Re: [Lazarus] Is win32 svn broken?

2011-10-14 Thread Gregory M. Turner
Sorry for the hassle. No worries! Please test. It works. P.S. Git is cool. Yes! I run git revert for the relevant revisions, then combined them and committed to server. Then I created a local branch and reverted again the earlier created revert-commit. So I got my changes saved

Re: [Lazarus] Is win32 svn broken?

2011-10-14 Thread Lukasz Sokol
On 14/10/2011 09:07, Gregory M. Turner wrote: Not that I fault anybody for using it -- I use it internally, in fact. But,... come now... one monolithic linear repository relying on a _convention_ of branch _directories_? Each repo hosted at a canonical url, which we need constant access

Re: [Lazarus] Is win32 svn broken?

2011-10-14 Thread Juha Manninen
2011/10/14 Gregory M. Turner g...@malth.us Git is cool. Yes! I run git revert for the relevant revisions, then combined them and committed to server. Then I created a local branch and reverted again the earlier created revert-commit. So I got my changes saved there, waiting until I

Re: [Lazarus] Is win32 svn broken?

2011-10-14 Thread Gregory M. Turner
- Original Message - Git is cool. Yes! Purportedly a solution is in the works: http://www.developer.com/open/subversion-1.7-released-with-some-git-esque-merging.html. I have no opinion regarding newmerge (nor have I any basis for one) but I administer some small gitolite repos

Re: [Lazarus] Is win32 svn broken?

2011-10-14 Thread Alexander Klenin
By the way, I'd recommend to upgrade freepascal repository to the recently released svn 1.7 This will slightly lessen the pain for those who still can not move to git. -- Alexander S. Klenin -- ___ Lazarus mailing list

Re: [Lazarus] Is win32 svn broken?

2011-10-13 Thread Juha Manninen
Hi Please test with r32866. You must do make clean all first and then build from the Build Lazarus dialog. There is also an associated bug report: 20476: Cannot compile Lazarus Regards, Juha -- ___ Lazarus mailing list

Re: [Lazarus] Is win32 svn broken?

2011-10-13 Thread Alex Shishkin
13.10.2011 11:06, Juha Manninen пишет: Hi Please test with r32866. You must do make clean all first and then build from the Build Already tested. Still broken. -- ___ Lazarus mailing list Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org

Re: [Lazarus] Is win32 svn broken?

2011-10-13 Thread Gregory M. Turner
- Original Message - 13.10.2011 11:06, Juha Manninen пишет: Hi Please test with r32866. You must do make clean all first and then build from the Build Already tested. Still broken. I have a bit more info on this. In some sense, the problem seems to come down to line 14 of

Re: [Lazarus] Is win32 svn broken?

2011-10-13 Thread Gregory M. Turner
- Original Message - Index: buildlazdialog.pas === --- buildlazdialog.pas(revision 32869) +++ buildlazdialog.pas(working copy) @@ -262,7 +262,7 @@ Tool.Title:=lisIDE;

Re: [Lazarus] Is win32 svn broken?

2011-10-13 Thread Gregory M. Turner
- Original Message - - Original Message - Just one other small note about this. Although AFAIK Windows won't let you delete a loaded PE file, it /will/ let you rename it. I don't even think you need any special privileges to do it (don't quote me). (Don't test this using

Re: [Lazarus] Is win32 svn broken?

2011-10-13 Thread Sven Barth
Am 13.10.2011 16:12, schrieb Gregory M. Turner: Just one other small note about this. Although AFAIK Windows won't let you delete a loaded PE file, it /will/ let you rename it. I don't even think you need any special privileges to do it (don't quote me). (Don't test this using explorer, it

Re: [Lazarus] Is win32 svn broken?

2011-10-13 Thread Juha Manninen
Hi I reverted the changes in r32874. Sorry for the hassle. I will concentrate on the issue later. Please test. Regards, Juha P.S. Git is cool. I run git revert for the relevant revisions, then combined them and committed to server. Then I created a local branch and reverted again the earlier

[Lazarus] Is win32 svn broken?

2011-10-12 Thread Gregory M. Turner
I am despairing after two days of trying to get svn to build itself on win32 (under wow64) with the fixes_2_6 branch of fpc. Is this, by any chance, in some known-not-working-for-now-while-somebody-hacks-on-something state? What always happens -- well, almost always; I have vague memories of

Re: [Lazarus] Is win32 svn broken?

2011-10-12 Thread Sven Barth
Am 12.10.2011 15:27, schrieb Gregory M. Turner: C:/lazarus/fpc/2.6/bin/i386-win32/fpc.exe -gl -dlclwin32 -Fu../lcl/units/i386-win32 -Fu../lcl/units/i386-win32/win32 -Fu../components/codetools/units/i386-win32 -Fu../components/lazutils/lib/i386-win32 -Fu../components/synedit/units/i386-win32

Re: [Lazarus] Is win32 svn broken?

2011-10-12 Thread Juha Manninen
2011/10/12 Gregory M. Turner g...@malth.us I am despairing after two days of trying to get svn to build itself on win32 (under wow64) with the fixes_2_6 branch of fpc. Is this, by any chance, in some known-not-working-for-now-while-somebody-hacks-on-something state? Yes, I think I am the

Re: [Lazarus] Is win32 svn broken?

2011-10-12 Thread Gregory M. Turner
It was bone dry to start, I literally deleted c:\Lazarus and checked out trunk from svn. Although it's been through quite a bit of thrashing since then, I'm reluctant to blow it away. I have a 99.5% working cygwin-based *.chm build environment set up in there, for one thing. I'll rm -rf at

Re: [Lazarus] Is win32 svn broken?

2011-10-12 Thread Gregory M. Turner
Ah, fantastic, thanks. Only problem is when I do that all my design packages stay as install next time or whatever it's called, forever. But don't worry about that. I'll solve this problem the old-fashioned way -- by playing video games until somebody else fixes it for me :) Out of pure

Re: [Lazarus] Is win32 svn broken?

2011-10-12 Thread Frank Church
2011/10/12 Gregory M. Turner g...@malth.us Ah, fantastic, thanks. Only problem is when I do that all my design packages stay as install next time or whatever it's called, forever. But don't worry about that. I'll solve this problem the old-fashioned way -- by playing video games until

Re: [Lazarus] Is win32 svn broken?

2011-10-12 Thread Sven Barth
On 12.10.2011 21:34, Gregory M. Turner wrote: Out of pure intellectual curiosity -- what is the story behind the monolithic build? Surely fpc doesn't lack (anymore?) the requisite .dll/ld.so features to accomodate a .bpl-style approach? While libraries mostly do work there is the whole

Re: [Lazarus] Is win32 svn broken?

2011-10-12 Thread Dimitri Smits
- Gregory M. Turner g...@malth.us schreef: Ah, fantastic, thanks. Only problem is when I do that all my design packages stay as install next time or whatever it's called, forever. But don't worry about that. I'll solve this problem the old-fashioned way -- by playing video games

Re: [Lazarus] Is win32 svn broken?

2011-10-12 Thread Juha Manninen
2011/10/12 Gregory M. Turner g...@malth.us Ah, fantastic, thanks. Only problem is when I do that all my design packages stay as install next time or whatever it's called, forever. But don't worry about that. I'll solve this problem the old-fashioned way -- by playing video games until

Re: [Lazarus] Is win32 svn broken?

2011-10-12 Thread Gregory M. Turner
2011/10/12 Gregory M. Turner g...@malth.us Ah, fantastic, thanks. Only problem is when I do that all my design packages stay as install next time or whatever it's called, forever. But don't worry about that. I'll solve this problem the old-fashioned way -- by playing video games until

Re: [Lazarus] Is win32 svn broken?

2011-10-12 Thread Alex Shishkin
12.10.2011 17:27, Gregory M. Turner пишет: I am despairing after two days of trying to get svn to build itself on win32 (under wow64) with the fixes_2_6 branch of fpc. Is this, by any chance, in some known-not-working-for-now-while-somebody-hacks-on-something state? I have problems too.