Re: [leaf-user] Can anyone run Bering 5.1.x on Soekris net6501?

2014-09-21 Thread Andrew
20.09.2014 22:16, Erich Titl пишет: Hi Andrew at 20.09.2014 20:13, Andrew wrote: 20.09.2014 14:07, Erich Titl пишет: ... Right. Modules aren't userland. So modules are splitted from userland initrd. I would probably argue that initrd isn't userland at all in my mindmap. For me initrd is a

Re: [leaf-user] Can anyone run Bering 5.1.x on Soekris net6501?

2014-09-21 Thread Andrew
21.09.2014 21:56, Andrew пишет: 20.09.2014 22:16, Erich Titl пишет: Hi Andrew at 20.09.2014 20:13, Andrew wrote: 20.09.2014 14:07, Erich Titl пишет: Also, almost all boot loaders suport multiple ramdisks. So I don't think that it's actual trouble. M... I have not seen this for grub,

Re: [leaf-user] Can anyone run Bering 5.1.x on Soekris net6501?

2014-09-20 Thread Erich Titl
Hi Andrew at 19.09.2014 20:39, Andrew wrote: 19.09.2014 15:04, Erich Titl пишет: Hi at 19.09.2014 10:35, kp kirchdoerfer wrote: Am Donnerstag, 18. September 2014, 18:59:40 schrieb Timothy Wegner: David wrote: ... Most probably it's the ehci-pci module (ehci-pci.ko.gz) which is missing.

Re: [leaf-user] Can anyone run Bering 5.1.x on Soekris net6501?

2014-09-20 Thread Andrew
20.09.2014 14:07, Erich Titl пишет: Hi Andrew at 19.09.2014 20:39, Andrew wrote: 19.09.2014 15:04, Erich Titl пишет: Hi at 19.09.2014 10:35, kp kirchdoerfer wrote: Am Donnerstag, 18. September 2014, 18:59:40 schrieb Timothy Wegner: David wrote: ... Most probably it's the ehci-pci

Re: [leaf-user] Can anyone run Bering 5.1.x on Soekris net6501?

2014-09-20 Thread Erich Titl
Hi Andrew at 20.09.2014 20:13, Andrew wrote: 20.09.2014 14:07, Erich Titl пишет: ... Right. Modules aren't userland. So modules are splitted from userland initrd. I would probably argue that initrd isn't userland at all in my mindmap. For me initrd is a way to allow a system to be booted and

Re: [leaf-user] Can anyone run Bering 5.1.x on Soekris net6501?

2014-09-19 Thread Erich Titl
at 18.09.2014 20:38, Timothy Wegner wrote: David wrote: If you do press Enter to activate this console are you able to mount the USB drive manually? If not then it is probably a Driver (i.e. missing Module) issue; if you can always mount it manually then it's normally a timing issue, and

Re: [leaf-user] Can anyone run Bering 5.1.x on Soekris net6501?

2014-09-19 Thread kp kirchdoerfer
Am Donnerstag, 18. September 2014, 18:59:40 schrieb Timothy Wegner: David wrote: I guess take a look at the output from 'lsmod' on your working system and compare with what you get after the press Enter prompt. lsmod of course reports a boatload of modules that are loaded later after

Re: [leaf-user] Can anyone run Bering 5.1.x on Soekris net6501?

2014-09-19 Thread Erich Titl
Hi at 19.09.2014 10:35, kp kirchdoerfer wrote: Am Donnerstag, 18. September 2014, 18:59:40 schrieb Timothy Wegner: David wrote: ... Most probably it's the ehci-pci module (ehci-pci.ko.gz) which is missing. It is needed with the newer kernel in 5.1. You may add it grom the modules tarball

Re: [leaf-user] Can anyone run Bering 5.1.x on Soekris net6501?

2014-09-19 Thread Timothy Wegner
kp wrote: Most probably it's the ehci-pci module (ehci-pci.ko.gz) which is missing. It This worked with Bering-uClibc_5.1.1-rc1! Thanks! My Soekris net6501 now runs Bering-uClibc_5.1.1-rc1 like a champ! While I am perfectly happy to manually add ehci-pci.ko.gz initmod.lrp as needed in the

Re: [leaf-user] Can anyone run Bering 5.1.x on Soekris net6501?

2014-09-19 Thread Andrew
19.09.2014 15:04, Erich Titl пишет: Hi at 19.09.2014 10:35, kp kirchdoerfer wrote: Am Donnerstag, 18. September 2014, 18:59:40 schrieb Timothy Wegner: David wrote: ... Most probably it's the ehci-pci module (ehci-pci.ko.gz) which is missing. It is needed with the newer kernel in 5.1.

Re: [leaf-user] Can anyone run Bering 5.1.x on Soekris net6501?

2014-09-19 Thread kp kirchdoerfer
Am Freitag, 19. September 2014, 11:12:09 schrieb Timothy Wegner: kp wrote: Most probably it's the ehci-pci module (ehci-pci.ko.gz) which is missing. It This worked with Bering-uClibc_5.1.1-rc1! Thanks! My Soekris net6501 now runs Bering-uClibc_5.1.1-rc1 like a champ! While I am

Re: [leaf-user] Can anyone run Bering 5.1.x on Soekris net6501?

2014-09-18 Thread l...@davidmbrooke.co.uk
Hi Jürgen, If you do press Enter to activate this console are you able to mount the USB drive manually? If not then it is probably a Driver (i.e. missing Module) issue; if you can always mount it manually then it's normally a timing issue, and usb_wait should help. You might need usb_wait=4 or

Re: [leaf-user] Can anyone run Bering 5.1.x on Soekris net6501?

2014-09-18 Thread Timothy Wegner
David wrote: If you do press Enter to activate this console are you able to mount the USB drive manually? If not then it is probably a Driver (i.e. missing Module) issue; if you can always mount it manually then it's normally a timing issue, and usb_wait should help. You might need usb_wait=4

Re: [leaf-user] Can anyone run Bering 5.1.x on Soekris net6501?

2014-09-18 Thread leaf
On 18 Sep 2014, at 19:38, Timothy Wegner wrote: David wrote: If you do press Enter to activate this console are you able to mount the USB drive manually? If not then it is probably a Driver (i.e. missing Module) issue; if you can always mount it manually then it's normally a timing issue,

Re: [leaf-user] Can anyone run Bering 5.1.x on Soekris net6501?

2014-09-18 Thread Erich Titl
at 18.09.2014 20:38, Timothy Wegner wrote: David wrote: If you do press Enter to activate this console are you able to mount the USB drive manually? If not then it is probably a Driver (i.e. missing Module) issue; if you can always mount it manually then it's normally a timing issue, and

Re: [leaf-user] Can anyone run Bering 5.1.x on Soekris net6501?

2014-09-18 Thread Timothy Wegner
David wrote: I guess take a look at the output from 'lsmod' on your working system and compare with what you get after the press Enter prompt. lsmod of course reports a boatload of modules that are loaded later after a successful boot process. So I renamed leaf.cfg to leaf.not so the good

Re: [leaf-user] Can anyone run Bering 5.1.x on Soekris net6501?

2014-09-17 Thread Northe Juergen [tux-net]
Hi syslinux.cfg is not enough. To put a getty on a serial line, you need inittab too. Juergen On 16. September 2014 23:30:32 MESZ, Timothy Wegner tweg...@swbell.net wrote: Jurgen wrote: have you upgraded your older 4801 box to version 5.1 with the geode image or also with the

Re: [leaf-user] Can anyone run Bering 5.1.x on Soekris net6501?

2014-09-17 Thread Andrew
17.09.2014 00:30, Timothy Wegner пишет: Jurgen wrote: have you upgraded your older 4801 box to version 5.1 with the geode image or also with the Bering-uClibc_5.1_x86_64_syslinux_vga.tar.gz No, I have always used the 486 image (Bering-uClibc_5.1_i486_syslinux_serial.tar.gz) with the older

Re: [leaf-user] Can anyone run Bering 5.1.x on Soekris net6501?

2014-09-17 Thread Erich Titl
Hi bit late to chime in, can't remember everything you tried but - have you verified you are loading _both_ initram files? - if so, have you verified that the running system stub is capable to read from your storage? I found problems with fast CF in the past. - if you can read from your

Re: [leaf-user] Can anyone run Bering 5.1.x on Soekris net6501?

2014-09-17 Thread Timothy Wegner
Jürgen wrote: syslinux.cfg is not enough. To put a getty on a serial line, you need inittab too. Of course you are right. I have the appropriate lines in inittab. Probably I picked them up by re-using a configdb.lrp from a serial version of Leaf. I appreciate the tip about re-using a

Re: [leaf-user] Can anyone run Bering 5.1.x on Soekris net6501?

2014-09-16 Thread Timothy Wegner
Thanks kp and Juergen for responding. kp wrote: Have you tried to add usb_wait=3 the APPEND line in syslinux.cfg? Yes, but no luck. I should add that I *did* successfully upgrade an older and much slower Soekris net4801 box to 5.1 with no problems. So I am not surprised that usb wait=3

Re: [leaf-user] Can anyone run Bering 5.1.x on Soekris net6501?

2014-09-16 Thread Northe, Juergen [tux-net]
Hello Tim, have you upgraded your older 4801 box to version 5.1 with the geode image or also with the Bering-uClibc_5.1_x86_64_syslinux_vga.tar.gz ? Afaik the 4801 does not support 64bit so you it seems you have used the Bering-uClibc_5.1_geode_syslinux_serial.tar.gz image for successfully

Re: [leaf-user] Can anyone run Bering 5.1.x on Soekris net6501?

2014-09-16 Thread Timothy Wegner
Jurgen wrote: have you upgraded your older 4801 box to version 5.1 with the geode image or also with the Bering-uClibc_5.1_x86_64_syslinux_vga.tar.gz No, I have always used the 486 image (Bering-uClibc_5.1_i486_syslinux_serial.tar.gz) with the older 4801. I should add I tried the 486

Re: [leaf-user] Can anyone run Bering 5.1.x on Soekris net6501?

2014-09-15 Thread Northe, Juergen [tux-net]
Hello Tim, some weeks ago I had similar problems with the new PC Engines APU board, I suppose you took the Bering-uClibc_5.1_x86_64_syslinux_vga.tar.gz which does not use the serial console. So I took the configdb.lrp from the Bering-uClibc_5.1_geode_syslinux_serial.tar.gz and modified the