Marc Bevand wrote:
Arnd Bergmann arnd at arndb.de writes:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Intel_Core_2_microprocessors is quite
good here. As a rule of thumb, anything higher than 6000 will have VT,
anything below 6000 will not. Interesting exceptions are
Doesn't have VT: E7300, Q8200,
On Tuesday 28 April 2009, Marc Bevand wrote:
As a rule of thumb, anything higher than 6000 will have VT,
anything below 6000 will not. Interesting exceptions are
Doesn't have VT: E7300, Q8200, Q8400, E8190
Does have VT: T5600, U2xxx, SU3xxx, Celeron 900 (?)
May have VT[1]: T5500,
On Tue, Apr 28, 2009 at 6:07 AM, Avi Kivity a...@redhat.com wrote:
Marc Bevand wrote:
This is very wrong:
- none of the Pentium, Celeron, Atom processors, even the latest ones,
come with VT
According to processorfinder, 3 out of the 8 Atoms come with VT. Some
Pentium Ds also do. Maybe
Arnd Bergmann arnd at arndb.de writes:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Intel_Core_2_microprocessors is quite
good here. As a rule of thumb, anything higher than 6000 will have VT,
anything below 6000 will not. Interesting exceptions are
Doesn't have VT: E7300, Q8200, Q8400, E8190
On Friday 24 April 2009, Oliver Rath wrote:
Hi,
Im looking for an abillity seeing vt-capability of Intel-processors by
there name :-/
I.e. T7200 has vt, T3400 has not. Exists a rule for the naming scheme
seeing vt-capability? Alternatively, exists a matrix anywhere in the net
for this?
Oliver Rath rath68 at web.de writes:
Im looking for an abillity seeing vt-capability of Intel-processors by
there name :-/
I.e. T7200 has vt, T3400 has not. Exists a rule for the naming scheme
seeing vt-capability? Alternatively, exists a matrix anywhere in the net
for this?
Browse
Hi,
Im looking for an abillity seeing vt-capability of Intel-processors by
there name :-/
I.e. T7200 has vt, T3400 has not. Exists a rule for the naming scheme
seeing vt-capability? Alternatively, exists a matrix anywhere in the net
for this?
Im tired searching for vt-capability for every new
