Ok I know some of these are old, but I just realised my webmail server was
adding a graphic to the text, and as such, the mail was not going through, so
here they are.
>From what I can gather, the wings were part of the aircraft that were
>"borrowed heavily" from the early Taylor Mono.
This
Hi,
I have been following the discussion occasioned by the AS-family or
aerofoils and the 1 degree incidence recommendation, but does this also
apply to aircraft fitted (or about to be fitted) with the RAF-48 airfoils
(ie the Diehl wing skins)?
Regards,
Duncan of Devonport
Auckland, New
quot;Duncan" <k...@chalksoft.com>
To: "krnet" <kr...@mylist.net>
Sent: Sunday, July 18, 2004 8:18 AM
Subject: KR> Wing incidence with RAF-48?
> Hi,
> I have been following the discussion occasioned by the AS-family or
> aerofoils and the 1 degree incidence
-
From: "Mac McConnell-Wood" <macw...@tinyworld.co.uk>
To: "KRnet" <kr...@mylist.net>
Sent: Sunday, July 18, 2004 4:45 AM
Subject: Re: KR> Wing incidence with RAF-48?
Ho! -Duncan of Devonport-are you of that ilk,-or just common old Duncan? Ref
the RAF incidence
Discussion of this topic raises a couple of interesting issues for me;
I started building my KR 2 in 1986 and completed the wing spars
(all...main, front and rear plus outer, front and rear).
I also completed the fuselage sides and horizontal stabilizer and
elevators before going into a 17 year
Bernard,
>From all that I have read and from my experience with my first KR, I think
that the faster you fly, over 130MPH or so, the less incidence you would
want to have. Be sure not to confuse the incidence set with the RAF48 with
that set with the new wing.
I can only tell you that at
et" <kr...@mylist.net>
Sent: Sunday, July 18, 2004 2:18 AM
Subject: KR> Wing incidence with RAF-48?
> Hi,
> I have been following the discussion occasioned by the AS-family or
> aerofoils and the 1 degree incidence recommendation, but does this also
> apply to aircraft
mylist.net>
>Subject: KR> Wing incidence with RAF-48?
>Date: Sun, 18 Jul 2004 19:18:00 +1200
>
>Hi,
>I have been following the discussion occasioned by the AS-family or
>aerofoils and the 1 degree incidence recommendation, but does this also
>apply to aircraft fitted (o
Ducan & Mark:
A little correction for Duncan: My project (that you're in-process of buying)
has the Rand-Robinson Wing Skin Kit, not the Diehl wing skins. My plan was to
use the 1 degree angle of incidence, not the 3.5 degrees called for in the
plans.
For Mark J and Others:
For my project, I
9 matches
Mail list logo
