Re: DrKonqi placement

manner possible. > > Maybe we need to separate the basic crash dialog from the bug reporting > functionality > > -- > David Faure, fa...@kde.org, http://www.davidfaure.fr > Working on KDE Frameworks 5 Thanks, Ben Cooksley KDE Sysadmin > > __

Re: Gerrit available for trial

On Sat, Oct 11, 2014 at 9:57 AM, David Faure wrote: > On Friday 12 September 2014 11:55:23 Kevin Krammer wrote: >> It is currently used for Trojita itself and at the Frameworks BoF at >> Akademy we decided to also test drive this with two of our actively >> developed frameworks. > > ... and these

Re: Review Request 120435: Declare InheritanceChecker before actual use

implications. - Ben Cooksley On Sept. 30, 2014, 11:36 a.m., Kevin Funk wrote: > > --- > This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: > https://git.reviewboard.kde.

Re: What's "qt5-stable" on build.kde.org

On Thu, Sep 18, 2014 at 9:30 PM, Jan Kundrát wrote: > On Thursday, 18 September 2014 10:10:41 CEST, Ben Cooksley wrote: >> >> This would still apply even after the implementation of new scheme for >> dependencies and other build metadata. > > > Where do I learn abou

Re: What's "qt5-stable" on build.kde.org

On Thu, Sep 18, 2014 at 6:04 PM, Marko Käning wrote: > On 18 Sep 2014, at 07:52 , Martin Gräßlin wrote: >> That's not what I meant. I mean we have things like frameworks which require >> only Qt 5.2, but we also have things like e.g. KWin requiring Qt 5.3 (soon >> 5.4). This will require two Qt b

Re: Re: Re: What's "qt5-stable" on build.kde.org

On Tue, Sep 16, 2014 at 9:45 PM, Martin Gräßlin wrote: > On Tuesday 16 September 2014 21:23:54 Ben Cooksley wrote: >> I wrote this a bit too quickly. >> The correct url is >> http://build.kde.org/view/External_Deps/job/qt5_master_qt5/ >> >> What the system means

Re: Re: What's "qt5-stable" on build.kde.org

On Tue, Sep 16, 2014 at 9:22 PM, Martin Gräßlin wrote: > On Tuesday 16 September 2014 21:17:37 Ben Cooksley wrote: >> On Tue, Sep 16, 2014 at 9:12 PM, Martin Gräßlin wrote: >> > Hi all, >> >> Hi Martin, >> >> > I just had a little problem with a new

Re: What's "qt5-stable" on build.kde.org

On Tue, Sep 16, 2014 at 9:12 PM, Martin Gräßlin wrote: > Hi all, Hi Martin, > > I just had a little problem with a new autotest for kwindowsystem which passed > on my setup, but failed on build.kde.org. It turned out that it's missing an > xcb_flush(QX11Info::connection()) before blocking in the

Re: Review Request 119991: Use Juvia to add comments on the API class pages

On Sun, Sep 14, 2014 at 4:42 PM, Matthew Dawson wrote: > On September 12, 2014 03:19:13 AM Ben Cooksley wrote: >> > On Sept. 8, 2014, 10:22 p.m., Ben Cooksley wrote: >> > Matthew Dawson wrote: >> > I don't think upstream would be happy with the patch, a

Re: Review Request 119991: Use Juvia to add comments on the API class pages

> On Sept. 8, 2014, 10:22 p.m., Ben Cooksley wrote: > > What is the status of this? Is there anything blocking it being shipped and > > made available on api.kde.org? > > Denis Steckelmacher wrote: > It works locally, so I'm just waiting for a ship-it or othe

Re: Review Request 119991: Use Juvia to add comments on the API class pages

> On Sept. 8, 2014, 10:22 p.m., Ben Cooksley wrote: > > What is the status of this? Is there anything blocking it being shipped and > > made available on api.kde.org? > > Denis Steckelmacher wrote: > It works locally, so I'm just waiting for a ship-it or othe

Re: Review Request 119991: Use Juvia to add comments on the API class pages

being shipped and made available on api.kde.org? - Ben Cooksley On Aug. 29, 2014, 2:16 p.m., Denis Steckelmacher wrote: > > --- > This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: > https://git.reviewboard.kde.

Re: kcoreaddons fails to build properly on OSX/CI (was OSX/CI: kauth fails to build )

On Sep 8, 2014 11:15 AM, "David Faure" wrote: > > On Wednesday 20 August 2014 22:44:20 Marko Käning wrote: > > I had to revert back to and rebuild the older cmake version now [3], in > > order to be at least partially able to build things. > > [2] cmake revision: 7000a06b06ef3c5d15418b3afb4f0525fa

Re: Review Request 119991: Use Juvia to add comments on the API class pages

> > Albert Astals Cid wrote: > Yeha, check with sysadmins why emails are not working and then maybe > create a api-kde-comme...@kde.org mailing list or something that people can > subscribe to? > > Ben Cooksley wrote: > Emails should be fixed now, I did everything

Re: Review Request 119991: Use Juvia to add comments on the API class pages

> > Albert Astals Cid wrote: > Yeha, check with sysadmins why emails are not working and then maybe > create a api-kde-comme...@kde.org mailing list or something that people can > subscribe to? > > Ben Cooksley wrote: > Emails should be fixed now, I did everything

Re: Loss of Jenkins build data

On Mon, Sep 1, 2014 at 9:59 PM, "Marko Käning" wrote: > Hi Ian, Hi Marko, > > did this also the data stored for OSX/CI? No binary builds were lost. This only affects the build log information accessible through the build.kde.org web interface. > > Greets, > Marko Thanks, Ben > __

Loss of Jenkins build data

Hi all, Due to https://issues.jenkins-ci.org/browse/JENKINS-21268 we have lost the past 2 weeks worth of Jenkins builds on the CI system. Hopefully all other changes in the past 2 weeks have remained persistent as it is unclear whether they will survive this bug as well. As the Maven plugin has n

Re: Review Request 119991: Use Juvia to add comments on the API class pages

> > Albert Astals Cid wrote: > Yeha, check with sysadmins why emails are not working and then maybe > create a api-kde-comme...@kde.org mailing list or something that people can > subscribe to? > > Ben Cooksley wrote: > Emails should be fixed now, I did everything

Re: Review Request 119940: Use style primitive to render custom tooltip rather than custom code

> On Aug. 26, 2014, 2:21 p.m., Aleix Pol Gonzalez wrote: > > +1 looks good to me. > > > > Maybe a before/after screenshot would help in these reviews. > > Hugo Pereira Da Costa wrote: > sorry. Will add > (being lazy) > > Ben Cooksley wrot

Re: Review Request 119991: Use Juvia to add comments on the API class pages

dated Aug. 29, 2014, 2:16 p.m.) > > > Review request for KDE Frameworks and Aurélien Gâteau. > > > Repository: kapidox > > > Description > --- > > Juvia is a Free Software commenting system that can easily be used on static > websites like api.kd

Re: OSX/CI: libkdxraw fails to build on branch frameworks

On Thu, Aug 28, 2014 at 9:07 AM, Marko Käning wrote: > Hi Albert, Ben and Aleix, Hi all, > > On 27 Aug 2014, at 22:19 , Albert Astals Cid wrote: >> As I already said, I don't think it's worth for you building things that >> don't >> have Linux CI [unless you can work on fixing them, but I thin

Re: Review Request 119940: Use style primitive to render custom tooltip rather than custom code

> On Aug. 26, 2014, 2:21 p.m., Aleix Pol Gonzalez wrote: > > +1 looks good to me. > > > > Maybe a before/after screenshot would help in these reviews. > > Hugo Pereira Da Costa wrote: > sorry. Will add > (being lazy) You may wish to examine System Settings, it has very similar code as

Unsolicited email delivered to the mailing list

offending behaviour be dealt with appropriately. If Mailgun.com refuses to implement impersonation prevention, they will also be subject to being indefinitely blacklisted. Apologies for any inconvenience this may have caused. Thanks, Ben Cooksley KDE Sysadmin

Re: Proposal to improving KDE Software Repository Organization

On Wed, Aug 20, 2014 at 9:39 AM, Michael Pyne wrote: > On Tue, August 19, 2014 10:18:17 David Faure wrote: >> On Tuesday 19 August 2014 19:10:14 Ben Cooksley wrote: >> > The old kf5-qt5 / latest-qt4 names are being mapped to division / >> > track combinations.

Re: Proposal to improving KDE Software Repository Organization

On Tue, Aug 19, 2014 at 6:55 PM, David Faure wrote: > Nice work. Thanks. > > Just one thing: > > On Monday 18 August 2014 21:54:40 Michael Pyne wrote: >> So "kf5-qt5" might mean "KF5/Devel, Plasma5/Devel, etc." while >> "kf5-qt5-stable" might mean "KF5/Devel, Plasma5/Stable, etc.". > > This

Re: Update of the metainfo.yaml file of all the frameworks

On Thu, Aug 14, 2014 at 3:16 AM, Denis Steckelmacher wrote: > On 08/13/2014 02:41 PM, Albert Astals Cid wrote: >> >> El Dimecres, 13 d'agost de 2014, a les 14:20:58, Aleix Pol va escriure: >>> >>> On Wed, Aug 13, 2014 at 12:29 PM, Denis Steckelmacher >>> >>> >>> wrote: On 08/13/2014 12:

Re: [qca] /: Revert "Fix plugins lookup when not building in the Qt prefix"

On Sun, Aug 10, 2014 at 2:40 AM, Aleix Pol wrote: > On Sat, Aug 9, 2014 at 2:07 PM, Ben Cooksley wrote: >> >> Git commit c8b445b04a0efe66e491a6f0a06ca4ef312fdc91 by Ben Cooksley. >> Committed on 09/08/2014 at 12:00. >> Pushed by bcooksley into branch 'master&#x

Re: OSX/CI: plasma-framework fails building on branch master

On Sun, Aug 10, 2014 at 1:10 AM, Marko Käning wrote: > Hi Ben, Hi Marko, > > On 09 Aug 2014, at 15:07 , Ben Cooksley wrote: >> Is lcov available for OS X? > > I haven’t checked that up to now. Do we need that? How can I check it? Long term, it will be needed as lcov is u

Re: OSX/CI: plasma-framework fails building on branch master

On Sun, Aug 10, 2014 at 1:05 AM, Marko Käning wrote: > Hi Aleix, Hi Marko, > > On 08 Aug 2014, at 01:27 , Aleix Pol wrote: >> You're building with coverage enabled, I guess you're using the same build >> arguments as Jenkins? > > that’s what I figured, but I wonder why this never happened befo

[qca] /: Revert "Fix plugins lookup when not building in the Qt prefix"

Git commit c8b445b04a0efe66e491a6f0a06ca4ef312fdc91 by Ben Cooksley. Committed on 09/08/2014 at 12:00. Pushed by bcooksley into branch 'master'. Revert "Fix plugins lookup when not building in the Qt prefix" This reverts commit 38e0665127650b3db5676c1dd5f0ffeb8cdb176f. This

Re: Moderator?

14-August/018012.html > > -- > Duff Thanks, Ben Cooksley > > ___ > Kde-frameworks-devel mailing list > Kde-frameworks-devel@kde.org > https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-frameworks-devel > _

Re: Review Request 119512: Fix saving/loading of file dialog sizes

On July 28, 2014, 10:17 a.m., Lukáš Tinkl wrote: > > If the only issue is the open ::exec() TODO, you might "trick" it by > > calling ::winId(), then restore the size and ultimately ::exec() > > > > Otherwise you could open an own nested eventloop instead of relying on the > > dialogs exec, bu

Re: OSX/CI system: libalkimia framework misses dependency to gmp

On 15 July 2014 06:49, Marko Käning wrote: > Hi Ben, Hi Marko, > > while trying to build libalkimia on the OSX/CI system I noticed that the > framework misses GMP, without pointing it out to the user as a required > package! Do you have the CMake output from the earlier build? > > Though, on

Re: KF5 Update Meeting Minutes 2014-w28

On 9 July 2014 17:14, Kevin Ottens wrote: > Hello, Hi Kevin, > > On Wednesday 09 July 2014 09:57:27 Ben Cooksley wrote: >> On 9 July 2014 03:30, Kevin Ottens wrote: >> > * ervin hopes to see kdepimlibs bits getting in sooner rather than later; >> >>

Re: KF5 Update Meeting Minutes 2014-w28

On 9 July 2014 03:30, Kevin Ottens wrote: > Hello everyone, Hi Kevin, > > This is the minutes of the Week 28 KF5 meeting. As usual it has been held on > #kde-devel at 4pm Paris time. > > Were present: agateau, apol, d_ed, dfaure, fregl, mgraesslin, notmart, > PovAddict, Riddell, sandsmark, tosky

Re: KF5 Update Meeting Minutes 2014-w28

On 9 July 2014 04:05, Mario Fux wrote: > Am Dienstag, 08. Juli 2014, 17.30:19 schrieb Kevin Ottens: >> Hello everyone, > > Morning Hi Mario, > >> This is the minutes of the Week 28 KF5 meeting. As usual it has been held >> on #kde-devel at 4pm Paris time. > > [snip] > >> * unormal is looking fo

Re: KCoreAddons does not install most of its headers on my system

On 19 June 2014 08:50, Kevin Ottens wrote: > On Thursday 19 June 2014 08:21:30 Ben Cooksley wrote: >> On 19 June 2014 07:19, Kevin Ottens wrote: >> > On Monday 16 June 2014 20:55:10 Michael Pyne wrote: >> >> On Mon, June 16, 2014 13:14:47 Kevin Ottens wrote: >&g

Re: KCoreAddons does not install most of its headers on my system

On 19 June 2014 07:19, Kevin Ottens wrote: > On Monday 16 June 2014 20:55:10 Michael Pyne wrote: >> On Mon, June 16, 2014 13:14:47 Kevin Ottens wrote: >> > On Monday 16 June 2014 12:58:30 Àlex Fiestas wrote: >> > > I encountered this yesterday, for a quick workaround rollback to cmake >> > > 3.0 >

Re: Issues for Qt5/KF5/KDE/CI system on OSX/MacPorts

On 3 June 2014 09:08, Marko Käning wrote: > Hi Ben, > > On 01 Jun 2014, at 23:05 , Ben Cooksley wrote: >> That is caused by the patch. It assumes you have kdoctools installed >> within the sources of kconfigwidgets. This won't work. > I see. > >> The solutio

Re: Issues for Qt5/KF5/KDE/CI system on OSX/MacPorts

On 31 May 2014 11:37, Marko Käning wrote: > So, I have figured that kdoctools has found docbook and docbook-xsl just fine > when installing it via MacPorts: > --- > -- Performing Test _OFFT_IS_64BIT - Success > -- Found LibXslt: /opt/local/lib/libxslt.dylib (found version "1.1.28") > -- Found LibX

Re: Issues for Qt5/KF5/KDE/CI system on OSX/MacPorts

Hi all, Going to respond to everything in one email. > to kdoctools’ search path on the KDE/CI system. > > Question is, how to achieve it? > Will we indeed have to patch its sources? Patching of the sources by the CI system is considered unacceptable for KDE projects. Particularly as these are p

Re: Issues for Qt5/KF5/KDE/CI system on OSX/MacPorts

On Thu, May 29, 2014 at 8:08 AM, Marko Käning wrote: > Hi Ben, > Hi Olivier, Hi Marko, > > On 28 May 2014, at 08:48 , Ben Cooksley wrote: >> Hmm. What about "Application Support" which kdoctools appears to use? > > as documented on [1] I have reconfigured th

Re: Issues for Qt5/KF5/KDE/CI system on OSX/MacPorts

On Tue, May 27, 2014 at 9:59 PM, Alex Merry wrote: > On Tuesday 27 May 2014 17:30:56 Ben Cooksley wrote: >> On Mon, May 26, 2014 at 9:04 PM, Alex Merry wrote: >> > On Monday 26 May 2014 19:41:33 Ben Cooksley wrote: >> >> On Mon, May 26, 2014 at 7:38 PM, wrote: &g

Re: Issues for Qt5/KF5/KDE/CI system on OSX/MacPorts

On Tue, May 27, 2014 at 9:55 PM, Alex Merry wrote: > On Monday 26 May 2014 20:37:23 mk-li...@email.de wrote: >> I hope that Ben can give me a hint about how to make use of proper variable >> substitution in that cfg file, since the following unfortunately doesn’t >> work: >> --- >> #configureExtra

Re: Issues for Qt5/KF5/KDE/CI system on OSX/MacPorts

On Tue, May 27, 2014 at 5:59 PM, Marko Käning wrote: > On 27 May 2014, at 07:29 , Ben Cooksley wrote: >> configurePlatformArgs=-DCMAKE_INSTALL_BUNDLEDIR="{installPrefix}/Applications” > > I ran into stg I had seen with my own trials to access the installPrefix

Re: Issues for Qt5/KF5/KDE/CI system on OSX/MacPorts

On Tue, May 27, 2014 at 5:53 PM, Marko Käning wrote: > On 27 May 2014, at 07:29 , Ben Cooksley wrote: > >> Please try the following syntax instead. >> Note that I recommend you override this in >> config/build/darwin-mavericks.cfg instead to ensure all CMake projects &g

Re: Issues for Qt5/KF5/KDE/CI system on OSX/MacPorts

On Mon, May 26, 2014 at 9:04 PM, Alex Merry wrote: > On Monday 26 May 2014 19:41:33 Ben Cooksley wrote: >> On Mon, May 26, 2014 at 7:38 PM, wrote: >> > On 26 May 2014, at 09:35 , Ben Cooksley wrote: >> >> For reasons stated above, application packages cannot res

Re: Issues for Qt5/KF5/KDE/CI system on OSX/MacPorts

On Tue, May 27, 2014 at 6:37 AM, wrote: > Hi Alex & Ben, Hi Marko, > > On 26 May 2014, at 11:04 , Alex Merry wrote: >> -DCMAKE_INSTALL_BUNDLEDIR=some/relative/path > > thanks to your hint I was able to insert a temporary workaround here on my CI > system > by supplying an additional configura

Re: Issues for Qt5/KF5/KDE/CI system on OSX/MacPorts

On Mon, May 26, 2014 at 7:38 PM, wrote: > On 26 May 2014, at 09:35 , Ben Cooksley wrote: >> For reasons stated above, application packages cannot reside within >> /Applications. >> If they need to reside within a separate directory, we'll need to >> arrange this

Re: Issues for Qt5/KF5/KDE/CI system on OSX/MacPorts

On Mon, May 26, 2014 at 7:32 PM, wrote: > Hi Ben, Hi Marko, > > On 26 May 2014, at 09:03 , Ben Cooksley wrote: >> This is because it was installed to /Applications/ within the >> installation jail (located at >> /Users/marko/WC/KDECI-builds/kconfig/local-in

Re: Issues for Qt5/KF5/KDE/CI system on OSX/MacPorts

On Mon, May 26, 2014 at 3:59 AM, wrote: > Hi Alex, > > On 24 May 2014, at 14:57 , Alex Merry wrote: >> Where *is* kconfig_compiler_kf5 installed? > > thanks again for pointing that out! > > I’ve found it here: > --- > $ find /opt/kde -name kconfig_compiler_kf5.app > $ find /Users/marko/WC/KDECI-

Re: Keeping CI green

On Fri, May 23, 2014 at 8:08 AM, Alex Merry wrote: > There are currently four frameworks that are yellow (for between 6 hours and 8 > days). kdelibs4support has had 3 commits (not counting those by scripty) since > it broke that have done nothing to fix the issue. > > If we claim that our release

Re: KF5 Maintainers: Please get ready for release

On Wed, Apr 30, 2014 at 1:45 AM, Alex Merry wrote: > On 29/04/14 14:35, John Layt wrote: >> Using "rbt post" has the same result, but at least has more verbose >> error messages: >> >> One or more fields had errors (HTTP 400, API Error 105) >> path: error: unable to find 1db2612bdc625b7267

Re: RFC: Do we want the entire commit history to be pushed if code is moved to another repository?

On Sat, Apr 26, 2014 at 7:20 PM, Frank Reininghaus wrote: > Hi everyone, > > when kdelibs was split into the different frameworks repositories, the > git history was dropped. I think that this was a good idea - splitting > the history properly would have been an extremely complex task, and > every

Re: kde4support => kdelibs4support[Was: Re: Releasing Deprecated modules and Tier 4 Definition]

On Thu, Apr 3, 2014 at 8:53 PM, Kevin Ottens wrote: > Hello, Hi all, > > On Thursday 03 April 2014 09:50:24 Jos Poortvliet wrote: >> On Wednesday 19 March 2014 10:41:15 Ben Cooksley wrote: >> > On Wed, Mar 19, 2014 at 7:15 AM, Kevin Ottens wrote: >> > >

Re: Where to put kglobalacceld?

On Mon, Apr 7, 2014 at 9:12 PM, Àlex Fiestas wrote: > On Friday 04 April 2014 15:41:07 Martin Gräßlin wrote: >> Given that kglobalaccel is only intended for the kde-workspaces anyway my >> suggestion is to move it into plasma-workspace repository instead of merging >> with the framework. Please no

Re: Re: build qt5 stable (changed subject from: qt5 stable: qengineio: fatal: remote error: access denied or repository not exported)

On Tue, Apr 1, 2014 at 9:23 PM, Dominik Haumann wrote: > On Monday, March 31, 2014 23:24:09 Albert Astals Cid wrote: >> El Dilluns, 31 de març de 2014, a les 22:34:21, Dominik Haumann va escriure: >> > On Monday 31 March 2014 17:27:33 Ben Cooksley wrote: >> > > O

Re: build qt5 stable (changed subject from: qt5 stable: qengineio: fatal: remote error: access denied or repository not exported)

On Tue, Apr 1, 2014 at 9:34 AM, Dominik Haumann wrote: > On Monday 31 March 2014 17:27:33 Ben Cooksley wrote: >> On Mon, Mar 31, 2014 at 5:38 AM, Gregor Mi > wrote: >> > On 30/03/14 12:41, Aleix Pol wrote: >> >> On Sun, Mar 30, 2014 at 12:02 PM, Grego

Re: build qt5 stable (changed subject from: qt5 stable: qengineio: fatal: remote error: access denied or repository not exported)

On Mon, Mar 31, 2014 at 5:38 AM, Gregor Mi wrote: > > > On 30/03/14 12:41, Aleix Pol wrote: >> On Sun, Mar 30, 2014 at 12:02 PM, Gregor Mi >> mailto:codeminis...@publicstatic.de>> wrote: >> >> >> >> On 30/03/14 11:29, Gregor Mi wrote: >> > Hi, >> > >> > has anyone recently build qt

Re: Problems found by the CI system

On Tue, Mar 25, 2014 at 12:37 AM, Vishesh Handa wrote: > On Monday, March 24, 2014 06:59:24 PM Ben Cooksley wrote: >> >> Baloo developers, please take a look at the failure in this log - >> http://build.kde.org/view/FAILED/job/baloo_stable/80/console. When >> referencin

Problems found by the CI system

Hi all, It seems lately that people have been breaking builds and not fixing the results, and some builds are extremely unreliable. It would be appreciated if these could be fixed. Frameworks folks, when pushing binary incompatible changes, please ensure you push them to the frameworks in the cor

Re: [kdesrc-build] /: kf5: Port rc files to use branch-groups consistently.

On Fri, Mar 21, 2014 at 12:45 PM, David Faure wrote: > On Wednesday 05 March 2014 10:44:24 Kevin Ottens wrote: >> Hello, >> >> On Tuesday 04 March 2014 22:54:42 David Faure wrote: >> > On Tuesday 04 March 2014 01:32:14 Michael Pyne wrote: >> > It wasn't that transparent at all - a number of module

Re: kde4support => kdelibs4support[Was: Re: Releasing Deprecated modules and Tier 4 Definition]

On Wed, Mar 19, 2014 at 7:15 AM, Kevin Ottens wrote: > Hello, Hi, > > On Monday 17 March 2014 22:53:25 Mario Fux KDE ML wrote: >> Am Montag, 17. März 2014, 18.15:09 schrieb Kevin Ottens: >> > Porting Aids: >> > * kde4support (obvious); >> >> Just that it doesn't get forgotten I'd like to second

Re: Binary incompatible changes

On Tue, Mar 4, 2014 at 9:30 PM, David Faure wrote: > On Tuesday 04 March 2014 12:08:07 Ben Cooksley wrote: >> On Sun, Mar 2, 2014 at 5:03 AM, Albert Astals Cid wrote: >> > El Dissabte, 1 de març de 2014, a les 16:53:28, David Faure va escriure: >> >> On Saturday

Re: Binary incompatible changes

On Sun, Mar 2, 2014 at 5:03 AM, Albert Astals Cid wrote: > El Dissabte, 1 de març de 2014, a les 16:53:28, David Faure va escriure: >> On Saturday 01 March 2014 16:39:56 Albert Astals Cid wrote: >> > Every time someone commits to okular, which may a bit too much, no? >> >> This is not what I sugg

Re: KActivities/master is now KF5/Qt5

On Fri, Feb 28, 2014 at 9:50 PM, Ivan Čukić wrote: > Hi all, > > Now that the 4.13 has been branched out, the master branch of KActivities is > for Qt5/KF5 development. > > I have updated the branch name in kf5-frameworks-build-include (I guess > David had something else in mind, so I'm CC-ing him

Re: kprintutils - next steps

On Sat, Mar 1, 2014 at 7:32 AM, John Layt wrote: > On 28 February 2014 14:14, Alex Merry wrote: > >> Given the alpha1 time constraints, I just pushed this. >> >> I'll leave dealing with the old repo to you (which I guess involves >> filing a sysadmin request to remove it). >> >> David: kprintutil

Binary incompatible changes

Hi all, As there still seem to be remnants of the last BIC change to Frameworks around i've now commenced a force rebuild of all Frameworks on the CI system. Apologies in advance for any noise this creates - but it is necessary for this to be fixed to allow for other Frameworks dependent projects

Re: Review Request 115478: Add QFileDialog unit autotest for filters (which reveals a QPA bug)

> On Feb. 4, 2014, 5:17 p.m., Alex Merry wrote: > > Has the Qt patch been submitted upstream? > > Dominik Haumann wrote: > Meanwhile yes: https://codereview.qt-project.org/#change,77390 > > Alex Merry wrote: > I don't think it's useful to have tests that fail because of upstream > issu

Frameworkification of kactivities and plasma-framework

Hi all, Can someone please frameworkify KActivities? The CI system needs this due to a dependency loop. The new KRunner framework depends on, among others plasma-framework, which in turn depends on kactivities. Previously both these two escaped the need to be fully fledged frameworks, however as

Re: Repository rename and consequences

On Sat, Feb 8, 2014 at 10:58 AM, Ben Cooksley wrote: > Hello all, > > Sysadmin has received a request to rename the repository "kwallet" > (currently located at kde/kdeutils) to "kwalletmanager" in order to > free this name up. > > Once that has been com

Re: Review Request 115613: Drop platform name from default user agent string

On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 10:21 PM, David Faure wrote: > On Monday 10 February 2014 09:15:23 Martin Gräßlin wrote: > > --- > > This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: > > https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115613/ > > --

Repository rename and consequences

- however custom scripts and procedures will need to be adjusted by hand. If anyone has any objections, please let us know. This change will be made in 48 hours. Thanks, Ben Cooksley KDE Sysadmin ___ Kde-frameworks-devel mailing list Kde-frameworks-devel

Continuous Integration

Hi folks, As you've probably observed, the CI system sent a large number of mails to this list over the past few hours. This was fallout from an extremely binary incompatible change affecting virtually all frameworks. I would suggest that maintainers please check the build logs for each of the f

Re: Build failed in Jenkins: kde4support_master_qt5 #32

On Fri, Jan 24, 2014 at 1:28 PM, šumski wrote: > On Friday 24 of January 2014 09:53:00 Ben Cooksley wrote: >> There has been no changes in regards to the compiler, etc. on >> build.kde.org in the past few weeks. >> The only thing that could have changed would be the versio

Re: Build failed in Jenkins: kde4support_master_qt5 #32

On Fri, Jan 24, 2014 at 8:36 AM, Christoph Cullmann wrote: > Hi, > > I think the problem is the > > -std=iso9899:1990 > > in our KDECompilerSettings.cmake, that causes at least this error on my > machine locally. > > (openSUSE 13.1, gcc 4.8.1) > > Without that, the configure checks work correct a

Re: Review Request 115190: Add unit test for KWindowInfo on X11

(436)] PASS : KWindowInfoX11Test::testTransientFor() PASS : KWindowInfoX11Test::testGroupLeader() PASS : KWindowInfoX11Test::testExtendedStrut() PASS : KWindowInfoX11Test::testGeometry() PASS : KWindowInfoX11Test::cleanupTestCase() Totals: 47 passed, 9 failed, 0 skipped * Finis

Re: qt configure parameters on Jenkins machine

On Tue, Jan 21, 2014 at 2:00 AM, Michal Humpula wrote: > Hi there, > > does anyone know, what are the ./configure params the Qt is compiled on > Jenkins machine with? There is some failing test in kate due to assertion in > Qt and I'm failing to reproduce the error locally. Please see the followi

Re: CI environment, kwallet & tests that pop windows

On Mon, Jan 20, 2014 at 11:02 AM, Valentin Rusu wrote: > Hello, Hi, > > kwallet-framework tests now (correctly) work when launched from a KF5 session. > kwalletd pop-ups password dialogs using KF5/Qt5 (yes!). > > I also added SKIP for the case where there's no graphical session, thinking > that

Re: Jenkins build became unstable: kwallet-framework_master_qt5 #21

On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 8:36 PM, Valentin Rusu wrote: > On 01/15/2014 07:16 AM, Ben Cooksley wrote: >> On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 11:44 AM, Valentin Rusu wrote: >>> On 01/14/2014 11:41 PM, KDE CI System wrote: >>>> See <http://build.kde.org/job/kwalle

Re: Jenkins build became unstable: kwallet-framework_master_qt5 #21

On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 11:44 AM, Valentin Rusu wrote: > On 01/14/2014 11:41 PM, KDE CI System wrote: >> See >> >> ___ >> Kde-frameworks-devel mailing list >> Kde-frameworks-devel@kde.org

Re: kde4support: kstandarddirs_unittest fix

On Tue, Dec 24, 2013 at 5:37 AM, David Faure wrote: > On Monday 23 December 2013 14:42:45 Alex Merry wrote: >> On 23/12/13 14:23, Alex Merry wrote: >> > On 23/12/13 12:52, David Faure wrote: >> >> On Monday 23 December 2013 11:43:39 Alex Merry wrote: >> >>> Either way, the tests will fail is KDEDI

Re: Framework metadata

On Thu, Dec 19, 2013 at 10:53 PM, John Layt wrote: > On 19 December 2013 08:47, Cornelius Schumacher wrote: >> On Wednesday 18 December 2013 Aurélien Gâteau wrote: >>> >>> The information in the DOAP file can also be used to generate manifest >>> files for Inqlude (http://inqlude.org/) >> >> For

Re: Framework metadata

On Thu, Dec 19, 2013 at 9:52 PM, Martin Graesslin wrote: > On Thursday 19 December 2013 21:22:36 you wrote: >> On Thu, Dec 19, 2013 at 9:15 PM, Martin Graesslin > wrote: >> > On Wednesday 18 December 2013 21:35:33 Christophe Giboudeaux wrote: >> >> On Wednesday 18 December 2013 19:50:58 Alex Merr

Re: Framework metadata

On Thu, Dec 19, 2013 at 9:15 PM, Martin Graesslin wrote: > On Wednesday 18 December 2013 21:35:33 Christophe Giboudeaux wrote: >> On Wednesday 18 December 2013 19:50:58 Alex Merry wrote: >> > On 18/12/13 17:54, Aurélien Gâteau wrote: >> > > We need to have at least a COPYING file in there, with th

Re: Allowing kicontheme tests to run without oxygen-icons

On Thu, Dec 19, 2013 at 12:32 PM, Alex Merry wrote: > Currently, kiconthemes tests fail on Jenkins, due to the absense of > oxygen-icons. But I figured they shouldn't really depend on a theme > being installed anyway, so I altered the tests to not require it. This is because the kiconthemes fram

Re: Let's get in release mode!

On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 11:47 PM, Martin Klapetek wrote: > On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 11:39 AM, David Faure wrote: > >> On Tuesday 17 December 2013 23:27:39 Ben Cooksley wrote: >> > Other than apidox, I was also concerned about frameworkintegration, >> > itemmodels,

Re: Let's get in release mode!

On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 10:59 PM, David Faure wrote: > On Tuesday 17 December 2013 21:40:48 Ben Cooksley wrote: > > On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 9:37 PM, David Faure wrote: > > > On Tuesday 17 December 2013 14:10:56 Ben Cooksley wrote: > > > > I do have some reservat

Re: Let's get in release mode!

On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 11:15 PM, Alex Merry wrote: > On 17/12/13 08:37, David Faure wrote: > > On Tuesday 17 December 2013 14:10:56 Ben Cooksley wrote: > >> I do have some reservations as to the name of quite a few of those > >> repositories however as they are very

Re: karchive bad split

Hi Treeve, It seems that I may have mis-pushed this repository. I have now adjusted it's contents with what is supposed to be the KArchive repository - can you please check? Thanks, Ben ___ Kde-frameworks-devel mailing list Kde-frameworks-devel@kde.org

Re: Let's get in release mode!

On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 9:37 PM, David Faure wrote: > On Tuesday 17 December 2013 14:10:56 Ben Cooksley wrote: > > I do have some reservations as to the name of quite a few of those > > repositories however as they are very generic - and thus tread on common > > names

Re: Let's get in release mode!

On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 1:04 PM, Ben Cooksley wrote: > On Mon, Dec 16, 2013 at 10:18 AM, Kevin Ottens wrote: > >> On Sunday 15 December 2013 10:58:35 Alex Merry wrote: >> > On 14/12/13 19:30, Kevin Ottens wrote: >> > > Now we're really getting there! Epics

Re: Let's get in release mode!

On Mon, Dec 16, 2013 at 10:18 AM, Kevin Ottens wrote: > On Sunday 15 December 2013 10:58:35 Alex Merry wrote: > > On 14/12/13 19:30, Kevin Ottens wrote: > > > Now we're really getting there! Epics and review board are clean, > thanks > > > to > > > everyone who helped to get there. Now it's the t

Re: Build failed in Jenkins: kdelibs_frameworks_qt5 #1806

On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 10:55 AM, Daniele E. Domenichelli < daniele.domeniche...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hello Ben, > Hi Daniele, > > On 02/12/13 08:25, Ben Cooksley wrote: > > As a temporary workaround, to keep the CI system functional I have > > reverted to the las

Changes to the CI system

es the build to fail, indicating a behaviour change has taken place. I have patched around this to allow those projects dependent on opencv to compile successfully. If there are any issues with these changes, please let sysadmin know through the usual mechanisms. Thanks, Ben C

Re: Build failed in Jenkins: kdelibs_frameworks_qt5 #1806

On Mon, Dec 2, 2013 at 1:28 PM, David Faure wrote: > On Sunday 01 December 2013 23:43:02 KDE CI System wrote: > > -- Performing Test __KDE_HAVE_W_OVERLOADED_VIRTUAL > > -- Performing Test __KDE_HAVE_W_OVERLOADED_VIRTUAL - Success > > -- Performing Test COMPILER_HAS_HIDDEN_VISIBILITY > > -- Perfor

Re: Superbuild in kdelibs

On Thu, Nov 28, 2013 at 9:10 AM, Aurélien Gâteau wrote: > Le jeudi 28 novembre 2013 07:41:19 Ben Cooksley a écrit : > > On Nov 28, 2013 7:26 AM, "Aurélien Gâteau" wrote: > > > Le mercredi 27 novembre 2013 10:16:57 Ben Cooksley a écrit : > > > > Hi, >

Re: Superbuild in kdelibs

On Nov 28, 2013 7:26 AM, "Aurélien Gâteau" wrote: > > Le mercredi 27 novembre 2013 10:16:57 Ben Cooksley a écrit : > > Hi, > > > > > I just disabled it, so that you can give it a try. Can you modify kdelibs > > > job > > > definition so tha

Re: Superbuild in kdelibs

On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 2:33 AM, Aurélien Gâteau wrote: > Le vendredi 22 novembre 2013 19:55:52 Ben Cooksley a écrit : > > On Fri, Nov 22, 2013 at 3:52 AM, Aurélien Gâteau > wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > Hi, > > > > > This morning I merge

Re: Review Request 114052: Skip tests which need a window manager running

> On Nov. 23, 2013, 4:19 p.m., Albert Astals Cid wrote: > > Have you talked to with the build.kde.org guys to see if we can get such a > > window manager running? > > Martin Gräßlin wrote: > [12:21] bcooksley: fyi > https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/114052/ > [12:22] mgraesslin: oki,

<    4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >