On 20.08.2013, at 14:57, Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote:
Alexander Graf ag...@suse.de writes:
On 19.08.2013, at 09:25, Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote:
Alexander Graf ag...@suse.de writes:
On 11.08.2013, at 20:16, Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote:
From: Aneesh Kumar K.V aneesh.ku...@linux.vnet.ibm.com
On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 10:21:09AM +0200, Alexander Graf wrote:
On 19.08.2013, at 09:25, Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote:
I noticed this when adding support for guest memory dumping via qemu gdb
server. Now the array we get would look like below
slbe0 slbv0
slbe1 slbv1
0
On 21.08.2013, at 06:11, Paul Mackerras wrote:
On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 10:21:09AM +0200, Alexander Graf wrote:
On 19.08.2013, at 09:25, Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote:
I noticed this when adding support for guest memory dumping via qemu gdb
server. Now the array we get would look like below
On 21.08.2013, at 08:37, Alexander Graf wrote:
On 21.08.2013, at 06:11, Paul Mackerras wrote:
On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 10:21:09AM +0200, Alexander Graf wrote:
On 19.08.2013, at 09:25, Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote:
I noticed this when adding support for guest memory dumping via qemu gdb
Alexander Graf ag...@suse.de writes:
On 20.08.2013, at 14:57, Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote:
Alexander Graf ag...@suse.de writes:
On 19.08.2013, at 09:25, Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote:
Alexander Graf ag...@suse.de writes:
On 11.08.2013, at 20:16, Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote:
From: Aneesh Kumar K.V
Il 21/08/2013 04:11, Timon Wang ha scritto:
From the fedora 19 host:
[root@fedora ~]# sg_inq /dev/sdc
standard INQUIRY:
PQual=0 Device_type=0 RMB=0 version=0x05 [SPC-3]
[AERC=0] [TrmTsk=0] NormACA=0 HiSUP=0 Resp_data_format=0
SCCS=1 ACC=0 TPGS=1 3PC=0 Protect=0 [BQue=0]
On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 08:37:47AM +0100, Alexander Graf wrote:
On 21.08.2013, at 06:11, Paul Mackerras wrote:
On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 10:21:09AM +0200, Alexander Graf wrote:
On 19.08.2013, at 09:25, Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote:
I noticed this when adding support for guest memory dumping
On Wed, 2013-08-21 at 11:09 +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
Il 21/08/2013 04:11, Timon Wang ha scritto:
From the fedora 19 host:
[root@fedora ~]# sg_inq /dev/sdc
standard INQUIRY:
PQual=0 Device_type=0 RMB=0 version=0x05 [SPC-3]
[AERC=0] [TrmTsk=0] NormACA=0 HiSUP=0
Am 21.08.2013 um 10:25 schrieb Paul Mackerras pau...@samba.org:
On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 08:37:47AM +0100, Alexander Graf wrote:
On 21.08.2013, at 06:11, Paul Mackerras wrote:
On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 10:21:09AM +0200, Alexander Graf wrote:
On 19.08.2013, at 09:25, Aneesh Kumar K.V
Hi all,
I have a question about Linux KVM HA cluster.
I understand that in a HA setup I can live migrate virtual machine
between host that shares the same storage (via various methods, eg:
DRDB). This enable us to migrate the VMs based on hosts loads and
performance.
ìMy current
On 08/21/2013 12:48 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
Hey guys,
I've put up a wiki page with a kvm PCI todo list,
mainly to avoid effort duplication, but also in the hope
to draw attention to what I think we should try addressing
in KVM:
http://www.linux-kvm.org/page/PCITodo
This page could cover
On Wed, 2013-08-21 at 14:45 +0200, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
On 08/21/2013 12:48 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
Hey guys,
I've put up a wiki page with a kvm PCI todo list,
mainly to avoid effort duplication, but also in the hope
to draw attention to what I think we should try addressing
in
On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 02:45:36PM +0200, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
On 08/21/2013 12:48 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
Hey guys,
I've put up a wiki page with a kvm PCI todo list,
mainly to avoid effort duplication, but also in the hope
to draw attention to what I think we should try addressing
Am 30.07.2013 18:55, schrieb Andreas Färber:
Introduce CPU_FOREACH(), CPU_FOREACH_SAFE() and CPU_NEXT() shorthand
macros.
Signed-off-by: Andreas Färber afaer...@suse.de
Needs the following addition now:
diff --git a/hw/cpu/a15mpcore.c b/hw/cpu/a15mpcore.c
index af182da..9d0e27e 100644
---
On 21 August 2013 15:12, Andreas Färber afaer...@suse.de wrote:
-for (i = 0, cpu = first_cpu; i s-num_cpu; i++, cpu =
cpu-next_cpu) {
+i = 0;
+CPU_FOREACH(cpu) {
DeviceState *cpudev = DEVICE(cpu);
int ppibase = s-num_irq - 32 + i * 32;
+
+if (i
eventfd_fget() tests to see whether the file is an eventfd file, which
we then immediately pass to eventfd_ctx_fileget(), which again tests
whether the file is an eventfd file. Simplify slightly by using
fdget() so that we only test that we're looking at an eventfd once.
fget() could also be
Alexander Graf ag...@suse.de writes:
On HV KVM yes, that would be the end of the list, but PR KVM could
give you entry 0 containing esid==0 and vsid==0 followed by valid
entries. Perhaps the best approach is to ignore any entries with
SLB_ESID_V clear.
That means we don't clear
Am 21.08.2013 16:36, schrieb Peter Maydell:
On 21 August 2013 15:12, Andreas Färber afaer...@suse.de wrote:
-for (i = 0, cpu = first_cpu; i s-num_cpu; i++, cpu =
cpu-next_cpu) {
+i = 0;
+CPU_FOREACH(cpu) {
DeviceState *cpudev = DEVICE(cpu);
int ppibase =
Hi Alex,
I'm looking at adding arm to kvm-unit-tests. One the first
things I'd like to do is clean up the kvm-unit-tests repo
a bit. There's some arch-specific files (including ppc)
laying around in the root dir that I'd sweep up before
adding another arch to the mix. Although, checking the git
On Fri, 16 Aug 2013, Nicholas A. Bellinger wrote:
+ spinlock_t lock;
Remove the spinlock.
+ unsignednr_free;
+ unsignedfreelist[];
+};
+
+static inline void move_tags(unsigned *dst, unsigned *dst_nr,
+
Hi,
Am 16.08.2013 09:41, schrieb Wincy Van:
Hi,there:
I have implemented a version of cross-platform KVM. Now, it can
works on Linux and Windows(kernel version 7600-9200, amd64). Is it
useful? If so, I want make it as a branch of current KVM. Here are some
screenshots:
Let's CC the
On Wednesday, August 21, 2013 6:02:31 AM CDT, g.da...@assyoma.it wrote:
Hi all,
I have a question about Linux KVM HA cluster.
I understand that in a HA setup I can live migrate virtual
machine between host that shares the same storage (via various
methods, eg: DRDB). This enable us to migrate
On 2013-08-21 21:40, Brian Jackson wrote:
On Wednesday, August 21, 2013 6:02:31 AM CDT, g.da...@assyoma.it
wrote:
Hi all,
I have a question about Linux KVM HA cluster.
I understand that in a HA setup I can live migrate virtual machine
between host that shares the same storage (via various
On Wednesday, August 21, 2013 3:49:09 PM CDT, g.da...@assyoma.it wrote:
On 2013-08-21 21:40, Brian Jackson wrote:
On Wednesday, August 21, 2013 6:02:31 AM CDT,
g.da...@assyoma.it wrote: ...
Hi Brian,
thank you for your reply.
As I googled extensively without finding anything, I was
prepared
Am 21.08.2013 um 16:59 schrieb Aneesh Kumar K.V
aneesh.ku...@linux.vnet.ibm.com:
Alexander Graf ag...@suse.de writes:
On HV KVM yes, that would be the end of the list, but PR KVM could
give you entry 0 containing esid==0 and vsid==0 followed by valid
entries. Perhaps the
Am 21.08.2013 um 18:02 schrieb Andrew Jones drjo...@redhat.com:
Hi Alex,
I'm looking at adding arm to kvm-unit-tests. One the first
things I'd like to do is clean up the kvm-unit-tests repo
a bit. There's some arch-specific files (including ppc)
laying around in the root dir that I'd
Hi all,
Linaro is going to host a bi-weekly sync-up call for technical issues on
KVM/ARM development. The KVM 32-bit and 64-bit maintainers as well as
the QEMU ARM maintainer will typically be on the call.
The first call will be held Tuesday August 27th.
If you, your organization, or any of
On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 05:09:39PM -0700, Christoffer Dall wrote:
Linaro is going to host a bi-weekly sync-up call for technical issues on
KVM/ARM development. The KVM 32-bit and 64-bit maintainers as well as
the QEMU ARM maintainer will typically be on the call.
The first call will be held
On Thu, Aug 22, 2013 at 5:47 AM, Brian Jackson i...@theiggy.com wrote:
On Wednesday, August 21, 2013 3:49:09 PM CDT, g.da...@assyoma.it wrote:
On 2013-08-21 21:40, Brian Jackson wrote:
On Wednesday, August 21, 2013 6:02:31 AM CDT, g.da...@assyoma.it wrote:
...
Hi Brian,
thank you for
On Thu, Aug 22, 2013 at 01:15:54AM +0100, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 05:09:39PM -0700, Christoffer Dall wrote:
Linaro is going to host a bi-weekly sync-up call for technical issues on
KVM/ARM development. The KVM 32-bit and 64-bit maintainers as well as
the
On Wed, 08/21 22:49, g.da...@assyoma.it wrote:
On 2013-08-21 21:40, Brian Jackson wrote:
On Wednesday, August 21, 2013 6:02:31 AM CDT, g.da...@assyoma.it
wrote:
Hi all,
I have a question about Linux KVM HA cluster.
I understand that in a HA setup I can live migrate virtual
machine between
On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 10:21:09AM +0200, Alexander Graf wrote:
On 19.08.2013, at 09:25, Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote:
I noticed this when adding support for guest memory dumping via qemu gdb
server. Now the array we get would look like below
slbe0 slbv0
slbe1 slbv1
0
Alexander Graf ag...@suse.de writes:
On 20.08.2013, at 14:57, Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote:
Alexander Graf ag...@suse.de writes:
On 19.08.2013, at 09:25, Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote:
Alexander Graf ag...@suse.de writes:
On 11.08.2013, at 20:16, Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote:
From: Aneesh Kumar K.V
On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 08:37:47AM +0100, Alexander Graf wrote:
On 21.08.2013, at 06:11, Paul Mackerras wrote:
On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 10:21:09AM +0200, Alexander Graf wrote:
On 19.08.2013, at 09:25, Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote:
I noticed this when adding support for guest memory dumping
Alexander Graf ag...@suse.de writes:
On HV KVM yes, that would be the end of the list, but PR KVM could
give you entry 0 containing esid==0 and vsid==0 followed by valid
entries. Perhaps the best approach is to ignore any entries with
SLB_ESID_V clear.
That means we don't clear
Hi Alex,
I'm looking at adding arm to kvm-unit-tests. One the first
things I'd like to do is clean up the kvm-unit-tests repo
a bit. There's some arch-specific files (including ppc)
laying around in the root dir that I'd sweep up before
adding another arch to the mix. Although, checking the git
Am 21.08.2013 um 16:59 schrieb Aneesh Kumar K.V
aneesh.ku...@linux.vnet.ibm.com:
Alexander Graf ag...@suse.de writes:
On HV KVM yes, that would be the end of the list, but PR KVM could
give you entry 0 containing esid==0 and vsid==0 followed by valid
entries. Perhaps the
37 matches
Mail list logo
