Okay. I got the basic-level kernel compiled. Here's what we have:
-rw-r--r-- 1 wolfstar root 470k Apr 23 16:14 kernel.standard
-rw-r--r-- 1 wolfstar root 404k Apr 23 16:15 kernel.upx
Before we get too excited, I'm stating for the record that there is next
to NOTHING in this k
George:
Sorry for the late reply...
> Time to do some good old-fashioned "market classification" here. We have
> two base-level types of people using LRP:
>
> 1. People who want to have a firewall/router that will let them share IP
> addresses and don't want to spend the money on a comm
Ewald wrote
> KP Kirchd=F6rfer wrote:
>
> > Am Sonntag, 22. April 2001 15:31 schrieb
Ewald Wasscher:
> >
> >> 21-4updated busybox to version 0.51
> >
> >
> > I'm running eigerstein with busybox 0.51
(and replaced most of the POS=
IXness
> > links and other progs with busybox and
tiny
Mike Noyes, 2001-04-19 13:39 -0700
>Scott C. Best, 2001-04-19 11:43 -0700
>>Mike:
>> I'm not so worried about how far "down" they certify
>>as much as how far "up". Certainly, everything downstairs will
>>be LGPL (so mods cannot be taken private, but it can be combined
>>with closed-source
> > Might I add to the TODO-list, to include Seawall?
>
> What does Charles think about that? For most home-users the default
> Eigerstein firewall rules will be sufficient I suppose.
For an updated EigerStein image, the current firewall scripts should remain,
or migrate to something like my exte
On Mon, 23 Apr 2001, Mike Noyes wrote:
> >-rw-r--r-- 1 wolfstar root 527k Apr 22 16:17 bzImage
>
> George,
> I'd be interested in the results of killing ipfwadm only, also. I know it's
> more work, and I'm only curious. So, do what you feel is best. :)
Not much more work, and I'm bless
George:
Hey, thanks for the 411.
> > Based on Tom's last post, I don't think updating
> > echowall for dual support should be that difficult. Unlike
> > other config packages, the main script takes a ruleset
> > and munges it with a .conf file, to produce a 3rd "run
> > file".
>
> T
KP Kirchdörfer wrote:
> Am Sonntag, 22. April 2001 15:31 schrieb Ewald Wasscher:
>
>> 21-4updated busybox to version 0.51
>
>
> I'm running eigerstein with busybox 0.51 (and replaced most of the POSIXness
> links and other progs with busybox and tinylogin), but as long as we see the
> se
Ewald Wasscher, 2001-04-23 20:22 +0200
>Mike Noyes wrote:
>>Interesting. The German text is present on the SF home page again. At
>>least I think it's German.
>
>No, it's Dutch! (which is very similar to German)
Ewald,
Thank you for correcting me. I apologize to all the German and Dutch
members
Mike Noyes wrote:
> Mike Noyes, 2001-04-23 10:36 -0700
>
>> I believe at this time that the SF staff was trying to slipstream an
>> update in. More than one project was affected. I also noticed German
>> text on the rblock of the SF home page shortly after our site started
>> working again. I
On Mon, 23 Apr 2001, Scott C. Best wrote:
> Heya. Just wanted to confirm the 2.4.3 disk images
> available at your site: the disk images do *not* have the
> FTP patch, but the kernel tarball *does*. To get an LRP
> image with the patch, I should dig it out of the second
> tarball and roll i
Mike Noyes, 2001-04-23 10:36 -0700
>I believe at this time that the SF staff was trying to slipstream an
>update in. More than one project was affected. I also noticed German text
>on the rblock of the SF home page shortly after our site started working
>again. It's gone now. Apparently, the ne
Eric Wolzak, 2001-04-23 18:54 +0200
>Site is up again, but during browsing I have a error now and then
>stating that mysql has too many connections. So it could be a
>restricting problem of the database.
>This is one of the disadvantages of dynamically generated pages.
>For every user there are a
> Everyone,
> Our web site is down. I submitted a support request to fix the problem. It
> looks like other projects are experiencing similar problems with their dbases.
Site is up again, but during browsing I have a error now and then
stating that mysql has too many connections. So it could b
Mike Noyes, 2001-04-23 09:42 -0700
>Our web site is down. I submitted a support request to fix the problem. It
>looks like other projects are experiencing similar problems with their dbases.
>
>https://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php? \
>func=detail&aid=418283&group_id=1&atid=21
Everyone,
Everyone,
Our web site is down. I submitted a support request to fix the problem. It
looks like other projects are experiencing similar problems with their dbases.
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php? \
func=detail&aid=418283&group_id=1&atid=21
--
Mike Noyes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
http:/
George Metz, 2001-04-23 06:35 -0400
>Most everyone saw that I was able to get a 474/411K standard/UPX'd kernel
>a few days back. So I went back in, and based on the fact that I'm looking
>to go for two separate kernels - one straight Ethernet Router, one Tinker
>setup - I pulled even MORE Usele
George:
Heya. Just wanted to confirm the 2.4.3 disk images
available at your site: the disk images do *not* have the
FTP patch, but the kernel tarball *does*. To get an LRP
image with the patch, I should dig it out of the second
tarball and roll it into the first. I get that right?
On Sun, Apr 22, 2001 at 10:28:52PM -0700, Steven Peck wrote:
> I was trying it, but interpreting the instrucions was difficult. The
> instructions say run install.sh, I was unable to find that file. So, I
> finnally figured to run rcf --configure and it poped up with a error in the
> 'write' scr
On Sun, 22 Apr 2001, Jean-Sebastien Morisset wrote:
> > BTW, have you received any feedback on your rcf511c4.lrp package? Also,
>
> Nope, not yet. I haven't seen that much enthousiasm for the LRP version of
> rcf. It took quite a few hours to ports all the scripts, so I'm a little
> disappointed.
20 matches
Mail list logo
