Jeff, all of your comments check out with mine, except this one:
>In our case, the final product would probably be a generic 486, but I
>don't see support for that.
486 platforms are NOT supported.
We have to evolve a little :(
"This reads on manual page 46: This LSP was built for 586 processo
On Tue, 26 Jun 2001, Luis.F.Correia wrote:
> >> > I've also downloaded the CD's, but it seems that something is wrong
> with
> >> > CD1...
> >> >
> >> > It should boot, but I get nothing.
> >>
> >> Hmm...I just tried booting mine and I get a lilo prompt...
>
> >I have a 1.2 and 2.0(2disks), and
No. Don't bother Mike.
Really, as I continue to read the pdf, I reckon that we
should go in the cross-compiling direction.
Why boot and install a target if you haven't decide what
packages will ou put there?
I will investigate further on.
I have had little experience with a full-distro but Red
Luis.F.Correia, 2001-06-26 12:22 +0100
>Mike,
>
>If you read the manual, HHL-JE-20.PDF, Chapter3 on page 19,
>"Installing HHL 2.0 on an IA-32/x86 Target for a Source-
>base Installation"
>
>Right on the Overview chapter you can read:
>"The HHL 2.0 CDs for IA-32/x86 targets are bootable, and may be
Mike,
If you read the manual, HHL-JE-20.PDF, Chapter3 on page 19,
"Installing HHL 2.0 on an IA-32/x86 Target for a Source-
base Installation"
Right on the Overview chapter you can read:
"The HHL 2.0 CDs for IA-32/x86 targets are bootable, and may be booted
directly on a target whose BIOS provid
Luis.F.Correia, 2001-06-26 09:30 +0100
> >> > I've also downloaded the CD's, but it seems that something is wrong
> >> > with CD1...
> >> >
> >> > It should boot, but I get nothing.
> >>
> >> Hmm...I just tried booting mine and I get a lilo prompt...
>
> >I have a 1.2 and 2.0(2disks), and the form
>> > I've also downloaded the CD's, but it seems that something is wrong
with
>> > CD1...
>> >
>> > It should boot, but I get nothing.
>>
>> Hmm...I just tried booting mine and I get a lilo prompt...
>I have a 1.2 and 2.0(2disks), and the former will boot (target mode) while
>the latter will not
On Thu, 21 Jun 2001, Charles Steinkuehler wrote:
> > I've also downloaded the CD's, but it seems that something is wrong with
> > CD1...
> >
> > It should boot, but I get nothing.
>
> Hmm...I just tried booting mine and I get a lilo prompt...
I have a 1.2 and 2.0(2disks), and the former will bo
Luis.F.Correia, 2001-06-22 09:12 +0100
>I'm sorry... (again) I should have RTFM'd
>
>The Journeyman is a development system as Jeff says.
>
>But, I should boot under a x86 system, maybe as hdc s Charles suggested.
>
>Anyway, after trying on several machines here @ work yesterday, I came
>to th
ummer is up and
the beach call is strong here :)
I'll post my results here.
-Original Message-
From: Charles Steinkuehler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, June 21, 2001 8:42 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Leaf-devel] Hard-Hat
> I've also downloaded the CD&#x
> I've also downloaded the CD's, but it seems that something is wrong with
> CD1...
>
> It should boot, but I get nothing.
Hmm...I just tried booting mine and I get a lilo prompt...
> Opening the same CD and extracting the bootflop.img which is under the
> bootimg directory, and put it on a flop
:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, June 21, 2001 5:55 PM
> To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
> Subject: RE: [Leaf-devel] Hard-Hat
>
>
> Hi,
>
> I've also downloaded the CD's, but it seems that something is wrong with
> CD1...
>
> It should boot, but
RE: [Leaf-devel] Hard-Hat
Hi,
I've also downloaded the CD's, but it seems that something is wrong with
CD1...
It should boot, but I get nothing.
Opening the same CD and extracting the bootflop.img which is under the
bootimg directory, and put it on a floppy, still does not boot.
A
Hi,
I've also downloaded the CD's, but it seems that something is wrong with
CD1...
It should boot, but I get nothing.
Opening the same CD and extracting the bootflop.img which is under the
bootimg directory, and put it on a floppy, still does not boot.
Any pointers?
Thanks
-Original M
> this works for mounting cdrom images w/o the cdrom.
>
> mount -t iso9660 /home/cdimage.iso /mnt -o loop
Using the -o loop option with mount is the much preferred way to mount ISO
(or floppy, or other raw filesystem) images, as you don't have to manually
create the loopback mount point, and reme
this works for mounting cdrom images w/o the cdrom.
mount -t iso9660 /home/cdimage.iso /mnt -o loop
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Jonathan
French
Sent: Tuesday, June 19, 2001 11:45 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Leaf-devel
5:45 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Leaf-devel] Hard-Hat
> Hmm...I forget not everyone has a CD rom burner yet. Perhaps a qualifer
for
> any disto should be the ability to mirror the CD and/or sell copies at
> minimal cost...
Hmmm. Okay, nutty idea. If an ISO image contai
On Tuesday 19 June 2001 09:44 am, you wrote:
>
> I don't suppose
> mount -t iso9600 /home/some_iso_image.iso /mnt
> would work...
>
No, but this will:
losetup /home/some_iso_image.iso
mount -t iso9660 /dev/loop0 /mnt
-Tom
--
Tom Eastep \ [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ICQ #60745924\ http
> Hmm...I forget not everyone has a CD rom burner yet. Perhaps a qualifer for
> any disto should be the ability to mirror the CD and/or sell copies at
> minimal cost...
Hmmm. Okay, nutty idea. If an ISO image contains the entire CDROM
filesystem, shouldn't there be a way (perhaps not written
At 05:57 PM 6/18/01 -0500, Charles Steinkuehler wrote:
>> ...If we could refer
>> people to a version that was readily available to people who do not have
>> their own CD burners, I agree that it would address a lot of the issues we
>> wrestle with.
>
>Hmm...I forget not everyone has a CD rom bur
> At 05:21 PM 6/18/01 -0500, Charles Steinkuehler wrote:
> >I just got a call from the Monta-Vista folks (makers of Hard-Hat).
> >
> >I wanted to get their reaction to our possible use of the HardHat
platform
> >as a cross-compile environment, and what sort of comittment they have to
> >keeping a
At 05:21 PM 6/18/01 -0500, Charles Steinkuehler wrote:
>I just got a call from the Monta-Vista folks (makers of Hard-Hat).
>
>I wanted to get their reaction to our possible use of the HardHat platform
>as a cross-compile environment, and what sort of comittment they have to
>keeping a free version
22 matches
Mail list logo
