Re: "Ignore All" issue/bug in LibO (was: Questions on Using LT in LibO)

2014-08-14 Thread Elanjelian Venugopal
Hi Daniel, On 13 August 2014 19:43, Daniel Naber wrote: > > This should be fixed now, at least for documents that are mostly Tamil > (we don't use the cursor position, as I assumed, but we look at the > beginning of the text and assume Tamil if at least one of the first 100 > characters is in th

Re: "Ignore All" issue/bug in LibO (was: Questions on Using LT in LibO)

2014-08-13 Thread Daniel Naber
On 2014-08-13 22:05, Elanjelian Venugopal wrote: > Also, btw, the UI in LibO (concerning LT) is still in English. I think > I've already translated these strings. Please see languagetool-office-extension/src/main/resources/Addons.xcu and description.xml, these are not part of our standard i18n p

Re: "Ignore All" issue/bug in LibO (was: Questions on Using LT in LibO)

2014-08-13 Thread Elanjelian Venugopal
OK, great. Will test and report. Also, btw, the UI in LibO (concerning LT) is still in English. I think I've already translated these strings. On 13 August 2014 19:43, Daniel Naber wrote: > On 2014-08-13 11:55, Elanjelian Venugopal wrote: > > > not for Tamil. As I've explained in my other e-ma

Re: "Ignore All" issue/bug in LibO (was: Questions on Using LT in LibO)

2014-08-13 Thread Daniel Naber
On 2014-08-13 11:55, Elanjelian Venugopal wrote: > not for Tamil. As I've explained in my other e-mail, Tamil uses common > characters like numbers, symbols and punctuation from other areas, but > the Tamil block itself starts at U+0B82 and ends at U+0BFA. This should be fixed now, at least for d

Re: Questions on Using LT in LibO

2014-08-13 Thread Daniel Naber
On 2014-08-13 11:42, Elanjelian Venugopal wrote: > The current arrangement works for most word processing needs; so, I'm > not sure if this could be considered a LibO bug? Interestingly there > are no issues in LT standalone. That's because we consider the whole text to be Tamil in the stand-alon

Re: "Ignore All" issue/bug in LibO (was: Questions on Using LT in LibO)

2014-08-13 Thread Elanjelian Venugopal
On 13 August 2014 17:29, Daniel Naber wrote: > > This would need to be implemented in LO. LT doesn't know which document > is being checked, we only see the text. > Hmm... if there is consensus among the members here a bug report could be filed, I suppose... > It's supposed to use the language

Re: Questions on Using LT in LibO

2014-08-13 Thread Elanjelian Venugopal
2014-08-13 15:56 GMT+08:00 Daniel Naber : > > When I paste that into LO 4.2, the quote characters always end up being > set to German, even when I mark all the text and set it to Tamil. This > will probably lead to LT getting called several times with sentence > fragments instead of the whole sent

Re: "Ignore All" issue/bug in LibO (was: Questions on Using LT in LibO)

2014-08-13 Thread Daniel Naber
On 2014-08-13 10:54, Elanjelian Venugopal wrote: > This method doesn't work for me, I fear. I prefer the way MS Word > handles this matter -- i.e. the "Ignore All" only ignores the rule for > the particular document. This would need to be implemented in LO. LT doesn't know which document is bein

Re: "Ignore All" issue/bug in LibO (was: Questions on Using LT in LibO)

2014-08-13 Thread Elanjelian Venugopal
Hi Daniel, On 13 August 2014 15:32, Daniel Naber wrote: > > That's how it's supposed to work, more or less. Although it should > probably be called "Turn off Rule" or something like that, but I'm not > sure if that makes sense for other checkers. > This method doesn't work for me, I fear. I pre

Re: Questions on Using LT in LibO

2014-08-13 Thread Daniel Naber
On 2014-08-11 11:45, Elanjelian Venugopal wrote: > 1) Take this sample sentence (in Tamil): > > இந்த பெட்டியில் உங்கள் > உரையை பிடிக்க தடுமாறலாம் > ஒட்டி சரிவர சோதிக்கிறதா > என பாருங்கள் பல. பிழைகளை > பிடிக்க தடுமாறலாம். > > "லேங்குவேஜ் டூல்" சில > இலக்கண பிழைகளை சரியாக > கண்டுபிடிக்கும். When

Re: Questions on Using LT in LibO

2014-08-13 Thread Daniel Naber
On 2014-08-11 14:27, Elanjelian Venugopal wrote: > So, it works fine for: > > "He is also know as the first Chechen writer." - name="also know (known)"> > > But not for: > > "All though the day: a song by Anita O'Day." - id="ALLTHOUGH" name="all though (although)"> > > Is this is a bug? Wel

Re: "Ignore All" issue/bug in LibO (was: Questions on Using LT in LibO)

2014-08-13 Thread Daniel Naber
On 2014-08-12 11:33, Elanjelian Venugopal wrote: > 2) "Ignore All" however is problematic. If used, it ignores not merely > all the instances in the particular document, but all future instances > in all future documents, as well. That's how it's supposed to work, more or less. Although it should

Re: "Ignore All" issue/bug in LibO (was: Questions on Using LT in LibO)

2014-08-12 Thread Elanjelian Venugopal
Hi, This is an update on my previous note. It appears this is a known issue of sorts, as I found the following previous discussion on the topic: 1) http://sourceforge.net/p/languagetool/mailman/message/31824768/ 2) http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.documentfoundation.libreoffice.bugs/183846

Re: Questions on Using LT in LibO

2014-08-11 Thread Elanjelian Venugopal
Hi, This is a follow-up to my earlier questions. I'd like to refer to Q3 that relate to "Ignore Rule" command in LibO. It appears the problem exists also for English when the rule is part of a rulegroup. It works fine if the rule is defined individually. So, it works fine for: "He is also know a

Questions on Using LT in LibO

2014-08-11 Thread Elanjelian Venugopal
Hi, While using the LT extension in LibO I encountered a number of issues. Not sure if these are specific to Tamil (given its limited state of development), and hence my writing about it here. 1) Take this sample sentence (in Tamil): இந்த பெட்டியில் உங்கள் உரையை பிடிக்க தடுமாறலாம் ஒட்டி சரிவர சோ