Hi,
I just checked the sheet shared across 2 projects. Thanks to the new
schematic format, it works fine. It looks like you don't need this
checkbox. The reason why this option was created doesn't exist anymore.
On Tue, 29 Sep 2020 at 00:00, Jeff Young wrote:
> I think this is no longer used.
Hi Nick,
That's actually the problem which I came from :)
On Wed, 23 Sep 2020 at 10:46, Nick Østergaard wrote:
> Hi
>
> Slightly related to this discussion and for inspiration:
>
> https://twitter.com/azonenberg/status/1282188633118699520
>
> Nick
>
> On Wed, 23 S
Hi Kliment,
I think if these things you explained will be implemented, it will make
high speed design very much easier.
And the problem is much worse if you have a lot of differential pairs. When
I see design and the only thing which I can do with differential pairs is
to tune length or redraw, I
>>For (1) I know Oleg Endo has been doing some work on the Net Inspector to
allow grouping nets for combined length measurement:
That's nice stuff to have, thanks Jon! From the beginning I was thinking
about a new GUI, which will hold all groups you want to length match. And
separately show about
Dear all,
I want to start my first KiCad high speed design and for that purpose I
plan to make some pcbnew python scripts. I just want to ask if some of that
tools are expected in the nightly builds (may be I will wait for it or even
give a hand or contribute)
1) tool to visualize nets lengths
Hi All!
I hope somebody will find it useful, I migrated openRex imx6 SOM (
https://www.imx6rex.com/ ) to KiCad. That's an open source ARM SOM module
from Fedevel courses. You can find it in my gitlab:
https://gitlab.com/jasuramme/imx6-openrex-kicad-port
The course I just finished is Advanced PCB
Hi James,
few months ago I implemented "update schematic from pcb" feature, and
I think it's a little bit similar to feature you want to make. I'm not
very often work with KiCad source, but if you don't have better person
to ask, feel free to ask me.
First of all - there's major change in
there as a comment?
>
>Eeli Kaikkonen
>
>On Mon, Feb 24, 2020 at 10:43 AM Alexander Shuklin
>
>wrote:
>
>> Hi anybody!
>> Sorry if there too much mistakes, I write from phone. When I looked
>into
>> undo stuff in schematic editor last time, it worked tha
Hi anybody!
Sorry if there too much mistakes, I write from phone. When I looked into undo
stuff in schematic editor last time, it worked that way:
Every schematic sheet has its own undo/redo history and when you apply undo,
only components in the opened sheet are affected.
From my point of view
Hi Jon,
I fetched code from your branch, but I cannot repeat that error yet.
May be that really related to GCC version? I use archlinux with gcc
9.2.0-4 ><
On Sat, 8 Feb 2020 at 22:12, Alexander Shuklin wrote:
>
> Hi Jon,
> That's my code. Unfortunately I almost sleep.
Hi Jon,
That's my code. Unfortunately I almost sleep. I don't see big
difference between using value_type and std::make_pair. I just tried
to be smart and used decltype to show that is the map pair. But it
doesn't change much.
Only thing I see now, that according documentation value type is
pair,
Hi Brian,
I'm sure that will work with the eeschema:
g_CurrentSheet->UpdateAllScreenReferences();
m_frame->SetSheetNumberAndCount();
m_frame->SyncView();
m_frame->OnModify();
m_frame->GetCanvas()->Refresh();
m_frame is SCH_EDIT_FRAME*
Probably with pcbnew
Hi all,
I would say, pin swapping is just will be an another tool (you
probably need some specific piece of GUI for that).
The reason I want back-annotation is to have proper geometrical
(geographical) re-annotation. We have contractor who ask if possible
renumber passive components in geometrical
alog, and if anybody against, please write in here
On Sun, 1 Dec 2019 at 02:36, Eeli Kaikkonen wrote:
>
> su 1. jouluk. 2019 klo 0.27 Alexander Shuklin (jasura...@gmail.com) kirjoitti:
>>
>> Hi Eeli,
>> first of all sorry for problems with compilation.
>
>
> No
ng able to change footprints in pcbnew strange because then it's out of
> sync with the schematic and it has to be changed in the schematic manually
> and updated to layout anyways. Being able to update it from the layout to the
> schematic looks like an obvious missing feature.
>
gt; could also be similar. Or do I just think it's so "simple" and can't see
> something?
>
> It's easy to see that number 1 isn't difficult and could be done with a
> python script (although many people would like to see it in the main KiCad, I
> think).
>
> Eeli
Hi Eeli and Brian,
Sorry for delay, unfortunately I cannot answer too often.
> It has occurred to me (Alexander please chime in) that once back annotation
> has been solved subject to all the issues raised by Wayne and others that it
> would be a general solution.
Unfortunately no. All stuff
that. Anyway, Brian
already busy with doing that in C++, so I believe that's alright.
If there will be some dialog with just common geometrical annotation,
you still can use python scripts to do some specific one.
On Sat, 23 Nov 2019 at 13:30, Dino Ghilardi wrote:
>
> On 23/11/19 10:05, Ale
o be addressed.
>
> On 11/22/19 9:53 AM, Alexander Shuklin wrote:
> > Excuse me for so much questions. There's plenty of ways how it can be
> > done, and I'm quite new, maybe I don't see some simple way.
> > I can back up data from pcbnew which is not up to date to sche
Hi Dino,
I would say "back annotation" and "geographical annotation" are just
different things. We with Brian plan to implement both of them.
Basically when you want to get references from board and apply them to
corresponding schematic, that back annotation. If you re-annotate
footprints in PCB
ference changes in the board.
>
> On 11/22/19 9:13 AM, Alexander Shuklin wrote:
> > Hi Wayne,
> >
> > I don't want to start PCB update from eeschema straight away, because
> > if you run back-annotation, you already changed some references in
> > layout and you gonn
> will ensure when you back annotate that there is a one to one
> correlation between board footprint sheet paths and schematic symbol
> sheet paths.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Wayne
>
> On 11/22/19 1:18 AM, Alexander Shuklin wrote:
> > Hi Wayne,
> > thanks for answer.
> >
mp. Thanks for tip!
On Fri, 22 Nov 2019 at 09:18, Alexander Shuklin wrote:
>
> Hi Wayne,
> thanks for answer.
> Hopefully I will show you commit soon, so team could look, check and
> suggest something about that. I'm aware about differences between
> PCBnew and eeschema and ju
te slow.
3) To hold information in what project this particular schematics was
used. So that's should be saved in .sch file then. But I don't think
that information will be very valuable.
On Thu, 21 Nov 2019 at 00:07, Wayne Stambaugh wrote:
>
> On 11/7/19 5:06 AM, Alexander Shuklin wrote:
> >
Congratulations, Ian!
Best regards,
Alex
___
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers
Post to : kicad-developers@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers
More help :
Hi,
is it alright to answer anybody in one letter?
First of all, don't take amiss if I keep silence for a day, as I have
2 little children and at the best case I have couple of hours a day on
my own.
On Wed, 6 Nov 2019 at 16:27, Wayne Stambaugh wrote:
> Complex schematic hierarchies (using the
Hi,
thanks for answers!
Brian, I will definitely like to give a hand. But before start
everything I need to study things guys talking about. I haven't really
look about KIWAY yet. Probably after that I will have more clear look
how to implement that.
And many thanks for suggestions and advices.
Hi all,
I used some Python script to renumber components in PCB and annotate
it back to schematics. I think now it's usually done by parsing .sch
file as a plain text and re-writing references inside.
May I implement some back annotation feature from PCB to schematic?
I looked a bit and probably
gt;
> The Excellon format is not related to Gerber format (they are 2
> different formats, although based on G commands)
>
> For recent doc on drill files see:
> https://www.ucamco.com/files/downloads/file/305/the_xnc_file_format_specification.pdf
>
> Looks to me your manufacturer
Hi,
sorry, I'm not quite sure with that topic, as I never worked with
protel gerber format before. My PCB manufacturer started to use some
online tool to check gerbers
(https://www.frontline-pcb.com/products/sales/insight-pcb-overview.html)
and now they demand to send them files with protel
:
>
> On 2019-09-09 08:21, Alexander Shuklin wrote:
> > Hi!
> > There's one thing I always missed - ability to change polygons
> > coordinates.
> > I prepared a patch for that.
> > First of all there's the linechain editing widget and I used it for
> > some
that all outlines shapes equal in zone?
Is it possible to create a hole in zone? I mean, through KiCad interface.
Should dialogs give possibility to edit holes coordinates as well?
I will attach pictures to this mail
On Tue, 10 Sep 2019 at 15:47, Seth Hillbrand wrote:
>
> On 2019-09-09 08:21, Ale
Strange, it's look like there no attachments were on my last email...
I never get a copy from my own messages on kicad mailing lists, so I
cannot check it...
So, I moved to another mail server and try again.
Can somebody please look at patch? I hope that would be useful, as I
sometimes need to
Hi!
There's one thing I always missed - ability to change polygons coordinates.
I prepared a patch for that.
First of all there's the linechain editing widget and I used it for some pcbnew
dialogs.
But there's few points in which I'm not so sure.
First of all, I added SHAPE_LINE_CHAIN property
evaluate the
>complexity and the cost of the schematic entry (since at the moment we
>do not have a timer that measures the time spent working on a project
>moving the mouse and pressing keys -may be another future extension,
>but will require a change in file format to save that data
release.
>
>Cheers,
>
>Wayne
>
>[1]: https://launchpad.net/kicad/+milestone/6.0.0-rc1
>
>On 7/31/19 6:31 AM, Alexander Shuklin wrote:
>>
>> Hi! Thanks for that.
>> Currently I cannot reproduce the bug.
>> I think it can be connected to KiCad 6.0.0-r
mplement.
>>>>
>>>>Cheers,
>>>>
>>>>Wayne
>>>>
>>>>On 7/29/19 9:30 AM, Clemens Koller wrote:
>>>>> Hi!
>>>>> I think it could be good to see both:
>>>>> - The actual PCB area of the
variable. For an example of this see the
>>> dialog_create_array.cpp file. This way if any new options must be
>>> added in the future, they can just be added to the struct very easily.
>>>
>>> -Ian
>>>
>>> On
>>>Instead of declaring the 2 static variables separately, I would suggest
>>>creating a struct for the settings then store that as the static variable.
>>>For an example of this see the dialog_create_array.cpp file. This way if any
>>>new options must be
t;
>> Instead of declaring the 2 static variables separately, I would
>> suggest creating a struct for the settings then store that as the
>> static variable. For an example of this see the
>> dialog_create_array.cpp file. This way if any new options must be
>
Here you are)
>Воскресенье, 28 июля 2019, 19:28 +03:00 от jp charras :
>
>Le 24/07/2019 à 14:52, Alexander Shuklin a écrit :
>> Hi Ian,
>> Sorry for delay, also I added feature to save statistics in txt file, as
>> Dino suggested.
>>
>> --
>> Ale
Hi all,
I'm very new here. Can you help me with one topic, as I'm in doubt?
That's what written in Kicad developers guide:
Patches are currently submitted and handled via the developer mailing list ,
where you have to apply for membership to be able to send to it. Alternatively,
you can attach
e settings then store that as the static variable. For
>an example of this see the dialog_create_array.cpp file. This way if any new
>options must be added in the future, they can just be added to the struct very
>easily.
>
>-Ian
>On Mon, Jul 22, 2019 at 9:39 PM Alexander Shuk
s the static variable. For
>an example of this see the dialog_create_array.cpp file. This way if any new
>options must be added in the future, they can just be added to the struct very
>easily.
>
>-Ian
>On Mon, Jul 22, 2019 at 9:39 PM Alexander Shuklin < jasura...@mail.ru > wro
Damn ><,
don't use last patch, please.
It doesn't count total vias amount. Use this one.
>Понедельник, 22 июля 2019, 22:14 +03:00 от Alexander Shuklin
>:
>
>Hi,
>thanks for sharing experience, as I never used that translations or wxWidgets
>before. And I have no ide
ot;Exclude components...") the window "jumps" to
>the center of the screen (its default position on open): do you have
>also this behaviour or it is just on my debian-linux with gtk3?
>
>
>Cheers,
>Dino.
>
>On 22/07/19 10:13, Alexander Shuklin wrote:
>>
advantage of this approach
>>is also having a more consistent "look" through all the dialogs.
>>
>>
>>
>>P.S. (a little bit off-topic):
>>If you move the statistic window and check/uncheck one of the checkboxes
>>("subctract holes" or "
statistics: Since making every hole in the pcb costs time,
>> manufacturers calculate the price of the PCB using also that number.
>>
>> Also the option to save or print a text with the statistics report
>> would
>> be nice.
>>
>>
>
in the attachment.
>>>
>>>_______
>>>Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers
>>>Post to : kicad-developers@lists.launchpad.net
>>>Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers
>>>M
/6290375c1d41ddb89d4b08067593f170c7d344c5
>>>and branch:
>>>https://github.com/jasuramme/kicad-source-mirror/tree/statistic_dialog
>>>and there's also patch and dialogs pics in the attachment.
>>>
>>>_______
>
50 matches
Mail list logo
