Re: [lazarus] problems in lcl/resources.pp and lcl/propertystorage.pas identifier duplicated

2006-01-01 Thread Michael Van Canneyt
On Sun, 1 Jan 2006, Marc Weustink wrote: Michael Van Canneyt wrote: On Sun, 1 Jan 2006, Vincent Snijders wrote: Michael Van Canneyt wrote: On Sun, 1 Jan 2006, Vincent Snijders wrote: Dale Welch wrote: in lcl/resources.pp and in lcl

Re: [lazarus] Look and feel of Lazarus

2005-12-31 Thread Michael Van Canneyt
On Sat, 31 Dec 2005, Graeme Geldenhuys wrote: Micha Nelissen wrote: Forgive my ignorance, but how does that help in this context ? Visual Form Inheritance is just like class inheritance, but for the GUI. I used it extensively in Delphi with my applications, and save me loads of work.

Re: [lazarus] Lazarus on handheld devices

2005-12-20 Thread Michael Van Canneyt
On Mon, 19 Dec 2005, Alexander Todorov wrote: Hi there, has anybody tried to create an application on handheld devices that run Linux with Lazarus? I found some Qt bindings for FPC and Sharp Zaurus http://users.pandora.be/Jan.Van.hijfte/qtforfpc/qtedemo.html

Re: [lazarus] USB Icon

2005-12-18 Thread Michael Van Canneyt
On Sun, 18 Dec 2005, Luis R. Hilario B. wrote: Hello, If a project has name USB, appears icon USB in the program instead of the traditional one (X). Who puts the icon, the graphical system or Lazarus? If Lazarus doesn't provide one, the graphical system does. Michael. O.S.: Linux

Re: [lazarus] Re: Trying to use LCLIntf.StretchBlt on gtk and possible patch for gtk interface

2005-12-14 Thread Michael Van Canneyt
On Wed, 14 Dec 2005, Marc Weustink wrote: Felipe Monteiro de Carvalho wrote: Andrew Haines wrote: and then at the (gdb) prompt: run --g-fatal-warnings (gdb) run --g-fatal-warnings Starting program: /home/felipe/Programação/Lente/magnifier --g-fatal-warnings Reading symbols from shared

Re: [lazarus] Re: Trying to use LCLIntf.StretchBlt on gtk and possible patch for gtk interface

2005-12-14 Thread Michael Van Canneyt
On Wed, 14 Dec 2005, Marc Weustink wrote: Michael Van Canneyt wrote: On Wed, 14 Dec 2005, Marc Weustink wrote: Felipe Monteiro de Carvalho wrote: Andrew Haines wrote: and then at the (gdb) prompt: run --g-fatal-warnings (gdb) run --g-fatal-warnings Starting program: /home/felipe

Re: [lazarus] Showing multiple forms

2005-12-13 Thread Michael Van Canneyt
On Tue, 13 Dec 2005, dannym wrote: What you are looking for is MDI (multiple Document Interface) and that is not supported by lazarus. Please don't see me as just ranting without substance (you can ask me for substance), but those are a bad idea. Think of what if you want to move one of the

Re: [lazarus] Re: list of all components for DB

2005-12-13 Thread Michael Van Canneyt
On Tue, 13 Dec 2005, Joost van der Sluis wrote: Will there be a native component for mysql5 into Lazarus? There already is. That is, if you use the newest fpc version from svn. (2.0.3 or 2.1.1) Then install the sqldb package that you can find in the components directory of your Lazarus

Re: [lazarus] Datetime-fields are broken in current svn

2005-12-12 Thread Michael Van Canneyt
On Sun, 11 Dec 2005, Micha Nelissen wrote: On Sun, 11 Dec 2005 17:30:09 +0100 Joost van der Sluis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: That's with the following definition of NativeFormat: When nativeformat is true, no conversion from the data takes place, so that the format is returned in the format

Re: [lazarus] Datetime-fields are broken in current svn

2005-12-12 Thread Michael Van Canneyt
On Mon, 12 Dec 2005, Joost van der Sluis wrote: As TDbf author my interpretation of NativeFormat is: True means data passed to/from Get/SetFieldData is in Delphi 5+ internal format (TDateTime and friends), False means data is in Delphi 4- internal format (TDateTimeRec and friends). That is

Re: [lazarus] Accessing temporary internet files directory em Win XP

2005-12-12 Thread Michael Van Canneyt
On Mon, 12 Dec 2005, Arí Ricardo Ody wrote: Apparently when I use FindFirst builtin function pointing the 1st parameter to the directory mentioned above, the function returns zero files. Or it can't see the links in this directory. Is this a bug? I think that the function must inform

Re: [lazarus] Turbocash may need Lazarus programmers

2005-12-08 Thread Michael Van Canneyt
On Wed, 7 Dec 2005, George Lober wrote: An interesting article at: http://www.tectonic.co.za/view.php?id=756 Saying, quote: ?We are looking for Python or Lazarus programmers. We have not yet decided on the final environment. The database will most likely be Firebird or MySQL,? what a

Re: [lazarus] TCanvas.FrameRect not working

2005-12-08 Thread Michael Van Canneyt
On Thu, 8 Dec 2005, Micha Nelissen wrote: Felipe Monteiro de Carvalho wrote: function TWidgetSet.FrameRect(DC: HDC; const ARect: TRect; hBr: HBRUSH) : integer; begin Result:= Windows.FrameRect(DC; ARect: TRect; hBr); end; Also Windows.FrameRect is declared as: function

Re: [lazarus] TCanvas.FrameRect not working

2005-12-08 Thread Michael Van Canneyt
On Thu, 8 Dec 2005, Micha Nelissen wrote: Michael Van Canneyt wrote: Not unless you use a pointer. Maybe using a pointer would work, then ? Yes. Can you add a pointer redef.inc entry for FrameRect then ? I can. BTW: why are all functions imported using 'var' where possible ? I

Re: [lazarus] Access violation

2005-12-08 Thread Michael Van Canneyt
On Thu, 8 Dec 2005, Arí Ricardo Ody wrote: Why the attached program issues access violation in the call of procedure LoadDirFiles? I try to remove the TStringList parameter and the violation persists... May someone give me an explanation? You must create the stringlist first, before

Re: [lazarus] $I include files

2005-12-08 Thread Michael Van Canneyt
On Thu, 8 Dec 2005, Mattias Gaertner wrote: On Thu, 08 Dec 2005 10:36:34 +0200 Graeme Geldenhuys [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, Is there a easy way in Lazarus to move code out of a unit into a include file and then insert the $I in the originating unit? At the moment I create a

Re: AW: [lazarus] Running a project always performs compile and link sequence

2005-12-07 Thread Michael Van Canneyt
On Wed, 7 Dec 2005, Florian Klaempfl wrote: Yoyong Hernan wrote: Below is a sample Run in Lazarus IDE [TMainIDE.DoRunProject] A TMainIDE.DoInitProjectRun A True 0 TMainIDE.DoInitProjectRun B TMainIDE.DoSaveAll TMainIDE.DoSaveProject End [TCompiler.Compile]

Re: AW: [lazarus] Running a project always performs compile and link sequence

2005-12-07 Thread Michael Van Canneyt
On Wed, 7 Dec 2005, Micha Nelissen wrote: Michael Van Canneyt wrote: - However, the compiler does always recompile and link the program itself. It has no way of knowing whether it needs to or not, because the source files are not stored in the compiled program. This story is incomplete

Re: [lazarus] Running a project always performs compile and link sequence

2005-12-07 Thread Michael Van Canneyt
On Wed, 7 Dec 2005, Philippe.martinole wrote: Hello, After reading this thread I ask myself what is wrong with always compiling and linking the project? For me it is very important because compiling the same project on Lazarus is a lot slower than with Delphi6PE. I definitly want to leave

Re: [lazarus] Running a project always performs compile and link sequence

2005-12-07 Thread Michael Van Canneyt
On Wed, 7 Dec 2005, Mattias Gaertner wrote: On Wed, 7 Dec 2005 13:15:14 +0100 (Romance Standard Time) Michael Van Canneyt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [...] Better spend time on an internal linker for FPC. More people will benefit from that :-) Even then, I think there are other

Re: [lazarus] Running a project always performs compile and link sequence

2005-12-07 Thread Michael Van Canneyt
On Wed, 7 Dec 2005, Mattias Gaertner wrote: On Wed, 7 Dec 2005 17:28:50 +0100 (CET) Michael Van Canneyt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Wed, 7 Dec 2005, Mattias Gaertner wrote: On Wed, 7 Dec 2005 13:15:14 +0100 (Romance Standard Time) Michael Van Canneyt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote

Re: [lazarus] Running a project allways performs compile and link sequence

2005-12-06 Thread Michael Van Canneyt
On Tue, 6 Dec 2005, Peter Vreman wrote: Checking changes is hard. Compiling it is the only to make sure that you running the latest saved source. Why not store the checksum of each source file of a project when compiling and do a check before compilation to determine whether or not to

Re: [lazarus] lazarus revision 8257

2005-12-06 Thread Michael Van Canneyt
On Tue, 6 Dec 2005, Micha Nelissen wrote: On Tue, 6 Dec 2005 18:47:37 +0100 barko [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: - latest revision 8257 - make clean all - is ok, FPC is 2.0.1 - from 0.9.10 lazarus packages... but... after running startlazarus i got this: It seems CheckSynchronize is

Re: [lazarus] Zeos TdateTime

2005-12-03 Thread Michael Van Canneyt
On Fri, 2 Dec 2005, Luiz Americo Pereira Camara wrote: Em Sex, 2005-12-02 às 18:26 +0100, Michael Van Canneyt escreveu: On Fri, 2 Dec 2005, Luiz Americo wrote: De: Michael Van Canneyt [EMAIL PROTECTED] How about sqliteds? I'm still working on that; I'm using

Re: [lazarus] Zeos TdateTime

2005-12-02 Thread Michael Van Canneyt
On Thu, 1 Dec 2005, Luiz Americo Pereira Camara wrote: Em Qui, 2005-12-01 às 15:26 +0100, Michael Van Canneyt escreveu: On Thu, 1 Dec 2005, Joost van der Sluis wrote: No, it's a FPC problem. Delphi actually does a dirty trick with the 'NativeFormat' parameter of GetFieldData

Re: [lazarus] Zeos TdateTime

2005-12-02 Thread Michael Van Canneyt
On Fri, 2 Dec 2005, Luiz Americo wrote: De: Michael Van Canneyt [EMAIL PROTECTED] How about sqliteds? I'm still working on that; I'm using the components for an article, so you can be sure that. Fixing it's easy. I can do that. But there were some more problems

Re: [lazarus] Zeos TdateTime

2005-12-01 Thread Michael Van Canneyt
On Thu, 1 Dec 2005, Joost van der Sluis wrote: No, it's a FPC problem. Delphi actually does a dirty trick with the 'NativeFormat' parameter of GetFieldData. If NativeFormat is false, it does a recursive call of itself with a temporary buffer, and then converts the data with an auxiliary

Re: [lazarus] Zeos TdateTime

2005-12-01 Thread Michael Van Canneyt
On Thu, 1 Dec 2005, Joost van der Sluis wrote: So we had to fix this in TDataset. I've done it, it's committed, if someone could please give it a test, I would be grateful. What if someone calls TDataset.GetfieldData(aField,aBuffer); ? Then it will return the wrong - TTimeStamp value. (iirc

Re: [lazarus] AMD 64

2005-12-01 Thread Michael Van Canneyt
On Thu, 1 Dec 2005, Tony Maro wrote: Meh... I just installed Ubuntu for AMD 64. So far, the few small apps I've tried to compile from source have failed (C, not Pascal.) Can I safely make the assumption that trying to develop for I386 machines is going to be a pain in the butt, at least

Re: [lazarus] Zeos TdateTime

2005-11-30 Thread Michael Van Canneyt
On Wed, 30 Nov 2005, Joost van der Sluis wrote: I am developing my first app using Lazarus and now I have found a serious problem with date with Lazarus. This show me a date 1/10/1899. I have been in zeos forum and they say that problem is for FPC not zeos. Somebody says that the

Re: [lazarus] Redirection of stdout to Memo component, problems

2005-11-20 Thread Michael Van Canneyt
On Sun, 20 Nov 2005, Michalis Kamburelis wrote: Andrew Haines wrote: [...] I am not extremely familiar with how streams work, but using LoadFromStream(Output) may not Read the data so it can be replaced with new data. Also as I said I think S.LoadFromStream is blocking until the

Re: [lazarus] MAC address

2005-11-16 Thread Michael Van Canneyt
On Wed, 16 Nov 2005, Andrea Mauri wrote: I would like to convert a delphi/kylix project in lazarus project. In the kylix project there is also a function that checks the MAC address: ethernet:= 'eth0'; i:= socket(AF_INET, 2, 0) ; if not i 0 then begin StrPLCopy(@f.ifrn_name, ethernet,

Re: [lazarus] Interprocess Communication

2005-11-09 Thread Michael Van Canneyt
/tests respectively) Michael. Michael Van Canneyt wrote: On Mon, 7 Nov 2005, SteveG wrote: There was talk recently of IPC methods being worked upon for Laz/FPC - (Windows) Does anybody know if this was competed (or could be tried if not) ? It depends on what you need. The SimpleIPC

Re: [lazarus] Interprocess Communication

2005-11-07 Thread Michael Van Canneyt
On Mon, 7 Nov 2005, SteveG wrote: There was talk recently of IPC methods being worked upon for Laz/FPC - (Windows) Does anybody know if this was competed (or could be tried if not) ? It depends on what you need. The SimpleIPC (one-way) implementation is ready and works cross-platform. I

Re: [lazarus] Multithreading in Lazarus = SMP Enabled applications?

2005-11-06 Thread Michael Van Canneyt
On Sun, 6 Nov 2005, Tony Pelton wrote: On 11/5/05, Michael Van Canneyt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On linux, be sure to include the 'cthreads' as the first unit in your program's uses clause if you want to use threads. This will install the C thread manager. Note that X

Re: [lazarus] Inherited forms

2005-11-05 Thread Michael Van Canneyt
On Sat, 5 Nov 2005, Mattias Gaertner wrote: On Sat, 05 Nov 2005 12:32:22 + Colin Western [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Mattias Gaertner wrote: On Sat, 05 Nov 2005 11:33:47 + Colin Western [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: To improve this I need the lfm files for the super

Re: [lazarus] Multithreading in Lazarus = SMP Enabled applications?

2005-11-05 Thread Michael Van Canneyt
On Sat, 5 Nov 2005, Horacio Jamilis wrote: Hi, I was trying to look for information about how to enable a linux server application to work with any procesor available on the system, being, this way, SMP enabled. Someplace I readed that working in Delphi with the TThread class (this

Re: [lazarus] Xfce , FVWM or BlackBox

2005-11-04 Thread Michael Van Canneyt
On Fri, 4 Nov 2005, Edwin Quijada wrote: hi! I developed an app using Lazarus and Suse10.0 but now I wanna run this app into P2 with 32mb using Xfce or another window manager. In this machine I just wanna run the binary package Can I run an app in this window manager?\ Yes. But you need

Re: [lazarus] Testing new forum

2005-10-31 Thread Michael Van Canneyt
On Mon, 31 Oct 2005, John Samperi wrote: At 06:34 PM 31/10/2005, you wrote: Maybe it more correct, to say it hasn't born yet, than dead. Maybe :-) It seems incredibly slow compared to D6 at compiling and running a program. The compilation step is as fast as Delphi's. The linking (the GNU

Re: [lazarus] Testing new forum

2005-10-31 Thread Michael Van Canneyt
On Mon, 31 Oct 2005, Vincent Snijders wrote: John Samperi wrote: At 08:40 PM 31/10/2005, you wrote: If you mean that button2 is placed on a new line, then that is correct. If there is a empty line inbetween, then maybe not. Did you edit memo1.text ? Isn't an extra empty line in there

Re: [lazarus] lazarus site is hacked

2005-10-29 Thread Michael Van Canneyt
On Sat, 29 Oct 2005, Florian Klaempfl wrote: Lv wrote: This is getting annoying.. Cant you guys just use Linux or BSD with ipchains or iptables. If you want a firewall script let me know. The problem is probably postnuke but not the OS. Another case for writing a good web system

Re: [lazarus] lazarus site is hacked

2005-10-29 Thread Michael Van Canneyt
On Sat, 29 Oct 2005, Razvan Adrian Bogdan wrote: On 10/29/05, Michael Van Canneyt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Another case for writing a good web system in FPC/Lazarus. I have one nearly set up. Michael. What is it based on (PSP) ? :) No. Rewritten from scratch. I want an OOP approach

Re: [lazarus] lazarus site is hacked

2005-10-29 Thread Michael Van Canneyt
On Sat, 29 Oct 2005, Razvan Adrian Bogdan wrote: On 10/29/05, Michael Van Canneyt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Sat, 29 Oct 2005, Razvan Adrian Bogdan wrote: On 10/29/05, Michael Van Canneyt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Another case for writing a good web system in FPC/Lazarus. I

Re: [lazarus] lazarus site is hacked

2005-10-29 Thread Michael Van Canneyt
On Sat, 29 Oct 2005, Michael A. Hess wrote: The sites have been fixed and I will now spend the rest of the day working on figuring out how they got in and attempt to patch it. Not how I planned on spending my day. I re-enabled DNS. Michael.

Re: [lazarus] Free Pascal and Lazarus at SYSTEMS 2005 in Munich, Germany

2005-10-24 Thread Michael Van Canneyt
On Mon, 24 Oct 2005, Sebastian Günther wrote: Hello everybody, unfortunately the official announcement is a little bit late, but nevertheless: Free Pascal and Lazarus have a small booth at the SYSTEMS 2005 exhibition in Munich, Germany; October 24th to 28th. Actually Mattias Gärtner, Marco

Re: [lazarus] Some questions about TForm.Height

2005-10-19 Thread Michael Van Canneyt
On Wed, 19 Oct 2005, Andrew Haines wrote: Michael Van Canneyt wrote: Since Lazarus cannot offer a method to get the title bar height on all platforms (notably Linux/Unix), the most sensible thing to do is to make Height=ClientHeight... This is not entirely correct

[lazarus] FPCUnit article/tutorial online.

2005-10-09 Thread Michael Van Canneyt
Hello, The Editor of Toolbox Magazine has allowed me to put an article about FPCUnit online. FPCUnit is (similarly to JUnit, DUnit) an Object Pascal testing framework. It comes standard with your Free Pascal/Lazarus installation. It was written by Dean Zobec, and Vincent Snijders made the

Re: [lazarus] Several LFM patches

2005-10-06 Thread Michael Van Canneyt
On Thu, 6 Oct 2005, Mattias Gaertner wrote: On Thu, 6 Oct 2005 09:58:33 +0200 (Romance Daylight Time) Michael Van Canneyt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Wed, 5 Oct 2005, Darius Blaszijk wrote: On Tue, 2005-10-04 at 23:55, Mattias Gaertner wrote: - improved indenting Beware

Re: [lazarus] Lazarus gtk2 Poll

2005-10-02 Thread Michael Van Canneyt
On Sun, 2 Oct 2005, andyman wrote: Hi, please see this link and cast your vote for which gtk2 version you have on your computer. http://www.lazarus.freepascal.org/index.php?name=PNphpBB2file=viewtopict=1428 How to vote ?? Michael.

Re: [lazarus] A Firebird connection trouble

2005-09-25 Thread Michael Van Canneyt
On Sat, 24 Sep 2005, wrote: Hi guys! I have the Firebird DBMS installed in the directory: /opt/firebird and the traditional DB employee.fdb in /opt/firebird/examples. Under Lazarus 0.9.8 in Linux Mandrake 10.1 I open a new project and include a a TIBConnection and fill the

Re: [lazarus] Corrections to fields editor and dataset

2005-09-18 Thread Michael Van Canneyt
On Sun, 18 Sep 2005, Alexandrov Alexandru wrote: On 7/27/05, Mattias Gaertner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Wed, 27 Jul 2005 09:25:28 +0300 Alexandrov Alexandru [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: New lookup fields are not added if lookup dataset have no fields. Here is a patch.

Re: [lazarus] obtaining lazarus via cvs is not working (any more ?)

2005-09-15 Thread Michael Van Canneyt
On Thu, 15 Sep 2005, Joris Spriet wrote: Hi, for some days now I'm having trouble obtaining lazarus via cvs. Apparently lazarus has dissapeared : D:\projects\freepascalcvs list cvs rls: Listing module: `.' CVSROOT fc fpc fpc-pre-1.0 fpc20 fpc21 fvnew fvnew-pre-1.0 html ia64 oldtests

Re: [lazarus] Lazarus Build Error

2005-09-14 Thread Michael Van Canneyt
On Wed, 14 Sep 2005, Alexander Todorov wrote: On 9/14/05, Joost van der Sluis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: btw: where should I send the patch Lazarus or FPC team? db.pp is in [LAZARUS]\fpcsrc\fcl\db\db.pp Send them to me, of to the fpc-devel list. And can you tell me where you needed

Re: [lazarus] TApplication.handleException

2005-09-12 Thread Michael Van Canneyt
On Mon, 12 Sep 2005, Bogus?aw Brandys wrote: Hi, Would it be useful adding WinAPI OutputDebugString to TApplication.HandleException or maybe DumpStack as the last choice (if debug log output is not set) ? OutputDebugString is not portable but very handy function - debug is shown only if

Re: [lazarus] DirectoryExists bug under Windows

2005-09-11 Thread Michael Van Canneyt
On Sat, 10 Sep 2005, Bogusław Brandys wrote: Where can I post fix for DirectoryExists bug (not detecting drive root entry under Windows) ? You should enter that in the FPC bug database, with a sample program. Michael.

Re: [lazarus] MessageDlg

2005-09-06 Thread Michael Van Canneyt
On Mon, 5 Sep 2005, Mattias Gaertner wrote: On Mon, 5 Sep 2005 17:04:04 +0200 (Romance Daylight Time) Michael Van Canneyt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Mon, 5 Sep 2005, Alexsander Rosa wrote: After years of development with this kind of dialog box (with a caption, a message ending

Re: [lazarus] MessageDlg

2005-09-05 Thread Michael Van Canneyt
On Mon, 5 Sep 2005, Alexsander Rosa wrote: After years of development with this kind of dialog box (with a caption, a message ending with a question and buttons labeled Yes, No, Cancel etc), I've noticed than most non-tech users actually do not READ the message, they just read the labels of

Re: [lazarus] Console GUI / Web Applications Support for Lazarus RAD

2005-09-04 Thread Michael Van Canneyt
On Sun, 4 Sep 2005, Dean Zobec wrote: Michael Van Canneyt ha scritto: I am investigating this currently. I'm working on some base HTTP/HTML components which will be incorporated in the FCL. My plan is to use this as the basis for 2 kinds of web-applications: 1. A more 'classic

Re: [lazarus] Console GUI / Web Applications Support for Lazarus RAD

2005-09-04 Thread Michael Van Canneyt
On Sun, 4 Sep 2005, Dean Zobec wrote: Michael Van Canneyt ha scritto: CMS is something that should sit on top of a good web-engine. First we need the web-engine. of course. But obviusly this is not a work at the core developers level. I've seen that the community

Re: [lazarus] OT: Did any onw saw Delphi 2005?

2005-09-03 Thread Michael Van Canneyt
On Fri, 2 Sep 2005, L505 wrote: Shall I give you the mail address of the Remobjects company ? Try to get support for D5, or if you feel lucky, D3 :-) Well PascalScript that I have downoaded (possibly an older version) does work with D5, but I guess you are talking about other

Re: [lazarus] OT: Did any onw saw Delphi 2005?

2005-09-03 Thread Michael Van Canneyt
On Sat, 3 Sep 2005, Razvan Adrian Bogdan wrote: On 9/3/05, L505 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Some things are simply too big to do yourself. For example, a stable RPC mechanism. Yeah, I like the fact that some stuff like synapse, KOL, etc. were already written by someone else.

Re: [lazarus] OT: Did any onw saw Delphi 2005?

2005-09-03 Thread Michael Van Canneyt
On Sat, 3 Sep 2005, Razvan Adrian Bogdan wrote: On 9/3/05, Florian Klaempfl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Razvan Adrian Bogdan wrote: On 9/3/05, L505 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Some things are simply too big to do yourself. For example, a stable RPC mechanism. Yeah, I like the

Re: [lazarus] OT: Did any onw saw Delphi 2005?

2005-09-03 Thread Michael Van Canneyt
On Sat, 3 Sep 2005, L505 wrote: And FPC, too bad KOL is win32 specific, if would have solved the eternal huge executable discussion. True.. Someone has done work to get KOL working on Kylix, but I've never used or tried Kylix.. so I don't know what size the KOL apps turn out to

Re: [lazarus] Console GUI / Web Applications Support for Lazarus RAD

2005-09-03 Thread Michael Van Canneyt
On Sat, 3 Sep 2005, L505 wrote: Some years ago I started a project in Delphi/Kylix that should finally allow me (and any other developer) to create Console GUI Applications using Delphi, in a pure RAD way, using non-visual standard components, and a set of components I was

Re: [lazarus] OT: Did any onw saw Delphi 2005?

2005-09-03 Thread Michael Van Canneyt
On Sat, 3 Sep 2005, L505 wrote: This statement needs some refinements: The 10x slower is only on Windows, and is mostly consumed by the linker; Ahh just what I thought - because I've always found the compiler fast, just the linker is slow. I wonder what specific parts of the linker

Re: [lazarus] OT: Did any onw saw Delphi 2005?

2005-09-03 Thread Michael Van Canneyt
On Sat, 3 Sep 2005, Mattias Gaertner wrote: On Sat, 3 Sep 2005 11:17:23 -0700 L505 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: And FPC, too bad KOL is win32 specific, if would have solved the eternal huge executable discussion. True.. Someone has done work to get KOL working on Kylix, but

Re: [lazarus] OT: Did any onw saw Delphi 2005?

2005-08-31 Thread Michael Van Canneyt
On Wed, 31 Aug 2005, Alexandre Leclerc wrote: This is off topic but yesterday I installed D2005 just to look at it. (The last Delphi I used was D6 or I believe, in 2003). I might be only me, but I was in shock when I saw the Interface. It took me everything to set the IDE to

Re: [lazarus] OT: Did any onw saw Delphi 2005?

2005-08-31 Thread Michael Van Canneyt
On Wed, 31 Aug 2005, Thomas Zastrow wrote: Michael Van Canneyt wrote: On Wed, 31 Aug 2005, Thomas Zastrow wrote: Alexandre Leclerc wrote: This is off topic but yesterday I installed D2005 just to look at it. (The last Delphi I used was D6 or I believe

Re: [lazarus] OT: Did any onw saw Delphi 2005?

2005-08-31 Thread Michael Van Canneyt
On Wed, 31 Aug 2005, Alexsander Rosa wrote: I do not know about you, but I try to avoid at all costs using 3rd party components. Right now the only 3rd party visual component I use in D7 is TMS's AdvStringGrid. This self-imposed restriction was, at first, to ease the port to Kylix. Now it's

Re: [lazarus] EXE packer for Linux

2005-08-31 Thread Michael Van Canneyt
On Wed, 31 Aug 2005, Tony Maro wrote: Ales Katona wrote: Tony Maro wrote: Being frustrated with the results of UPX in Linux (can't access param(0) if it's packed) I did some hunting and found: http://exepak.sourceforge.net/ For the TruckBites installer, I wrote my

Re: [lazarus] making WIN32 DLL ?

2005-08-30 Thread Michael Van Canneyt
On Tue, 30 Aug 2005, Tony Pelton wrote: hi all, interestingly, with what i _think_ is the same basic set of compiler flags for debug and optimizations etc ... the DLL from lazarus comes out about 4x as large. First off, try to look at the uses clause of your main source file. if it

Re: [lazarus] Simple IPC implementation.

2005-08-30 Thread Michael Van Canneyt
On Tue, 30 Aug 2005, Micha Nelissen wrote: On Tue, 30 Aug 2005 11:09:30 +0200 (Romance Daylight Time) Michael Van Canneyt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Tue, 30 Aug 2005, Micha Nelissen wrote: What do you mean with Idle handler? TApplication.OnIdle ? In any sane app, that is only

Re: [lazarus] Simple IPC implementation.

2005-08-30 Thread Michael Van Canneyt
On Tue, 30 Aug 2005, Vincent Snijders wrote: Micha Nelissen wrote: On Tue, 30 Aug 2005 11:09:30 +0200 (Romance Daylight Time) Michael Van Canneyt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: In windows, it's slightly more difficult (surprise, surprise :-) ) You can use MsgWaitForMultipleObjects to do

Re: [lazarus] Simple IPC implementation.

2005-08-30 Thread Michael Van Canneyt
On Tue, 30 Aug 2005, Micha Nelissen wrote: On Tue, 30 Aug 2005 12:20:40 +0200 (Romance Daylight Time) Michael Van Canneyt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: You can wait on any handle: file, pipe, socket. From msdn: The WaitForSingleObject function can wait for the following objects

Re: [lazarus] Simple IPC implementation.

2005-08-30 Thread Michael Van Canneyt
On Tue, 30 Aug 2005, Vincent Snijders wrote: Michael Van Canneyt wrote: On Tue, 30 Aug 2005, Vincent Snijders wrote: Micha Nelissen wrote: On Tue, 30 Aug 2005 11:09:30 +0200 (Romance Daylight Time) Michael Van Canneyt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: In windows, it's slightly more

Re: [lazarus] Simple IPC implementation.

2005-08-30 Thread Michael Van Canneyt
On Tue, 30 Aug 2005, Micha Nelissen wrote: On Tue, 30 Aug 2005 12:23:06 +0200 (Romance Daylight Time) Michael Van Canneyt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Things you could use this function for: file change notifications, events, ... all have to be seperately implemented in the FCL/LCL to make

Re: [lazarus] Messages in Windows

2005-08-29 Thread Michael Van Canneyt
On Mon, 29 Aug 2005, SteveG wrote: Could anybody tell me if it is yet possible to send messages between apps in Lazarus ? eg -WM_USER in Windows If not, any suggestions on how to send a signal to another app (no data) would be really appreciated You can always send a message to any

Re: [lazarus] SVN Updates Initial LCL - Carbon interface

2005-08-29 Thread Michael Van Canneyt
On Mon, 29 Aug 2005, Marc Weustink wrote: Hi Some updates: r7585: * The global InterfaceObject variable got renamed to WidgetSet * Moved the maineventloop to a callback through the widgetset, this was needed for the carbon interface. r7586: I'm proud to announce the initial steps

Re: [lazarus] Messages in Windows

2005-08-29 Thread Michael Van Canneyt
On Mon, 29 Aug 2005, Micha Nelissen wrote: On Mon, 29 Aug 2005 09:22:31 +0200 (CEST) Michael Van Canneyt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Mon, 29 Aug 2005, SteveG wrote: Could anybody tell me if it is yet possible to send messages between apps in Lazarus ? eg -WM_USER

Re: [lazarus] Messages in Windows

2005-08-29 Thread Michael Van Canneyt
On Mon, 29 Aug 2005, Bogusław Brandys wrote: Michael Van Canneyt wrote: On Mon, 29 Aug 2005, Micha Nelissen wrote: On Mon, 29 Aug 2005 09:22:31 +0200 (CEST) Michael Van Canneyt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Mon, 29 Aug 2005, SteveG wrote: Could anybody tell me

Re: [lazarus] Segmentation fault starting Lazarus

2005-08-29 Thread Michael Van Canneyt
On Mon, 29 Aug 2005, Micha Nelissen wrote: On Sun, 28 Aug 2005 19:42:44 -0300 Joao Morais [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I downloaded all FPC and Lazarus project (svn), succesful compiled the FPC SVN is known to produce segfaulting programs. (Or has that been fixed already?) It is fixed

Re: [lazarus] Simple IPC implementation.

2005-08-29 Thread Michael Van Canneyt
On Mon, 29 Aug 2005, Micha Nelissen wrote: On Mon, 29 Aug 2005 16:32:42 +0200 (CEST) Michael Van Canneyt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: 3. Currently a loop must be implemented with a timer. (the server app shows how) Any suggestions on how to integrate it in a message loop would

Re: [lazarus] Simple IPC implementation.

2005-08-29 Thread Michael Van Canneyt
On Mon, 29 Aug 2005, Micha Nelissen wrote: On Mon, 29 Aug 2005 23:22:53 +0200 (CEST) Michael Van Canneyt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Mon, 29 Aug 2005, Micha Nelissen wrote: Do you know the TThread.Synchronize eventloop hooks ? (WakeMainThread and friends). I think this can

Re: [lazarus] REM Objects Pascal Script

2005-08-23 Thread Michael Van Canneyt
On Tue, 23 Aug 2005, Bogus?aw Brandys wrote: Hi, Is REM Object Pascal Script compatible with Free Pascal or somebody is working on it ? IFPS (the predecessor of REMObjects Pascal script) compiled with FPC. It should not be too hard to get the new version to work. Michael.

Re: [lazarus] SVN in windows and linux

2005-08-18 Thread Michael Van Canneyt
On Thu, 18 Aug 2005, Luiz Americo wrote: Andreas Berger wrote: Are there any visual tool for svn that works in windows and linux? *Does any one know if TortoiseSVN run under Wine? I know I could just test it, but I am too lazy to do all these tests :) I'm using esvn in windows. In

Re: [lazarus] Further questions when porting a Delphi project

2005-08-17 Thread Michael Van Canneyt
On Wed, 17 Aug 2005, Mattias Gaertner wrote: I don't know, why the Screen forms must have separate names, but nevertheless: implemented. Separate names Sorry. I meant unique names. All created froms are registered with the screen object, so it knows all forms and thus all names.

Re: [lazarus] Further questions when porting a Delphi project

2005-08-17 Thread Michael Van Canneyt
On Wed, 17 Aug 2005, Mattias Gaertner wrote: On Wed, 17 Aug 2005 15:13:35 +0200 (Romance Daylight Time) Michael Van Canneyt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Wed, 17 Aug 2005, Mattias Gaertner wrote: I don't know, why the Screen forms must have separate names, but nevertheless

Re: [lazarus] Marketing efforts.

2005-08-15 Thread Michael Van Canneyt
On Mon, 15 Aug 2005, Tony Maro wrote: Micha Nelissen wrote: On Mon, 15 Aug 2005 11:26:09 +0200 (CEST) Michael Van Canneyt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I've been following the talk about Lazarus' visibility, and marketing. Me too, of course

Re: Eclipse lazarus and marketing

2005-08-15 Thread Michael Van Canneyt
On Mon, 15 Aug 2005, Darius Blaszijk wrote: Please don't take it personaly Not at all but I think you people should stop talking and start working. Make that roadmap yourself, post it on the mailing list, don't talk about it. I agree, but don't you believe that there should be

Re: [lazarus] Marketing efforts.

2005-08-15 Thread Michael Van Canneyt
On Mon, 15 Aug 2005, Tony Maro wrote: And Borland should not try to fight us; We're a partner: we help in keeping Object Pascal alive; Something they should consider carefully... True, but my point being that some companies make strange decisions when their backs are against the

Re: [lazarus] Marketing efforts.

2005-08-15 Thread Michael Van Canneyt
On Mon, 15 Aug 2005, Ales Katona wrote: I've been following the SP war since it started and learned a few facts which are wrongly understood. FYI software patents in europe are NOT abolished, but nether are they enforced today. The big victory we won not so long ago was basicly just a

Re: [lazarus] Eclipse

2005-08-09 Thread Michael Van Canneyt
On Mon, 8 Aug 2005, L505 wrote: | I'm a programmer in both languages too... | | And I agree, in java decisions are much more difficult. When compared with | Delphi, Java can be defined as the complex way of do simple things... | | (And I won't talk about ridiculous constructions like

<    4   5   6   7   8   9