Martin Hejl wrote:
>Hi Joep,
>
>
>
>>perhaps be better to use bzip2 which is very efficient but a little
>>trial turned out that gzip -9 gives a better compression than bzip2 -9.
>>
>>
>The results of bzip compression depend highly on the input - sometimes
>it's a lot better than gzip, some
Hi Joep,
> perhaps be better to use bzip2 which is very efficient but a little
> trial turned out that gzip -9 gives a better compression than bzip2 -9.
The results of bzip compression depend highly on the input - sometimes
it's a lot better than gzip, sometimes it fails big time. There's no
gene
Martin Hejl wrote:
>Hi Joep,
>
>Joep Blom wrote:
>
>
>>Do you have any idea about the difference in size:
>>modules.lrp 118954 (from mounted .bin file)
>>My modules.lrp 123018
>>Using tar -c *| gzip -9 > ../package.lrp : size 123007
>>
>>
>Ok, so you're comparing gnu
Hi Joep,
Joep Blom wrote:
> Do you have any idea about the difference in size:
> modules.lrp 118954 (from mounted .bin file)
> My modules.lrp 123018
> Using tar -c *| gzip -9 > ../package.lrp : size 123007
Ok, so you're comparing gnu gzip with busybox gzip, right? (lrp fro
Martin Hejl wrote:
>Martin Hejl wrote:
>
>
>>I doubt it, since (unless I'm totally off) the "package/" prefix would
>>be part of the pathname in the archive (check the contents of the
>>package with "tar xvft package.lrp" - you will most likely see
>>"package/lib/" and "package/etc/" instead of
Martin Hejl wrote:
> I doubt it, since (unless I'm totally off) the "package/" prefix would
> be part of the pathname in the archive (check the contents of the
> package with "tar xvft package.lrp" - you will most likely see
> "package/lib/" and "package/etc/" instead of "lib/" and "etc/")
oops, ma
Hi Joep
> Hi,
> I have 2 small questions.
> 1 In the manual on chapter development under "Building a LEAF package
> from the compiled source the following commands are advised for creating
> an LRP-package:
> tar -c * | gzip -9 > package.lrp
> However when following this advice in a directory con
Hi,
I have 2 small questions.
1 In the manual on chapter development under "Building a LEAF package
from the compiled source the following commands are advised for creating
an LRP-package:
tar -c * | gzip -9 > package.lrp
However when following this advice in a directory containing the
directori
Thank you, Peter. I will watch for that in the future.
Dale Mirenda
On Oct 18, 2004, at 10:21 AM, Peter Mueller wrote:
Glad its working!! But let's go back to your ifconfig:
eth0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:10:4B:2C:90:9C
inet addr:64.113.213.14 Bcast:64.113.213.15
Mask:255.25
> The replacement for the suspect FlowPoint 2200 DSL router
> arrived today
> from the ISP (an Efficient Networks 5851). I plugged it into the
> network sans the "crutch" switch between the two routers, and
> it worked
> like a charm. Hypothesis becomes history.
Glad its working!! But let's
On Oct 14, 2004, at 8:13 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So the idea that different gear may be stronger or more tolerant is
not
off-the-wall at all.
Thanks for letting us know how it all turned out.
scott; canada
Thanks for the validation, Scott. I'm staying here another day in Boise
because the I
> So the idea that different gear may be stronger or more tolerant is not
> off-the-wall at all.
>
> Thanks for letting us know how it all turned out.
>
> scott; canada
>
Thanks for the validation, Scott. I'm staying here another day in Boise
because the ISP is sending a replacement DSL router (to
> Dale,
>
> If I am understanding correctly, you've confirmed:
>
> 1. The Win98 box doesn't drop packets ever (ie. their equipment works)
> 2. Your equipment works (connected the laptop to the DachBox via a
> crossover cable and dropped no
> packets from the laptop to the LEAF router or from the
About your 'strongest' comment...
This is by no means far-fetched, IMO. We're all probably more accustomed
to hardware being either working or non-working and are infrequently
confronted with a situation of degradation or 'dying' gear.
A story from my past:
I was working in telecom - PC-based
Dale,
If I am understanding correctly, you've confirmed:
1. The Win98 box doesn't drop packets ever (ie. their equipment works)
2. Your equipment works (connected the laptop to the DachBox via a
crossover cable and dropped no
packets from the laptop to the LEAF router or from the LEAF router to
> The bottom line to all of the above is that I'm more stumped
> than ever and
> don't know what to do next. I suppose I'll try to replace the
> eth0 NIC in
> the DachBox2 to try to eliminate the double fault
> possibility. I actually
> tried to do that earlier today as well, but neither of the
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>> If possible, I'm more open than ever to any suggestion.
>
> You mentioned the DSL modem has a 4-port switch on it. Are you using the
> same port for testing all machines (ie: 'doze box, firewall, and laptop)?
>
> You problem still smells like bad infrastructure (ie:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If possible, I'm more open than ever to any suggestion.
You mentioned the DSL modem has a 4-port switch on it. Are you using the
same port for testing all machines (ie: 'doze box, firewall, and laptop)?
You problem still smells like bad infrastructure (ie: cable or port)
> Charles Steinkuehler wrote:
>
>> Thinking about this some more, I'm beginning to suspect the DSL line.
>
> If I may, would this possibility not have been obviated when Dale
> connected a Win98 box to the line and had no loss in pings?
>
Thank you, Scott. I've downloaded the software and I'll giv
Charles Steinkuehler wrote:
Thinking about this some more, I'm beginning to suspect the DSL line.
If I may, would this possibility not have been obviated when Dale
connected a Win98 box to the line and had no loss in pings?
But taking that bad-copper theory further I'll make mention of the value
Dale Mirenda wrote:
Random thought: One thing to check for might be running out of
masquerade ports. This can happen if you have a lot of local activity
getting masqueraded (how many users are at this facility?):
One fileserver, a switch, five desktops (only three users), two
networked printe
On Oct 12, 2004, at 12:37 PM, Charles Steinkuehler wrote:
There are a couple of snmp packages on the Dachstein CD:
snmp - cmu snmp Ver:3.6b7
netsnmpd - net-snmp (aka ucd-snmp) from Andrew Hoying (repackaged)
The cmu snmp is older, and I think both packages have known issues,
but I only allow acce
Dale Mirenda wrote:
- Have you been using anything like MRTG to monitor bandwidth usage
via snmp? The traffic graphs can often quickly tell you where to
start looking for problems (ie: inbound traffic is pegged...go find
the rouge kazza user and get them to "play nice"; outbound traffic
pegge
Thank you, Charles. I've addressed your questions to the measure of my
ability below:
On Oct 12, 2004, at 7:59 AM, Charles Steinkuehler wrote:
Dale Mirenda wrote:
On Oct 11, 2004, at 10:31 AM, Peter Mueller wrote:
I can do that on the one in Seattle, and on the remote router when I
get to Boise,
Dale Mirenda wrote:
On Oct 11, 2004, at 10:31 AM, Peter Mueller wrote:
I can do that on the one in Seattle, and on the remote router when I
get to Boise, Erich. I'll read up on tcpdump (never used it
before) and
give it a go. Thanks for the idea; I'm getting lots of input
on tools
I've never had to
On Oct 11, 2004, at 10:31 AM, Peter Mueller wrote:
I can do that on the one in Seattle, and on the remote router when I
get to Boise, Erich. I'll read up on tcpdump (never used it
before) and
give it a go. Thanks for the idea; I'm getting lots of input
on tools
I've never had to think about before,
> I can do that on the one in Seattle, and on the remote router when I
> get to Boise, Erich. I'll read up on tcpdump (never used it
> before) and
> give it a go. Thanks for the idea; I'm getting lots of input
> on tools
> I've never had to think about before, and that is why I came to this
I can do that on the one in Seattle, and on the remote router when I
get to Boise, Erich. I'll read up on tcpdump (never used it before) and
give it a go. Thanks for the idea; I'm getting lots of input on tools
I've never had to think about before, and that is why I came to this
forum for h
Dale
can you install tcpdump on those Bering boxes and monitor the traffic on
their interfaces. You might see what happens when you try to connect.
Erich
THINK
Püntenstrasse 39
8143 Stallikon
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
PGP Fingerprint: BC9A 25BC 3954 3BC8 C024 8D8A B7D4 FF9D 05B8 0A16
On Oct 10, 2004, at 11:10 AM, Lynn Avants wrote:
An 'ipsec barf' will give you virtually every detail concerning the
VPN authentication and connection process.
Probably the first test I'll run when I'm at the Boise console.
Assuming you are
running both ends for subnet sharing, you will not be able
On Oct 10, 2004, at 2:36 AM, Erich Titl wrote:
M are 80 ms fine for you? Is this your normal service?
Yes, it is, Erich. The Seattle to Portland link enjoyed a latency of
about 25 ms, much nicer for internet backups and so on, but that was
though a major carrier with a latency guarantee a
Dale -- This is a tough one to pin down. So far, you've been doing the
right things, and your approach is about as systematic as mine would have
been in the same place. So these comments are best read as things for you
to look into when you are in Boise and can access the router either through
I've been using a set of identical Dachstein CD v.1.0.2 routers
(2.2.19-3-LEAF-RAID) with ipsec VPN to link three small offices for
several years. They have run literally flawlessly in all that time, and
I've never had a problem from intrusion from the internet or virus
attack from the private
Hi Sebastian,
i'm using uClibc on RedHat9 and it's work.
regards
Felix
__
Gesendet von Yahoo! Mail - http://mail.yahoo.de
Logos und Klingeltöne fürs Handy bei http://sms.yahoo.de
-
On Tue, 2003-12-02 at 09:18, Sebastian A. Aresca wrote:
> Hi ... only want to know wich distribution must i used to compile program to
> work
> on bering 1.2 kernel 2.4.20.
> The problem is with the library (of course). In the development page tell
> something to
> user redhat 5 or debian slink but
Hi ... only want to know wich distribution must i used to compile program to
work
on bering 1.2 kernel 2.4.20.
The problem is with the library (of course). In the development page tell
something to
user redhat 5 or debian slink but this is for kernel 2.4.18. So wich must i
use?
thanks in advance.
Kevin Kato wrote:
i uncommented to INTERN_WWW_SERVER and added the private ip numbers for the
server but port 80 is closed on eigerstein box. when i nmap the eigerstein
box, http is not listed at all. i'm lost...here!
Please keep the leaf-user list in the reply-to.
You have to make sure you all
kevin wrote:
a little background information:
i am in the process of configuring and running a linux apache http
webserver from my house and i had a few questions concerning my LRP.
(eigerstein, basic configuration) the web server will host my web pages
for public viewing for now, and i will i
a little background information:
i am in the process of configuring and running a linux apache http
webserver from my house and i had a few questions concerning my LRP.
(eigerstein, basic configuration) the web server will host my web pages
for public viewing for now, and i will install a ftp
Hi Dominik
On Tue, 22 Jul 2003 06:01:42 +0200, Dominik Strnad
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hello I am using Bearing 1.2, booting from flash.
That's Bering, not Bearing. Sorry for being picky : )
I add few *.lrp packages to be loaded. Last one - and doesn't matter
which -
its everytime the last
Lu.
From: "Dominik Strnad" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: [leaf-user] *.lrp(nf!) - when packages are loaded
Date: Tue, 22 Jul 2003 06:01:42 +0200
Hello I am using Bearing 1.2, booting from flash.
I add few *.lrp packages to be loaded. Last one - and doesn
Hello I am using Bearing 1.2, booting from flash.
I add few *.lrp packages to be loaded. Last one - and doesn't matter which -
its everytime the last one, is shown with (nf!) mark and it isn't loaded to
the system.
I thought that this was due to small syst_size so I extend it in
syslinux.cfg:
di
Am 21:39 2003-06-23 +0200 hat K.-P. Kirchdörfer geschrieben:
>The main argument was that Dave misused a "technical and project" site
for a
>political statement - the comment itself has been treated more
carefully in
>terms of "free speach" - very american - I appreciated that.
>
>Unfortunately t
> > political statement - the comment itself has been treated more
> carefully in
> > terms of "free speach" - very american - I appreciated that.
>
> pn] Hey, I'm all for freedom of speech. He had every right to do
> what he did on his domain. With
> that freedom comes responsibility and ac
On Mon, 2003-06-23 at 10:47, Mike Noyes wrote:
> On Mon, 2003-06-23 at 10:19, Lee wrote:
> > Dave Cinege has written some comments at http://www.linuxrouter.org
> >
> > Just a heads up.
>
> For those that wish to chat about this:
>
> confrence.jabber.org
> Room: leaf
Everyone,
Jabber
> Dave has also replied on Slashdot-comments under the name 'Diesel_Dave'.
> I made a reply to his post where the comments pertain to LEAF.
Yep. Very good, and well-needed responses. And I just happened to have
mod points. I think it's up to +3 now. It's too bad it's so far down the
page, thou
Am Montag, 23. Juni 2003 21:36 schrieb Peter Nosko:
> --- "K.-P. Kirchdörfer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Guess Peter referred to the day the death penalty for the man who was
> > found guilty for the bombing in Oklahoma City has been executed.
> > On that day the web page for linuxrouter.org ow
On Monday 23 June 2003 12:19 pm, Lee wrote:
> Dave Cinege has written some comments at http://www.linuxrouter.org
Dave has also replied on Slashdot-comments under the name 'Diesel_Dave'.
I made a reply to his post where the comments pertain to LEAF.
http://developers.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=
--- "K.-P. Kirchdörfer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Guess Peter referred to the day the death penalty for the man who was found
> guilty for the bombing in Oklahoma City has been executed.
> On that day the web page for linuxrouter.org owned by Dave Cinege had been
> blacked and a questionable c
On Mon, 2003-06-23 at 12:39, K.-P. Kirchdörfer wrote:
> Unfortunately the archives of LRP aren't accessible anymore.
Message from Dave C. stating the linuxrouter.org site would be down on
the 11th.
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-router&m=99217136117457&w=2
Threads on the 11th and 12th.
htt
t; Could you let us know a little bit more?
>
> Thanks.
>
> M Lu.
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Peter Nosko" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "leaf" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Monday, June 23, 2003 11:05 AM
> Subject: RE: [leaf-user]
On Mon, 2003-06-23 at 11:34, M Lu wrote:
> I joined this mailing list quite late and do not know about those things.
> Could you let us know a little bit more?
Everyone,
Here is a short history:
Date: 2000-05-22
First draft of the "Troubleshooting Request HOWTO" is posted on the
linux-router mail
ne 23, 2003 11:05 AM
Subject: RE: [leaf-user] LRP
> pn] I think June 11, 2001 had more to do with LRP's fade into oblivion
than anything else. Funny
> that he didn't acknowledge that in his comments...
>
> --- Matt Russell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > i'l
pn] I think June 11, 2001 had more to do with LRP's fade into oblivion than anything
else. Funny
that he didn't acknowledge that in his comments...
--- Matt Russell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> i'll say he had some things to say. makes me almost feel bad for using it
> without paying a red cent
i'll say he had some things to say. makes me almost feel bad for using it
without paying a red cent..
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Lee
Sent: Monday, June 23, 2003 11:19 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [leaf-user] LRP
Dave Cineg
On Mon, 2003-06-23 at 10:19, Lee wrote:
> Dave Cinege has written some comments at http://www.linuxrouter.org
>
> Just a heads up.
For those that wish to chat about this:
confrence.jabber.org
Room: leaf
--
Mike Noyes
http://sourceforge.net/users/mhnoyes/
SF.net Projects: ffl, leaf,
Dave Cinege has written some comments at http://www.linuxrouter.org
Just a heads up.
---
This SF.Net email is sponsored by: INetU
Attention Web Developers & Consultants: Become An INetU Hosting Partner.
Refer Dedicated Servers. We Manage Th
Ok, we can add the intel pro 100 to that list.
It is an half height PCI card and the chip is the i82559.
-Original Message-
From: Ray Olszewski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2002 6:38 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [leaf-user] LRP Bering / change nic
I'll try later today on my Intel Pro100 PCI, just for a sanity check.
-Original Message-
From: Ray Olszewski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2002 6:38 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [leaf-user] LRP Bering / change nic mac address
At 05:30 PM 9/
On Thursday 12 September 2002 11:30, Luis.F.Correia wrote:
> Ray,
>
> you are right in most of your affirmation.
>
> I had done it ONCE using EigerStein and an 3Com Etherlink
> 3 ISA (I think...)
>
> The command I used to change the MAC was:
>
> ip link set eth0 address ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
>
> You w
At 05:30 PM 9/12/02 +0100, Luis.F.Correia wrote:
>Ray,
>
>you are right in most of your affirmation.
>
>I had done it ONCE using EigerStein and an 3Com Etherlink
>3 ISA (I think...)
>
>The command I used to change the MAC was:
>
>ip link set eth0 address ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
>
>You will need to chang
[leaf-user] LRP Bering / change nic mac address
At 08:23 AM 9/12/02 -0700, Tom Eastep wrote:
>On Thursday 12 September 2002 03:05 am, Lennard de Hoog wrote:
> > Blaise,
> >
> > the mac address is in the Nic, there is no way to change a mac
> > address.
> >
> >
At 08:23 AM 9/12/02 -0700, Tom Eastep wrote:
>On Thursday 12 September 2002 03:05 am, Lennard de Hoog wrote:
> > Blaise,
> >
> > the mac address is in the Nic, there is no way to change a mac address.
> >
> > so you can't fix or change the mac address.
> >
>
>Not so -- most drivers allow overridin
On Thursday 12 September 2002 03:05 am, Lennard de Hoog wrote:
> Blaise,
>
> the mac address is in the Nic, there is no way to change a mac address.
>
> so you can't fix or change the mac address.
>
Not so -- most drivers allow overriding the manufacture-provided MAC address.
-Tom
--
Tom Eastep
te de distribution sur LEAF (Adresse de messagerie)
Subject: [leaf-user] LRP Bering / change nic mac address
Hello,
I'm using LRP Bering 1.0 rc 3. My firewall is connected to internet through
a cable modem. My cable modem internet provider has to link a static ip
address with the nic mac addre
Blaise,
the mac address is in the Nic, there is no way to change a mac address.
so you can't fix or change the mac address.
hope that this is what you meant.
Lenn'
On Thu, 2002-09-12 at 11:53, Blaise Lab wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'm using LRP Bering 1.0 rc 3. My firewall is connected to interne
Hello,
I'm using LRP Bering 1.0 rc 3. My firewall is connected to internet through
a cable modem.
My cable modem internet provider has to link a static ip address with the
nic mac address... if I have a problem with the nic and must change it, I
must give the new mac address to my cable modem int
On Mon, 22 Jul 2002, Charles Steinkuehler wrote:
> The current issue (100th issue...Aug 2002) of Linux Journal includes an
> article testing the performance of an LRP/LEAF based router, and
> compares it with a Cisco ("The Linux Router" by Kaleem Anwar, Muhammad
> Amir, Ahmad Saeed and Muhammad I
The current issue (100th issue...Aug 2002) of Linux Journal includes an
article testing the performance of an LRP/LEAF based router, and
compares it with a Cisco ("The Linux Router" by Kaleem Anwar, Muhammad
Amir, Ahmad Saeed and Muhammad Imran).
The article uses LRP 2.9.8 as a testbed, but refer
--On Wednesday, May 22, 2002 4:15 PM -0500 "Omar D. Samuels"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Can my LRP box make use of dial-up in any way if I have
> an ISA telephone modem in there?
This is how I use my Oxygen installation the most - it is configured for
dialup any of three Internet connection
Can my LRP box make use of dial-up in any way if I have an ISA telephone
modem in there?
Just checking
___
Don't miss the 2002 Sprint PCS Application Developer's Conference
August 25-28 in Las Vegas -- http://devcon.sprintpcs.com/adp/
Hey I got my LRP up and running just great. I think I'm running on
Eigerstein 2. I had to make a few modifications to tune it to my needs, but
it went pretty smoothly overall... a real no-brainer.
The only thing that really gave me some trouble was getting my network cards
to work. I am runnin
ogram are you
using to send files, what is your firewall setup / type etc are you seeing
any denied packets and the like.
S
>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (leaf)
>Subject: [Leaf-user] LRP and MS Messenger
>Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2002 17:21:00 +
>
>Why is i cant
Why is i cant send thru file transfer but can recieve.
Using DCD with one ip and masq internal network.
___
Leaf-user mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user
On Thu, 14 Mar 2002, Luis.F.Correia wrote:
> I guess you can't do a double NAT.
>
> I've also tried that to no avail...
>
> You must try to get them to configure the Cisco 1720
> as Bridge with at least one public IP on your side.
>
> Then you can use LEAF to do the rest of the job.
Won't happen
lto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, March 14, 2002 4:25 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [Leaf-user] LRP behind Cisco Router, FTP?, DMZ?
All,
I have successfully configured two LRP boxes, one on my home network which
uses DHCP and one at
my office using a fixed IP address. Pretty much &q
All,
I have successfully configured two LRP boxes, one on my home network which
uses DHCP and one at
my office using a fixed IP address. Pretty much "cookbook'ed" the office
setup from the great
documentation provided by Richard Lohman (thanks!). My office ISP is
WinStar. They installed a
Ci
> > Probably, although you don't mention what you're trying to specify
source
> > ports for. If you need to make custom rules, that's what the
> > ipchains.input, ipchains.output, and ipchains.forward files are for in
> /etc.
>
> I want local users to be able to ssh into external machines, and (b
Thanks for the reply.
>
> Take a close look at your logs...sounds like you might be on a cable-mode
> (or other shared-network setup). The denied packets are probably being
> generated by one of your 'neighbors', and are coming in your external
> interface, otherwise they wouldn't be getting log
> I get a lot of denys for windows machines on ports 137 and 138 (netbios) I
> realise that the default Dachstein denies these, but it doesn't appear to
> have a -l option in the config, so I'm a bit surprised they're in my logs.
> Anyone else seen that? Also, what are these windows machines tryin
Hi,
I have a few questions -
I get a lot of denys for windows machines on ports 137 and 138 (netbios) I
realise that the default Dachstein denies these, but it doesn't appear to
have a -l option in the config, so I'm a bit surprised they're in my logs.
Anyone else seen that? Also, what are these
I asked the same question of Coyote developer
Joshua Jackson, and he told me
[snip]
Coyote Linux was split from the LRP over 2 years
ago and very little, if anything is still compatible.
While most .lrp packages can be retro-fitted to
work with Coyote due to the fact that both distros
used gli
Jason:
Lynn has a pretty good comparison of the various leaf distro's out there
on his web site. http://www.geocities.com/guitarlynn/lrp.html
Robert Chambers
Jason C. Leach wrote:
>hi,
>
>What are some of the significant differences between
>Coyote and Charls' versionf of LRP?
>
>j.
>
hi,
What are some of the significant differences between
Coyote and Charls' versionf of LRP?
j.
--
..
. Jason C. Leach
..
PGP/GPG Public key at http://www.keyserver.net/
Key ID: 1CF6DA85
___
Leaf-user mailing list
[EMAIL
is trying to do the
same thing.
-M
>From: Jeff Newmiller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: malik menzong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: Re: [Leaf-user] LRP Oxygen CD and floppy disk boot question
>Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2002 16:35:31 -0800 (
malik menzong wrote:
>
> The good news is that I can ping the world now from the router. Every time I
> think I saved my config. and I reboot it was not actually saved.
> The only hurdle I have now is to see the internet from my machine behind the
> firewall. that machine do ping to the etho netw
On 1/31/02 at 9:42 PM, malik menzong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> One more question that keeps bugging is the following. I
> made an 1.68 image that is self contained and a 1.44 ima
> as well. Everytime I boot from the cd and I make a change
> if I tried to back up the changes on the 1440 image i
The good news is that I can ping the world now from the router. Every time I
think I saved my config. and I reboot it was not actually saved.
The only hurdle I have now is to see the internet from my machine behind the
firewall. that machine do ping to the etho network card but cant ping after
malik menzong wrote:
>
> Lynn:
> That is what I was saying. I open the resolv.conf file and wrote something
> like this:
> XXX.XXX.XXX # DNS0
> XXX.XXX.XX # DNS1
If you put valid statements into Oxygen's resolv.conf, then
you can sit down at the Oxygen terminal and type
nslookup www.google.
On Thu, 31 Jan 2002, malik menzong wrote:
> Lynn:
> That is what I was saying. I open the resolv.conf file and wrote something
> like this:
> XXX.XXX.XXX # DNS0
> XXX.XXX.XX # DNS1
>
> That is the only thing in that file. From behind the firewall I can ping to
> both network card address. from
:
ping cnn.com or ping XXX.XXX.XXX (actually ip address for cnn) it wont
resolve it. all packets are lost.
>From: guitarlynn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: "malik menzong" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: Re: [Leaf-user] LRP Oxygen CD and floppy dis
On Wednesday 30 January 2002 15:34, malik menzong wrote:
> Thanks dave.
> That helps. I made some progress from yesterday actually. Now I can
> ping from the the machine behind the router to the router. I can also
> ping from the router to the external gateways. But I cant ping to
> sites on the w
contained floppy image or do I need
to copy it there? (oxygen 1.8.0 with openwall floppy)
regards
-M
>From: "david goodrich" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: "'malik menzong'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
><[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Subject: RE: [Leaf-user
Tuesday, January 29, 2002 10:59 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Leaf-user] LRP Oxygen CD and floppy disk boot question
Thanks Mark and David D.
I found out about the disk image formatting the hard way I guess. I also
find out that once it is set up for 1.440 you real
ll do some more research and fill you all up.
Regards,
-M
>From: Mark Plowman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: Re: [Leaf-user] LRP Oxygen CD and floppy disk boot question
>Date: Sun, 27 Jan 2002 11:18:26 +0100 (CET)
>
>malik
ubject: RE: [Leaf-user] LRP and DOC
01/28/02 09:19
Yes, I believe it has IDE in it.
-Original Message-
From: Patrick Nixon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, January 28, 2002 9:20 PM
To: John Mullan
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [Leaf-user] LRP and DOC
John,
Does your Kernel have IDE/CDRom support
> >
> > -----Original Message-
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Patrick
> > Nixon
> > Sent: Saturday, January 26, 2002 1:51 PM
> > To: John Mullan
> > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Su
ROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Patrick
> Nixon
> Sent: Saturday, January 26, 2002 1:51 PM
> To: John Mullan
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: FW: [Leaf-user] LRP and DOC
>
>
> John,
> Congrats on getting this working.
D]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: FW: [Leaf-user] LRP and DOC
John,
Congrats on getting this working. I'm currently spending most
of
my weekend attempting to get it working and like charles mentioned, I'm
running into a 'insufficent low memory error'. How did you get aro
1 - 100 of 208 matches
Mail list logo
