On Tue, 12 Mar 2002, David Douthitt wrote:
> On 3/12/02 at 6:56 AM, Jeff Newmiller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>
> > On Mon, 11 Mar 2002, David Douthitt wrote:
>
> > > Not really May I recommend:
> >
> > If you _are_ going to make a script, all sorts of options
> > are available. As I sa
On 3/12/02 at 9:15 AM, Charles Steinkuehler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> And a big disadvantage...it's a lot for someone to type
> in, creating even more questions along the lines of "did
> they type in the script correctly?".
I was speaking from the standpoint of finally getting a script writte
On 3/12/02 at 6:56 AM, Jeff Newmiller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> On Mon, 11 Mar 2002, David Douthitt wrote:
> > Not really May I recommend:
>
> If you _are_ going to make a script, all sorts of options
> are available. As I said before, the problem is that it
> will have to be made easy
On 3/12/02 at 7:31 AM, Ray Olszewski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 1. Is incorporating a "diagnostics" script in into each
> LEAF distribution a good idea?
I think so.
> But ... the FAQ mentions optional information, to be
> supplied if circumstances warrant; how does one sensibly
> incorporate
In appreciation of all of your outstanding work, I am contributing a
minor, but hopefully helpful addition to the LEAF collections. These
are conglomerations of your good lrp's along with some documentation to
tie it all together for two things:
1- Wireless Leaf Cookbook, based on Dachstein and
On Tue, 12 Mar 2002, Ray Olszewski wrote:
> 1. Is incorporating a "diagnostics" script in into each LEAF distribution a
> good idea? Probably (as long as it doesn't get so big as to cause problems
> with fitting on a floppy).
If we were going with a method that provides a separate disk image for
Support Requests item #529085, was opened at 2002-03-12 11:46
You can respond by visiting:
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=213751&aid=529085&group_id=13751
Category: Release/Branch: Dachstein
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Nobody/Anonymous (n
Am Dienstag, 12. März 2002 18:26 schrieb Mike Noyes:
> At 2002-03-12 17:51 +0100, KP Kirchdörfer wrote:
> >packages - for packages usable with glibc 2.0.x and glibc 2.1.3
> >packages-glibc 2.1.3 for packages compiled with glibc 2.1.3 (due
> > to various reasons).
>
> KP,
> Creation of a packages t
At 2002-03-12 09:48 -0800, Jeff Newmiller wrote:
>On Tue, 12 Mar 2002, Mike Noyes wrote:
>[...]
> > Questions:
> > How can I determine the lib used in package creation? Do we need
> > separate trees for lib versions?
>
>untested ... but something like
>
> md ${package}
> cd ${package}
> gunz
On Tue, 12 Mar 2002, Mike Noyes wrote:
[...]
> Questions:
> How can I determine the lib used in package creation? Do we need separate
> trees for lib versions?
untested ... but something like
md ${package}
cd ${package}
gunzip ${packagelrppath}
ldd `ls bin/* sbin/* usr/bin usr/sbin us
At 2002-03-12 17:51 +0100, KP Kirchdörfer wrote:
>packages - for packages usable with glibc 2.0.x and glibc 2.1.3
>packages-glibc 2.1.3 for packages compiled with glibc 2.1.3 (due to
>various reasons).
KP,
Creation of a packages tree in bin is on my to-do list. I already have a
list of packages
A quick comment:
> 1. Is incorporating a "diagnostics" script in into each LEAF
> distribution a good idea? Probably (as long as it doesn't get
> so big as to cause problems with fitting on a floppy).
This is a good idea. We could ask for users to post
*at a minumum* the results
Am Dienstag, 12. März 2002 15:34 schrieb Mike Noyes:
> At 2002-03-11 22:37 -0600, David Douthitt wrote:
> >On 3/11/02 at 10:42 PM, Manfred Schuler
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >
> >wrote:
> > > Today I received this security announcements.
> > > If you think, it is not necessary to forward this messa
On Tue, 12 Mar 2002, Charles Steinkuehler wrote:
[...]
> Create a diagnostic disk image. The idea here would be to put everything
> needed onto a disk image (which presumably even the greenest user can deal
> with, or they wouldn't be having configuration problems :-). There would be
> a fairl
Having followed the discussion about the use of scripts to collect
diagnostic information, I think we are muddling two distinct questions.
1. Is incorporating a "diagnostics" script in into each LEAF distribution a
good idea? Probably (as long as it doesn't get so big as to cause problems
with fi
> Not really May I recommend:
>
> ( echo "Messages log\n"
> ) > /tmp/sysdata.txt
>
> This has several advantages:
>
> 1. Single file at the end for details - /tmp/sysdata.txt - just attach
> and mail. If you use "matt" (new package to attach files to mail!)
> you can even mail it right from
On Mon, 11 Mar 2002, David Douthitt wrote:
> On 3/11/02 at 1:46 AM, Matt Schalit <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > guitarlynn wrote:
>
> > The section below needs a little more work. The syntax shown
> > will overwrite forward.txt.
> >
> > cp /var/log/messages /mnt/messages.txt
> > ip addr sho
At 2002-03-11 22:37 -0600, David Douthitt wrote:
>On 3/11/02 at 10:42 PM, Manfred Schuler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>wrote:
>
> > Today I received this security announcements.
> > If you think, it is not necessary to forward this message
> > to the list, please tell me.
>
>Should we (as distribution cre
18 matches
Mail list logo
