[kubernetes-users] Re: Publicly proposing SIG-CLI

2016-09-22 Thread Aaron Crickenberger
Yes please, CLI is its own brand of user experience - aaron On Thursday, September 22, 2016 at 2:09:16 PM UTC-7, DL duglin wrote: > > yes yes yes huge +1 > > -Doug > > On Sep 22, 2016, at 4:37 PM, Fabiano Franz > wrote: > > I've been talking to a few people in the past couple weeks and now we'd

[kubernetes-users] Re: Publicly proposing SIG-CLI

2016-09-22 Thread Aaron Crickenberger
That said, the draft link came across as '[1] "SIG-CLI' to me. Typo? This seems like a group with potential overlap with other sigs like api machinery, would be useful to better understand the boundaries. - aaron On Thursday, September 22, 2016 at 4:50:47 PM UTC-7, Aaron Crickenberger wrote:

[kubernetes-users] Re: Publicly proposing SIG-CLI

2016-09-22 Thread
API machinery does not want to own the user-facing half of kubectl, I'm reasonably sure. On Thu, Sep 22, 2016 at 4:53 PM, Aaron Crickenberger wrote: > That said, the draft link came across as '[1] "SIG-CLI' to me. Typo? > This seems like a group with potential overlap with other sigs like api >

[kubernetes-users] Re: Publicly proposing SIG-CLI

2016-09-22 Thread
Would love to see more development on kubectl. Our wish list: https://github.com/kubernetes/community/wiki/Roadmap:-kubectl On Thu, Sep 22, 2016 at 4:50 PM, Aaron Crickenberger wrote: > Yes please, CLI is its own brand of user experience > > - aaron > > On Thursday, September 22, 2016 at 2:09:1

[kubernetes-users] Re: Publicly proposing SIG-CLI

2016-09-22 Thread
Yeah, the API machinery charter explicitly disclaims the CLI: https://goo.gl/x5nWrF On Thu, Sep 22, 2016 at 5:42 PM, Clayton Coleman wrote: > +1 - API machinery supports clients and sigs, but does not own them (it > can help own client machinery though) > > On Sep 22, 2016, at 7:55 PM, 'Daniel S

[kubernetes-users] Re: Publicly proposing SIG-CLI

2016-09-22 Thread Stefan Schimanski
+1 - very good idea On Thu, Sep 22, 2016 at 10:37 PM, Fabiano Franz wrote: > I've been talking to a few people in the past couple weeks and now we'd > like to formally propose the creation of SIG-CLI (Special Interest Group > for the Kubernetes Command Line Interface). > > The idea would be to