On Tuesday 01 August 2006 10:05, Alexsander Rosa wrote:
> So the best thing for PostgreSQL users is to bury sqldb for good and
> use Zeos instead? Is this correct?
Not to be rude - but that's bull. SQLdb works. It may have a few issues but
so does Zeos.
John
the problem is not in SQLdb, but in FPC itself?
Regards,
Zlatko
- Original Message -
From: "Alexsander Rosa" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Tuesday, August 01, 2006 7:05 PM
Subject: Re: [lazarus] problems with SQLdb components and Postgres
So the best thing for PostgreSQL
ander Rosa" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Tuesday, August 01, 2006 7:05 PM
Subject: Re: [lazarus] problems with SQLdb components and Postgres
So the best thing for PostgreSQL users is to bury sqldb for good and
use Zeos instead? Is this correct?
2006/7/28, Alexandre Leclerc <[EMAIL
So the best thing for PostgreSQL users is to bury sqldb for good and
use Zeos instead? Is this correct?
2006/7/28, Alexandre Leclerc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
2006/7/28, Zlatko Matić <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Unfortnately, Lazarus+PostgreSQL doesn't work properly with recent snapshots
> such as Lazarus-
2006/7/28, Zlatko Matić <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Unfortnately, Lazarus+PostgreSQL doesn't work properly with recent snapshots
such as Lazarus-0.9.17-20060728-win32.exe.
It was O.K. with Lazarus-0.9.17-20060703-win32.exe and now it doesn't work
with recent snapshots. I thought that the bug was fixed.
?
Regards,
Zlatko
- Original Message -
From: "Zlatko Matić" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Monday, July 03, 2006 5:11 PM
Subject: Re: [lazarus] problems with SQLdb components and Postgres
Hi!
I downloaded the most recent snapshot (Lazarus-0.9.17-20060703-win32.exe
On Tue, 4 Jul 2006, Alexandre Leclerc wrote:
> 2006/7/4, Marc Weustink <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > Joost van der Sluis wrote:
> >
> > [snip]
> >
> > /me just jumping in, so might probably completely clueless
> >
> > > If you open the table, the postgresql-client will allocate some memory
> > > to sto
On Tue, 4 Jul 2006, Marc Weustink wrote:
> Joost van der Sluis wrote:
> /me just jumping in, so might probably completely clueless
>
> > If you open the table, the postgresql-client will allocate some memory
> > to store the data. That'll be 10+8=18 bytes plus something dependent on
> > it's ow
2006/7/4, Marc Weustink <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Joost van der Sluis wrote:
[snip]
/me just jumping in, so might probably completely clueless
> If you open the table, the postgresql-client will allocate some memory
> to store the data. That'll be 10+8=18 bytes plus something dependent on
> it's ow
Joost van der Sluis wrote:
[snip]
/me just jumping in, so might probably completely clueless
If you open the table, the postgresql-client will allocate some memory
to store the data. That'll be 10+8=18 bytes plus something dependent on
it's own string-data-format.
At the same time TBufDataset
On Mon, 2006-07-03 at 12:16 -0400, Alexandre Leclerc wrote:
> 2006/7/3, Zlatko Matić <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > Hi!
> > I downloaded the most recent snapshot (Lazarus-0.9.17-20060703-win32.exe)
> > this morning and now it finally works! I'm so excited about it, it's great!
> > Finally I can experimen
2006/7/3, Zlatko Matić <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Hi!
I downloaded the most recent snapshot (Lazarus-0.9.17-20060703-win32.exe)
this morning and now it finally works! I'm so excited about it, it's great!
Finally I can experiment with Lazarus as front-end for my PostgreSQL
databases. I'm so happy about
y much.
Zlatko
- Original Message -
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Monday, July 03, 2006 10:23 AM
Subject: Re: [lazarus] problems with SQLdb components and Postgres
Hi Zlatko,
it has nothing to do with the amount of records, but with the amount of
fields. The size for one record.
lem remains! How do you explain that?
>
> Regards,
>
> Zlatko
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Joost van der Sluis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To:
> Sent: Monday, July 03, 2006 1:10 AM
> Subject: Re: [lazarus] problems with SQLdb component
ng_type='OTISCI POVRŠINA';" and now it has only 9
rows. But, the problem remains! How do you explain that?
Regards,
Zlatko
- Original Message - From: "Joost van der Sluis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Monday, July 03, 2006 1:10 AM
Subject: Re: [lazaru
VRŠINA';" and now it has only 9
rows. But, the problem remains! How do you explain that?
Regards,
Zlatko
- Original Message -
From: "Joost van der Sluis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Monday, July 03, 2006 1:10 AM
Subject: Re: [lazarus] problems with SQLdb c
; To:
> Sent: Sunday, July 02, 2006 3:16 PM
> Subject: Re: [lazarus] problems with SQLdb components and Postgres
>
>
> On Saturday 01 July 2006 23:32, Zlatko Matić wrote:
> > Hi!
> >
> > Well, I agree it is a complex query:) But the same happens with very
> > s
Yes, the same happens when using simple sql query such as "select * from
sometable;".
- Original Message -
From: "johnf" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Sunday, July 02, 2006 3:16 PM
Subject: Re: [lazarus] problems with SQLdb components and Postgres
On S
t;
> To:
> Sent: Saturday, July 01, 2006 11:59 PM
> Subject: Re: [lazarus] problems with SQLdb components and Postgres
>
> On Saturday 01 July 2006 11:05, Zlatko Matić wrote:
> > ((results_microbs join batches_microbs on'
> > ' (((results_microbs.bat
n.
Thanks,
Zlatko
P.S. Have you seen screenshots that I sent you directly on your e-mail?
- Original Message -
From: "johnf" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Saturday, July 01, 2006 11:59 PM
Subject: Re: [lazarus] problems with SQLdb components and Postgres
On S
On Saturday 01 July 2006 11:05, Zlatko Matić wrote:
> ((results_microbs join batches_microbs on'
> ' (((results_microbs.batch) ='
> ' (batches_microbs.batch join'
> ' (departments join plants on'
> ' ((departments.department ='
> ' plants.department)
OP TRIGGER audit_public_plants_delete_trigger ON plants;
CREATE TRIGGER audit_public_plants_delete_trigger
AFTER DELETE
ON plants
FOR EACH ROW
EXECUTE PROCEDURE auditor.audit_public_plants_func_delete();
-- Trigger: audit_public_plants_insert_trigger on plants
-- DROP TRIGGER audit_public_pla
Joost van der Sluis wrote:
On Sat, 2006-07-01 at 08:41 +0200, Zlatko Matić wrote:
I downloaded binaries Lazarus-0.9.16-20060528-win32.exe,
Lazarus-0.9.17-20060628-win32.exe, Lazarus-0.9.17-20060630-win32.exe. I
don't know which version of the compiler is included. How can I check it?
All t
t, some test-data and code to show the
problem?
Joost
> - Original Message -
> From: "Joost van der Sluis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To:
> Sent: Friday, June 30, 2006 11:20 PM
> Subject: Re: [lazarus] problems with SQLdb components and Postgres
>
>
&
Why? There were some known bugs in FPC 2.0.2 affecting SqlDb?
Regards,
Zlatko
- Original Message -
From: "Joost van der Sluis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Friday, June 30, 2006 11:20 PM
Subject: Re: [lazarus] problems with SQLdb components and Postgres
On Fri,
t;[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Friday, June 30, 2006 11:20 PM
Subject: Re: [lazarus] problems with SQLdb components and Postgres
On Fri, 2006-06-30 at 18:25 +0200, Zlatko Matić wrote:
I have big problem with displaying results from a query, by using
Postgres 8.1.X, TPQConnection, TSQLQuery a
On Fri, 2006-06-30 at 18:25 +0200, Zlatko Matić wrote:
> I have big problem with displaying results from a query, by using
> Postgres 8.1.X, TPQConnection, TSQLQuery and TSQLTransaction. I think
> that something is very wrong with SqlDB components...Values in some
> columns are not displayed at all
On Friday 30 June 2006 09:25, Zlatko Matić wrote:
> I have big problem with displaying results from a query, by using Postgres
> 8.1.X, TPQConnection, TSQLQuery and TSQLTransaction. I think that something
> is very wrong with SqlDB components...Values in some columns are not
> displayed at all, or
I have big problem with displaying results from a
query, by using Postgres 8.1.X, TPQConnection, TSQLQuery and TSQLTransaction. I
think that something is very wrong with SqlDB components...Values in some
columns are not displayed at all, or are displayed incorrectly (zero insted of
actual nu
29 matches
Mail list logo
