On 2/15/02 at 9:58 AM, Michael D. Schleif <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> David Douthitt wrote:
> >
> > On 2/14/02 at 4:36 PM, Michael D. Schleif <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > For example, /var/log is the standard residence of logfiles.
> >
> > Is it? Only in Linux apparently; my Unixware
I finally came to realize what the confusion I was feeling was -
especially in reference to sources that are used IN a base LEAF
system. I had been considering three different methods of creating
packages or binaries:
* Create a directory in the source tree (lrp/) and do a make in this
directory
No I'm not talking about Windows.. :-)
I found something called a SG Cluster, which is a floppy-based load
distributor system based on PicoBSD (a floppy-based BSD distribution
now being released WITH FreeBSD sources - like tinyX is). This floppy
will act as a load director - that is, it hand
Serge Caron wrote:
>
> Hello Matt,
>
> First, the important stuff:
>
> >or any of us lacked passion. That's kind of insulting. And what
>
> Please accept a direct apology from me to you for no other reason than the
> fact that your feelings were hurt.
No problem, my feelings weren't hurt.
At 2002-02-15 15:34 -0800, Matt Schalit wrote:
>That doesn't work. This place is just a central location
>for people to congregate. I don't think it's a top down,
>standards producing enumeration of anything. But that's
>just what I took from Mike Noyes's explanation of what
>LEAF was when I jo
Mike Noyes wrote:
>
> Charles Steinkuehler, 2002-02-15 08:21 -0600
I hate to be a bit lazy, but lacking all the fancy Linux
distro's, I was wondering if somebody could distill the
essential commands needed to grab everything in bulk data
format so that I'd just have a few .tgz files or somethin
"Michael D. Schleif" wrote:
>
> David Douthitt wrote:
[snip]
> > Not only is standardization impossible, but the little variances are
> > what makes a distribution individual and perhaps better than others.
>
> Nothing is impossible.
>
> In fact, your dependent clause, again, is my point! We
Serge Caron wrote:
>
[ snip ]
> I am waiting for a plane and cannot do that right now. I suggest you visit
> http://leaf.sourceforge.net/devel/scaron/leaf.htm with a fresh eye and mess
> around with the discussion.img floppy.
>
> Please take apart root.lrp before you start (just for fun!). If
At 2002-02-15 09:58 -0600, Michael D. Schleif wrote:
>How many times need I state: ``NO, I am not advocating any system of
>commandments and laws, transgression of which invokes the ire of the
>greater community; rather, I believe that it is important -- no,
>critical -- that I, as LEAF user and,
David Douthitt wrote:
>
> On 2/14/02 at 4:36 PM, Michael D. Schleif <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > For example, /var/log is the standard residence of logfiles.
>
> Is it? Only in Linux apparently; my Unixware and HP-UX systems use
> /var/adm/syslog.
I am sorry that you always miss my point
David Douthitt wrote:
>
> On 2/14/02 at 8:05 AM, Michael D. Schleif <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > I know that it is available; but, it is *not* included in
> > DCD -- is it included in Oxygen? I do not argue against
> > its usage; rather, I am often frustrated by lack of real
> > awk, sed a
Correction #2: my bad . . .
"Michael D. Schleif" wrote:
>
> Voilà!
>
> Serge Caron wrote:
> >
> > >Let me reduce my confusion to its firstmost problem: How does your sed
> > >process facilitate ``*I don't backup program binaries*''?
> > >
> > >AFAIK, ${pkg}.list files -- _minus_ ${pkg}.exclude
Correction: my bad . . .
"Michael D. Schleif" wrote:
>
> Voilà!
>
> Serge Caron wrote:
> >
> > >Let me reduce my confusion to its firstmost problem: How does your sed
> > >process facilitate ``*I don't backup program binaries*''?
> > >
> > >AFAIK, ${pkg}.list files -- _minus_ ${pkg}.exclude.li
Charles Steinkuehler, 2002-02-15 08:21 -0600
> > SF provides nightly tarballs of our repository for backup purposes.
> >
> > http://cvs.sourceforge.net/cvstarballs/leaf-cvsroot.tar.gz
>
>I grabbed our CVS tarball yesterday, but have yet to try and make a
>repository out of it. Current size is abo
> SF provides nightly tarballs of our repository for backup purposes.
>
> http://cvs.sourceforge.net/cvstarballs/leaf-cvsroot.tar.gz
I grabbed our CVS tarball yesterday, but have yet to try and make a
repository out of it. Current size is about 35 Meg. I'd prefer to not have
to download this ev
I would just like to thank everyone for this discussion.
Due to limited examples and precise wording designed to
be clear (but somehow let most of the information vague),
I am finally coming into a more complete understanding
of what was originally proposed, and what direction some
developers wou
At 2002-02-15 09:19 +0100, Ewald Wasscher wrote:
>Charles Steinkuehler wrote:
>>
>>- Look into mirroring our CVS content, downloads directory, and SF
>>"meta-data"
>Last time I checked I didn't have normal shell access to the cvs server.
>So unless SF cooperates it will be hard to backup the repo
Charles Steinkuehler wrote:
>
>- Look into mirroring our CVS content, downloads directory, and SF
>"meta-data"
>
Last time I checked I didn't have normal shell access to the cvs server.
So unless SF cooperates it will be hard to backup the repository. It
seems CVSup would be perfect for this, b
18 matches
Mail list logo
