06844 Dessau-Roßlau, Kavalierstraße 31
> Tel. +49 340 2510 404
>
> -Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> Von: Kea-users Im Auftrag von Darren Ankney
> Gesendet: Donnerstag, 31. Oktober 2024 09:50
> An: Kea user's list
> Betreff: [EXTERN] Re: [Kea-users] Problem with ip address
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Kea-users Im Auftrag von Darren Ankney
Gesendet: Donnerstag, 31. Oktober 2024 09:50
An: Kea user's list
Betreff: [EXTERN] Re: [Kea-users] Problem with ip address range in subnets
Hi Jôrg,
You might be able to overcome this by using the interface param
Hi Jôrg,
You might be able to overcome this by using the interface parameter.
"interface": "eth0",
added to the subnets that are each on the interface might help, but
I've never personally tested assigning multiple subnets to the same
interface. It may be that the wrong subnet mask will be comp
Thanks
Sten
> On 30 Oct 2024, at 14.24, Kevin P. Fleming
> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Oct 30, 2024, at 07:58, Hartmann, Jörg wrote:
>> The error message is "no suitable subnet configured for a direct client".
>> If i give the cisco phones a part of 192.168.22.0 they get IPs to. So it's a
>> probably
IP
from „subnet“: „192.168.23.0/24“.
regards
Jörg
Von: Kea-users Im Auftrag von Kevin P. Fleming
Gesendet: Mittwoch, 30. Oktober 2024 14:25
An: kea-users@lists.isc.org
Betreff: [EXTERN] Re: [Kea-users] Problem with ip address range in subnets
On Wed, Oct 30, 2024, at 07:58, Hartmann, Jörg wrote
On Wed, Oct 30, 2024, at 07:58, Hartmann, Jörg wrote:
> The error message is "no suitable subnet configured for a direct client".
>
> If i give the cisco phones a part of 192.168.22.0 they get IPs to. So it's a
> probably an error with the netmask which i dont understand.
>
> The server has 192.