I have been unable to build kate5 for several days
/var/git/kate5/addons/kate/project/kateprojectpluginview.cpp: In constructor
'KateProjectPluginView::KateProjectPluginView(KateProjectPlugin*,
KTextEditor::MainWindow*)':
/var/git/kate5/addons/kate/project/kateprojectpluginview.cpp:55:175:
Hi,
build.kde.org says it builds, perhaps your ktexteditor.git is too old ;)
Greetings
Christoph
- Ursprüngliche Mail -
I have been unable to build kate5 for several days
/var/git/kate5/addons/kate/project/kateprojectpluginview.cpp: In constructor
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115100/#review47670
---
This review has been submitted with commit
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115100/
---
(Updated Jan. 19, 2014, 9:49 a.m.)
Status
--
This change has been
On Sunday 19 January 2014 10:33:25 Christoph Cullmann wrote:
Hi,
build.kde.org says it builds, perhaps your ktexteditor.git is too old ;)
my mistake, I was still using scratch/cullmann/ktexteditor.git
Greetings
Christoph
- Ursprüngliche Mail -
I have been unable to build
On Jan. 17, 2014, 6:51 p.m., Alex Merry wrote:
KF5DocToolsMacros.cmake, lines 166-172
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115077/diff/1/?file=234284#file234284line166
These should *not* be renamed, as they are compatibility macros.
However, they should probably be moved to
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115101/
---
(Updated Jan. 19, 2014, 10:56 a.m.)
Review request for KDE Frameworks,
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115120/
---
Review request for KDE Frameworks.
Repository: kimageformats
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115120/
---
(Updated Jan. 19, 2014, 12:23 p.m.)
Review request for KDE Frameworks.
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115065/#review47675
---
docs/kde5options/man-kde5options.7.docbook
On Jan. 19, 2014, 12:39 a.m., Luigi Toscano wrote:
The patch looks ago, I have two remarks:
- I think that kde5options should be kf5options (as it happened with
kde4-config - kf5-config)
- I'm not sure if the content of those manpages still applies. The special
options described
Hello,
I thought it'd be interesting to some to get updated stats since my last call
to arms.
On Monday 13 January 2014 19:40:54 Kevin Ottens wrote:
This is a reminder that we're still looking for maintainers for our
frameworks.
Out of the 57 existing frameworks 25 have no maintainer (yes,
On Wednesday, January 15, 2014 11:15:54 AM Alex Merry wrote:
On 15/01/14 07:36, Valentin Rusu wrote:
On 01/15/2014 07:16 AM, Ben Cooksley wrote:
It seems you are relying on D-Bus auto-launching. Is this the case?
Yes, the kwallet API uses DBus activation to get kwalletd up un running.
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115123/
---
Review request for KDE Frameworks and Stephen Kelly.
Repository:
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/114897/
---
(Updated Jan. 19, 2014, 1:20 p.m.)
Review request for Build System,
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/114904/
---
(Updated Jan. 19, 2014, 1:21 p.m.)
Review request for Build System,
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/114908/
---
(Updated Jan. 19, 2014, 1:21 p.m.)
Review request for Build System,
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115123/#review47698
---
Makes a lot of sense to me, yep.
cmake/FindOpenEXR.cmake
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115123/
---
(Updated Jan. 19, 2014, 3:39 p.m.)
Review request for KDE Frameworks and
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115123/
---
(Updated Jan. 19, 2014, 3:49 p.m.)
Review request for KDE Frameworks and
See http://build.kde.org/job/ktexteditor_master_qt5/50/changes
___
Kde-frameworks-devel mailing list
Kde-frameworks-devel@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-frameworks-devel
On Jan. 19, 2014, 2:34 p.m., Stephen Kelly wrote:
cmake/FindOpenEXR.cmake, line 110
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115123/diff/1/?file=234689#file234689line110
I would simply add a fatal_error if cmake version is VERSION_LESS
2.8.12, and remove the rest of this version stuff.
See http://build.kde.org/job/ktexteditor_master_qt5/51/changes
___
Kde-frameworks-devel mailing list
Kde-frameworks-devel@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-frameworks-devel
See http://build.kde.org/job/ktexteditor_master_qt5/53/changes
___
Kde-frameworks-devel mailing list
Kde-frameworks-devel@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-frameworks-devel
On Jan. 18, 2014, 2:52 p.m., Alex Merry wrote:
modules/ECMGeneratePriFile.cmake, line 12
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115099/diff/1/?file=234571#file234571line12
What if this was TARGET target and you extracted the interface
defines etc. from that target?
That,
On Jan. 18, 2014, 8:58 a.m., David Faure wrote:
Why does this remove some forwarding headers?
Friedrich W. H. Kossebau wrote:
Because they are installed from the KParts module itself already, with
the same forwarding include path. So no need to duplicate them in
KDE4Support, or?
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115123/#review47714
---
cmake/FindOpenEXR.cmake
On Jan. 18, 2014, 2:52 p.m., Alex Merry wrote:
modules/ECMGeneratePriFile.cmake, line 12
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115099/diff/1/?file=234571#file234571line12
What if this was TARGET target and you extracted the interface
defines etc. from that target?
That,
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115098/
---
(Updated Jan. 19, 2014, 5:30 p.m.)
Review request for KDE Frameworks and
On Jan. 19, 2014, 5:21 p.m., Stephen Kelly wrote:
cmake/FindOpenEXR.cmake, line 26
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115123/diff/3/?file=234694#file234694line26
What is in PC_OpenEXR_CFLAGS_OTHER ?
INTERFACE_COMPILE_DEFINITIONS is only suitable for compile definitions,
KCrash automatically initializes itself with the use of
Q_COREAPP_STARTUP_FUNCTION, provided that apps link to that lib.
This works OK, except for one thing: it gives no chance for KCrash to add
--nocrashhandler to QCommandLineParser (in the case where the app uses that).
Which makes me
See http://build.kde.org/job/ktexteditor_master_qt5/58/changes
___
Kde-frameworks-devel mailing list
Kde-frameworks-devel@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-frameworks-devel
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115098/#review47725
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- David Faure
On Jan. 19, 2014, 5:30
Hello,
On Sunday 19 January 2014 18:43:01 David Faure wrote:
KCrash automatically initializes itself with the use of
Q_COREAPP_STARTUP_FUNCTION, provided that apps link to that lib.
This works OK, except for one thing: it gives no chance for KCrash to add
--nocrashhandler to
On Sunday 19 January 2014 20:44:48 Kevin Ottens wrote:
What about KCRASH_NO_CRASH_HANDLER ? It's long but it makes it at least
descriptive.
Except that it's not technically correct, a crash handler (= a function called
upon crashing) is still called, to handle autorestart functionality (when
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115120/#review47727
---
src/imageformats/CMakeLists.txt
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/114908/#review47736
---
Looks good to me.
(i.e. wait a bit in case of objections,
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115097/#review47737
---
This review has been submitted with commit
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115098/#review47738
---
This review has been submitted with commit
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115098/
---
(Updated Jan. 19, 2014, 9:55 p.m.)
Status
--
This change has been
Hello,
kwallet-framework tests now (correctly) work when launched from a KF5 session.
kwalletd pop-ups password dialogs using KF5/Qt5 (yes!).
I also added SKIP for the case where there's no graphical session, thinking
that the CI does not have such an environment, but I was wrong :o)
QTest
See http://build.kde.org/job/ktexteditor_master_qt5/61/changes
___
Kde-frameworks-devel mailing list
Kde-frameworks-devel@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-frameworks-devel
On Sunday, January 19, 2014 10:07:36 PM KDE CI System wrote:
See http://build.kde.org/job/ktexteditor_master_qt5/61/changes
___
Kde-frameworks-devel mailing list
Kde-frameworks-devel@kde.org
See http://build.kde.org/job/ktexteditor_master_qt5/62/changes
___
Kde-frameworks-devel mailing list
Kde-frameworks-devel@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-frameworks-devel
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115132/
---
Review request for KDE Frameworks.
Repository: kconfigwidgets
On Jan. 19, 2014, 12:39 a.m., Luigi Toscano wrote:
The patch looks ago, I have two remarks:
- I think that kde5options should be kf5options (as it happened with
kde4-config - kf5-config)
- I'm not sure if the content of those manpages still applies. The special
options described
On Jan. 17, 2014, 6:51 p.m., Alex Merry wrote:
KF5DocToolsMacros.cmake, lines 166-172
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115077/diff/1/?file=234284#file234284line166
These should *not* be renamed, as they are compatibility macros.
However, they should probably be moved to
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115101/#review47746
---
autotests/kmessagewidgetautotest.cpp
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115134/
---
Review request for KDE Frameworks.
Repository: kjsembed
Description
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115101/#review47749
---
autotests/kmessagewidgetautotest.cpp
On Mon, Jan 20, 2014 at 11:02 AM, Valentin Rusu k...@rusu.info wrote:
Hello,
Hi,
kwallet-framework tests now (correctly) work when launched from a KF5 session.
kwalletd pop-ups password dialogs using KF5/Qt5 (yes!).
I also added SKIP for the case where there's no graphical session,
See http://build.kde.org/job/ktexteditor_master_qt5/70/changes
___
Kde-frameworks-devel mailing list
Kde-frameworks-devel@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-frameworks-devel
See http://build.kde.org/job/ktexteditor_master_qt5/72/changes
___
Kde-frameworks-devel mailing list
Kde-frameworks-devel@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-frameworks-devel
On Jan. 17, 2014, 8:43 p.m., Martin Gräßlin wrote:
this would break my workflow given that I install kde4 and kf5 to different
prefixes. I think this needs a different approach, but please don't ask me
for it. I'm lacking ideas how we could solve this upstream.
Hrvoje Senjan wrote:
Hello all,
Just a quick reminder:
The next KF5 Update Meeting will happen on #kde-devel tomorrow at 4pm Paris
time.
See you there!
Regards.
--
Kévin Ottens, http://ervin.ipsquad.net
KDAB - proud supporter of KDE, http://www.kdab.com
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed
55 matches
Mail list logo
