This came to DH - the opening sentence was obviously written by a man. We
might have had it before, but it's all Oh so true.
HA! you can't believe half of em' an the other half don't know what they are
talking about-unsigned
GREAT QUOTES BY GREAT WOMEN
Inside every older lady is
So Charles is going to marry Camilla in April. At least she won't be Queen
Camilla, but Princess Consort (assuming Charles outlives his mother and sons
to become king), in the meantime she'll be Duchess of Cornwall.
I'm not religious, but am glad it's not going to be a church wedding - if it
was
Prince Charles only has to outlive his mother the Queen to become King - his
elder son will inherit after he dies.
I am no expert in Constitutional matters, but I can't see that he couldn't
be head of the Anglican church - sometimes people find it hard to separate
the person from the body they
Actually, I think the fact that Lady Di is dead clears it in the eyes of the
church. I know that's why the Catholic Church allowed my aunt to get
married in the church. Her first husband died and they didn't count the
husbands after him. History shows us that most of the monarch would be hard
Actually, I think the problem may be that Camilla's first husband is alive.
After all, that was the Duke of Windsor's problem.
I thought it was clever of Charles a few years ago when he went about saying
that the Church of England came into existence because of a divorce, Henry
VIII's.
Devon
Carol wrote:
There is no problem with the civil marriage
There was for the Duke of Windsor and Princess Margaret.
My concern is that The Duke of Windsor couldn't keep the crown and marry a
divorcee (Charles can), Margaret wasn't allowed to marry a divorcee even
though there was very little
Jean said
My concern is that The Duke of Windsor couldn't keep the crown and marry a
divorcee (Charles can), Margaret wasn't allowed to marry a divorcee even
though there was very little likelihood of every becoming monarch (Anne
could). Who changed the rules for the monarchy and when?
I don't
This afternoon a constitutional expert explained why Charles can now marry
Camilla. A summary of what he said is:
The Monarch has to give consent to the marriage of anyone in line to the
throne. In order for him/her to give consent he/she has to consult the
government and get their approval.
In a message dated 10/02/2005 14:39:42 GMT Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Actually, I think the fact that Lady Di is dead clears it in the eyes of
the
church. I know that's why the Catholic Church allowed my aunt to get
married in the church.
Last time I checked, Camilla's
In a message dated 10/02/2005 14:39:42 GMT Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
History shows us that most of the monarch would be hard
put to be Defenders of the Faith considering their indiscretions.
By the way, the title of Defender of the faith was given to Henry VIII for a
paper
that the Church of England came into existence because of a divorce,
Didn't he decree the C of E first, and then the divorce? ;)
Much nicer than beheading.
(cheerful thought)
--
bye for now
Bev in Sooke, BC (on Vancouver Island, west coast of Canada)
Cdn. floral bobbins
I think it's great that Charley has finally decided to marry Camilla. Why
shouldn't he have the same rights as his subjects? The title of Defender
of the Faith was awarded to Henry VIII by the Catholic pope for writing a
treatise on the Catholic faith long before his divorce from Catherine of
Thanks Jean for the news. I'm feeling a little shocked even
though it's none of my business G. It's nice that the social
climate can be taken into account to make this wedding
possible. But I still miss Princess Diana!
I have read about the comment Camilla made to Prince Charles
when
13 matches
Mail list logo
