[Kicad-developers] [PATCH] Kill unused NETLIST_EXPORTER_GENERIC::writeListOfNets

2016-05-04 Thread Simon Richter
This function is unused, and looks similar to the tree builder above, so it might likely be left over from a refactoring effort. --- .../netlist_exporters/netlist_exporter_generic.cpp | 73 -- .../netlist_exporters/netlist_exporter_generic.h | 7 --- 2 files changed, 80

[Kicad-developers] Kicad Fields, was Re: [RFC] On net ties, microwave tools & custom pad shapes, altogether.

2016-05-04 Thread Strontium
I split this from the net-ties, etc RFC because its drifting off topic from that discussion. I am not sure I understand the rationale to "It should also be limited to passing information to external tools such as simulators and scripts such as Tom's proposal"? Both the Footprint and the

Re: [Kicad-developers] [RFC] On net ties, microwave tools & custom pad shapes, altogether.

2016-05-04 Thread José Ignacio
I'm 300% in favor of this proposal, an it makes sense to store the dimensions in the key_value pairs. From a user's perspective, they can grab a premade symbol with default values populated in those fields, place in the schematic and edit if necessary. for selecting the "autogenerated flag" what

Re: [Kicad-developers] [RFC] On net ties, microwave tools & custom pad shapes, altogether.

2016-05-04 Thread Tomasz Wlostowski
On 04.05.2016 16:48, Wayne Stambaugh wrote: > How are you saving this auto generate flag and width/length parameters > in the schematic? If you are using component fields or text that's > fine. However, please keep in mind that using component fields and text > is for passing information to

Re: [Kicad-developers] Preferences rework - pcbnew

2016-05-04 Thread Chris Pavlina
I had originally thought that was the idea with the 4.x series, but I might be wrong. On Wed, May 04, 2016 at 11:10:46AM -0600, Duane Johnson wrote: > Might it be worth making a specific (intermediate) release whose purpose is > to make it the last support for "legacy" canvas? > > On Wed, May 4,

Re: [Kicad-developers] Preferences rework - pcbnew

2016-05-04 Thread Duane Johnson
Might it be worth making a specific (intermediate) release whose purpose is to make it the last support for "legacy" canvas? On Wed, May 4, 2016 at 9:19 AM, Chris Pavlina wrote: > While I understand your point, and I think I agree with it (though I'm > almost > on the

Re: [Kicad-developers] Round Rectangle corner radius control suggestion

2016-05-04 Thread Chris Pavlina
An alternative interface could be to optionally accept % as a unit in fields for values with a clear relationship to another value, as the fields already do accept units like in and mm. I kind of like the idea, but I wonder how intuitive that would be - it works fine if you know it's there, but

Re: [Kicad-developers] Preferences rework - pcbnew

2016-05-04 Thread Chris Pavlina
While I understand your point, and I think I agree with it (though I'm almost on the fence), I wonder if I should explain - I think the argument for removing legacy sooner rather than later is that by removing the crutch of "eh, we can just use legacy for that for now", we will encourage

Re: [Kicad-developers] Preferences rework - pcbnew

2016-05-04 Thread Wayne Stambaugh
Removing the legacy canvas cannot be done until there is an acceptable solution for users who do not have usable opengl on their systems. The Cairo canvas is not usable even on the fastest system I've have access to. Until either Cairo gets a significant speed boost, opengl becomes usable on all

Re: [Kicad-developers] [RFC] On net ties, microwave tools & custom pad shapes, altogether.

2016-05-04 Thread Wayne Stambaugh
The use of fields for arbitrary data is indeed powerful. It should also be limited to passing information to external tools such as simulators and scripts such as Tom's proposal. Anything that is supported as a feature in KiCad should be part of the schematic file format and fully supported by

Re: [Kicad-developers] [RFC] On net ties, microwave tools & custom pad shapes, altogether.

2016-05-04 Thread Wayne Stambaugh
How are you saving this auto generate flag and width/length parameters in the schematic? If you are using component fields or text that's fine. However, please keep in mind that using component fields and text is for passing information to third party tools that are not part of kicad. If we are

Re: [Kicad-developers] mode openGL issues after latest updates

2016-05-04 Thread Wayne Stambaugh
On 5/4/2016 5:20 AM, Maciej Sumiński wrote: > On 05/03/2016 04:48 PM, Wayne Stambaugh wrote: > [snip] >> Not quite yet. See attached screen shot on latest msys2/mingw32. The >> Cairo version is 1.15.2. I suppose it could be the graphics drivers on >> my work laptop (it's one of the Intel HD

Re: [Kicad-developers] mode openGL issues after latest updates

2016-05-04 Thread jp charras
Le 04/05/2016 à 12:23, Maciej Sumiński a écrit : > On 05/04/2016 11:45 AM, jp charras wrote: >> Le 04/05/2016 à 11:20, Maciej Sumiński a écrit : >>> On 05/03/2016 04:48 PM, Wayne Stambaugh wrote: >>> [snip] Not quite yet. See attached screen shot on latest msys2/mingw32. The Cairo

Re: [Kicad-developers] Round Rectangle corner radius control suggestion

2016-05-04 Thread ifs
2016-05-04 13:56 egunean, jp charras-(e)k idatzi du: Le 04/05/2016 à 13:29, i...@elektroquark.com a écrit : 2016-05-04 13:03 egunean, jp charras-(e)k idatzi du: Le 04/05/2016 à 12:45, i...@elektroquark.com a écrit : Hello: In the Pad Properties window, Round Rectangle properties, there is

Re: [Kicad-developers] Round Rectangle corner radius control suggestion

2016-05-04 Thread jp charras
Le 04/05/2016 à 13:29, i...@elektroquark.com a écrit : > 2016-05-04 13:03 egunean, jp charras-(e)k idatzi du: >> Le 04/05/2016 à 12:45, i...@elektroquark.com a écrit : >>> Hello: >>> >>> In the Pad Properties window, Round Rectangle properties, there is the >>> "Corner size" option. It >>> shows

Re: [Kicad-developers] Round Rectangle corner radius control suggestion

2016-05-04 Thread ifs
2016-05-04 13:03 egunean, jp charras-(e)k idatzi du: Le 04/05/2016 à 12:45, i...@elektroquark.com a écrit : Hello: In the Pad Properties window, Round Rectangle properties, there is the "Corner size" option. It shows the calculated "Corner radius" as information. Using IPC rules as

Re: [Kicad-developers] Round Rectangle corner radius control suggestion

2016-05-04 Thread jp charras
Le 04/05/2016 à 12:45, i...@elektroquark.com a écrit : > Hello: > > In the Pad Properties window, Round Rectangle properties, there is the > "Corner size" option. It > shows the calculated "Corner radius" as information. > > Using IPC rules as guidelines, the maximum corner radius must be 25%

[Kicad-developers] Round Rectangle corner radius control suggestion

2016-05-04 Thread ifs
Hello: In the Pad Properties window, Round Rectangle properties, there is the "Corner size" option. It shows the calculated "Corner radius" as information. Using IPC rules as guidelines, the maximum corner radius must be 25% of the pad width, with a maximum of 0.25 mm. If the pad is big

Re: [Kicad-developers] mode openGL issues after latest updates

2016-05-04 Thread Maciej Sumiński
On 05/04/2016 11:45 AM, jp charras wrote: > Le 04/05/2016 à 11:20, Maciej Sumiński a écrit : >> On 05/03/2016 04:48 PM, Wayne Stambaugh wrote: >> [snip] >>> Not quite yet. See attached screen shot on latest msys2/mingw32. The >>> Cairo version is 1.15.2. I suppose it could be the graphics

Re: [Kicad-developers] mode openGL issues after latest updates

2016-05-04 Thread jp charras
Le 04/05/2016 à 11:20, Maciej Sumiński a écrit : > On 05/03/2016 04:48 PM, Wayne Stambaugh wrote: > [snip] >> Not quite yet. See attached screen shot on latest msys2/mingw32. The >> Cairo version is 1.15.2. I suppose it could be the graphics drivers on >> my work laptop (it's one of the Intel

Re: [Kicad-developers] mode openGL issues after latest updates

2016-05-04 Thread Maciej Sumiński
On 05/03/2016 04:48 PM, Wayne Stambaugh wrote: [snip] > Not quite yet. See attached screen shot on latest msys2/mingw32. The > Cairo version is 1.15.2. I suppose it could be the graphics drivers on > my work laptop (it's one of the Intel HD graphics chips). I'll test it > on my home system

Re: [Kicad-developers] mode openGL issues after latest updates

2016-05-04 Thread Maciej Sumiński
On 05/04/2016 10:09 AM, Mário Luzeiro wrote: > Hi Orson, > > I understand, but my question was, since that check is inside the > "BeginUpdate" I am supposing that you will do in any case every time that > redraw update: i.e in this case you will call GL functions and in the worst > case when

Re: [Kicad-developers] Bitmap fonts (+ dotted grid)

2016-05-04 Thread Maciej Sumiński
Apparently wxLogInfo() has changed its behavior and instead of writing to console, now it shows a window. I have just removed the related code, because if the required version is not supported, the user will get an appropriate error message anyway (revision 6771). Regards, Orson On 05/03/2016

Re: [Kicad-developers] mode openGL issues after latest updates

2016-05-04 Thread Mário Luzeiro
Hi Orson, I understand, but my question was, since that check is inside the "BeginUpdate" I am supposing that you will do in any case every time that redraw update: i.e in this case you will call GL functions and in the worst case when the windows is not displayed and you have no context. For

Re: [Kicad-developers] mode openGL issues after latest updates

2016-05-04 Thread Maciej Sumiński
Hi Mario, wxWidgets will trigger an assert in Linux if you try to set OpenGL context when the parent window is not yet visible. It may happen only when a window is created upon pcbnew launch, but anyway it is enough to require such condition there. It is also necessary to set the right context if