On Tue, 27 Mar 2012 20:46:32 +0200
Marco van de Voort mar...@stack.nl wrote:
On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 01:00:08PM +0100, Mattias Gaertner wrote:
There is no big difference between a link from one fpdoc file to another
(e.g. LCL to RTL) and between a fpdoc element and a wiki page.
1. One
On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 09:54:01AM +0200, Mattias Gaertner wrote:
1. One can be offline, the other not.
You can make offline snapshots of the wiki.
Ah, that is working again? Since when?
And how do I show it? Probably extracting the contents and
properly relinking and indexing it needs
Marco van de Voort mar...@stack.nl hat am 28. März 2012 um 16:59
geschrieben:
On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 09:54:01AM +0200, Mattias Gaertner wrote:
1. One can be offline, the other not.
You can make offline snapshots of the wiki.
Ah, that is working again? Since when?
A db dump is
On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 01:00:08PM +0100, Mattias Gaertner wrote:
There is no big difference between a link from one fpdoc file to another
(e.g. LCL to RTL) and between a fpdoc element and a wiki page.
1. One can be offline, the other not.
2. One is versioned per lazarus version, one is not.
Is anybody else lined up to take over?
Richard
On 2 March 2012 07:40, Vincent Snijders vincent.snijd...@gmail.com wrote:
Op 2 maart 2012 00:04 heeft Frank Church vfcli...@gmail.com het
volgende geschreven:
Googling brought up this link -
On 02/03/12 20:44, Vincent Snijders wrote:
Op 2 maart 2012 10:27 schreef Richard Mace richard.m...@gmail.com
mailto:richard.m...@gmail.com het volgende:
Is anybody else lined up to take over?
I don't know.
Vincent
--
___
Lazarus mailing
Is anybody else lined up to take over?
I don't know.
Vincent
--
___
Lazarus mailing
listLazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.orghttp://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus
I'll be happy to do it.
I have silently
On Thu, Mar 1, 2012 at 8:12 AM, Graeme Geldenhuys
graemeg.li...@gmail.com wrote:
The wiki is utterly useless and broken!! If you don't know the
directly link to what you are looking for, chances are you will never
find it.
lol! Only if you don't know how to use Google. It flawlessly finds
Op 1 maart 2012 08:12 heeft Graeme Geldenhuys
graemeg.li...@gmail.com het volgende geschreven:
On 1 March 2012 02:22, Hans-Peter Diettrich wrote:
The results are very strange. Entering documentation finds almost all
pages, because these have this keyword in the headline and navigation menu.
On 02/29/2012 05:54 PM, Marc Santhoff wrote:
Reading about this type of confusion - count me in - I need to ask:
Where is the process of building up help files documented?
In fact (after the work in progress has stabilized), the documentation
should be quite short. Hopefully, finally, there
On 1 March 2012 10:09, Felipe Monteiro de Carvalho wrote:
lol! Only if you don't know how to use Google. It flawlessly finds
everything I need by searching for lazarus wiki searchterm.
Totally defeats the point of the Search and Index features on the wiki
then, doesn't it?
In that case,
On Thu, Mar 1, 2012 at 10:36 AM, Graeme Geldenhuys
graemeg.li...@gmail.com wrote:
In that case, could we ask the wiki maintainers to please disable the
wiki Search and Index functions, and rather embed a Google Search in
it's place.
Yes, that would be a great solution. Unfortunately I don't
Op 1 maart 2012 14:28 heeft Hans-Peter Diettrich
drdiettri...@aol.com het volgende geschreven:
Vincent Snijders schrieb:
Op 1 maart 2012 08:12 heeft Graeme Geldenhuys
graemeg.li...@gmail.com het volgende geschreven:
On 1 March 2012 02:22, Hans-Peter Diettrich wrote:
The results are very
Am Donnerstag, den 01.03.2012, 14:28 +0100 schrieb Hans-Peter Diettrich:
Vincent Snijders schrieb:
Op 1 maart 2012 08:12 heeft Graeme Geldenhuys
graemeg.li...@gmail.com het volgende geschreven:
On 1 March 2012 02:22, Hans-Peter Diettrich wrote:
The results are very strange. Entering
Am Donnerstag, den 01.03.2012, 14:15 +0100 schrieb Hans-Peter Diettrich:
Marc Santhoff schrieb:
Am Donnerstag, den 01.03.2012, 01:22 +0100 schrieb Hans-Peter Diettrich:
Marc Santhoff schrieb:
A complete index, yes. To the right on
http://wiki.lazarus.freepascal.org/
under the
On 01/03/2012, Felipe Monteiro de Carvalho
felipemonteiro.carva...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Mar 1, 2012 at 10:36 AM, Graeme Geldenhuys
graemeg.li...@gmail.com wrote:
In that case, could we ask the wiki maintainers to please disable the
wiki Search and Index functions, and rather embed a Google
Op 2 maart 2012 00:04 heeft Frank Church vfcli...@gmail.com het
volgende geschreven:
Googling brought up this link -
http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Extension:Google_Custom_Search_Engine
Who is the webmaster of the wiki and can this be forwarded to him?
I was, but I want to stop doing it.
On 02/28/2012 08:06 PM, Mattias Gaertner wrote:
If you want to write some help about an IDE dialog: Use F1 to open the
wiki page. If it does not open, or opens the wrong page, just write an
email, so I can fix it.
If this happens rather often this is no possible way to go.
And it it does
On Wed, 29 Feb 2012 09:34:14 +0100
Michael Schnell mschn...@lumino.de wrote:
On 02/28/2012 08:06 PM, Mattias Gaertner wrote:
If you want to write some help about an IDE dialog: Use F1 to open the
wiki page. If it does not open, or opens the wrong page, just write an
email, so I can fix
On 02/29/2012 09:57 AM, Mattias Gaertner wrote:
It is since many years. Have you seen any secondary help for the dialogs?
I don't understand what you mean. I think there should be single source
for online and offline help. Everything else obviously is not manageable
at all. (In fact I don't
On 02/29/2012 10:23 AM, Michael Schnell wrote:
(Many thanks to DoDi for trying to get involved!).
Many thanks to Graeme as well !
-Michael
--
___
Lazarus mailing list
Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org
On 29 February 2012 10:57, Mattias Gaertner wrote:
Have you seen any secondary help for the dialogs?
How do you hook into the IDE dialog help system? Is this by
registering yet another help package? How would the IDE decide between
a HTML, CHM or INF help system for the dialogs in the IDE?
On 29 February 2012 10:57, Mattias Gaertner wrote:
Have you seen any secondary help for the dialogs?
And, what's the point is me doing an HTML (from the wiki) to INF
conversion, and then the next day somebody updates the wiki pages
again. The INF (or CHM) help would always be out of date. So
On Wed, 29 Feb 2012 10:23:18 +0100
Michael Schnell mschn...@lumino.de wrote:
On 02/29/2012 09:57 AM, Mattias Gaertner wrote:
It is since many years. Have you seen any secondary help for the dialogs?
I don't understand what you mean. I think there should be single source
for online and
On Wed, 29 Feb 2012 11:39:32 +0200
Graeme Geldenhuys graemeg.li...@gmail.com wrote:
On 29 February 2012 10:57, Mattias Gaertner wrote:
Have you seen any secondary help for the dialogs?
How do you hook into the IDE dialog help system? Is this by
registering yet another help package?
On 02/29/2012 11:10 AM, Mattias Gaertner wrote:
I started it.
Please elaborate.
Is the wiki supposed to be the upcoming help source, thus invalidating
FPDoc and friends ?
In fact I don't have a decent opinion on whether this is a good idea,
but I do recommend considering the implications
On Wed, 29 Feb 2012 11:43:46 +0200
Graeme Geldenhuys graemeg.li...@gmail.com wrote:
On 29 February 2012 10:57, Mattias Gaertner wrote:
Have you seen any secondary help for the dialogs?
And, what's the point is me doing an HTML (from the wiki) to INF
conversion, and then the next day
On 02/29/2012 11:17 AM, Mattias Gaertner wrote:
How do you hook into the IDE dialog help system? Is this by
registering yet another help package?
Yes.
How would the IDE decide between
a HTML, CHM or INF help system for the dialogs in the IDE?
Whatever the user installs.
This is nice (for the
On 02/29/2012 11:26 AM, Mattias Gaertner wrote:
The wiki is frequently edited by many people and already contains more
than 2500 pages. It makes no sense to shut it down.
But if there is no way to keep it in sync with the FPDoc files, how is
the future of either considered to be ?
-Michael
On Wed, 29 Feb 2012 11:24:31 +0100
Michael Schnell mschn...@lumino.de wrote:
On 02/29/2012 11:10 AM, Mattias Gaertner wrote:
I started it.
Please elaborate.
I started a tool to download the wiki and convert it to other formats.
I'm still evaluating possibilities.
Is the wiki supposed to
On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 10:43 AM, Graeme Geldenhuys
graemeg.li...@gmail.com wrote:
And, what's the point is me doing an HTML (from the wiki) to INF
conversion, and then the next day somebody updates the wiki pages
again. The INF (or CHM) help would always be out of date.
I think it would be
On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 11:34 AM, Felipe Monteiro de Carvalho
felipemonteiro.carva...@gmail.com wrote:
If you can contribute
something which can generate such a wiki to CHM conversion, then I
suppose it could be repeated in the future with much less work then
the first time.
Aha, I missed
Am 29.02.2012 11:33, schrieb Michael Schnell:
On 02/29/2012 11:26 AM, Mattias Gaertner wrote:
The wiki is frequently edited by many people and already contains more
than 2500 pages. It makes no sense to shut it down.
But if there is no way to keep it in sync with the FPDoc files, how is
the
On 02/29/2012 11:33 AM, Mattias Gaertner wrote:
Is the wiki supposed to be the upcoming help source, thus invalidating
FPDoc and friends ?
Are you kidding?
fpdoc is great.
There only can be a single source for the help so either FPDoc or
directly managing the Wiki kontent is great not both.
On 02/29/2012 12:08 PM, Sven Barth wrote:
The Wiki is used for documenting e.g. the usage of the IDE. You can't
do this using FPDoc.
This would mean that there never will be any offline help for Lazarus
users.
That would really be a bad thing.
-Michael
--
On 02/29/2012 11:34 AM, Felipe Monteiro de Carvalho wrote:
I think it would be perfectly fine to generate 1 new offline IDE CHM
for each release and ship Lazarus with it.
This discussion is about how to enable non-core members to help
improving the docs.
Your claim would prevent this as the
Am 29.02.2012 12:25, schrieb Michael Schnell:
On 02/29/2012 11:33 AM, Mattias Gaertner wrote:
Is the wiki supposed to be the upcoming help source, thus invalidating
FPDoc and friends ?
Are you kidding?
fpdoc is great.
There only can be a single source for the help so either FPDoc or
directly
On 02/29/2012 11:34 AM, Felipe Monteiro de Carvalho wrote:
For SVN users the best option would be the wiki still.
Resulting in their work never can be included in the offline help.
Very bad.
-Michael
--
___
Lazarus mailing list
On 02/29/2012 12:30 PM, Sven Barth wrote:
It won't, because the Wiki is the source for this kind of help and
where editing takes place.
I am sure that this will lead to perfect confusion and help content for
ever unusable (for logical causes not for technical ones.)
-Michael
--
On Wed, 29 Feb 2012, Michael Schnell wrote:
On 02/29/2012 11:34 AM, Felipe Monteiro de Carvalho wrote:
I think it would be perfectly fine to generate 1 new offline IDE CHM for
each release and ship Lazarus with it.
This discussion is about how to enable non-core members to help improving
Am 29.02.2012 12:31, schrieb Michael Schnell:
On 02/29/2012 11:34 AM, Felipe Monteiro de Carvalho wrote:
For SVN users the best option would be the wiki still.
Resulting in their work never can be included in the offline help.
Very bad.
Why do you say that? Once a relese is about to be done
Am 29.02.2012 12:28, schrieb Michael Schnell:
On 02/29/2012 12:08 PM, Sven Barth wrote:
The Wiki is used for documenting e.g. the usage of the IDE. You can't
do this using FPDoc.
This would mean that there never will be any offline help for Lazarus
users.
That would really be a bad thing.
On 02/29/2012 12:36 PM, michael.vancann...@wisa.be wrote:
That your changes are not distributed at once after you've submitted
them is another
matter entirely.
Submitting of course is another matter. I vote for a review by some kind
of committee before submitting.
This is what svn is
On 02/29/2012 12:37 PM, Sven Barth wrote:
(of course nightly snapshots...
Maybe automatic nightly snapshots fed into the svn might be more
workable for potential doc writers than being able to decently review
their work with the next release, but anyway, splitting the help
proceedings in two
On 02/29/2012 12:32 PM, Sven Barth wrote:
Did you read Matthias' answers? He wrote that he's working on a tool
to export the Wiki entries for e.g. CHM, so this is not a problem...
So some part of the offline help is produced by FPdoc and thus
privileged (an non-core member of the community
Am 29.02.2012 12:50, schrieb Michael Schnell:
On 02/29/2012 12:32 PM, Sven Barth wrote:
Did you read Matthias' answers? He wrote that he's working on a tool
to export the Wiki entries for e.g. CHM, so this is not a problem...
So some part of the offline help is produced by FPdoc and thus
On Wed, 29 Feb 2012, Michael Schnell wrote:
On 02/29/2012 12:32 PM, Sven Barth wrote:
Did you read Matthias' answers? He wrote that he's working on a tool
to export the Wiki entries for e.g. CHM, so this is not a problem...
So some part of the offline help is produced by FPdoc and thus
On 02/29/2012 12:54 PM, Sven Barth wrote:
Michael already wrote in one of the recent discussions that he wants
to create a webpage (using fpweb of course ;) ) that will allow to
edit the FPDoc help entries (I'll try to find the mail).
Also there is always the way that works today: edit the
Am 29.02.2012 12:48, schrieb Michael Schnell:
On 02/29/2012 12:37 PM, Sven Barth wrote:
(of course nightly snapshots...
Maybe automatic nightly snapshots fed into the svn might be more
workable for potential doc writers than being able to decently review
their work with the next release, but
On 02/29/2012 12:54 PM, michael.vancann...@wisa.be wrote:
Where did you see that fpdoc is priviledged ? Anyone can download and
work
on it, and submit patches.
See my answer to Sven.
-Michael
--
___
Lazarus mailing list
Sven Barth pascaldra...@googlemail.com hat am 29. Februar 2012 um 12:08
geschrieben:
Am 29.02.2012 11:33, schrieb Michael Schnell:
On 02/29/2012 11:26 AM, Mattias Gaertner wrote:
The wiki is frequently edited by many people and already contains more
than 2500 pages. It makes no sense to
On 02/29/2012 12:57 PM, Sven Barth wrote:
Contributors for source documentation need to edit the fpdoc files
(e.g. those from the SVN checkout) and commit the changes (either as
patch or directly if they have SVN write access).
Regarding that this discussion started in the issue how to allow
On Wed, 29 Feb 2012, Michael Schnell wrote:
On 02/29/2012 12:54 PM, Sven Barth wrote:
Michael already wrote in one of the recent discussions that he wants to
create a webpage (using fpweb of course ;) ) that will allow to edit the
FPDoc help entries (I'll try to find the mail).
Also
Michael Schnell mschn...@lumino.de hat am 29. Februar 2012 um 12:25
geschrieben:
[...]
There only can be a single source for the help
Where do you get this attitude?
You are using open source, you should know better.
[...]
Showing is simple: Just move the mouse over an identifier.
On 02/29/2012 01:04 PM, michael.vancann...@wisa.be wrote:
Do you simetimes actually listen to what we say here ?
Seemingly I misunderstood and you are right to be angry .
You can perfectly review your changes in at least 2 ways:
1. Hover the mouse over the identifier in the IDE. The IDE
Michael Schnell mschn...@lumino.de hat am 29. Februar 2012 um 12:57
geschrieben:
On 02/29/2012 12:54 PM, Sven Barth wrote:
Michael already wrote in one of the recent discussions that he wants
to create a webpage (using fpweb of course ;) ) that will allow to
edit the FPDoc help entries
Am 29.02.2012 12:57, schrieb Michael Schnell:
On 02/29/2012 12:54 PM, Sven Barth wrote:
Michael already wrote in one of the recent discussions that he wants
to create a webpage (using fpweb of course ) that will allow to
edit the FPDoc help entries (I'll try to find the mail).
Also there
Am 29.02.2012 13:01, schrieb Michael Schnell:
On 02/29/2012 12:57 PM, Sven Barth wrote:
Contributors for source documentation need to edit the fpdoc files
(e.g. those from the SVN checkout) and commit the changes (either as
patch or directly if they have SVN write access).
Regarding that this
On 02/29/2012 12:59 PM, Sven Barth wrote:
As already written:
* either use the editor hints of the IDE which work on the FPDoc files
in %laz%\doc\xml
* or build the help files yourself
Obvious best option: * do nothing.
-Michael
--
___
Lazarus
Sven Barth pascaldra...@googlemail.com hat am 29. Februar 2012 um 13:42
geschrieben:
Am 29.02.2012 12:57, schrieb Michael Schnell:
On 02/29/2012 12:54 PM, Sven Barth wrote:
Michael already wrote in one of the recent discussions that he wants
to create a webpage (using fpweb of
On 29 February 2012 13:25, Michael Schnell wrote:
offline help from the svn sources and failed multiple times (in action with
DocView, even trying to find out how this should be done with CHM.)
I created new LCL help in INF format over the weekend, using fpdoc
from latest 2.7.1. The only issue
On 02/29/2012 02:53 PM, michael.vancann...@wisa.be wrote:
None of this is an excuse for not contributing.
You are perfectly right, but ... (see my answer to Graeme).
-Michael
--
___
Lazarus mailing list
Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org
Mattias Gaertner schrieb:
And it it does open: Is the helpful user supposed to use the wiki to
improve the help text ? This would make the Wiki database the primary
help source.
It is since many years.
This IMO is a bad idea, as long as many Lazarus versions are used
concurrently, with
Michael Schnell schrieb:
On 02/29/2012 11:26 AM, Mattias Gaertner wrote:
The wiki is frequently edited by many people and already contains more
than 2500 pages. It makes no sense to shut it down.
But if there is no way to keep it in sync with the FPDoc files, how is
the future of either
Mattias Gaertner schrieb:
Not having top priority and being NOT interested are two different
things. AFAIK everyone agreed that having all help offline would be nice
feature.
ACK
The wiki is frequently edited by many people and already contains more
than 2500 pages. It makes no sense to
On 29-2-2012 14:02, Michael Schnell wrote:
On 02/29/2012 12:59 PM, Sven Barth wrote:
As already written:
* either use the editor hints of the IDE which work on the FPDoc files
in %laz%\doc\xml
* or build the help files yourself
Obvious best option: * do nothing.
-Michael
I'm sorry, but
On 02/29/2012 04:15 PM, Reinier Olislagers wrote:
I'm sorry, but then I suggest you stop bothering the list with your
posts...
Agreed.
- Michael
--
___
Lazarus mailing list
Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org
Michael Schnell schrieb:
It's a bit frustrating to see Graeme, DoDi, Sven and others try to
improve the help itself and especially the help generation process,
while I can't see the common final goal in focus (one or more online
and offline versatile help viewers / file formats being fed and
Am Mittwoch, den 29.02.2012, 13:07 +0100 schrieb Mattias Gaertner:
Michael Schnell mschn...@lumino.de hat am 29. Februar 2012 um 12:25
geschrieben:
[...]
There only can be a single source for the help
Where do you get this attitude?
You are using open source, you should know
Am Mittwoch, den 29.02.2012, 15:45 +0200 schrieb Graeme Geldenhuys:
On 29 February 2012 15:36, Michael Schnell wrote:
[ I apologise if I sound frustrated with you, but it probably is because I
am. ]
LOL
* fpdoc is well documented. So usage should not be a problem.
* LCL, fpGUI etc all
Marc Santhoff schrieb:
Where is the process of building up help files documented? Seen from my
current knowledge there are many new tools and facts I do not know or
understand.
In the source directories, i.e. in $fpcdocs (wherever you checked it
out), or in Lazarus/docs/html. The procedures
Marc Santhoff m.santh...@web.de hat am 29. Februar 2012 um 17:54
geschrieben:
[...]
Showing is simple: Just move the mouse over an identifier.
About destroying: You apparently have not tried it.
I talked about showing / seeing my modifications.
Michael, PLEASE try to use the
Am Mittwoch, den 29.02.2012, 18:22 +0100 schrieb Mattias Gaertner:
Marc Santhoff m.santh...@web.de hat am 29. Februar 2012 um 17:54
geschrieben:
[...]
Showing is simple: Just move the mouse over an identifier.
About destroying: You apparently have not tried it.
I talked
Am Mittwoch, den 29.02.2012, 18:15 +0100 schrieb Hans-Peter Diettrich:
Marc Santhoff schrieb:
Where is the process of building up help files documented? Seen from my
current knowledge there are many new tools and facts I do not know or
understand.
In the source directories, i.e. in
Em 28/02/2012 16:06, Mattias Gaertner escreveu:
On Tue, 28 Feb 2012 19:43:48 +0100
Marc Santhoff m.santh...@web.de wrote:
Hi again,
since there were multiple complaints about missing documentation, where
can I find a list of what is missing exactly in
On 29 February 2012 18:59, Marc Santhoff wrote:
Developers of ölazarus do know, they use it. For me as a user of
lazarus, using it to make progrms and source libraries, it is pretty
confusing to follow the threads about these non documented workflows.
All the various documentations I mentioned
On 28 February 2012 18:43, Marc Santhoff m.santh...@web.de wrote:
Hi again,
since there were multiple complaints about missing documentation, where
can I find a list of what is missing exactly in detail?
Is there a wiki page about it? Or a docs page collecting empty
descriptions or the
Date: Wed, 29 Feb 2012 19:32:47 +0100
From: Marc Santhoff m.santh...@web.de
Subject: Re: [Lazarus] Missing Documentation
To: Lazarus mailing list lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org
Message-ID: 1330540367.57395.61.ca...@zaphod.das.netz
Content-Type: text/plain
Am Mittwoch, den 29.02.2012
Marc Santhoff schrieb:
One name I remember (from huge masses of emails) is FPDocManager. Is
that a class or a tool?
It's a project in examples/fpdocmanager. It shall allow even newbies to
create their own local documentation. It also allows FPDoc documentation
writers to create skeletons
Am Mittwoch, den 29.02.2012, 13:47 -0600 schrieb John Repucci:
Date: Wed, 29 Feb 2012 19:32:47 +0100
From: Marc Santhoff m.santh...@web.de
Subject: Re: [Lazarus] Missing Documentation
To: Lazarus mailing list
lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org
Am Mittwoch, den 29.02.2012, 20:43 +0100 schrieb Hans-Peter Diettrich:
Marc Santhoff schrieb:
One name I remember (from huge masses of emails) is FPDocManager. Is
that a class or a tool?
It's a project in examples/fpdocmanager. It shall allow even newbies to
create their own local
Marc Santhoff schrieb:
A complete index, yes. To the right on
http://wiki.lazarus.freepascal.org/
under the headline Navigation there is a link to it.
The results are very strange. Entering documentation finds almost all
pages, because these have this keyword in the headline and
Am Donnerstag, den 01.03.2012, 01:22 +0100 schrieb Hans-Peter Diettrich:
Marc Santhoff schrieb:
A complete index, yes. To the right on
http://wiki.lazarus.freepascal.org/
under the headline Navigation there is a link to it.
The results are very strange. Entering documentation
On 1 March 2012 02:22, Hans-Peter Diettrich wrote:
The results are very strange. Entering documentation finds almost all
pages, because these have this keyword in the headline and navigation menu.
It even finds result pages where the entered word doesn't appear
_anywhere_ in the wiki page.
1. Are they created by a tool or hand edited? what are the tools used?
Source documentation is generated using FPDoc. The tool makeskel parses
the source file and generates a xml file which the documentation will
reside in.
Documentation for e.g. IDE usage is done in the Wiki.
2. Is there
Hi again,
since there were multiple complaints about missing documentation, where
can I find a list of what is missing exactly in detail?
Is there a wiki page about it? Or a docs page collecting empty
descriptions or the like?
Sometimes I'm bored, maybe there are items I'm able to add
a couple
On Tue, 28 Feb 2012 19:43:48 +0100
Marc Santhoff m.santh...@web.de wrote:
Hi again,
since there were multiple complaints about missing documentation, where
can I find a list of what is missing exactly in detail?
Is there a wiki page about it? Or a docs page collecting empty
descriptions
Marc Santhoff schrieb:
since there were multiple complaints about missing documentation, where
can I find a list of what is missing exactly in detail?
Is there a wiki page about it? Or a docs page collecting empty
descriptions or the like?
You can checkout e.g. rev. 34110, and search for ?]
On Tue, 28 Feb 2012 22:17:45 +0100
Hans-Peter Diettrich drdiettri...@aol.com wrote:
Marc Santhoff schrieb:
since there were multiple complaints about missing documentation, where
can I find a list of what is missing exactly in detail?
Is there a wiki page about it? Or a docs page
Mattias Gaertner schrieb:
You can checkout e.g. rev. 34110, and search for ?] in the xml files.
These are the places where I couldn't find reliable infos myself.
There were all converted to notes, were they not?
Even if so, moving a note out of its context invalidates the note.
E.g. the
90 matches
Mail list logo
