Vincent Snijders schrieb:
The Lazarus team is happy to announce that Lazarus 0.9.30.4RC2 is
available for download from:
http://sourceforge.net/projects/lazarus/files/
I'm not sure whether I got the latest version for Win7
Vincent Snijders schrieb:
Please, let me know if you find any problems with these release candidates.
Also let me know if you installed it without any problem.
Installing into an new (clean) Win7 user account seems to work, but this
IMO is a poor solution.
Now the well known docking
My experience with the 0.9.30.4 and trunk versions suggests that docking
will be discontinued in Lazarus?
The LCL, IDE and Win32 widgetset contain code that breaks Delphi
compatible drag-dock deliberately, for no obvious reason or benefit. It
looks to me as if none of the core developers
On 16 March 2012 21:39, Graeme Geldenhuys graemeg.li...@gmail.com wrote:
On 16 March 2012 22:43, Gugui wrote:
which the best component to work with lazarus 0.9.30.2 x86_64-linux-gtk 2
and Firebird 2.1 ?
Our company uses SqlDB primarily (part of FPC) and FBLib (lives in the
tiOPF
Den 17-03-2012 06:59, Hans-Peter Diettrich skrev:
Can we agree to make the IDE dockable again *now*, or should I stop
waiting for another usable IDE?
From a usability standpoint one of my two major gripes with Lazarus are
floating windows. It looks unorderly in my eyes for every panel to
I guess this is personal preference, but I find it annoying that Lazarus
insists that a project must be open at all times.
Lazarus starts up with a new project and if you try to close it, you are
immidately prompted to make another or open a project. Why can't I just
have lazarus sit there
On Sat, 17 Mar 2012 07:48:09 +0100
Anders E. Andersen ande...@ellenshoej.dk wrote:
I guess this is personal preference, but I find it annoying that Lazarus
insists that a project must be open at all times.
Lazarus starts up with a new project and if you try to close it, you are
immidately
If you just want to use SynEdit to edit text you can use LazEdit from
lazarus-ccr/applications/lazedit
--
Felipe Monteiro de Carvalho
--
___
Lazarus mailing list
Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org
On Sat, Mar 17, 2012 at 6:59 AM, Hans-Peter Diettrich
drdiettri...@aol.com wrote:
The LCL, IDE and Win32 widgetset contain code that breaks Delphi compatible
drag-dock deliberately, for no obvious reason or benefit. It looks to me as
if none of the core developers understands the implementation
On Fri, Mar 16, 2012 at 11:36:56PM +0200, Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
work automatically. Unfortunately you will have to fix many things
manually in your projects.
dbExpress could be replaced with SqlDB (comes as part of FPC) or Zeos
etc. I don't know the other component package you mentioned,
On Sat, Mar 17, 2012 at 21:12, Felipe Monteiro de Carvalho
felipemonteiro.carva...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Mar 17, 2012 at 6:59 AM, Hans-Peter Diettrich
drdiettri...@aol.com wrote:
The LCL, IDE and Win32 widgetset contain code that breaks Delphi compatible
drag-dock deliberately, for no
On Sat, 17 Mar 2012, Alexander Klenin wrote:
On Sat, Mar 17, 2012 at 21:12, Felipe Monteiro de Carvalho
felipemonteiro.carva...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Mar 17, 2012 at 6:59 AM, Hans-Peter Diettrich
drdiettri...@aol.com wrote:
The LCL, IDE and Win32 widgetset contain code that breaks Delphi
On Sat, 17 Mar 2012 12:52:12 +0100 (CET)
Michael Van Canneyt mich...@freepascal.org wrote:
On Sat, 17 Mar 2012, Alexander Klenin wrote:
On Sat, Mar 17, 2012 at 21:12, Felipe Monteiro de Carvalho
felipemonteiro.carva...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Mar 17, 2012 at 6:59 AM, Hans-Peter
On Saturday 17 of March 2012 12:52:12 Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
On Sat, 17 Mar 2012, Alexander Klenin wrote:
On Sat, Mar 17, 2012 at 21:12, Felipe Monteiro de Carvalho
felipemonteiro.carva...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Mar 17, 2012 at 6:59 AM, Hans-Peter Diettrich
17.03.12 20:19, zeljko написал:
I also never experienced any problems; I don't use it in the IDE, but in
other apps.
Now I don't understand anything. Some have problems (like Dodi), and
some doesn't have any problem ... so where is problem exactly ? ;)
Dodi has implemented an own vision
On Saturday 17 of March 2012 14:17:18 Paul Ishenin wrote:
17.03.12 20:19, zeljko написал:
I also never experienced any problems; I don't use it in the IDE, but
in
other apps.
Now I don't understand anything. Some have problems (like Dodi), and
some doesn't have any problem
Dear Mattias,
3. listemplateeditparamcellhelp with msgid Inserts an
editable Cell.
[...]
This is in Code Templates (Tools menu).
See arrayc for example
enter arrayc (without quotes) then hit ctrl-j
see trycf for sync
I can't find the long message regarding to
Hi, after updating Ubuntu at 11.10 because of Unity I swiched to
Xubuntu 11.10 (fresh installation), but saving and building a simple
project (application) on a pendrive with ntfs the executable cannot be
run. The same project stored in HOME is OK.
Xubuntu is missing something or what?
As I
On Sat, 17 Mar 2012 18:58:16 +0100
Salvatore Coppola coppolastu...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi, after updating Ubuntu at 11.10 because of Unity I swiched to
Xubuntu 11.10 (fresh installation), but saving and building a simple
project (application) on a pendrive with ntfs the executable cannot be
run.
2012/3/17 Mattias Gaertner nc-gaert...@netcologne.de:
On Sat, 17 Mar 2012 18:58:16 +0100
Salvatore Coppola coppolastu...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi, after updating Ubuntu at 11.10 because of Unity I swiched to
Xubuntu 11.10 (fresh installation), but saving and building a simple
project
On Sat, 17 Mar 2012 20:09:48 +0100
Salvatore Coppola coppolastu...@gmail.com wrote:
2012/3/17 Mattias Gaertner nc-gaert...@netcologne.de:
On Sat, 17 Mar 2012 18:58:16 +0100
Salvatore Coppola coppolastu...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi, after updating Ubuntu at 11.10 because of Unity I swiched to
Paul Ishenin schrieb:
Dodi has implemented an own vision of docking while delphi like docking
still works.
Please explain?
What's Delphi like docking, and in how far is it different from the
EasyDockManager implementation?
How did you make work Delphi like docking in the IDE?
DoDi
--
zeljko schrieb:
Now I don't understand anything. Some have problems (like Dodi), and
some doesn't have any problem ... so where is problem exactly ? ;)
One problem may be an undefined environment, i.e. which FPC version
should be used for Lazarus trunk. I'm just trying to use FPC 2.6 for
On Sat, 17 Mar 2012 17:40:58 +0100
Hans-Peter Diettrich drdiettri...@aol.com wrote:
Mattias Gaertner schrieb:
I'm currently trying to fix some 0.99 bugs. I hope to find some time for
docking too. But it is a complex topic, has a big risk of breaking
things and needs a lot of time.
I'd
On 17/03/2012 20:29, Mattias Gaertner wrote:
Then fix the page restore bug.
Then saving/restoring the bounds of the floating windows
(anchordocking).
On that part, I wondered why the old layout stuff was totally abandoned.
Even in docking, a user might want to specify fixed positions (maybe
On Sat, 17 Mar 2012 20:49:07 +
Martin laza...@mfriebe.de wrote:
On 17/03/2012 20:29, Mattias Gaertner wrote:
Then fix the page restore bug.
Then saving/restoring the bounds of the floating windows
(anchordocking).
On that part, I wondered why the old layout stuff was totally
Oh, it's more than just annoying. It causes applications using Advantage
Database components to crash, especially if you forget to add adsdata to the
uses clause (no, I don't know why ADS doesn't add that automatically). Lazarus
then doesn't allow you to enter the form again so you have to
On 17/03/2012 21:04, Mattias Gaertner wrote:
On Sat, 17 Mar 2012 20:49:07 +
Martinlaza...@mfriebe.de wrote:
On 17/03/2012 20:29, Mattias Gaertner wrote:
Then fix the page restore bug.
Then saving/restoring the bounds of the floating windows
(anchordocking).
On that part, I wondered why
Op 17 maart 2012 22:14 heeft Ajeandro Gonzalo
parkingspac...@yahoo.com het volgende geschreven:
Oh, it's more than just annoying. It causes applications using Advantage
Database components to crash, especially if you forget to add adsdata to the
uses clause (no, I don't know why ADS doesn't
2012/3/17 Mattias Gaertner nc-gaert...@netcologne.de:
On Sat, 17 Mar 2012 20:09:48 +0100
Salvatore Coppola coppolastu...@gmail.com wrote:
2012/3/17 Mattias Gaertner nc-gaert...@netcologne.de:
On Sat, 17 Mar 2012 18:58:16 +0100
Salvatore Coppola coppolastu...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi, after
Hi all,
Just compiled and ran lazarus from source in Ubuntu 11.04 but none of
the scroll bars seem to be working. It uses the hidden scroll bars
which don't scroll the window when I move them up and down.
This is happening on all windows, the object inspector, right down to
the file selector.
On 17 March 2012 08:27, Richard Mace wrote:
It looks like the latest version of the tiOPF components is back in 2008, is
that the case, or are there some more recent ones?
Definitively not! You probably looked at the last released version
available for download from SourceForge. That is very
On 17.03.2012 23:08, Salvatore Coppola wrote:
I'm low level user so can you take a look, is how you supposed?
Somehow somewhere the default mount options can be changed in xubuntu. I
assume you want it to have it mounted with exec bits set every time you
plug it in, maybe you should consult the
hi all:
Not executing programs from external file systems is a kernel option
adopted by many linux distros, I think. You should copy the program to
the local filesystem and change permissions to execute it.
2012/3/17 Bernd Kreuss prof7...@googlemail.com:
On 17.03.2012 23:08, Salvatore Coppola
Same prob here with SVN build 36144 on Ubuntu 11.10.
I looked around a bit and found that removing the autohiding scrollbars
from ubuntu solved the problem.
Look for liboverlay-scrollbar in synaptic and remove the entr(y)(ies)
cheers
Samps
On Sun, Mar 18, 2012 at 9:57 AM, samps okholm
On Sun, 18 Mar 2012 11:17:45 +1030
Samps list...@unplugd.com wrote:
Same prob here with SVN build 36144 on Ubuntu 11.10.
I looked around a bit and found that removing the autohiding scrollbars
from ubuntu solved the problem.
Look for liboverlay-scrollbar in synaptic and remove the
On Sun, 18 Mar 2012 11:17:45 +1030
Samps list...@unplugd.com wrote:
Look for liboverlay-scrollbar in synaptic and remove the entr(y)(ies)
No need to disable them for the whole system. I just use a simple script to
disable them for lazarus:
#!/bin/sh
LIBOVERLAY_SCROLLBAR=0
18.03.12 1:02, Hans-Peter Diettrich написал:
Please explain?
What's Delphi like docking, and in how far is it different from the
EasyDockManager implementation?
At least the implementation of lazdocktree and easydockmanager is different.
How did you make work Delphi like docking in the IDE?
thx. Works a treat :-)
Samps
On Sun, Mar 18, 2012 at 11:43 AM, Reimar Grabowski reimg...@web.de wrote:
On Sun, 18 Mar 2012 11:17:45 +1030
Samps list...@unplugd.com wrote:
Look for liboverlay-scrollbar in synaptic and remove the entr(y)(ies)
No need to disable them for the whole system. I
I just encountered the below pop-up error message when debugging.
Within that one session of Laz, I was able to reproduce the message,
but once I existed / restarted Lazarus, it did not reoccur.
Any suggestions for the next time I encounter it?
code segment: sA,sB are strings; I was able to
Mattias Gaertner schrieb:
On Sat, 17 Mar 2012 17:40:58 +0100
Hans-Peter Diettrich drdiettri...@aol.com wrote:
Mattias Gaertner schrieb:
I'm currently trying to fix some 0.99 bugs. I hope to find some time for
docking too. But it is a complex topic, has a big risk of breaking
things and needs
Martin schrieb:
On 17/03/2012 21:04, Mattias Gaertner wrote:
On Sat, 17 Mar 2012 20:49:07 +
Martinlaza...@mfriebe.de wrote:
On 17/03/2012 20:29, Mattias Gaertner wrote:
Then fix the page restore bug.
Then saving/restoring the bounds of the floating windows
(anchordocking).
On that
Martin schrieb:
On 17/03/2012 20:29, Mattias Gaertner wrote:
Then fix the page restore bug.
Then saving/restoring the bounds of the floating windows
(anchordocking).
On that part, I wondered why the old layout stuff was totally abandoned.
Perhaps it turned out unusable?
Even in docking, a
Paul Ishenin schrieb:
18.03.12 1:02, Hans-Peter Diettrich написал:
Please explain?
What's Delphi like docking, and in how far is it different from the
EasyDockManager implementation?
At least the implementation of lazdocktree and easydockmanager is
different.
These are only different
On 18/03/2012 02:47, John Repucci wrote:
I just encountered the below pop-up error message when debugging.
Within that one session of Laz, I was able to reproduce the message,
but once I existed / restarted Lazarus, it did not reoccur.
Any suggestions for the next time I encounter it?
code
On 18/03/2012 02:35, Hans-Peter Diettrich wrote:
Martin schrieb:
On 17/03/2012 21:04, Mattias Gaertner wrote:
On Sat, 17 Mar 2012 20:49:07 +
Martinlaza...@mfriebe.de wrote:
On 17/03/2012 20:29, Mattias Gaertner wrote:
Then fix the page restore bug.
Then saving/restoring the bounds of
On 18/03/2012 02:29, Hans-Peter Diettrich wrote:
Martin schrieb:
On 17/03/2012 20:29, Mattias Gaertner wrote:
Then fix the page restore bug.
Then saving/restoring the bounds of the floating windows
(anchordocking).
On that part, I wondered why the old layout stuff was totally abandoned.
On Sun, Mar 18, 2012 at 12:59, Hans-Peter Diettrich
drdiettri...@aol.com wrote:
At least I prefer docking different forms into notebooks, from which I can
e.g. select Object/Procject inspector, depending on the current activity
(editing forms or source code).
I'd like to have this feature.
--
48 matches
Mail list logo
