On Thu, Feb 6, 2014 at 12:21 AM, David Faure fa...@kde.org wrote:
[resent with Frederik's correct email address]
On Thursday 06 February 2014 00:53:53 Frederik Gladhorn wrote:
Thanks a lot, I really appreciate it.
Some issues left:
- who do we write down as maintainer for attica?
- can I
On Thursday 06 February 2014 07:23:30 Kevin Ottens wrote:
On Thursday 06 February 2014 01:15:15 David Faure wrote:
Some issues left:
- who do we write down as maintainer for attica?
Good question, let's mark it TBD until someone dares to step up for it.
That said, obviously, if there's
On Thursday 06 February 2014 07:23:30 Kevin Ottens wrote:
On Thursday 06 February 2014 01:15:15 David Faure wrote:
Some issues left:
- who do we write down as maintainer for attica?
Good question, let's mark it TBD until someone dares to step up for it.
That said, obviously, if there's
I can do the changes if needed. It just needs the changes here:
http://community.kde.org/Frameworks/Porting_Notes under Build System
?
I believe attica currently builds with both qt4 or qt5 based on cmake
options (if QT4_BUILD is set it builds with qt4). Is the qt4 branch
supposed to not use ECM
On Tuesday 4. February 2014 23.40.22 David Faure wrote:
On Monday 03 February 2014 11:34:44 Kevin Ottens wrote:
On Monday 03 February 2014 10:17:49 David Faure wrote:
Any new module that should be added to this release, compared to TP1?
Should I include attica?
Since this question
On Wednesday 05 February 2014 18:39:51 David Faure wrote:
On Wednesday 05 February 2014 09:55:08 Jeremy Whiting wrote:
I can do the changes if needed. It just needs the changes here:
http://community.kde.org/Frameworks/Porting_Notes under Build System
?
No, it should follow all the
Frederik wrote:
From my point of view, please just go ahead and change it as you think is
sensible.
OK, thanks for the green lights, I went ahead:
* Qt4 support for attica is now in the qt4 branch
* Attica master is now qt5 only, and requires ECM.
* It gained all the bells and whistles of
On Thursday 6. February 2014 00.29.45 David Faure wrote:
Frederik wrote:
From my point of view, please just go ahead and change it as you think is
sensible.
OK, thanks for the green lights, I went ahead:
* Qt4 support for attica is now in the qt4 branch
* Attica master is now qt5
On Thursday 06 February 2014 00:53:53 Frederik Gladhorn wrote:
On Thursday 6. February 2014 00.29.45 David Faure wrote:
Frederik wrote:
From my point of view, please just go ahead and change it as you think
is
sensible.
OK, thanks for the green lights, I went ahead:
* Qt4
[resent with Frederik's correct email address]
On Thursday 06 February 2014 00:53:53 Frederik Gladhorn wrote:
Thanks a lot, I really appreciate it.
Some issues left:
- who do we write down as maintainer for attica?
- can I run astyle on the code to make it consistent with all other
frameworks?
On Monday 03 February 2014 11:34:44 Kevin Ottens wrote:
On Monday 03 February 2014 10:17:49 David Faure wrote:
Any new module that should be added to this release, compared to TP1?
Should I include attica?
Since this question keeps popping up, let's integrate it. It should also be
11 matches
Mail list logo