry, apol, mgraesslin, Riddell, teo, tosky and
myself.
Announcement:
* Alpha 1 didn't get released, dfaure just forgot :-)
* It should be rel
On Monday 03 February 2014 10:17:49 David Faure wrote:
> Any new module that should be added to this release, compared to TP1?
>
> Should I include attica?
Since this question keeps popping up, let's integrate it. It should also be
added to the list: http://community.kde.org/Frameworks/List
Als
Hello all,
Just a quick reminder:
The next KF5 Update Meeting will happen on #kde-devel tomorrow at 4pm Paris
time.
See you there!
Regards.
--
Kévin Ottens, http://ervin.ipsquad.net
KDAB - proud supporter of KDE, http://www.kdab.com
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed mes
On Wednesday 29 January 2014 09:20:09 Martin Klapetek wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 28, 2014 at 7:10 PM, Kevin Ottens wrote:
> > I don't think we'll get a one size fit all type of solution, that will
> > heavily
> > depend on the nature of the framework. For instance so
Hello,
On Tuesday 28 January 2014 12:58:01 David Edmundson wrote:
> For a task in Plasma I've had to port KKeySequence to render on
> QtQuick, using QtQuickControls.
>
> I expect over time we will see more KDE widgets having QtQuick
> implementations as well. Same for a lot of our other framework
Hello everyone,
This is the minutes of the Week 3 KF5 meeting. As usual it has been held on
#kde-devel at 4pm Paris time.
Were present: afiestas, agateau, alexmerry, apol, dMaggot, mgraesslin,
Riddell, sebas, teo, tosky and myself.
Announcement:
* Maintainers! Maintainers! Maintainers!
* Don
> On Jan. 27, 2014, 2:23 a.m., Aleix Pol Gonzalez wrote:
> > It's a test, not a demo. If you want, it's for demonstrating the developer
> > that he did it right, but I wouldn't see it as documentation.
> >
> > I would rename it to KRecentFilesActionTest
Yes, definitely a manual test (otherwise
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115285/#review48355
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Kevin Ottens
On Jan. 24, 2014, 9:36
g/r/115255/#comment34195>
Warning? And/or assert?
- Kevin Ottens
On Jan. 23, 2014, 11:30 a.m., Martin Gräßlin wrote:
>
> ---
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://git.reviewboar
248/#comment34193>
Warning?
src/kxmessages.cpp
<https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115248/#comment34194>
Warning for the !d->valid case?
- Kevin Ottens
On Jan. 23, 2014, 9:03 a.m., Martin Gräßlin wrote:
>
> ---
g/r/115230/#comment34192>
No chance to issue a warning at runtime when hitting that case?
- Kevin Ottens
On Jan. 22, 2014, 3:18 p.m., Martin Gräßlin wrote:
>
> ---
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply,
welcome though.
- Kevin Ottens
On Jan. 22, 2014, 3:13 p.m., Alexander Richardson wrote:
>
> ---
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://git.reviewboard.kde.
someone from kdewin
though.
- Kevin Ottens
On Jan. 22, 2014, 3:12 p.m., Alexander Richardson wrote:
>
> ---
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://git.reviewboard.kde.
ng on build.kde.org
- Kevin Ottens
On Jan. 22, 2014, 9:20 a.m., Martin Gräßlin wrote:
>
> ---
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://git.reviewboard
to factorize the qApp call, and I see the need for that indeed,
then that block should be provided by a separate method
(setupApplication(QCoreApplication *)?).
- Kevin Ottens
On Jan. 21, 2014, 11:36 p.m., Aleix Pol Gonzalez wrote:
>
> --
tps://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/114989/#comment34190>
Should indeed just say kconfig_compiler.
- Kevin Ottens
On Jan. 12, 2014, 8:08 p.m., Siddharth Sharma wrote:
>
> ---
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply,
other HAVE_FOO we have in the
other frameworks. You might have opened the pandora box. :-)
- Kevin Ottens
On Jan. 26, 2014, 5:36 p.m., Alex Merry wrote:
>
> ---
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit
997/#comment34189>
Agreed, this part needs to be less ambiguous. Looks fine otherwise.
- Kevin Ottens
On Jan. 26, 2014, 5:39 p.m., Alex Merry wrote:
>
> ---
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply,
> On Jan. 27, 2014, 2:14 a.m., Aleix Pol Gonzalez wrote:
> > Shouldn't we maybe just remove these? Especially considerign they already
> > are deprecated in kdelibs 4.
> >
> > I don't really like disabling compilation of deprecated symbols, especially
> > in this case we're not winning that mu
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115123/#review48339
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Kevin Ottens
On Jan. 19, 2014, 3:49
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115268/#review48338
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Kevin Ottens
On Jan. 23, 2014, 6:18
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115295/#review48336
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Kevin Ottens
On Jan. 24, 2014, 2:45
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115296/#review48337
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Kevin Ottens
On Jan. 24, 2014, 2:45
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115294/#review48334
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Kevin Ottens
On Jan. 24, 2014, 2:45
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115266/#review48333
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Kevin Ottens
On Jan. 23, 2014, 4:43
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115264/#review48332
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Kevin Ottens
On Jan. 23, 2014, 4:15
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115120/#review48331
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Kevin Ottens
On Jan. 19, 2014, 12:23
Hello,
On Monday 27 January 2014 00:28:25 Alex Merry wrote:
> Is there a schedule anywhere? I think I wasn't the only one taken by
> surprise by Kévin's announcement about the alpha last week.
It was in my email about governance.
> http://community.kde.org/Frameworks should either host the sch
Hello all,
Just a quick reminder:
The next KF5 Update Meeting will happen on #kde-devel tomorrow at 4pm Paris
time.
See you there!
Regards.
--
Kévin Ottens, http://ervin.ipsquad.net
KDAB - proud supporter of KDE, http://www.kdab.com
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed mes
On Thursday 23 January 2014 22:47:45 Valentin Rusu wrote:
> On Wednesday, January 22, 2014 10:48:00 PM Kevin Ottens wrote:
> > On Wednesday 22 January 2014 22:21:47 Valentin Rusu wrote:
> > > On Thursday, January 23, 2014 04:24:37 AM Michael Palimaka wrote:
> > > &g
On Wednesday 22 January 2014 22:21:47 Valentin Rusu wrote:
> On Thursday, January 23, 2014 04:24:37 AM Michael Palimaka wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > attica seems to have been absorbed as a framework, but does not appear
> > to have been assigned a tier. Based on its dependencies, it looks like
> > it wo
Hello,
On Wednesday 22 January 2014 12:27:29 Alex Merry wrote:
> On 22/01/14 06:33, Kevin Ottens wrote:
> > On Tuesday 21 January 2014 17:18:36 Alex Merry wrote:
> >> Traditionally, the front pages of our apidox has included a list of
> >> authors, the maintainer(s
On Tuesday 21 January 2014 12:05:26 Antonis Tsiapaliokas wrote:
> > 1) Create two different groups named plasma-workspace and
> > plasma-desktop like frameworks
> > 2) Split out every component into individual repos
> > 3) Assign repos to the related group.
> >
> > Advantages:
> >
> > 1) Easy to
Hello,
On Wednesday 22 January 2014 00:30:19 David Gil Oliva wrote:
> I'm revising KCompletion and I have found that in kcompletion.h you can see
> the declaration of KCompletionBase (which is defined in a separate file)
> and KCompletionMatches (which is defined in kcompletion.cpp).
>
> I think
On Tuesday 21 January 2014 17:18:36 Alex Merry wrote:
> Traditionally, the front pages of our apidox has included a list of
> authors, the maintainer(s) and the license. This is obviously
> duplicating/summarising information stored elsewhere, and is easy to let
> get out of date.
Yes... definite
Hello everyone,
This is the minutes of the Week 3 KF5 meeting. As usual it has been held on
#kde-devel at 4pm Paris time.
Were present: afiestas, agateau, alexmerry, arichardson, dfaure, mgraesslin,
Riddell, tosky and myself.
Announcement:
* Come on people, we're still short on maintainers!
Hello all,
Just a quick reminder:
The next KF5 Update Meeting will happen on #kde-devel tomorrow at 4pm Paris
time.
See you there!
Regards.
--
Kévin Ottens, http://ervin.ipsquad.net
KDAB - proud supporter of KDE, http://www.kdab.com
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed mes
Hello,
On Sunday 19 January 2014 18:43:01 David Faure wrote:
> KCrash automatically initializes itself with the use of
> Q_COREAPP_STARTUP_FUNCTION, provided that apps link to that lib.
>
> This works OK, except for one thing: it gives no chance for KCrash to add
> --nocrashhandler to QCommandLin
Hello,
I thought it'd be interesting to some to get updated stats since my last call
to arms.
On Monday 13 January 2014 19:40:54 Kevin Ottens wrote:
> This is a reminder that we're still looking for maintainers for our
> frameworks.
Out of the 57 existing frameworks 25 have no
Hello everyone,
This is the minutes of the Week 3 KF5 meeting. As usual it has been held on
#kde-devel at 4pm Paris time.
Were present: afiestas, agateau, alexmerry, dfaure, mck182, Riddell, valir and
myself.
Announcement:
* We're *still* actively looking for maintainers! Konqi wants YOU!
*
On Monday 13 January 2014 20:12:31 Valentin Rusu wrote:
> On 01/13/2014 07:54 PM, David Faure wrote:
> > On Monday 13 January 2014 16:48:52 Nicolás Alvarez wrote:
> >> 2014/1/13 David Faure :
> >>
> >> If you rename kwallet to kwalletmanager and kwallet-framework to
> >> kwallet, people with a clo
Hello everyone,
This is a reminder that we're still looking for maintainers for our
frameworks. Out of the 57 existing frameworks 33 have no maintainer (yes,
that's almost 60%). I don't know about you, but I find that worrying.
The modules without maintainers are spread this way:
- 9 are tier
Hello,
On Monday 13 January 2014 10:05:26 David Faure wrote:
> On Sunday 12 January 2014 19:59:26 Valentin Rusu wrote:
> > Please be informed that I successfully imported the git history of
> > kwalletd from kde-runtime to kwallet-framework, the I ported it to KF5.
> > The code is ready to be push
Hello,
On Sunday 12 January 2014 23:11:09 Cornelius Schumacher wrote:
> KDE Frameworks now have a dedicated page on Inqlude. There is a group
> listing all frameworks at http://inqlude.org/groups/kde-frameworks.html.
> The intention is not to make them stand out, but to have a logical grouping
> a
Hello all,
Just a quick reminder:
The next KF5 Update Meeting will happen on #kde-devel tomorrow at 4pm Paris
time.
See you there!
Regards.
--
Kévin Ottens, http://ervin.ipsquad.net
KDAB - proud supporter of KDE, http://www.kdab.com
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed mes
On Wednesday 08 January 2014 23:00:02 Alex Merry wrote:
> On 08/01/14 22:24, Kevin Ottens wrote:
> > I also modified a bit one of the policies:
> > http://community.kde.org/Frameworks/Policies#Frameworks_buildsystem_is_con
> > sistent (was saying "installation rules&q
701 - 800 of 1776 matches
Mail list logo
