At the risk of being shot down for advertising, I'll say: I use Lace 2000. To
me, having tried the others, I find this the easiest to use - because of the
amount of lacemaker input, it's the nearest thing, in my opinion, to the
traditional way of doing things, by hand.
Imagine the computer
Sorry if I mislead using the term mat. All I am doing is making a
rectangle out of a pricking for a corner (using CorelDraw 10). It will
have a fabric inset in the center. It has both a wavy footside and
headside.
You say that you have turned the pricking into a mat.
On looking more closely at
Marcie
I haven't got that far in Niven yet, but I looked at the book. What I would
do is just omit one of the dots on the pricking, and just treat it as a
printing press stutter. That seems the simplest solution. Treating it as a
two point exchange would require a ring pair, which there isn't.
On Fri, 29 Aug 2003 10:48:52 -0400, Marcie wrote:
I have begun the process of turning the pricking for Pattern 11 in
Niven's Flanders Lace book (pgs. 52 - 53 in the new edition) into a
rectangular mat and have been going over the diagram vs. my
semi-finished product. While I was at it I noticed
