everybody,please help me.i have case for use lazarus.i use linux fedora. i use
htpasswd for cretead user and password.
if i use open termina concole i just type
/usr/bin/htpasswd -c tipe-file User
Add password: *
Retype Password:*
so if i use program lazarus,how to enter/input password h
Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
>
> For fun, I created a small program that creates program code for 2.3
> million lines distributed over 460 units (approx 6000 lines per
This made be laugh. Don't you think software developers have a weird
idea of what is considered 'fun'? :-) Try and explain that t
Phil Hess wrote:
>
> By the way, Delphi 2010 compiles that 2.3 million lines of code in 70
> seconds, including linking and creating a map file.
I know Delphi is fast, but that is very fast. We have already had a
discussion why Delphi could be so fast, so we will not go into that
again. Just the
Paul Ishenin wrote:
This is my view of road to 1.0 and it can differ from ideas of other
developers.
sounds like that needs to be published somewhere so that other Lazarus
developers can read it and their ideas can be discussed and added to the point
of saying, "that's it, let's do it" and th
Tom Lisjac wrote:
There is no point to releasing a 1.0 for publicity reasons if the
publicity is going to end up being bad due to instability and code
breakage. That would only make Lazarus/FPC a well publicized failure.
Given that choice, I'd rather see the project continue to plod along
in the
On Wed, 2 Dec 2009, Phil Hess wrote:
- "Graeme Geldenhuys" wrote:
The subtext is that with Delphi you can pull off the hat trick of a
2.3 million line app that sells for big bucks and where the client
does not tolerate bugs or instabilities or excuses. Can anyone make
that claim for La
http://lazarus.freepascal.org/index.php?PHPSESSID=5ca1e078c15770ad5ae317f9996540cf&topic=8079.0
--
___
Lazarus mailing list
Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org
http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus
- "Graeme Geldenhuys" wrote:
> > The subtext is that with Delphi you can pull off the hat trick of a
> > 2.3 million line app that sells for big bucks and where the client
> > does not tolerate bugs or instabilities or excuses. Can anyone make
> > that claim for Lazarus?
>
> Well, our appli
On keskiviikko, 2. joulukuuta 2009 20:43:01 Hans-Peter Diettrich wrote:
> I still use [Suse] 10.3, due to certain issues with the 11 version on my
machines.
Hi, did you try the latest OpenSuse 11.2? The earlier 11.x versions had issues
at least with KDE4. For me this latest Suse looks very good.
2009/12/3 Chris Jennings :
> Hi All
> I am new to Lazarus and having a few problems with whatelse seems to be an
> excellent development environment. I have past experience with Delphi and am
> hoping to be able to use Lazarus for a major upcomming open source project.
>
> Today I have everything (
Steve Harp schrieb:
I’ve got some old Delphi apps that I need to compile for Linux. I’m
using Lazarus v0.9.28.2 beta on openSUSE 11.2 64-bit.
I still use 10.3, due to certain issues with the 11 version on my machines.
The IDE loads
fine and the About box displays normally. However, when I
Dipl. Phys. Jörg Schläger schrieb:
open suse includes lazarus and fpc on DVD here the Version of open suse 11.1
Version:
0.9.26-0
Erstellt am:
Do 09 Okt 2008 23:08:11 CEST
A newer version were nice. I vaguely remember some issues with 0.9.26 on
openSUSE, that made me immediatly use the 0.
Problema resolvido!
Após reinstalar várias versões do lazarus (oficial, beta, x86, x64) e
do fpc, o erro das units não encontradas persistia.
Então, criei uma máquina virtual no virtualbox, rodando Windows XP
SP3. Instalei o lazarus e os packages e tudo funcionou perfeitamente.
Então, descobri que
Hi All
I am new to Lazarus and having a few problems with whatelse seems to be
an excellent development environment. I have past experience with Delphi
and am hoping to be able to use Lazarus for a major upcomming open
source project.
Today I have everything (fpc-2.2.5 / lazarus-0.9.28.2 /
On Tue, 1 Dec 2009 11:26:08 +0100
Marco van de Voort wrote:
> The point is that the audience is different. Simplifying version nummbers is
> great for marketing to a dumb user crowd.
Lazarus gets more dumb users, more people ask for help. Less time for people to
work on Lazarus and more people
On 12/2/09, Mehmet Erol Sanliturk wrote:
> Yes , because many of the subscribers of this mailing list do not have
> their English as a mother language and not experts on use of English .
> This is easily understood from their English usage style .
>
> For that reason , we should be forgiving a
No hurry. I'm actually kind of excited now again about the prospect of actually
getting Orpheus and THtmlPort packages running reliably on all 4 major
widgetsets (win32, carbon, gtk2, qt). The improvements in GTK2 / LCL in SVN are
big, I think. And if Qt has improved too in SVN...
Of course one
On Wednesday 02 December 2009 15:22, Phil Hess wrote:
> Zeljko,
>
> This is what my Qt "Crashes" for TOvcSpinner is based on. And also on
> testing with the current stable version.
>
> If this is fixed, that's great, but doesn't help the user who has 0.9.28.2.
But it could be in 0.9.28.3 then.
>
Vincent Snijders wrote:
>
> You could start with the examples, the testall example was useful when the
> win32
> widget set was written.
Thanks Vincent, I'll take a look at those. I guess after a while the IDE
itself can serve as a test. At least there I will know how it used to
work and look w
Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
Marc Weustink wrote:
That process is already started.
I take it you mean cleaning up the code and not "backporting to the
original code". In that case, excellent news. ;-)
Yes, he means cleaning up.
Some of the IFDEF have been removed already, and the only
Marc Weustink wrote:
>
> That process is already started.
I take it you mean cleaning up the code and not "backporting to the
original code". In that case, excellent news. ;-)
Regards,
- Graeme -
--
fpGUI Toolkit - a cross-platform GUI toolkit using Free Pascal
http://opensoft.homeip.net/fp
Steve Harp wrote:
Hi All,
I’m new to Lazarus and Free Pascal but I’ve been using Delphi since v2.
I’ve got some old Delphi apps that I need to compile for Linux. I’m
using Lazarus v0.9.28.2 beta on openSUSE 11.2 64-bit. The IDE loads
fine and the About box displays normally. However, w
Phil Hess wrote:
>
> If Delphi is dead, then what's Lazarus?
What I meant to say was that after about Delphi 7 and the rise of Visual
Studio + .NET, Delphi took a major hit in popularity. Combine that with
Borlands many failed attempt at getting into .NET and then deciding to
sell Delphi, the fut
Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
Hi,
If I want to start implementing the LCL-fpGUI widgetset, is there a test
process or automated or manual list of tests I could follow to see where
there are still issues? Maybe a set of test projects testing all
properties of each component somewhere?
If not, how do
I found him not on DVD openSUSE 11.0. But it is certainly on the website for
all versions:
lazarus
devel:languages:pascal/openSUSE_11.2
Lazarus is a free and open source Rapid Application Development
tool for the FreePascal compiler using the Lazarus component
library - LCL.
[more]
1-Click Ins
Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
Take TSynEdit for example. The code has changed such a lot from the
original, I don't think anybody will be able to backport Lazarus's
synedit to the original code. So why not simply clean up the Lazarus
code and remove all those damn IFDEFs so the code is actually readab
Zeljko,
This is what my Qt "Crashes" for TOvcSpinner is based on. And also on testing
with the current stable version.
If this is fixed, that's great, but doesn't help the user who has 0.9.28.2.
Also, I want to make sure there aren't any Mac-specific or even endian issues
here. I think most of
Graeme,
If Delphi is dead, then what's Lazarus?
The subtext is that with Delphi you can pull off the hat trick of a 2.3 million
line app that sells for big bucks and where the client does not tolerate bugs
or instabilities or excuses. Can anyone make that claim for Lazarus?
Thanks.
-Phil
--
Graeme Geldenhuys schreef:
Hi,
If I want to start implementing the LCL-fpGUI widgetset, is there a test
process or automated or manual list of tests I could follow to see where
there are still issues? Maybe a set of test projects testing all
properties of each component somewhere?
You could st
> -Original Message-
> From: Mattias Gärtner [mailto:nc-gaert...@netcologne.de]
> Sent: Wednesday, December 02, 2009 8:09 AM
> To: lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org
> Subject: Re: [Lazarus] Lazarus crashing
>
> Zitat von Steve Harp :
>
>> Hi All,
>>
>>
>>
>> I'm new to Lazarus and Free
open suse includes lazarus and fpc on DVD here the Version of open suse 11.1
Version:
2.2.2-0
Erstellt am:
Di 29 Jul 2008 22:38:09 CEST
Installiert am:
Mo 31 Aug 2009 11:55:25 CEST
Paketgruppe:
Development/Languages
Lizenz:
GPL and modified LGPL
Installierte Gr
Michael Joyner ᏩᏯ wrote:
> But, I do know that if one
> does not go fishing, one will not catch any fish.
I have two quotes which can easily be applied in this case to Lazarus. ;-)
"If you can't imitate him, don't copy him." -- Yogi Berra
"If you come to a fork in the road, take it." -- Yogi
Zitat von Steve Harp :
Hi All,
I'm new to Lazarus and Free Pascal but I've been using Delphi since v2.
I've got some old Delphi apps that I need to compile for Linux. I'm using
Lazarus v0.9.28.2 beta on openSUSE 11.2 64-bit. The IDE loads fine and the
About box displays normally. However,
Rigel Rig wrote:
> >> Is there a Linux distribution, which
> >> includes in packages Lazarus?
> >
> >yes
> >
> Which?
In the Ubuntu repositories, it has been available for some time. See
attached screenshot. Though, looking at the versions, none of them are
the latest releases of FPC or Laza
Helmut Hartl wrote:
At the current state this discussion mixes orthogonal things into
one dimension.
A thing a programmer never should do ... :-)
"A wise man should see a diamond gem if it lies before him on the
ground - At least he can decide if he wants to use funny arranged
carbon atoms - o
Hi All,
I'm new to Lazarus and Free Pascal but I've been using Delphi since v2.
I've got some old Delphi apps that I need to compile for Linux. I'm using
Lazarus v0.9.28.2 beta on openSUSE 11.2 64-bit. The IDE loads fine and the
About box displays normally. However, when I select File/Open,
Hi,
If I want to start implementing the LCL-fpGUI widgetset, is there a test
process or automated or manual list of tests I could follow to see where
there are still issues? Maybe a set of test projects testing all
properties of each component somewhere?
If not, how do you guys know what works an
a week crash/internal course
workshop in Jan.2010 - He agreed.
That will help us evaluate possibilities and make progress ...
Maybe the "5000 year old principle" of giving something to get something
is still applyable ?
greets
Helmut
__ Hinweis vo
Already have a version of Lazarus, which makes some importing from Delphi. Why
not release first stable version with this opportunity? The following does not
necessarily have it. The aim is to enable easier transfer of applications and
components from Delphi.
Rigel
>Mehmet Erol Sanliturk
> If it feels buggy, we've lost.
So I wrote with less features and no major bugs. Minor bugs have any software.
>I doubt. Professionally, maybe. Hobby no, delphi is too expensive for
>that (seen from the reactions on last weekends fair I was).
The boss of the company will buy it! Professional p
Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
Vincent Snijders wrote:
Maybe because of the tone of voice.
Or my bad English. :-/
Regards,
- Graeme -
Yes , because many of the subscribers of this mailing list do not have
their English as a mother language and not experts on use of English .
This is easi
Raistware schrieb:
> Be free to work with the most efficient way you can.
> Break compatiblity whenever you need to create a better ide. Users will
> increase and, eventually some of them will contribute to Lazarus
> development...
This is a dream proven wrong by reality. 10 years ago there were
f
Vincent Snijders wrote:
Mehmet Erol Sanliturk schreef:
Unfortunately , there is a concept < law of conservation of bugs >
mentioned in the page
http://www.site.uottawa.ca:4321/oose/index.html#lawofconservationofbugs
Does that mean, we should stop fixing bugs, because you only get more?
Vin
Mehmet Erol Sanliturk wrote:
>
> I think , it is not necessary to have so much fear because my
> expectation is that Delphi will not be able to compile any Windows
> application directly to Linux or Mac natively.
Very true, and considering that Delphi still includes the 'Windows' unit
in every
Raistware wrote:
>
> Also there are a thing that shock me out completly: ¿why should Lazarus
> mantain backward compatibility with Delphi?
> First of all, Delphi is not suited to compile anyother platform outside
> of windows.
I agree, it's a nice to have feature, but it makes Lazarus developme
On Wednesday 02 December 2009 10:23, Marc Weustink wrote:
> zeljko wrote:
> > On Wednesday 02 December 2009 08:37, Paul Ishenin wrote:
> >> For 1.0 rc1 we need to fix 1.0 win32 bugs. Maybe not all the bugs in the
> >> tracker with 1.0 target are really has 1.0 target. But at least we need
> >> to r
Vincent Snijders escribió:
Does that mean, we should stop fixing bugs, because you only get more?
No, that mean that a feature freezee is needed to order to achieve an
stable release. No new features accepted until all blocking BUGS were
solved. Lazarus is stable enough and mature enought to h
Some more documentation about docking is available now in
http://wiki.lazarus.freepascal.org/EasyDockingManager
See the "Further Options" section for some issues that IMO deserve some
discussion.
Paul complains about too much text and too few
grapics/videos/screenshots. All contributions are
Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
Rigel Rig wrote:
Delphi in 2011 will be on a Linux and Mac, and very rarely Delphi
programmer will go to Lazarus.
I very much agree! Lazarus v1.0 non-beta must be out before
Delphi has cross-platform support. The advantage of Lazarus over Delphi
will seriously diminis
zeljko wrote:
On Wednesday 02 December 2009 08:37, Paul Ishenin wrote:
For 1.0 rc1 we need to fix 1.0 win32 bugs. Maybe not all the bugs in the
tracker with 1.0 target are really has 1.0 target. But at least we need
to review all and decide about each of them.
For 1.0 rc2 we need to do the sam
Paul Ishenin wrote:
Andrew Haines wrote:
I did a small test loading a text file with 50,000+ lines with my custom
model and the GtkTreeView retrieved the value of each item in the list
on startup. I assume it's to calculate the size for the scrollbar since
the height of the listitems is not fix
On Wednesday 02 December 2009 08:37, Paul Ishenin wrote:
> For 1.0 rc1 we need to fix 1.0 win32 bugs. Maybe not all the bugs in the
> tracker with 1.0 target are really has 1.0 target. But at least we need
> to review all and decide about each of them.
>
> For 1.0 rc2 we need to do the same but fo
Rigel Rig wrote:
Why not both? If there was a stable version of Lazarus, when Borland
thought to sell Delphi, would attract many Delphi developers.
At that time we already saw an increase of ppl. The 0.9 version didn't
scare them.
What I read in this thread is that Borland had no problem rele
You can not do v.1 because constantly adding new things! Should be stopped at
a certain stable level, to remove volatile components and to release a stable
version.
Rigel
> Оригинално писмо
>От: Paul Ishenin
>Относно: Re: [Lazarus] Release 1.0, part 2
>До: Lazarus maili
Mehmet Erol Sanliturk schreef:
Unfortunately , there is a concept < law of conservation of bugs >
mentioned in the page
http://www.site.uottawa.ca:4321/oose/index.html#lawofconservationofbugs
Does that mean, we should stop fixing bugs, because you only get more?
Vincnt
--
_
Vincent Snijders wrote:
>
> Maybe because of the tone of voice.
Or my bad English. :-/
Regards,
- Graeme -
--
fpGUI Toolkit - a cross-platform GUI toolkit using Free Pascal
http://opensoft.homeip.net/fpgui/
--
___
Lazarus mailing list
Lazarus@
Graeme Geldenhuys schreef:
comments, bad press, FUD, etc they all scare developers away. I'm
trying to do a good thing here, but it seems like all the core Lazarus
you must mean some or most, not all
developers have a mental block against anything I say.
Maybe because of the tone of voice
Rigel Rig wrote:
> Delphi in 2011 will be on a Linux and Mac, and very rarely Delphi
> programmer will go to Lazarus.
I very much agree! Lazarus v1.0 non-beta must be out before
Delphi has cross-platform support. The advantage of Lazarus over Delphi
will seriously diminish after that.
Regards,
2009/12/1 Mattias Gaertner
> On Tue, 1 Dec 2009 13:55:32 +0100
> wile64 wrote:
>
> > 2009/12/1 Mattias Gaertner
> >
> > > On Mon, 30 Nov 2009 16:33:34 +0100
> > > wile64 wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hi,
> > > >
> > > > 1) I search to resize component when he load, like autosize but with
> my
> > > > p
Why not both? If there was a stable version of Lazarus, when Borland thought
to sell Delphi, would attract many Delphi developers. Delphi in 2011 will be on
a Linux and Mac, and very rarely Delphi programmer will go to Lazarus. One of
the main advantages of Lazarus would not have it!
If there
60 matches
Mail list logo
