On Mon, 2004-07-05 at 14:14, Eric Wolzak wrote:
> sorry for being so quiet for so long, my new job is takeing lots of energy
> and
> time. ( but positiv stress :) )
Eric,
Do you still have time for Bering? If not, would you like to find
someone to pass the branch lead to?
--
Mike Noyes
http:
Mike
At 20:18 13.07.2004, Mike Noyes wrote:
On Tue, 2004-07-13 at 10:14, Erich Titl wrote:
> At 15:51 13.07.2004, Mike Noyes wrote:
> >Lua and uClibc are available. Lua was even packaged and used by David
> >Douthitt in Oxygen.
>
> actually lua sounds quite interesting, looks pretty small, it could
On Tue, 2004-07-13 at 10:14, Erich Titl wrote:
> At 15:51 13.07.2004, Mike Noyes wrote:
> >Lua and uClibc are available. Lua was even packaged and used by David
> >Douthitt in Oxygen.
>
> actually lua sounds quite interesting, looks pretty small, it could open
> new horizons. Does anyone know if
Mike
At 15:51 13.07.2004, Mike Noyes wrote:
On Mon, 2004-07-12 at 21:32, Chad Carr wrote:
> On Mon, 2004-07-12 at 09:54, Mike Noyes wrote:
> The problem is, basically, that the existing tools I know of are written
> in perl or C++, both of which are too large for our purposes.
Chad,
Lua and uClibc
On Mon, 2004-07-12 at 21:32, Chad Carr wrote:
> On Mon, 2004-07-12 at 09:54, Mike Noyes wrote:
> The problem is, basically, that the existing tools I know of are written
> in perl or C++, both of which are too large for our purposes.
Chad,
Lua and uClibc are available. Lua was even packaged and us
On Mon, 2004-07-12 at 09:54, Mike Noyes wrote:
> On Tue, 2004-07-06 at 13:53, Eric Wolzak wrote:
> > It seems the discussion starts again :)
>
> Eric,
> Yes. :-)
Yes. We have a lot to talk about. I have begun coding again. We
should talk before things get out of hand... ;-)
> > Did anybody t
On Tue, 2004-07-06 at 13:53, Eric Wolzak wrote:
> It seems the discussion starts again :)
Eric,
Yes. :-)
> Did anybody try out the weblet.lrp / cdb.lrp which is a working demo of parts
> of the webconfiguation
> www.leafinfo.com/webconfig
I took a look at it, but didn't do any testing.
> I a
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Chad Carr
> Sent: Tuesday, July 06, 2004 10:41 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED];
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [leaf-devel] Source: config
>
>
> On Jul 5, 2004, at 9:58 PM, S Mohan wrote:
>
.
Warm regards
Mohan
> -Original Message-
> From: Chad Carr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, July 06, 2004 10:48 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [leaf-devel] Source: config
>
>
> On Jul 5, 2004, at 9:14 PM, S Mohan wrote:
> > 3. As par
On Jul 5, 2004, at 9:58 PM, S Mohan wrote:
Chad and list,
Are the triggers asynchronous or synchronous? I imagine triggers can
be used
for semantic validation across packages and take appropriate
decisions. If
it does come to an irresolvable state, then errors have to be directed
back
to the ini
codes passed by called programs via triggers.
Hope I have been lucid enough.
Regards
Mohan
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Chad Carr
> Sent: Tuesday, July 06, 2004 2:22 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [
ginal Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Chad Carr
> Sent: Tuesday, July 06, 2004 3:13 AM
> To: Ray Olszewski
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [leaf-devel] Source: config
>
>
> On Jul 5, 2004, at 2:19 PM, Ray Olszewski w
On Mon, 2004-07-05 at 14:41, Nathan Angelacos wrote:
> It works as an "advanced home router" for the web case. I'm not at
> liberty to give the whole web thing away, but if anyone is interested
> I could peel off a few cgi's as a demo.
Nathan,
Are you willing to donate your snippet(s) of code t
On Jul 5, 2004, at 2:19 PM, Ray Olszewski wrote:
Some discussion of this might be profitable.
I think so, too. Shall we start?
I really do think we can work through this, I do. We just need to talk
it through.
We should probably start up a task force of some kind consisting at
least one each
--- Ray Olszewski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Actually no. I meant people other than Erich who are either upstream
> developers (e.g., Tom) or packagers (e.g., Charles). That is, the
sorts of
> people who will actually have to use, or to ignore (as they have up
to now,
> saving the oc
IL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [leaf-devel] Source: config
Date sent: Mon, 5 Jul 2004 14:15:39 -0700 (Pacific Daylight Time)
> On Mon, 5 Jul 2004, Ray Olszewski wrote:
>
> >
> > The really really hard parts -- e.g., the structure of the Shorewall
> > s
At 10:24 PM 7/5/2004 +0200, Erich Titl wrote:
[...]
I'm not dead set on this ... I'm happy to listen to an argument for doing
it the other way ... but I don't see the case for doing it the way you
propose to be so obvious that it doesn't require an explanation.
What motivates me to propose my ap
On Mon, 5 Jul 2004, Ray Olszewski wrote:
>
> The really really hard parts -- e.g., the structure of the Shorewall
> subsection -- are not yet done. Or at least I hope not ... this area lacks
> very basic details, such as a way to specify port forwarding/DNAT.
>
Here are some random thoughts.
I d
Hello List,
sorry for being so quiet for so long, my new job is takeing lots of energy and
time. ( but positiv stress :) )
I just uploaded the work in progress on the cdb.lrp and weblet.lrp on my server
at http://www.leafinfo.com/webconfig/
I played a lot with the webbased configuration, and
On Jul 5, 2004, at 1:24 PM, Erich Titl wrote:
Your analysis is convincing, especially as it covers the most
important part of getting the system configured the way the user wants
it.
My suggestion to allow the inverse way was wrong in the way it was
formulated. I would actually love if the UI sh
On Jul 5, 2004, at 12:17 PM, Ray Olszewski wrote:
At 10:30 AM 7/5/2004 -0700, Chad Carr wrote:
On Jul 5, 2004, at 9:47 AM, Ray Olszewski wrote:
Erich -- I'll be a bit happier when this discussion starts to
attract comments from someone other than the two of us (and Mike).
Until then, a couple of
Ray and List
At 18:47 05.07.2004, Ray Olszewski wrote:
Erich -- I'll be a bit happier when this discussion starts to attract
comments from someone other than the two of us (and Mike). Until then, a
couple of small responses to what you wrote.
(After I wrote this, I got Mike's mail forwarding Cha
On Mon, 2004-07-05 at 12:17, Ray Olszewski wrote:
> Probably some of this was discussed a year ago, though I didn't find that
> discussion today when I looked.
Ray,
Unfortunately, much of the discussion was held in off list messages and
irc, so the content isn't available. :-(
> BTW, I'd still l
On Mon, 2004-07-05 at 11:36, Etienne Charlier wrote:
> I'm really glad that this thread started up!
>
> I can help modifying package to take care of the reading config values
> from the repository !!
Etienne,
Would you like write access to src/config in cvs?
--
Mike Noyes
http://sourceforge.n
At 10:30 AM 7/5/2004 -0700, Chad Carr wrote:
On Jul 5, 2004, at 9:47 AM, Ray Olszewski wrote:
Erich -- I'll be a bit happier when this discussion starts to attract
comments from someone other than the two of us (and Mike). Until then, a
couple of small responses to what you wrote.
I guess you pro
ation to such a system
Regards
Etienne
- Original Message -
From: "Chad Carr" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, July 05, 2004 7:30 PM
Subject: Re: [leaf-devel] Source: config
>
> On Jul 5, 2004, at 9:47 AM, Ray Olszewski wrote:
>
>
On Jul 5, 2004, at 9:47 AM, Ray Olszewski wrote:
Erich -- I'll be a bit happier when this discussion starts to attract
comments from someone other than the two of us (and Mike). Until then,
a couple of small responses to what you wrote.
I guess you probably meant myself, Lynn or Eric, hmm?
(After
Erich -- I'll be a bit happier when this discussion starts to attract
comments from someone other than the two of us (and Mike). Until then, a
couple of small responses to what you wrote.
(After I wrote this, I got Mike's mail forwarding Chad's messages. At this
point, they don't change my thin
Hi Ray and List
At 07:50 05.07.2004 -0700, Ray Olszewski wrote:
>At 08:36 AM 7/5/2004 +0200, Erich Titl wrote:
>>Mike
>...
>After Mike posted the request yesterday, I took a look at this sub-project too. I
>read it, and its limitations, exactly as you do, Erich. It's designed not to solve
>the
At 08:36 AM 7/5/2004 +0200, Erich Titl wrote:
Mike
At 10:17 04.07.2004 -0700, Mike Noyes wrote:
>Everyone,
>I'd like us to complete the work Chad Carr started on the leaf config
>system. This is one of the main deficiencies I feel we have presently.
>lrcfg isn't viable as a sole option anymore. Cha
On Sun, 2004-07-04 at 23:36, Erich Titl wrote:
> At 10:17 04.07.2004 -0700, Mike Noyes wrote:
> >I'd like us to complete the work Chad Carr started on the leaf config
> >system. This is one of the main deficiencies I feel we have presently.
> >lrcfg isn't viable as a sole option anymore. Chad's sys
Mike
At 10:17 04.07.2004 -0700, Mike Noyes wrote:
>Everyone,
>I'd like us to complete the work Chad Carr started on the leaf config
>system. This is one of the main deficiencies I feel we have presently.
>lrcfg isn't viable as a sole option anymore. Chad's system allows for
>multiple front-end sup
32 matches
Mail list logo
